xfs: deduplicate xlog_do_recovery_pass()
PATCH 1/1 xfs: deduplicate xlog_do_recovery_pass()
In xlog_do_recovery_pass(), there are 2 distinct cases:
non-wrapped and wrapped log recovery.
If we find a wrapped log, we recover around the end of the log, and then handle the rest of recovery exactly as in the non-wrapped case - using exactly the same (duplicated) code.
Rather than having the same code in both cases, we can get the wrapped portion out of the way first if needed, and then recover the non-wrapped portion of the log.
There should be no functional change here, just code reorganization & deduplication.
The patch looks a bit bigger than it really is; the last hunk is whitespace changes (un-indenting).
Tested with xfstests "check -g log" on a stock configuration.
---
xfs_log_recover.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c +27 -54
@@ -4132,41 +4132,13 @@ xlog_do_recovery_pass( }memset (rhash,0 ,sizeof (rhash)); -if (tail_blk <= head_blk) { -for (blk_no = tail_blk; blk_no < head_blk; ) { - error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no, hblks, hbp, &offset); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - - rhead = (xlog_rec_header_t *)offset; - error =xlog_valid_rec_header (log, rhead, blk_no); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - -/* blocks in data section */ - bblks = (int )BTOBB (be32_to_cpu (rhead->h_len)); - error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no + hblks, bblks, dbp, - &offset); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - - error =xlog_unpack_data (rhead, offset, log); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - - error =xlog_recover_process_data (log, - rhash, rhead, offset, pass); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - blk_no += bblks + hblks; - } - }else { + blk_no = tail_blk; +if (tail_blk > head_blk) {/* * Perform recovery around the end of the physical log. * When the head is not on the same cycle number as the tail, -* we can't do a sequential recovery as above. +* we can't do a sequential recovery. */ - blk_no = tail_blk;while (blk_no < log->l_logBBsize) {/* * Check for header wrapping around physical end-of-log
@@ -4280,34 +4252,35 @@ xlog_do_recovery_pass(ASSERT (blk_no >= log->l_logBBsize); blk_no -= log->l_logBBsize; + } -/* read first part of physical log */ -while (blk_no < head_blk) { - error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no, hblks, hbp, &offset); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; +/* read first part of physical log */ +while (blk_no < head_blk) { + error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no, hblks, hbp, &offset); +if (error) + goto bread_err2; - rhead = (xlog_rec_header_t *)offset; - error =xlog_valid_rec_header (log, rhead, blk_no); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; + rhead = (xlog_rec_header_t *)offset; + error =xlog_valid_rec_header (log, rhead, blk_no); +if (error) + goto bread_err2; - bblks = (int )BTOBB (be32_to_cpu (rhead->h_len)); - error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no+hblks, bblks, dbp, - &offset); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; +/* blocks in data section */ + bblks = (int )BTOBB (be32_to_cpu (rhead->h_len)); + error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no+hblks, bblks, dbp, + &offset); +if (error) + goto bread_err2; - error =xlog_unpack_data (rhead, offset, log); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; + error =xlog_unpack_data (rhead, offset, log); +if (error) + goto bread_err2; - error =xlog_recover_process_data (log, rhash, - rhead, offset, pass); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - blk_no += bblks + hblks; - } + error =xlog_recover_process_data (log, rhash, + rhead, offset, pass); +if (error) + goto bread_err2; + blk_no += bblks + hblks; } bread_err2:
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 12 lines · Eric Sandeen
In
xlog_do_recovery_pass(), there are 2 distinct cases:
non-wrapped and wrapped log recovery.If we find a wrapped log, we recover around the end of the log, and then handle the rest of recovery exactly as in the non-wrapped case - using exactly the same (duplicated) code.
Rather than having the same code in both cases, we can get the wrapped portion out of the way first if needed, and then recover the non-wrapped portion of the log.
Quoted 7 lines
There should be no functional change here, just code reorganization & deduplication.
The patch looks a bit bigger than it really is; the last hunk is whitespace changes (un-indenting).
Tested with xfstests "check -g log" on a stock configuration.
which didn't actually hit any log wraps. Does xfstests really not cover wrapped log recovery? anyway, something like this on a small log:
[root@bp-05 xfstests]# while true; do mount /dev/sdc5 /mnt/scratch; ltp/fsstress -n 500 -d /mnt/scratch; src/godown -f /mnt/scratch; umount /mnt/scratch; done
hit plenty of log wraps w/ no problem.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 16 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 15 lines · Eric Sandeen
In
xlog_do_recovery_pass(), there are 2 distinct cases:
non-wrapped and wrapped log recovery.If we find a wrapped log, we recover around the end of the log, and then handle the rest of recovery exactly as in the non-wrapped case - using exactly the same (duplicated) code.
Rather than having the same code in both cases, we can get the wrapped portion out of the way first if needed, and then recover the non-wrapped portion of the log.
There should be no functional change here, just code reorganization & deduplication.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
The patch looks a bit bigger than it really is; the last hunk is whitespace changes (un-indenting).
Tested with xfstests "check -g log" on a stock configuration.
which didn't actually hit any log wraps. Does xfstests really not cover wrapped log recovery? anyway, something like this on a small log:
xfs/016
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 7 lines
Dave Chinner [email protected] _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 20 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 19 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 18 lines · Eric Sandeen
In
xlog_do_recovery_pass(), there are 2 distinct cases:
non-wrapped and wrapped log recovery.If we find a wrapped log, we recover around the end of the log, and then handle the rest of recovery exactly as in the non-wrapped case - using exactly the same (duplicated) code.
Rather than having the same code in both cases, we can get the wrapped portion out of the way first if needed, and then recover the non-wrapped portion of the log.
There should be no functional change here, just code reorganization & deduplication.
The patch looks a bit bigger than it really is; the last hunk is whitespace changes (un-indenting).
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Tested with xfstests "check -g log" on a stock configuration.
which didn't actually hit any log wraps. Does xfstests really not cover wrapped log recovery? anyway, something like this on a small log:
xfs/016
AFAICT that doesn't ever run recovery...
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 23 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 22 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 21 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 19 lines · Eric Sandeen
In
xlog_do_recovery_pass(), there are 2 distinct cases:
non-wrapped and wrapped log recovery.If we find a wrapped log, we recover around the end of the log, and then handle the rest of recovery exactly as in the non-wrapped case - using exactly the same (duplicated) code.
Rather than having the same code in both cases, we can get the wrapped portion out of the way first if needed, and then recover the non-wrapped portion of the log.
There should be no functional change here, just code reorganization & deduplication.
The patch looks a bit bigger than it really is; the last hunk is whitespace changes (un-indenting).
Tested with xfstests "check -g log" on a stock configuration.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
which didn't actually hit any log wraps. Does xfstests really not cover wrapped log recovery? anyway, something like this on a small log:
xfs/016
AFAICT that doesn't ever run recovery...
It does:
loop 20 times {
mount
<do stuff>
unmount
dump and process log
}
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 7 lines
Dave Chinner [email protected] _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list [email protected] http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Quoted 15 lines · Eric Sandeen
In
xlog_do_recovery_pass(), there are 2 distinct cases:
non-wrapped and wrapped log recovery.If we find a wrapped log, we recover around the end of the log, and then handle the rest of recovery exactly as in the non-wrapped case - using exactly the same (duplicated) code.
Rather than having the same code in both cases, we can get the wrapped portion out of the way first if needed, and then recover the non-wrapped portion of the log.
There should be no functional change here, just code reorganization & deduplication.
Quoted 7 lines
The patch looks a bit bigger than it really is; the last hunk is whitespace changes (un-indenting).
Tested with xfstests "check -g log" on a stock configuration.
Signed-off-by Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>---
Looks good to me:
Quoted 113 lines
xfs_log_recover.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c +27
-54@@ -4132,41 +4132,13 @@ xlog_do_recovery_pass( }memset (rhash,0 ,sizeof (rhash)); -if (tail_blk <= head_blk) { -for (blk_no = tail_blk; blk_no < head_blk; ) { - error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no, hblks, hbp, &offset); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - - rhead = (xlog_rec_header_t *)offset; - error =xlog_valid_rec_header (log, rhead, blk_no); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - -/* blocks in data section */ - bblks = (int )BTOBB (be32_to_cpu (rhead->h_len)); - error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no + hblks, bblks, dbp, - &offset); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - - error =xlog_unpack_data (rhead, offset, log); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - - error =xlog_recover_process_data (log, - rhash, rhead, offset, pass); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - blk_no += bblks + hblks; - } - }else { + blk_no = tail_blk; +if (tail_blk > head_blk) {/* * Perform recovery around the end of the physical log. * When the head is not on the same cycle number as the tail, -* we can't do a sequential recovery as above. +* we can't do a sequential recovery. */ - blk_no = tail_blk;while (blk_no < log->l_logBBsize) {/* * Check for header wrapping around physical end-of-log @@ -4280,34 +4252,35 @@ xlog_do_recovery_pass(ASSERT (blk_no >= log->l_logBBsize); blk_no -= log->l_logBBsize; + } -/* read first part of physical log */ -while (blk_no < head_blk) { - error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no, hblks, hbp, &offset); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; +/* read first part of physical log */ +while (blk_no < head_blk) { + error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no, hblks, hbp, &offset); +if (error) + goto bread_err2; - rhead = (xlog_rec_header_t *)offset; - error =xlog_valid_rec_header (log, rhead, blk_no); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; + rhead = (xlog_rec_header_t *)offset; + error =xlog_valid_rec_header (log, rhead, blk_no); +if (error) + goto bread_err2; - bblks = (int )BTOBB (be32_to_cpu (rhead->h_len)); - error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no+hblks, bblks, dbp, - &offset); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; +/* blocks in data section */ + bblks = (int )BTOBB (be32_to_cpu (rhead->h_len)); + error =xlog_bread (log, blk_no+hblks, bblks, dbp, + &offset); +if (error) + goto bread_err2; - error =xlog_unpack_data (rhead, offset, log); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; + error =xlog_unpack_data (rhead, offset, log); +if (error) + goto bread_err2; - error =xlog_recover_process_data (log, rhash, - rhead, offset, pass); -if (error) - goto bread_err2; - blk_no += bblks + hblks; - } + error =xlog_recover_process_data (log, rhash, + rhead, offset, pass); +if (error) + goto bread_err2; + blk_no += bblks + hblks; } bread_err2:
Quoted 4 lines
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs