ocfs2: do not BUG if jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata fails
PATCH 1/1 ocfs2: do not BUG if jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata fails
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata may fail. Currently it cannot take care of non zero return value and just BUG in ocfs2_journal_dirty. This patch is aborting the handle instead of BUG.
--- fs/ocfs2/journal.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/ocfs2/journal.c +9 -1
@@ -775,7 +775,15 @@ void ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)trace_ocfs2_journal_dirty ((unsigned long long )bh->b_blocknr); status =jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata (handle, bh); -BUG_ON (status); +if (status) { +mlog_errno (status); +if (!is_handle_aborted (handle)) { + handle->h_err = status; +mlog (ML_ERROR ,"jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata failed. " +"Aborting transaction." ); +jbd2_journal_abort_handle (handle); + } + } }#define OCFS2_DEFAULT_COMMIT_INTERVAL (HZ * JBD2_DEFAULT_MAX_COMMIT_AGE)
Signature · 1 line
1.8.4.3
PATCH 1/1 ocfs2: do not BUG if jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata fails
Hi Joseph,
Quoted 15 lines · Joseph Qi
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadatamay fail. Currently it cannot take care of non zero return value and just BUG inocfs2_journal_dirty. This patch is aborting the handle instead of BUG.Signed-off-by Joseph Qi <[email protected]>--- fs/ocfs2/journal.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/ocfs2/journal.c +0
-0@@ -775,7 +775,15 @@ void ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)trace_ocfs2_journal_dirty ((unsigned long long )bh->b_blocknr);
fs/ocfs2/journal.c void ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh) · line 784
Quoted 10 lines
fs/ocfs2/journal.c +7
-1status =jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata (handle, bh); -BUG_ON (status); +if (status) { +mlog_errno (status); +if (!is_handle_aborted (handle)) { + handle->h_err = status; +mlog (ML_ERROR ,"jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata failed. " +"Aborting transaction." ); +jbd2_journal_abort_handle (handle);
The buffers dirtied before are still committed to disk while handle is aborted and may cause some inconsistency.
Maybe the journal should also be set aborted if jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata fails like ext4?
Quoted 6 lines
fs/ocfs2/journal.c +2
-0+ } + } }#define OCFS2_DEFAULT_COMMIT_INTERVAL (HZ * JBD2_DEFAULT_MAX_COMMIT_AGE)
PATCH 1/1 ocfs2: do not BUG if jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata fails
Quoted 18 lines · Xue jiufei
Hi Joseph,
Quoted 16 lines · Joseph Qi
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadatamay fail. Currently it cannot take care of non zero return value and just BUG inocfs2_journal_dirty. This patch is aborting the handle instead of BUG.Signed-off-by Joseph Qi <[email protected]>--- fs/ocfs2/journal.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/ocfs2/journal.c +0
-0@@ -775,7 +775,15 @@ void ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)trace_ocfs2_journal_dirty ((unsigned long long )bh->b_blocknr);
Quoted 13 lines
fs/ocfs2/journal.c void ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh) · line 784
Quoted 9 lines
fs/ocfs2/journal.c +7
-1status =jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata (handle, bh); -BUG_ON (status); +if (status) { +mlog_errno (status); +if (!is_handle_aborted (handle)) { + handle->h_err = status; +mlog (ML_ERROR ,"jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata failed. " +"Aborting transaction." ); +jbd2_journal_abort_handle (handle);The buffers dirtied before are still committed to disk while handle is aborted and may cause some inconsistency.
Maybe the journal should also be set aborted ifjbd2_journal_dirty_metadatafails like ext4?
You are right. I'll take this and send a new version. Thanks.
--Joseph
Quoted 11 lines
fs/ocfs2/journal.c void ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh) · line 789
Quoted 6 lines
fs/ocfs2/journal.c +2
-0+ } + } }#define OCFS2_DEFAULT_COMMIT_INTERVAL (HZ * JBD2_DEFAULT_MAX_COMMIT_AGE).
PATCH 1/1 ocfs2: do not BUG if jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata fails
In reply to Xue jiufeiQuoted 18 lines · Xue jiufei
Hi Joseph,
Quoted 16 lines · Joseph Qi
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadatamay fail. Currently it cannot take care of non zero return value and just BUG inocfs2_journal_dirty. This patch is aborting the handle instead of BUG.Signed-off-by Joseph Qi <[email protected]>--- fs/ocfs2/journal.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/ocfs2/journal.c +0
-0@@ -775,7 +775,15 @@ void ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)trace_ocfs2_journal_dirty ((unsigned long long )bh->b_blocknr);
Quoted 13 lines
fs/ocfs2/journal.c void ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh) · line 784
Quoted 9 lines
fs/ocfs2/journal.c +7
-1status =jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata (handle, bh); -BUG_ON (status); +if (status) { +mlog_errno (status); +if (!is_handle_aborted (handle)) { + handle->h_err = status; +mlog (ML_ERROR ,"jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata failed. " +"Aborting transaction." ); +jbd2_journal_abort_handle (handle);The buffers dirtied before are still committed to disk while handle is aborted and may cause some inconsistency.
Maybe the journal should also be set aborted ifjbd2_journal_dirty_metadatafails like ext4?
Maybe aborting the handle and journal is also not enough. Though the journal is aborted, the caller still returns success. Then the user space thinks the operation is successful, but the metadata cannot be committed to disk due to aborted journal.
Do we also have to return the error in ocfs2_journal_dirty and then handle it in caller? If so, it must be huge work:)
Quoted 11 lines
fs/ocfs2/journal.c void ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh) · line 789
Quoted 6 lines
fs/ocfs2/journal.c +2
-0+ } + } }#define OCFS2_DEFAULT_COMMIT_INTERVAL (HZ * JBD2_DEFAULT_MAX_COMMIT_AGE).