unlock rtnl mutex in ic_open_devs while waiting
Subsystems (4)
RFC PATCH 1/1 unlock rtnl mutex in ic_open_devs while waiting
This fixes a deadlock with alx_link_check, which takes the rtnl_mutex in a work item to check the link.
I have no idea whether alx should be fixed or ipconfig.c, but this saves 120 seconds off my boot time. ;-)
---
net/ipv4/ipconfig.c +2 -0
@@ -270,7 +270,9 @@ static int __init ic_open_devs(void)if (ic_is_init_dev (dev) &&netif_carrier_ok (dev)) goto have_carrier; +rtnl_unlock ();msleep (1 ); +rtnl_lock ();if (time_before (jiffies, next_msg))continue ;
David Miller
maintainerFrom: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 14:52:06 +0100
Quoted 7 lines
This fixes a deadlock with
alx_link_check, which takes thertnl_mutexin a work item to check the link.I have no idea whether alx should be fixed or
ipconfig.c, but this saves 120 seconds off my boot time. ;-)Signed-off-by Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
I genuinely think that alx_link_check() needs to use a smaller hammer to do it's locking, there is no reason to use the RTNL mutex.
A driver private mutex will probably work just as well and not have this problem.
Op 06-01-15 om 23:21 schreef David Miller:
Quoted 9 lines
From: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 14:52:06 +0100Quoted 6 lines
This fixes a deadlock with
alx_link_check, which takes thertnl_mutexin a work item to check the link.I have no idea whether alx should be fixed or
ipconfig.c, but this saves 120 seconds off my boot time. ;-)
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>I genuinely think that
alx_link_check()needs to use a smaller hammer to do it's locking, there is no reason to use the RTNL mutex.A driver private mutex will probably work just as well and not have this problem.
I guess alx_check_link uses the rtnl_lock for serializing against any possible alx_reset call. The alternative is stopping check_link work before running anything that changes the device state. Does the below patch look sane instead?
---
drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/alx/alx.h +2 -0
@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ struct alx_priv {unsigned int size; } descmem; +bool stop_link_check; +/* protect int_mask updates */ spinlock_t irq_lock;u32 int_mask;
drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/alx/main.c +16 -3
@@ -315,7 +316,8 @@ static irqreturn_t alx_intr_handle(struct alx_priv *alx, u32 intr)*/ alx->int_mask &= ~ALX_ISR_PHY ; write_int_mask = true; -alx_schedule_link_check (alx); +if (!alx->stop_link_check) +alx_schedule_link_check (alx); }if (intr & (ALX_ISR_TX_Q0 |ALX_ISR_RX_Q0 )) {
@@ -742,6 +744,17 @@ static netdev_features_t alx_fix_features(struct net_device *netdev,return features; } +static void alx_disable_link_check (struct alx_priv *alx) +{ +unsigned long flags; + +spin_lock_irqsave (&alx->irq_lock, flags); + alx->stop_link_check = true; +spin_unlock_irqrestore (&alx->irq_lock, flags); + +cancel_work_sync (&alx->link_check_wk); +} +static void alx_netif_stop (struct alx_priv *alx) { alx->dev->trans_start = jiffies;
@@ -756,6 +769,7 @@ static void alx_halt(struct alx_priv *alx) {struct alx_hw *hw = &alx->hw; +alx_disable_link_check (alx);alx_netif_stop (alx); hw->link_speed =SPEED_UNKNOWN ; hw->duplex =DUPLEX_UNKNOWN ;
@@ -788,6 +802,7 @@ static void alx_activate(struct alx_priv *alx)/* clear old interrupts */ alx_write_mem32 (&alx->hw,ALX_ISR , ~(u32 )ALX_ISR_DIS ); + alx->stop_link_check = false;alx_irq_enable (alx);alx_schedule_link_check (alx);
@@ -850,6 +865,7 @@ static int __alx_open(struct alx_priv *alx, bool resume)/* clear old interrupts */ alx_write_mem32 (&alx->hw,ALX_ISR , ~(u32 )ALX_ISR_DIS ); + alx->stop_link_check = false;alx_irq_enable (alx);if (!resume)
@@ -966,9 +982,7 @@ static void alx_link_check(struct work_struct *work) alx = container_of(work, struct alx_priv, link_check_wk); -rtnl_lock ();alx_check_link (alx); -rtnl_unlock (); }