Panic doing BLKDISCARD on a raid 5 array on linux 3.17.3
I've hit a panic bug on stock linux 3.17.3 (which includes the recent commit on BLKDISCARD in md/raid5.c) running in Dom0 under Xen 4.1.0 that I've isolated to a BLKDISCARD system call within mkfs.ext3 and only happens on a raid 5 array (it doesn't happen on a raid 1 array).
The system it happens on is remote and I don't have physical access to it, but the system administrator there is fairly helpful. We're in the process of commissioning the system which needs to be done tomorrow (thursday), so I've only got 24 hours in which I can run any tests you may want. If necessary I can arrange remote access, but it's a little complex.
We have 3 512GB SSDs on the system, all with a GPT partition table and the same partition layout. All the partitions have optimal alignment according to parted. One of the partitions on each SSD is assembled into a raid 1 array, another partition is assembled into a raid 5 array. Each array is the used as the only physical volume in a LVM volume group. I then create a logical volume on each array and format the logical volume with mkfs.ext3. I ran mkfs.ext3 in verbose mode and also ran strace on it in a separate session (though it was over a network) so it's possible I lost the last few packets of data.
/dev/Test/Test - 400MB LV on raid 1/dev/Master/Test - 400MB LV on raid 5
A) mkfs.ext3 -E nodiscard -v /dev/Test/Test - succeeds
B) mkfs.ext3 -v /dev/Test/Test - succeeds
C) mkfs.ext3 -E nodiscard -v /dev/Master/Test - succeeds
D) mkfs.ext3 -v /dev/Master/Test - panics
mkfs.ext3 output from (B)
-------------------------
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)fs_types for mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext3', 'small'
Discarding device blocks: done Discard
succeeded and will return 0s - skipping inode table wipe Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=1024 (log=0)
Fragment size=1024 (log=0)
Stride=4 blocks, Stripe width=4 blocks
51200 inodes, 204800 blocks
10240 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=1
Maximum filesystem blocks=67371008
25 block groups
8192 blocks per group, 8192 fragments per group 2048 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
8193, 24577, 40961, 57345, 73729
Allocating group tables: done Writing inode
tables: done Creating journal (4096 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
strace output from (B) around the BLKDISCARD
--------------------------------------------gettimeofday({1418806647, 890754}, NULL) = 0 gettimeofday({1418806647, 890814}, NULL) = 0ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {0, 3000000010}) = 0write(1, "Discarding device blocks: ", 26) = 26write(1, " 1024/204800", 13) = 13write(1, "\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10", 13) = 13 ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {100000, 3000000010}) = 0write(1, " ", 13) = 13write(1, "\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10", 13) = 13write(1, "done "..., 33) = 33write(1, "Discard succeeded and will retur"..., 65) = 65
mkfs.ext3 output from (D)
-------------------------
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)fs_types for mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext3', 'small' <Panic>
strace output from (D) around the BLKDISCARD
--------------------------------------------gettimeofday({1418809706, 244197}, NULL) = 0gettimeofday({1418809706, 244259}, NULL) = 0
ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {0, 3000000010}
<Panic>
I have a photograph of the panic output from a previous session which includes raid5d and blk_finish_plug in the stack trace, unfortunately I don't have the top part of the panic and vger won't accept the attachment. I also have a photograph of the console output from the crash at (D), but in this case it outputs to the console every 180 seconds:
INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 1}sending NMI to all CPUs:
xen: vector 0x2 is not implemented
thanks,
Anthony Wright
Quoted 88 lines · On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:00:13 +0000 Anthony Wright <[email protected]>…
I've hit a panic bug on stock linux 3.17.3 (which includes the recent commit on BLKDISCARD in
md/raid5.c) running in Dom0 under Xen 4.1.0 that I've isolated to a BLKDISCARD system call within mkfs.ext3 and only happens on a raid 5 array (it doesn't happen on a raid 1 array).The system it happens on is remote and I don't have physical access to it, but the system administrator there is fairly helpful. We're in the process of commissioning the system which needs to be done tomorrow (thursday), so I've only got 24 hours in which I can run any tests you may want. If necessary I can arrange remote access, but it's a little complex.
We have 3 512GB SSDs on the system, all with a GPT partition table and the same partition layout. All the partitions have optimal alignment according to parted. One of the partitions on each SSD is assembled into a raid 1 array, another partition is assembled into a raid 5 array. Each array is the used as the only physical volume in a LVM volume group. I then create a logical volume on each array and format the logical volume with mkfs.ext3. I ran mkfs.ext3 in verbose mode and also ran strace on it in a separate session (though it was over a network) so it's possible I lost the last few packets of data.
/dev/Test/Test- 400MB LV on raid 1/dev/Master/Test- 400MB LV on raid 5A) mkfs.ext3 -E nodiscard -v
/dev/Test/Test- succeeds
B) mkfs.ext3 -v/dev/Test/Test- succeeds
C) mkfs.ext3 -E nodiscard -v/dev/Master/Test- succeeds
D) mkfs.ext3 -v/dev/Master/Test- panicsmkfs.ext3 output from (B)
-------------------------
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)fs_typesfor mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext3', 'small'
Discarding device blocks: done Discard
succeeded and will return 0s - skipping inode table wipe Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=1024 (log=0)
Fragment size=1024 (log=0)
Stride=4 blocks, Stripe width=4 blocks
51200 inodes, 204800 blocks
10240 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=1
Maximum filesystem blocks=67371008
25 block groups
8192 blocks per group, 8192 fragments per group 2048 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks:8193, 24577, 40961, 57345, 73729Allocating group tables: done Writing inode
tables: done Creating journal (4096 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: donestrace output from (B) around the BLKDISCARD
--------------------------------------------gettimeofday({1418806647, 890754}, NULL)= 0gettimeofday({1418806647, 890814}, NULL)= 0ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {0, 3000000010})= 0write(1, "Discarding device blocks: ", 26)= 26write(1, " 1024/204800", 13)= 13write(1, "\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10", 13)= 13ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {100000, 3000000010})= 0write(1, " ", 13)= 13write(1, "\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10", 13)= 13write(1, "done "..., 33)= 33write(1, "Discard succeeded and will retur"..., 65)= 65mkfs.ext3 output from (D)
-------------------------
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)fs_typesfor mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext3', 'small' <Panic>strace output from (D) around the BLKDISCARD
--------------------------------------------gettimeofday({1418809706, 244197}, NULL)= 0gettimeofday({1418809706, 244259}, NULL)= 0
ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {0, 3000000010}
<Panic>I have a photograph of the panic output from a previous session which includes raid5d and
blk_finish_plugin the stack trace, unfortunately I don't have the top part of the panic and vger won't accept the attachment. I also have a photograph of the console output from the crash at (D), but in this case it outputs to the console every 180 seconds:
Quoted 7 lines
INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 1}sending NMI to all CPUs:
xen: vector0x2is not implementedthanks,
Anthony Wright
Presumably you have deliberately enabled DISCARD support by setting the
raid456.devices_handle_discard_safely
modules parameters? Otherwise the DISCARD should be a no-op.
It is very hard to deduce anything without the full Oops. Do you have access to another machine on the same subnet? If so you could enable netconsole and capture the full oops from the other machines (all console messages are sent via UDP at a very low level).
I suspect md/raid5 is sending down a discard request in some way that the scsi/sata layer or driver doesn't like, but without the full oops, I really cannot guess what it might be.
NeilBrown
Quoted 95 lines · NeilBrown
Quoted 92 lines · On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:00:13 +0000 Anthony Wright <[email protected]>…
I've hit a panic bug on stock linux 3.17.3 (which includes the recent commit on BLKDISCARD in
md/raid5.c) running in Dom0 under Xen 4.1.0 that I've isolated to a BLKDISCARD system call within mkfs.ext3 and only happens on a raid 5 array (it doesn't happen on a raid 1 array).The system it happens on is remote and I don't have physical access to it, but the system administrator there is fairly helpful. We're in the process of commissioning the system which needs to be done tomorrow (thursday), so I've only got 24 hours in which I can run any tests you may want. If necessary I can arrange remote access, but it's a little complex.
We have 3 512GB SSDs on the system, all with a GPT partition table and the same partition layout. All the partitions have optimal alignment according to parted. One of the partitions on each SSD is assembled into a raid 1 array, another partition is assembled into a raid 5 array. Each array is the used as the only physical volume in a LVM volume group. I then create a logical volume on each array and format the logical volume with mkfs.ext3. I ran mkfs.ext3 in verbose mode and also ran strace on it in a separate session (though it was over a network) so it's possible I lost the last few packets of data.
/dev/Test/Test- 400MB LV on raid 1/dev/Master/Test- 400MB LV on raid 5A) mkfs.ext3 -E nodiscard -v
/dev/Test/Test- succeeds
B) mkfs.ext3 -v/dev/Test/Test- succeeds
C) mkfs.ext3 -E nodiscard -v/dev/Master/Test- succeeds
D) mkfs.ext3 -v/dev/Master/Test- panicsmkfs.ext3 output from (B)
-------------------------
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)fs_typesfor mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext3', 'small'
Discarding device blocks: done Discard
succeeded and will return 0s - skipping inode table wipe Filesystem label=
OS type: Linux
Block size=1024 (log=0)
Fragment size=1024 (log=0)
Stride=4 blocks, Stripe width=4 blocks
51200 inodes, 204800 blocks
10240 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=1
Maximum filesystem blocks=67371008
25 block groups
8192 blocks per group, 8192 fragments per group 2048 inodes per group
Superblock backups stored on blocks:8193, 24577, 40961, 57345, 73729Allocating group tables: done Writing inode
tables: done Creating journal (4096 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: donestrace output from (B) around the BLKDISCARD
--------------------------------------------gettimeofday({1418806647, 890754}, NULL)= 0gettimeofday({1418806647, 890814}, NULL)= 0ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {0, 3000000010})= 0write(1, "Discarding device blocks: ", 26)= 26write(1, " 1024/204800", 13)= 13write(1, "\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10", 13)= 13ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {100000, 3000000010})= 0write(1, " ", 13)= 13write(1, "\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10", 13)= 13write(1, "done "..., 33)= 33write(1, "Discard succeeded and will retur"..., 65)= 65mkfs.ext3 output from (D)
-------------------------
mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)fs_typesfor mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext3', 'small' <Panic>strace output from (D) around the BLKDISCARD
--------------------------------------------gettimeofday({1418809706, 244197}, NULL)= 0gettimeofday({1418809706, 244259}, NULL)= 0
ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {0, 3000000010}
<Panic>I have a photograph of the panic output from a previous session which includes raid5d and
blk_finish_plugin the stack trace, unfortunately I don't have the top part of the panic and vger won't accept the attachment. I also have a photograph of the console output from the crash at (D), but in this case it outputs to the console every 180 seconds:INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 1}sending NMI to all CPUs:
xen: vector0x2is not implemented
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
thanks,
Anthony Wright
Presumably you have deliberately enabled DISCARD support by setting the
raid456.devices_handle_discard_safelymodules parameters? Otherwise the DISCARD should be a no-op.
I haven't touched the raid456.devices_handle_discard_safely setting, I only learnt about it when I discovered your patch while I investigated the crash. I'm presuming it's the default value, but if there's a way to confirm that please let me know.
Quoted 4 lines
It is very hard to deduce anything without the full Oops. Do you have access to another machine on the same subnet? If so you could enable netconsole and capture the full oops from the other machines (all console messages are sent via UDP at a very low level).
I've got netconsole working, but it doesn't always panic and it takes a while to get the system reset. Below is the output I got from the most recent crash:
[63207.177400] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
0000001e00008000
Anthony.
Quoted 3 lines · NeilBrown
I suspect md/raid5 is sending down a discard request in some way that the scsi/sata layer or driver doesn't like, but without the full oops, I really cannot guess what it might be.
We've tried 4 times to reproduce the panic we got originally, but unforunately with no luck. Below are the outputs from all four crashes as captured by netconsole, in case they are any help.
Crash #1
[63207.177400] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
0000001e00008000
Crash #2
[ 531.210340] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000100000000 [ 531.210514] IP:[ 531.210340] BUG: unable to handle kernel
[<ffffffff8128788e>] __blk_segment_map_sg+0x5e/0x1b0 paging request[ 531.210632] PGD 20187f067 PUD 0 at 0000000100000000
[ 531.210514] IP: [<ffffffff8128788e>] __blk_segment_map_sg+0x5e/0x1b0 [ 531.210632] PGD 20187f067 PUD 0 [ 531.210783] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 531.210932] Modules linked in: eql netconsole configfs raid456[ 531.210783] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 531.210932] Modules linked in: eql netconsole configfs raid456
async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor xor async_tx raid6_pq xt_multiport async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor xor async_tx raid6_pq xt_multiport xt_tcpudp iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables aesni_intel aes_x86_64 glue_helper lrw xt_tcpudp iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables aesni_intel aes_x86_64 glue_helper lrw gf128mul ablk_helper cryptd ppdev gf128mul ablk_helper cryptd ppdev
Crash #3
[ 268.115094] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 268.115263] Modules linked in:[ 268.115094] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 268.115263] Modules linked in:
Crash #4
[ 276.325157] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Quoted 32 lines · Anthony Wright
Quoted 3 lines · NeilBrown
I suspect md/raid5 is sending down a discard request in some way that the scsi/sata layer or driver doesn't like, but without the full oops, I really cannot guess what it might be.
We've tried 4 times to reproduce the panic we got originally, but unforunately with no luck. Below are the outputs from all four crashes as captured by netconsole, in case they are any help.
Crash #1
[63207.177400] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
0000001e00008000Crash #2
[ 531.210340] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000100000000 [ 531.210514] IP:[ 531.210340] BUG: unable to handle kernel[<
ffffffff8128788e>]__blk_segment_map_sg+0x5e/0x1b0paging request[ 531.210632] PGD20187f067PUD 0 at 0000000100000000[ 531.210514] IP: [<ffffffff8128788e>] __blk_segment_map_sg+0x5e/0x1b0 [ 531.210632] PGD 20187f067 PUD 0 [ 531.210783] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 531.210932] Modules linked in: eql netconsole configfs raid456[ 531.210783] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 531.210932] Modules linked in: eql netconsole configfs raid456
async_raid6_recovasync_memcpyasync_pqasync_xorxorasync_txraid6_pqxt_multiportasync_raid6_recovasync_memcpyasync_pqasync_xorxorasync_txraid6_pqxt_multiportxt_tcpudpiptable_filterip_tablesx_tablesaesni_intelaes_x86_64glue_helperlrwxt_tcpudpiptable_filterip_tablesx_tablesaesni_intelaes_x86_64glue_helperlrw gf128mulablk_helpercryptd ppdev gf128mulablk_helpercryptd ppdev
Quoted 9 lines
Crash #3
[ 268.115094] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 268.115263] Modules linked in:[ 268.115094] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 268.115263] Modules linked in:Crash #4
[ 276.325157] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Are you trimming these? Or do they literally end with nothing else reported? In any case you must be trimming what comes before what you've posted and I don't think that's a good idea, often there's something wrong happening well before an oops gets reported.
Signature · 1 line
Chris Murphy