ARM: at91/dt: sam9263: Fix typo: ac91_clk -> ac97_clk
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/2 ARM: at91/dt: sam9263: Fix typo: ac91_clk -> ac97_clk
That clock should be called ac97_clk.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi +1 -1
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ reg = <17>; }; - ac91_clk: ac97_clk { + ac97_clk: ac97_clk { #clock-cells = <0>; reg = <18>; };
Signature · 1 line
2.2.0
PATCH 1/2 ARM: at91/dt: sam9263: Fix typo: ac91_clk -> ac97_clk
On Friday 05 December 2014, 15:16:55 wrote Alexander Stein:
Quoted 13 lines
That clock should be called
ac97_clk.Signed-off-by Alexander Stein <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi +0
-0
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi line 300
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi +1
-1@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ reg = <17>; }; - ac91_clk: ac97_clk { + ac97_clk: ac97_clk { #clock-cells = <0>; reg = <18>; };
Please ignore those 2 patches for now. I made a mistake during local rebase.
Best regards,
Alexander
PATCH 1/2 ARM: at91/dt: sam9263: Fix typo: ac91_clk -> ac97_clk
Le 05/12/2014 16:00, Alexander Stein a ?crit :
Quoted 16 lines
On Friday 05 December 2014, 15:16:55 wrote Alexander Stein:
Quoted 15 lines
That clock should be called
ac97_clk.Signed-off-by Alexander Stein <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi +0
-0@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ reg = <17>; };
Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi line 300
Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi +1
-1- ac91_clk: ac97_clk { + ac97_clk: ac97_clk { #clock-cells = <0>; reg = <18>; };Please ignore those 2 patches for now. I made a mistake during local rebase.
Well at least this one (1/2) is valid and applies on my new at91-3.20-dt. So I take it for now: tell me if you feel otherwise.
Bye,
Quoted 6 lines
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Signature · 1 line
Nicolas Ferre
PATCH 2/2 ARM: at91/dt: sam9263: Add missing clocks to ac97 node
In reply to Alexander SteinThe clock node specifying 'ac97_clk' was missing.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi +2 -0
@@ -821,6 +821,8 @@ interrupts = <18 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 5>; pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ac97>; + clocks = <&ac97_clk>; + clock-names = "ac97_clk"; status = "disabled"; };
Signature · 1 line
2.2.0
PATCH 2/2 ARM: at91/dt: sam9263: Add missing clocks to ac97 node
Le 05/12/2014 15:16, Alexander Stein a ?crit :
Quoted 12 lines
The clock node specifying '
ac97_clk' was missing.Signed-off-by Alexander Stein <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi +0
-0
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi line 827
Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi +2
-0@@ -821,6 +821,8 @@ interrupts = <18 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 5>; pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ac97>; + clocks = <&ac97_clk>; + clock-names = "ac97_clk"; status = "disabled"; };
I see, this one comes after the addition of the node itself. I ignore it.
Bye,
Signature · 1 line
Nicolas Ferre