Skip to contentSkip to conversation

vb2: regression fix for vbi capture & poll

RFC PATCH In review Hans Verkuil 2 participants 2 messages Sep 16, 2014 Media (V4L/DVB)

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

RFC PATCH 1/1 vb2: regression fix for vbi capture & poll

(My proposal to fix this. Note that it is untested, I plan to do that this evening)

Commit 9241650d62f7 broke vbi capture applications that expect POLLERR to be returned if STREAMON wasn't called.

Rather than checking whether buffers were queued AND vb2 was not yet streaming, just check whether streaming is in progress and return POLLERR if not.

This change makes it impossible to poll in one thread and call STREAMON in another, but doing that breaks existing applications and is also not according to the spec. So be it.

drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c +3 -3
index 7e6aff6..0452fb2 100644
@@ -2583,10 +2583,10 @@ unsigned int vb2_poll(struct vb2_queue *q, struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * There is nothing to wait for if no buffer has been queued and the
-	 * queue isn't streaming, or if the error flag is set.
+	 * There is nothing to wait for if the queue isn't streaming, or if
+	 * the error flag is set.
 	 */
-	if ((list_empty(&q->queued_list) && !vb2_is_streaming(q)) || q->error)
+	if (!vb2_is_streaming(q) || q->error)
 		return res | POLLERR;
 
 	/*
#1 lore raw

Hi Hans,

Thank you for the patch.

Quoted 6 lines · On Tuesday 16 September 2014 12:28:50 Hans Verkuil wrote:

(My proposal to fix this. Note that it is untested, I plan to do that this evening)

Commit 9241650d62f7 broke vbi capture applications that expect POLLERR to be returned if STREAMON wasn't called.

Quoted 7 lines

Rather than checking whether buffers were queued AND vb2 was not yet streaming, just check whether streaming is in progress and return POLLERR if not.

This change makes it impossible to poll in one thread and call STREAMON in another, but doing that breaks existing applications and is also not according to the spec. So be it.

I like this approach better than reverting the offending patch, as it doesn't break my use case :-)

If we decide that this is the right fix, we should update the V4L2 specification to reflect that.

I've proposed an alternative solution in a reply to the "[PATCH/RFC v2 1/2]
v4l: vb2: Don't return POLLERR during transient buffer underruns" mail thread. I think I like this patch better, as the behaviour is simpler, even if it doesn't strictly conform to the spec.

Quoted 20 lines
(quoted diff) +0 -0

b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c index 7e6aff6..0452fb2 100644

drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c +3 -3
@@ -2583,10 +2583,10 @@ unsigned int vb2_poll(struct vb2_queue *q, struct
 file *file, poll_table *wait) }
 
 	/*
-	 * There is nothing to wait for if no buffer has been queued and the
-	 * queue isn't streaming, or if the error flag is set.
+	 * There is nothing to wait for if the queue isn't streaming, or if
+	 * the error flag is set.
 	 */
-	if ((list_empty(&q->queued_list) && !vb2_is_streaming(q)) || q->error)
+	if (!vb2_is_streaming(q) || q->error)
 		return res | POLLERR;
 
 	/*
Signature · 3 lines
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart