Skip to contentSkip to conversation

openssl: bump version to 1.0.2

PATCH New Vicente Olivert Riera 2 participants 4 messages Jan 26, 2015 – Jan 27, 2015

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 openssl: bump version to 1.0.2

- Bump version to 1.0.2
- Adapt patches to new version
- Update hash value

---
 package/openssl/002-dont-force-large-file.patch    |   28 +-
 ...todev-Fix-issue-with-signature-generation.patch |  727 ++++++++++----------
 package/openssl/openssl.hash                       |    8 +-
 package/openssl/openssl.mk                         |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 381 insertions(+), 384 deletions(-)
package/openssl/002-dont-force-large-file.patch +14 -14
index 5b04656..13340d6 100644
@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
 [patch]: bss_file.c: don't force largefile mode
----
- crypto/bio/bss_file.c |    3 ---
- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
 
-Index: openssl-0.9.8g/crypto/bio/bss_file.c
-===================================================================
---- openssl-0.9.8g.orig/crypto/bio/bss_file.c
-+++ openssl-0.9.8g/crypto/bio/bss_file.c
+[Adapted to version 1.0.2]
+
+Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <[email protected]>
+
+diff -rup a/crypto/bio/bss_file.c b/crypto/bio/bss_file.c
+--- a/crypto/bio/bss_file.c	2015-01-22 14:58:32.000000000 +0000
++++ b/crypto/bio/bss_file.c	2015-01-26 16:27:52.972519876 +0000
 @@ -78,9 +78,6 @@
-  * sequential access of large files without extra "magic" comprise *BSD,
-  * Darwin, IRIX...
+  * of 32-bit platforms which allow for sequential access of large files
+  * without extra "magic" comprise *BSD, Darwin, IRIX...
   */
--#ifndef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
--#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
--#endif
- #endif
+-#  ifndef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
+-#   define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64
+-#  endif
+ # endif
  
- #include <stdio.h>
+ # include <stdio.h>
package/openssl/003-cryptodev-Fix-issue-with-signature-generation.patch +362 -365

784 lines not on this page · raw message

package/openssl/openssl.hash +4 -4
index 79119f1..a8cb172 100644
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# From https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.1l.tar.gz.md5
-# From https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.1l.tar.gz.sha1
-md5	cdb22925fc9bc97ccbf1e007661f2aa6	openssl-1.0.1l.tar.gz
-sha1	4547a0b4269acf76b1f9e7d188896867d6fc8c18	openssl-1.0.1l.tar.gz
+# From https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.2.tar.gz.md5
+# From https://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.2.tar.gz.sha1
+md5 38373013fc85c790aabf8837969c5eba openssl-1.0.2.tar.gz
+sha1 2f264f7f6bb973af444cd9fc6ee65c8588f610cc openssl-1.0.2.tar.gz
package/openssl/openssl.mk +1 -1
index 9b0d9e4..48f287e 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #
 ################################################################################
 
-OPENSSL_VERSION = 1.0.1l
+OPENSSL_VERSION = 1.0.2
 OPENSSL_SITE = http://www.openssl.org/source
 OPENSSL_LICENSE = OpenSSL or SSLeay
 OPENSSL_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 openssl: bump version to 1.0.2

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

"Vicente" == Vicente Olivert Riera <[email protected]> writes:

- Bump version to 1.0.2
- Adapt patches to new version
- Update hash value

1.0.2 is listed as a new major version. Is it 100% compatible? Did you test build some packages?

Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 openssl: bump version to 1.0.2

Hello Peter,

yes, I have built some packages depending on openssl. See this build-time.log list:

$ awk -F: '{print $4}' build-time.log | uniq
  toolchain-external
  toolchain
  busybox
  dtv-scan-tables
  host-m4
  host-libtool
  host-autoconf
  host-automake
  host-pkgconf
  zlib
  openssl
  host-ncurses
  ncurses
  readline
  lftp
  host-libcap
  libcap
  libcurl
  libevent
  libffi
  libsigc
  libtorrent
  lzo
  nut
  openssh
  host-expat
  host-zlib
  host-python
  python
  rtorrent
  squid
  stunnel
  host-gettext
  host-libxml-parser-perl
  host-intltool
  transmission
  tvheadend
  vsftpd
  host-bison
  host-flex
  vtun
  wget
  wpa_supplicant
  host-fakeroot
  host-makedevs
  host-mkpasswd

Regards,
--
Vincent

El 26/01/15 a las 23:10, Peter Korsgaard escribi?:

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

"Vicente" == Vicente Olivert Riera <[email protected]> writes:

- Bump version to 1.0.2
- Adapt patches to new version
- Update hash value

1.0.2 is listed as a new major version. Is it 100% compatible? Did you test build some packages?

#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 openssl: bump version to 1.0.2

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

"Vicente" == Vicente Olivert Riera <[email protected]> writes:

Hello Peter,
yes, I have built some packages depending on openssl. See this build-time.log list:

Ok, thanks. This would be useful info in the commit message (or as a comment below).

Committed, thanks.

Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard