bind: fix conf.patch to remove configuration that causes failure

The following changes since commit 68ddb28a68ceb59cd1ed322c16143827ce1ac712:

distrodata_class: checkpkg make usage of latest_versionstring methods in bitbake fetcher (2014-11-28 13:59:52 +0000)

are available in the git repository at:

git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib ChenQi/bind-configuration
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=ChenQi/bind-configuration

Chen Qi (1):
bind: fix conf.patch to remove configuration that causes failure

 meta/recipes-connectivity/bind/bind/conf.patch | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

1.9.1

conf.patch added db.255 confgiuration entry to named.conf. However, We don't have db.255 configuration file, so remove this entry to avoid the following failure.

zone 255.in-addr.arpa/IN: loading from master file /etc/bind/db.255 failed: file not found

---
 meta/recipes-connectivity/bind/bind/conf.patch | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

index 2785c6a..7bab072 100644
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ diff -urN bind-9.3.1.orig/conf/db.root bind-9.3.1/conf/db.root
 diff -urN bind-9.3.1.orig/conf/named.conf bind-9.3.1/conf/named.conf
 --- bind-9.3.1.orig/conf/named.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
 +++ bind-9.3.1/conf/named.conf	2005-07-10 22:33:46.000000000 +0200
-@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
 +// This is the primary configuration file for the BIND DNS server named.
 +//
 +// If you are just adding zones, please do that in /etc/bind/named.conf.local

@@ -155,11 +155,6 @@ diff -urN bind-9.3.1.orig/conf/named.conf bind-9.3.1/conf/named.conf
 +	file "/etc/bind/db.0";
 +};
 +
-+zone "255.in-addr.arpa" {
-+	type master;
-+	file "/etc/bind/db.255";
-+};
-+
 +// zone "com" { type delegation-only; };
 +// zone "net" { type delegation-only; };
 +

1.9.1

Can you explain why the correct fix is to remove the reference to db.255, and not add a db.255 configuration file?

Ross

Hi Ross,

Sorry for the late reply. I just noticed this email.

I chose to remove reference to db.255 because I saw there was no db.255. I didn't take a second thinking about this problem.

I will send out V2 by adding db.255 configuration file.

Best Regards,
Chen Qi