UBI/UBIFS updates for 4.1-rc4
Richard Weinberger
maintainerLinus,
the following changes since commit 5ebe6afaf0057ac3eaeb98defd5456894b446d22:
Linux 4.1-rc2 (2015-05-03 19:22:23 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/linux-ubifs.git tags/upstream-4.1-rc4
for you to fetch changes up to 98fb1ffd8154890d7051750e61ff5548c3ee2ab2:
UBI: block: Add missing cache flushes (2015-05-06 22:52:22 +0200)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This pull request contains a single bug fix for the UBI block driver.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Cernekee (1):
UBI: block: Add missing cache flushes
drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Quoted 17 lines · Richard Weinberger
Linus,
the following changes since commit
5ebe6afaf0057ac3eaeb98defd5456894b446d22:Linux 4.1-rc2 (2015-05-03 19:22:23 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org/linux-ubifs.gittags/upstream-4.1-rc4for you to fetch changes up to
98fb1ffd8154890d7051750e61ff5548c3ee2ab2:UBI: block: Add missing cache flushes (2015-05-06 22:52:22 +0200)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This pull request contains a single bug fix for the UBI block driver.
Quoted 6 lines
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Cernekee (1):
UBI: block: Add missing cache flushesdrivers/mtd/ubi/block.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Linus,
just noticed that you did not pull this (and also not my UML fixes). Is something wrong with my pull requests?
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, //richard
Quoted 3 lines · Richard Weinberger
just noticed that you did not pull this (and also not my UML fixes). Is something wrong with my pull requests?
I don't actually have the original in my mailbox at all. It may have been caught as spam - I haven't checked my spam box for a while.
Linus
Richard Weinberger
maintainerAm 17.05.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines · Richard Weinberger
just noticed that you did not pull this (and also not my UML fixes). Is something wrong with my pull requests?
I don't actually have the original in my mailbox at all. It may have been caught as spam - I haven't checked my spam box for a while.
Hmm, I have not changed my mail setup lately.
If my mails are tagged as spam can you please tell me why? :-)
Thanks,
//richard
Quoted 3 lines · Richard Weinberger
Hmm, I have not changed my mail setup lately.
If my mails are tagged as spam can you please tell me why? :-)
Sadly, gmail doesn't give scores or reasons like spamassassin, presumably to make it harder to game. So it's impossibel to tell why gmail hates some email. But often it's a header that doesn't look normal.
Linus
Quoted 3 lines · Linus Torvalds
I don't actually have the original in my mailbox at all. It may have been caught as spam - I haven't checked my spam box for a while.
Yes. Both this and the UML pull request were in my spam box.
You're doing something bad that gmail really dislikes. Possibly this:
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.11?) ([email protected]@213.47.235.169)
by radon.swed.at with ESMTPA; 14 May 2015 10:13:58 -0000
Hmm?
Linus
Richard Weinberger
maintainerAm 17.05.2015 um 01:31 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines · Linus Torvalds
I don't actually have the original in my mailbox at all. It may have been caught as spam - I haven't checked my spam box for a while.
Quoted 6 lines
Yes. Both this and the UML pull request were in my spam box.
You're doing something bad that gmail really dislikes. Possibly this:
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.11?) ([email protected]@213.47.235.169) by radon.swed.at with ESMTPA; 14 May 2015 10:13:58 -0000
Hmm, interesting. I have not changed this mail setup for years. Looks like I have to put on my MTA admin hat and find out ... :D
Thanks,
//richard