powerpc/t104xrdb: make T104x board compliant in u-boot
PATCH 1/1 powerpc/t104xrdb: make T104x board compliant in u-boot
When booted with upstream code, it shows error in u-boot that board is not compliant. This patch will make board compliant with upstream code changes in u-boot.
Signed-off-by Vijay Rai <[email protected]>
--- include/configs/T1040QDS.h | 2 ++ include/configs/T104xRDB.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
include/configs/T1040QDS.h +2 -0
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@*/ #define CONFIG_T1040QDS #define CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT +#define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD +#define CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO #ifdef CONFIG_RAMBOOT_PBL #define CONFIG_RAMBOOT_TEXT_BASE CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
include/configs/T104xRDB.h +2 -0
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@*/ #define CONFIG_T104xRDB#define CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT +#define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD +#define CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO #ifdef CONFIG_RAMBOOT_PBL #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_PBL_PBI $(SRCTREE)/board/freescale/t104xrdb/t104x_pbi.cfg
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 1/1 powerpc/t104xrdb: make T104x board compliant in u-boot
Quoted 6 lines · Vijay Rai
When booted with upstream code, it shows error in u-boot that board is not compliant. This patch will make board compliant with upstream code changes in u-boot.
Signed-off-by Vijay Rai <[email protected]>---
I think the commit message is not accurate. You are not making it compliant, but rather using generic board. No need to say "upstream" here. This is the upstream u-boot.
Have you tested features such as deep sleep using generic board code?
York