Skip to contentSkip to conversation

i40e: crash on NMI by continuous module reload

PATCH Stefan Assmann 4 participants 9 messages Feb 27, 2015 – Mar 2, 2015

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

When unloading/loading the driver in a loop with
modprobe -r i40e ; modprobe i40e
after a few cycles the driver no longer successfully probes and outputs the following.

[  160.171944] i40e 0000:07:00.1 eth7: adding 68:05:ca:2a:3a:41 vid=0
[  161.271487] i40e 0000:07:00.1: set phy mask fail, aq_err -54
[  161.685505] i40e 0000:07:00.0 eth6: NIC Link is Down
[  161.873172] i40e 0000:07:00.1: link restart failed, aq_err=0
[  162.401255] i40e 0000:07:00.1: PCI-Express: Speed 8.0GT/s Width x8
[  162.710082] i40e 0000:07:00.0: add filter failed, err -54, aq_err 0
[  162.930801] i40e 0000:07:00.1: get phy abilities failed, aq_err -54, advertised speed settings may not be correct
[  162.977599] i40e 0000:07:00.1: Features: PF-id[1] VFs: 32 VSIs: 34 QP: 32 RX: PS RSS FD_ATR FD_SB NTUPLE PTP
[  163.238624] i40e 0000:07:00.0 eth6: NIC Link is Down
[  163.244566] i40e 0000:07:00.2: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  163.244607] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.2 failed with error -15
[  163.464911] i40e 0000:07:00.3: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  163.490747] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.3 failed with error -15
[  163.518932] i40e 0000:07:00.1: i40e_ptp_stop: removed PHC on eth7
[  163.746713] i40e 0000:07:00.1 eth7: NIC Link is Down
[  164.270164] i40e 0000:07:00.1: add filter failed, err -54, aq_err 0
[...]
[  184.462907] i40e: Copyright (c) 2013 - 2014 Intel Corporation.
[  184.711290] i40e 0000:07:00.0: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  184.736457] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.0 failed with error -15
[  184.983109] i40e 0000:07:00.1: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  185.009354] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.1 failed with error -15
[  185.256612] i40e 0000:07:00.2: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  185.281990] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.2 failed with error -15
[  185.529085] i40e 0000:07:00.3: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  185.555094] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.3 failed with error -15

Followed by

[  188.178408] NMI: IOCK error (debug interrupt?) for reason 71 on CPU 0.
[  188.214709] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.19.0+ #81
[  188.245187] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360p Gen8, BIOS P71 08/02/2014
[  188.276847] task: ffffffff81e13480 ti: ffffffff81e00000 task.ti: ffffffff81e00000
[  188.313671] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8100d45b>]  [<ffffffff8100d45b>] default_idle+0x1b/0xb0
[  188.351779] RSP: 0018:ffffffff81e03ea8  EFLAGS: 00000246
[  188.377118] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff81e00010 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  188.412311] RDX: ffffffff81e00000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
[  188.448563] RBP: ffffffff81e03eb8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000fffe4047
[  188.482137] R10: ffffffff81a0e045 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[  188.518089] R13: ffffffff81efd970 R14: ffffffff81e00010 R15: 0000000000000000
[  188.553382] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880237a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  188.594583] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  188.621056] CR2: 00007fbcb561bc88 CR3: 0000000235966000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
[  188.656549] Stack:
[  188.665693]  ffffffff81e00010 ffffffff81e00010 ffffffff81e03ec8 ffffffff8100cc3a
[  188.700062]  ffffffff81e03f48 ffffffff810884b7 ffffffff81e13480 ffff880236538910
[  188.734638]  ffffffff81e00000 ffffffff81e00010 ffffffff81e00010 ffffffff81e00000
[  188.773067] Call Trace:
[  188.784412]  [<ffffffff8100cc3a>] arch_cpu_idle+0xa/0x10
[  188.808717]  [<ffffffff810884b7>] cpu_startup_entry+0x227/0x3b0
[  188.837221]  [<ffffffff819d0a52>] rest_init+0x72/0x80
[  188.860698]  [<ffffffff81f201bd>] start_kernel+0x41b/0x428
[  188.887669]  [<ffffffff81f1fbc0>] ? set_init_arg+0x5d/0x5d
[  188.914359]  [<ffffffff81f1f5ad>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
[  188.945125]  [<ffffffff81f1f700>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x151/0x158
[  188.972480] Code: c0 48 83 c8 08 0f 22 c0 eb ce 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 8b 05 a1 a8 ec 00 48 89 e5 41 54 65 44 8b 25 cc cc ff 7e 85 c0 5

3 7f 19 fb f4 <8b> 05 87 a8 ec 00 65 44 8b 25 b7 cc ff 7e 85 c0 7f 44 5b 41 5c

I've tracked this down to the following hunk from this commit. commit cafa2ee6fbb1bbc2fecdeef990858d56646fc1bd

Author: Anjali Singhai Jain <[email protected]>
Date:   Sat Sep 13 07:40:45 2014 +0000

i40e: Fix a bug where Rx would stop after some time
[...]

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
index f7464e8..ff6d94d 100644

[...]
@@ -9169,6 +9178,13 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
if (err)
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "set phy mask fail, aq_err %d\n", err);

+ msleep(75);
+ err = i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an(&pf->hw, true, NULL);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "link restart failed, aq_err=%d\n",
+ pf->hw.aq.asq_last_status);
+ }
+
/* The main driver is (mostly) up and happy. We need to set this state
* before setting up the misc vector or we get a race and the vector
* ends up disabled forever.

With this hunk removed the driver successfully unloaded/reloaded a couple of hundred times. Would it be safe to just remove this hunk? I haven't seen any negative effects by removing this yet.

Stefan

#1 lore raw
Quoted 96 lines · Stefan Assmann

When unloading/loading the driver in a loop with
modprobe -r i40e ; modprobe i40e
after a few cycles the driver no longer successfully probes and outputs the following.

[  160.171944] i40e 0000:07:00.1 eth7: adding 68:05:ca:2a:3a:41 vid=0
[  161.271487] i40e 0000:07:00.1: set phy mask fail, aq_err -54
[  161.685505] i40e 0000:07:00.0 eth6: NIC Link is Down
[  161.873172] i40e 0000:07:00.1: link restart failed, aq_err=0
[  162.401255] i40e 0000:07:00.1: PCI-Express: Speed 8.0GT/s Width x8
[  162.710082] i40e 0000:07:00.0: add filter failed, err -54, aq_err 0
[  162.930801] i40e 0000:07:00.1: get phy abilities failed, aq_err -54, advertised speed settings may not be correct
[  162.977599] i40e 0000:07:00.1: Features: PF-id[1] VFs: 32 VSIs: 34 QP: 32 RX: PS RSS FD_ATR FD_SB NTUPLE PTP
[  163.238624] i40e 0000:07:00.0 eth6: NIC Link is Down
[  163.244566] i40e 0000:07:00.2: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  163.244607] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.2 failed with error -15
[  163.464911] i40e 0000:07:00.3: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  163.490747] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.3 failed with error -15
[  163.518932] i40e 0000:07:00.1: i40e_ptp_stop: removed PHC on eth7
[  163.746713] i40e 0000:07:00.1 eth7: NIC Link is Down
[  164.270164] i40e 0000:07:00.1: add filter failed, err -54, aq_err 0
[...]
[  184.462907] i40e: Copyright (c) 2013 - 2014 Intel Corporation.
[  184.711290] i40e 0000:07:00.0: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  184.736457] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.0 failed with error -15
[  184.983109] i40e 0000:07:00.1: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  185.009354] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.1 failed with error -15
[  185.256612] i40e 0000:07:00.2: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  185.281990] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.2 failed with error -15
[  185.529085] i40e 0000:07:00.3: Initial pf_reset failed: -15
[  185.555094] i40e: probe of 0000:07:00.3 failed with error -15

Followed by

[  188.178408] NMI: IOCK error (debug interrupt?) for reason 71 on CPU 0.
[  188.214709] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.19.0+ #81
[  188.245187] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360p Gen8, BIOS P71 08/02/2014
[  188.276847] task: ffffffff81e13480 ti: ffffffff81e00000 task.ti: ffffffff81e00000
[  188.313671] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8100d45b>]  [<ffffffff8100d45b>] default_idle+0x1b/0xb0
[  188.351779] RSP: 0018:ffffffff81e03ea8  EFLAGS: 00000246
[  188.377118] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff81e00010 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  188.412311] RDX: ffffffff81e00000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
[  188.448563] RBP: ffffffff81e03eb8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000fffe4047
[  188.482137] R10: ffffffff81a0e045 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[  188.518089] R13: ffffffff81efd970 R14: ffffffff81e00010 R15: 0000000000000000
[  188.553382] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880237a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  188.594583] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  188.621056] CR2: 00007fbcb561bc88 CR3: 0000000235966000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
[  188.656549] Stack:
[  188.665693]  ffffffff81e00010 ffffffff81e00010 ffffffff81e03ec8 ffffffff8100cc3a
[  188.700062]  ffffffff81e03f48 ffffffff810884b7 ffffffff81e13480 ffff880236538910
[  188.734638]  ffffffff81e00000 ffffffff81e00010 ffffffff81e00010 ffffffff81e00000
[  188.773067] Call Trace:
[  188.784412]  [<ffffffff8100cc3a>] arch_cpu_idle+0xa/0x10
[  188.808717]  [<ffffffff810884b7>] cpu_startup_entry+0x227/0x3b0
[  188.837221]  [<ffffffff819d0a52>] rest_init+0x72/0x80
[  188.860698]  [<ffffffff81f201bd>] start_kernel+0x41b/0x428
[  188.887669]  [<ffffffff81f1fbc0>] ? set_init_arg+0x5d/0x5d
[  188.914359]  [<ffffffff81f1f5ad>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
[  188.945125]  [<ffffffff81f1f700>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x151/0x158
[  188.972480] Code: c0 48 83 c8 08 0f 22 c0 eb ce 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 8b 05 a1 a8 ec 00 48 89 e5 41 54 65 44 8b 25 cc cc ff 7e 85 c0 5

3 7f 19 fb f4 <8b> 05 87 a8 ec 00 65 44 8b 25 b7 cc ff 7e 85 c0 7f 44 5b 41 5c

I've tracked this down to the following hunk from this commit. commit cafa2ee6fbb1bbc2fecdeef990858d56646fc1bd

Author: Anjali Singhai Jain <[email protected]>
Date:   Sat Sep 13 07:40:45 2014 +0000

i40e: Fix a bug where Rx would stop after some time
[...]

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +7 -0
index f7464e8..ff6d94d 100644
[...]
@@ -9169,6 +9178,13 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	if (err)
 		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "set phy mask fail, aq_err %d\n", err);
 
+	msleep(75);
+	err = i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an(&pf->hw, true, NULL);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "link restart failed, aq_err=%d\n",
+			 pf->hw.aq.asq_last_status);
+	}
+
 	/* The main driver is (mostly) up and happy. We need to set this state
 	 * before setting up the misc vector or we get a race and the vector
 	 * ends up disabled forever.

With this hunk removed the driver successfully unloaded/reloaded a couple of hundred times. Would it be safe to just remove this hunk? I haven't seen any negative effects by removing this yet.

Stefan

Quoted 12 lines

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Stefan,
I wouldn't remove them yet as this does look like a valid idea to check to see if the link is restarting successfully. On the other hand can you try removing the msleep line as this one is most likely causing the issue due to sleeping for some long in a probe function is generally a bad idea.
Thanks,
Nick

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

#2 lore raw

On 27.02.2015 15:02, nick wrote:

[...]

Quoted 26 lines
Quoted 26 lines

i40e: Fix a bug where Rx would stop after some time
[...]

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +7 -0
index f7464e8..ff6d94d 100644
[...]
@@ -9169,6 +9178,13 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	if (err)
 		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "set phy mask fail, aq_err %d\n", err);
 
+	msleep(75);
+	err = i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an(&pf->hw, true, NULL);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "link restart failed, aq_err=%d\n",
+			 pf->hw.aq.asq_last_status);
+	}
+
 	/* The main driver is (mostly) up and happy. We need to set this state
 	 * before setting up the misc vector or we get a race and the vector
 	 * ends up disabled forever.

With this hunk removed the driver successfully unloaded/reloaded a couple of hundred times. Would it be safe to just remove this hunk? I haven't seen any negative effects by removing this yet.

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Stefan

Stefan,
I wouldn't remove them yet as this does look like a valid idea to check to see if the link is restarting successfully. On the other hand can you try removing the msleep line as this one is most likely causing the issue due to sleeping for some long in a probe function is generally a bad idea.
Thanks,
Nick

Thanks Nick for the quick reply. I tested removing the msleep but that didn't make a difference. You actually need to remove the complete hunk to get a stable driver reload.

Stefan

#3 lore raw
Quoted 40 lines · Stefan Assmann

On 27.02.2015 15:02, nick wrote:

[...]

Quoted 26 lines
Quoted 26 lines

i40e: Fix a bug where Rx would stop after some time
[...]

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +7 -0
index f7464e8..ff6d94d 100644
[...]
@@ -9169,6 +9178,13 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	if (err)
 		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "set phy mask fail, aq_err %d\n", err);
 
+	msleep(75);
+	err = i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an(&pf->hw, true, NULL);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "link restart failed, aq_err=%d\n",
+			 pf->hw.aq.asq_last_status);
+	}
+
 	/* The main driver is (mostly) up and happy. We need to set this state
 	 * before setting up the misc vector or we get a race and the vector
 	 * ends up disabled forever.

With this hunk removed the driver successfully unloaded/reloaded a couple of hundred times. Would it be safe to just remove this hunk? I haven't seen any negative effects by removing this yet.

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Stefan

Stefan,
I wouldn't remove them yet as this does look like a valid idea to check to see if the link is restarting successfully. On the other hand can you try removing the msleep line as this one is most likely causing the issue due to sleeping for some long in a probe function is generally a bad idea.
Thanks,
Nick

Quoted 6 lines

Thanks Nick for the quick reply. I tested removing the msleep but that didn't make a difference. You actually need to remove the complete hunk to get a stable driver reload.

Stefan

Stefan,
Basically there are a few things that could be going wrong
1. You are getting a error return for the function,i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an
2. You are trying to re able the device again when not needed
3. You are sending a NULL value to a field for command arguments that takes a 0 and not NULL to take no arguments
Nick

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

#4 lore raw
Quoted 57 lines

From: nick [mailto:[email protected]]

Quoted 7 lines · Stefan Assmann

On 27.02.2015 15:02, nick wrote:

[...]

Quoted 3 lines

Review

Quoted 3 lines

i40e: Fix a bug where Rx would stop after some time
[...]

(quoted diff) +0 -0

b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,

Quoted 5 lines

index f7464e8..ff6d94d 100644

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
[...]
@@ -9169,6 +9178,13 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,

const struct pci_device_id *ent)

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, · line 9179

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
 	if (err)
 		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "set phy mask fail, aq_err %d\n",

err);

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, · line 9187

Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +7 -0
+	msleep(75);
+	err = i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an(&pf->hw, true, NULL);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "link restart failed, aq_err=%d\n",
+			 pf->hw.aq.asq_last_status);
+	}
+
 	/* The main driver is (mostly) up and happy. We need to set this

state

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, · line 9188

Quoted 1 line
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
 	 * before setting up the misc vector or we get a race and the

vector

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
 	 * ends up disabled forever.
 

With this hunk removed the driver successfully unloaded/reloaded a couple of hundred times. Would it be safe to just remove this hunk? I haven't seen any negative effects by removing this yet.

Stefan

Stefan,
I wouldn't remove them yet as this does look like a valid idea to

check to see if the link is

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

restarting successfully. On the other hand can you try removing the

msleep line as this one is

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

most likely causing the issue due to sleeping for some long in a

probe function is generally a

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

bad idea.
Thanks,
Nick

Thanks Nick for the quick reply. I tested removing the msleep but that didn't make a difference. You actually need to remove the complete

hunk

Quoted 4 lines

to get a stable driver reload.

Stefan

Quoted 9 lines

Stefan,
Basically there are a few things that could be going wrong
1. You are getting a error return for the function,i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an
2. You are trying to re able the device again when not needed
3. You are sending a NULL value to a field for command arguments that takes a 0 and not NULL
to take no arguments
Nick

First of all, I would make sure you've got a short sleep in between each load and unload in this stress test. There's a lot going on under the covers in the Firmware that really should be allowed to settle out before jostling it again with another load/unload command.

It would help to know what Firmware you have on your NIC - can you give us the output from "ethtool -i <ethX>"?

The out-of-tree driver has just (finally!) been updated on SourceForge, so you might give this version 1.2.37 driver a try to see if it changes your result. That code still has the hunk in question, but protected by a FW version check. The related patch will be headed upstream to net-next very soon.

Firmware updates have also just been released, but I'm not sure they've made it to the Intel Downloads site yet. Updating your FW will make a difference.

sln

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

#5 lore raw
Quoted 87 lines · Shannon
Quoted 10 lines

From: nick [mailto:[email protected]]

Quoted 7 lines · Stefan Assmann

On 27.02.2015 15:02, nick wrote:

[...]

Quoted 3 lines

Review

Quoted 3 lines

i40e: Fix a bug where Rx would stop after some time
[...]

(quoted diff) +0 -0

b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev

Quoted 5 lines

index f7464e8..ff6d94d 100644

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
[...]
@@ -9169,6 +9178,13 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev

*pdev,

Quoted 5 lines

const struct pci_device_id *ent)

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev · line 9179

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
 	if (err)
 		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "set phy mask fail, aq_err %d\n",

err);

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +7 -0
+	msleep(75);
+	err = i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an(&pf->hw, true, NULL);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "link restart failed, aq_err=%d\n",
+			 pf->hw.aq.asq_last_status);
+	}
+
 	/* The main driver is (mostly) up and happy. We need to set

this

Quoted 6 lines

state

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

* before setting up the misc vector or we get a race and the

vector

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

* ends up disabled forever.

With this hunk removed the driver successfully unloaded/reloaded

a

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

couple of hundred times. Would it be safe to just remove this

hunk?

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

I haven't seen any negative effects by removing this yet.

Stefan

Stefan,
I wouldn't remove them yet as this does look like a valid idea to

check to see if the link is

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

restarting successfully. On the other hand can you try removing

the

Quoted 8 lines

msleep line as this one is

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

most likely causing the issue due to sleeping for some long in a

probe function is generally a

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

bad idea.
Thanks,
Nick

Thanks Nick for the quick reply. I tested removing the msleep but

that

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line

didn't make a difference. You actually need to remove the complete

hunk

Quoted 4 lines

to get a stable driver reload.

Stefan

Quoted 9 lines

Stefan,
Basically there are a few things that could be going wrong
1. You are getting a error return for the function,i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an
2. You are trying to re able the device again when not needed
3. You are sending a NULL value to a field for command arguments that takes a 0 and not NULL
to take no arguments
Nick

First of all, I would make sure you've got a short sleep in between each load and unload in this stress test. There's a lot going on under the covers in the Firmware that really should be allowed to settle out before jostling it again with another load/unload command.

It would help to know what Firmware you have on your NIC - can you give us the output from "ethtool -i <ethX>"?

The out-of-tree driver has just (finally!) been updated on SourceForge, so you might give this version 1.2.37 driver a try to see if it changes your result. That code still has the hunk in question, but protected by a FW version check. The related patch will be headed upstream to net-next very soon.

Quoted 5 lines

Firmware updates have also just been released, but I'm not sure they've made it to the Intel Downloads site yet. Updating your FW will make a difference.

sln

Thanks Shannon,
For the advice on there being a newer driver and firmware to test that on before reporting the bug against this driver. I am curious as to why this newer code is not up streamed to Linux next yet through. Nick

Signature · 13 lines
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
#6 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · Nicholas Krause

Thanks Shannon,
For the advice on there being a newer driver and firmware to test that on before reporting the bug against this driver. I am curious as to why this newer code is not up streamed to Linux next yet through.

Because I still have ~40 patches in my queue for i40e that need to go upstream to get the upstream driver in sync with our out-of-tree driver.

Also Nick, please do not take advantage of me being nice to you and letting you remain on e1000-devel mailing list, even though you have been banned on @vger.kernel.org mailing lists. It is clear from your attempts to help Stefan, you do not know the driver and your "blind stabs in the dark" to assist, only hinder our abilities to assist others.

#7 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Jeff Kirsher
Quoted 2 lines · Nicholas Krause

Thanks Shannon,
For the advice on there being a newer driver and firmware to test

that

Quoted 2 lines

on before reporting the bug against this driver. I am curious as to why this newer code is not up streamed to Linux next yet through.

Because I still have ~40 patches in my queue for i40e that need to go upstream to get the upstream driver in sync with our out-of-tree driver.

Quoted 6 lines

Also Nick, please do not take advantage of me being nice to you and letting you remain on e1000-devel mailing list, even though you have been banned on @vger.kernel.org mailing lists. It is clear from your attempts to help Stefan, you do not know the driver and your "blind stabs in the dark" to assist, only hinder our abilities to assist others.

Jeff,
These seem to be the most likely culprits after reading the code. However there seems to be something else going wrong with the function call in the trace code. Jeff I do understand your busy with the upstream merging of the Intel drivers and was just wondering when the merge would be finished. Furthermore I can try tracing this later during my March
Break. I do appreciate you being nice to me and am sorry about making you lose
your patience. I am interested in learning about the Intel network drivers and working with them, if would like to give me something to start with.
Sorry,
Nick :(

Signature · 13 lines
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
#8 lore raw
In reply to Nelson, Shannon
Quoted 67 lines · Shannon
Quoted 57 lines

From: nick [mailto:[email protected]]

Quoted 7 lines · Stefan Assmann

On 27.02.2015 15:02, nick wrote:

[...]

Quoted 3 lines

Review

Quoted 3 lines

i40e: Fix a bug where Rx would stop after some time
[...]

(quoted diff) +0 -0

b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,

Quoted 5 lines

index f7464e8..ff6d94d 100644

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
[...]
@@ -9169,6 +9178,13 @@ static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,

const struct pci_device_id *ent)

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, · line 9179

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
 	if (err)
 		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "set phy mask fail, aq_err %d\n",

err);

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, · line 9187

Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +7 -0
+	msleep(75);
+	err = i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an(&pf->hw, true, NULL);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "link restart failed, aq_err=%d\n",
+			 pf->hw.aq.asq_last_status);
+	}
+
 	/* The main driver is (mostly) up and happy. We need to set this

state

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c static int i40e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, · line 9188

Quoted 1 line
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
 	 * before setting up the misc vector or we get a race and the

vector

Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c +0 -0
 	 * ends up disabled forever.
 

With this hunk removed the driver successfully unloaded/reloaded a couple of hundred times. Would it be safe to just remove this hunk? I haven't seen any negative effects by removing this yet.

Stefan

Stefan,
I wouldn't remove them yet as this does look like a valid idea to

check to see if the link is

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

restarting successfully. On the other hand can you try removing the

msleep line as this one is

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

most likely causing the issue due to sleeping for some long in a

probe function is generally a

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

bad idea.
Thanks,
Nick

Thanks Nick for the quick reply. I tested removing the msleep but that didn't make a difference. You actually need to remove the complete

hunk

Quoted 4 lines

to get a stable driver reload.

Stefan

Quoted 9 lines

Stefan,
Basically there are a few things that could be going wrong
1. You are getting a error return for the function,i40e_aq_set_link_restart_an
2. You are trying to re able the device again when not needed
3. You are sending a NULL value to a field for command arguments that takes a 0 and not NULL
to take no arguments
Nick

Quoted 1 line

First of all, I would make sure you've got a short sleep in between each load and unload in this stress test. There's a lot going on under the covers in the Firmware that really should be allowed to settle out before jostling it again with another load/unload command.

If a short delay is needed I think this should be implemented by the driver. Triggering this kind of bug from userspace shouldn't be possible. I'm using this reload loop regularly on driver backports to test for regressions.
Btw, I noticed this problem during a normal reboot and used the reloading while looking for a reproducer.

Quoted 1 line

It would help to know what Firmware you have on your NIC - can you give us the output from "ethtool -i <ethX>"?

# ethtool -i eth6
driver: i40e
version: 1.2.9-k
firmware-version: f4.22 a1.1 n04.26 e800014b1
bus-info: 0000:07:00.0
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: yes
supports-eeprom-access: yes
supports-register-dump: yes
supports-priv-flags: yes
Quoted 1 line

The out-of-tree driver has just (finally!) been updated on SourceForge, so you might give this version 1.2.37 driver a try to see if it changes your result. That code still has the hunk in question, but protected by a FW version check. The related patch will be headed upstream to net-next very soon.

1.2.37 fails the same way.

Quoted 1 line

Firmware updates have also just been released, but I'm not sure they've made it to the Intel Downloads site yet. Updating your FW will make a difference.

If you could point me to the firmware updates and instructions I can perform the update.

Thanks!

Stefan