igb: add i210/i211 external phy support
Subsystems (2)
cover igb: add i210/i211 external phy support
The i210/i211 can use an external phy and there is support built into igb for several. However if you instead want to use the Linux phydev driver API the igb driver needs to register an MDIO bus with Linux.
This patch series fixes mdio read/write capability for i210/i211 and registers an MDIO bus if the EEPROM is configured with an external phy.
This has only been tested on an i210 with an external phy as that is all I have access to. Testing is needed.
Tim Harvey (3):
net: igb: add i210/i211 support for phy read/write
net: igb: add phy read/write functions that accept phy addr
net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 20 +++- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h | 7 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++----- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.h | 6 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 5 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 1/3 net: igb: add i210/i211 support for phy read/write
The i210/i211 uses the MDICNFG register for the phy address instead of the MDIC register.
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +62 -9
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ out:s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data) {struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy; -u32 i, mdic =0 ; +u32 i, mdicnfg, mdic =0 ;s32 ret_val =0 ;if (offset >MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS ) {
@@ -148,11 +148,25 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data)* Control register. The MAC will take care of interfacing with the * PHY to retrieve the desired data. */ - mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | - (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | - (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +switch (hw->mac.type) { +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (phy->addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); + mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +break ; +default : + mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +break ; + }wr32 (E1000_MDIC , mdic); +wrfl ();/* Poll the ready bit to see if the MDI read completed * Increasing the time out as testing showed failures with
@@ -177,6 +191,18 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) *data = (u16 ) mdic; out: +switch (hw->mac.type) { +/* restore MDICNFG to have phy's addr */ +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (hw->phy.addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); +break ; +default : +break ; + }return ret_val; }
@@ -191,7 +217,7 @@ out:s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data) {struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy; -u32 i, mdic =0 ; +u32 i, mdicnfg, mdic =0 ;s32 ret_val =0 ;if (offset >MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS ) {
@@ -204,12 +230,27 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data)* Control register. The MAC will take care of interfacing with the * PHY to retrieve the desired data. */ - mdic = (((u32 )data) | - (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | - (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | - (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +switch (hw->mac.type) { +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (phy->addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); + mdic = (((u32 )data) | + (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +break ; +default : + mdic = (((u32 )data) | + (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +break ; + }wr32 (E1000_MDIC , mdic); +wrfl ();/* Poll the ready bit to see if the MDI read completed * Increasing the time out as testing showed failures with
@@ -233,6 +274,18 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) } out: +switch (hw->mac.type) { +/* restore MDICNFG to have phy's addr */ +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (hw->phy.addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); +break ; +default : +break ; + }return ret_val; }
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 1/3 net: igb: add i210/i211 support for phy read/write
Quoted 4 lines · Tim Harvey
The i210/i211 uses the MDICNFG register for the phy address instead of the MDIC register.
Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>
This patch probably is not needed. The existing functions should work as long as you have a separate means for updating the PHY addr which should only need to be updated while searching for the PHY, and since the PHY isn't pluggable it should probably be stored in the EEPROM.
Quoted 36 lines
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +13
-4@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ out:s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data) {struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy; -u32 i, mdic =0 ; +u32 i, mdicnfg, mdic =0 ;s32 ret_val =0 ;if (offset >MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS ) {@@ -148,11 +148,25 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data)* Control register. The MAC will take care of interfacing with the * PHY to retrieve the desired data. */ - mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | - (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | - (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +switch (hw->mac.type) { +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (phy->addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); + mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +break ; +default : + mdic = ((offset << E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT) |
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) · line 172
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +5
-0+ (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ)); +break ; + }wr32 (E1000_MDIC , mdic); +wrfl ();/* Poll the ready bit to see if the MDI read completed * Increasing the time out as testing showed failures with
I'm not really a fan of this section of code. Why is it that you need to be able to change the phy address? It should be something that is set once for the device once you have your PHY and stays that way.
Quoted 37 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +14
-5@@ -177,6 +191,18 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) *data = (u16 ) mdic; out: +switch (hw->mac.type) { +/* restore MDICNFG to have phy's addr */ +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (hw->phy.addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); +break ; +default : +break ; + }return ret_val; }@@ -191,7 +217,7 @@ out:s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data) {struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy; -u32 i, mdic =0 ; +u32 i, mdicnfg, mdic =0 ;s32 ret_val =0 ;if (offset >MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS ) {@@ -204,12 +230,27 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data)* Control register. The MAC will take care of interfacing with the * PHY to retrieve the desired data. */ - mdic = (((u32 )data) | - (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | - (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | - (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +switch (hw->mac.type) {
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) · line 243
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +10
-0+case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (phy->addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); + mdic = (((u32 )data) | + (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +break ;
You could just fall though. The area covered by the PHY_SHIFT should be read/only and will not be impacted if any value is placed there.
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) · line 256
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +8
-0+default : + mdic = (((u32 )data) | + (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +break ; + }wr32 (E1000_MDIC , mdic); +wrfl ();/* Poll the ready bit to see if the MDI read completed * Increasing the time out as testing showed failures with
Same thing for this one. You shouldn't need to do anything fancy to write it.
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +5
-0@@ -233,6 +274,18 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) } out: +switch (hw->mac.type) { +/* restore MDICNFG to have phy's addr */ +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG );
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) · line 291
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +7
-0+ mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (hw->phy.addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); +break ; +default : +break ; + }return ret_val; }
This bit doesn't add any value. You could definitely drop this.
PATCH 1/3 net: igb: add i210/i211 support for phy read/write
Quoted 5 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 4 lines · Tim Harvey
The i210/i211 uses the MDICNFG register for the phy address instead of the MDIC register.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>This patch probably is not needed. The existing functions should work as long as you have a separate means for updating the PHY addr which should only need to be updated while searching for the PHY, and since the PHY isn't pluggable it should probably be stored in the EEPROM.
Alexander,
Thanks for the review!
The i210 requires that the PHY address be in the MDICNFG register, whereas other earlier chips supported by the igb driver stored the phy in the MDIC register directly. You are probably thinking this is not necessary because typically you would use flash configuration control words to pre-load this value and that is correct. However, if we are to add support for phylib we need to export functions that allow a phy id to be passed in, and so I'm explicitly setting it up (as it was when the phy address was only in MDIC for earlier chips).
Quoted 49 lines
Quoted 49 lines
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +1
-1@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ out:s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data) {struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy; -u32 i, mdic =0 ; +u32 i, mdicnfg, mdic =0 ;s32 ret_val =0 ;if (offset >MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS ) {@@ -148,11 +148,25 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) * Control register. The MAC will take care of interfacing withthe
* PHY to retrieve the desired data.
*/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +17
-3- mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | - (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | - (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +switch (hw->mac.type) { +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (phy->addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); + mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +break ; +default : + mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +break ; + }wr32 (E1000_MDIC , mdic); +wrfl ();
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
/* Poll the ready bit to see if the MDI read completed
* Increasing the time out as testing showed failures withI'm not really a fan of this section of code. Why is it that you need to be able to change the phy address? It should be something that is set once for the device once you have your PHY and stays that way.
I'm not changing the phy address - I'm putting it in the correct register for the i210/i211.
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 48 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +13
-1@@ -177,6 +191,18 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) *data = (u16 ) mdic; out: +switch (hw->mac.type) { +/* restore MDICNFG to have phy's addr */ +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (hw->phy.addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); +break ; +default : +break ; + }return ret_val; }@@ -191,7 +217,7 @@ out:s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data) {struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy; -u32 i, mdic =0 ; +u32 i, mdicnfg, mdic =0 ;s32 ret_val =0 ;if (offset >MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS ) {@@ -204,12 +230,27 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) * Control register. The MAC will take care of interfacing withthe
* PHY to retrieve the desired data.
*/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +7
-4- mdic = (((u32 )data) | - (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | - (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | - (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +switch (hw->mac.type) { +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (phy->addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg);
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) · line 243
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +4
-0+ mdic = (((u32 )data) | + (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +break ;You could just fall though. The area covered by the
PHY_SHIFTshould be read/only and will not be impacted if any value is placed there.
The i210 Programming Interface document specifies that MDIC[25:21] are 'Reserved' and should be written with 0.
I would tend to agree that these bits are likely ignored on the i210/i211 but I'm just following the documentation here and not chancing it. If its agree'd that I don't need to do this, I can simplify the code by falling through.
I can also rename the mdic to reg and use it for both registers if its desired to not have an additional variable on the stack.
Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +3
-0+default : + mdic = (((u32)data) | + (offset << E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT) |drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) · line 256
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +5
-0+ (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE)); +break ; + }wr32 (E1000_MDIC , mdic); +wrfl ();/* Poll the ready bit to see if the MDI read completed * Increasing the time out as testing showed failures with Same thing for this one. You shouldn't need to do anything fancy to write it.
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +10
-0@@ -233,6 +274,18 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) } out: +switch (hw->mac.type) { +/* restore MDICNFG to have phy's addr */ +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (hw->phy.addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); +break ; +default :
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) · line 207
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +2
-0+break ; + }return ret_val; }This bit doesn't add any value. You could definitely drop this.
This is likely more relevant to the 2nd patch that allows a phy address to be passed in.
Tim
PATCH 1/3 net: igb: add i210/i211 support for phy read/write
Quoted 17 lines · Tim Harvey
Quoted 11 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 4 lines · Tim Harvey
The i210/i211 uses the MDICNFG register for the phy address instead of the MDIC register.
Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>This patch probably is not needed. The existing functions should work as long as you have a separate means for updating the PHY addr which should only need to be updated while searching for the PHY, and since the PHY isn't pluggable it should probably be stored in the EEPROM.
Alexander,
Thanks for the review!
Quoted 8 lines
The i210 requires that the PHY address be in the MDICNFG register, whereas other earlier chips supported by the igb driver stored the phy in the MDIC register directly. You are probably thinking this is not necessary because typically you would use flash configuration control words to pre-load this value and that is correct. However, if we are to add support for phylib we need to export functions that allow a phy id to be passed in, and so I'm explicitly setting it up (as it was when the phy address was only in MDIC for earlier chips).
I think you might be interpreting things a bit to literally. If you are passing only one phy address into the PHY mask which I believe you are via the ~(1 << phy.addr) call in your third patch there isn't much point in writing the PHY address since you are already locked the phylib into only supporting one PHY address.
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 48 lines
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +1
-1@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ out:s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data) {struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy; -u32 i, mdic =0 ; +u32 i, mdicnfg, mdic =0 ;s32 ret_val =0 ;if (offset >MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS ) {@@ -148,11 +148,25 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) * Control register. The MAC will take care of interfacing withthe
* PHY to retrieve the desired data.
*/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +17
-3- mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | - (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | - (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +switch (hw->mac.type) { +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (phy->addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); + mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +break ; +default : + mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ )); +break ; + }wr32 (E1000_MDIC , mdic); +wrfl ();
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
/* Poll the ready bit to see if the MDI read completed
* Increasing the time out as testing showed failures withI'm not really a fan of this section of code. Why is it that you need to be able to change the phy address? It should be something that is set once for the device once you have your PHY and stays that way.
I'm not changing the phy address - I'm putting it in the correct register for the i210/i211.
This code was kind of an undocumented hack. Basically with the phy addr bits of the mdic register being reserved zero it didn't actually hurt things to write to them as the hardware has ignored them since the 82850 if I recall correctly.
Quoted 54 lines
Quoted 46 lines
Quoted 46 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +13
-1@@ -177,6 +191,18 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) *data = (u16 ) mdic; out: +switch (hw->mac.type) { +/* restore MDICNFG to have phy's addr */ +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (hw->phy.addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); +break ; +default : +break ; + }return ret_val; }@@ -191,7 +217,7 @@ out:s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data) {struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy; -u32 i, mdic =0 ; +u32 i, mdicnfg, mdic =0 ;s32 ret_val =0 ;if (offset >MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS ) {@@ -204,12 +230,27 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) * Control register. The MAC will take care of interfacing withthe
* PHY to retrieve the desired data.
*/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +6
-4- mdic = (((u32 )data) | - (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | - (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | - (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +switch (hw->mac.type) { +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (phy->addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT );Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) · line 243
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +5
-0+wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); + mdic = (((u32 )data) | + (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +break ;You could just fall though. The area covered by the
PHY_SHIFTshould be read/only and will not be impacted if any value is placed there.
Quoted 2 lines
The i210 Programming Interface document specifies that MDIC[25:21] are 'Reserved' and should be written with 0.
Yes, int this case the "should" is not a must, and writing something to it has no effect. That is why the legacy code was left in place to write to the register.
Quoted 7 lines
I would tend to agree that these bits are likely ignored on the i210/i211 but I'm just following the documentation here and not chancing it. If its agree'd that I don't need to do this, I can simplify the code by falling through.
I can also rename the mdic to reg and use it for both registers if its desired to not have an additional variable on the stack.
The fact is this was how it was done before you modified the code. If anything changing it at this point risks introducing regressions. If you look in the documentation the MDICNFG register has been around since the 82580. There was one errata against the 82580 that required rewriting the register after reset, but the implementations of hardware since then have wanted to leave this register value static.
Quoted 39 lines
Quoted 31 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) · line 256
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +8
-0+default : + mdic = (((u32 )data) | + (offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | + (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | + (E1000_MDIC_OP_WRITE )); +break ; + }wr32 (E1000_MDIC , mdic); +wrfl ();/* Poll the ready bit to see if the MDI read completed * Increasing the time out as testing showed failures with Same thing for this one. You shouldn't need to do anything fancy to write it.
Quoted 14 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +9
-0@@ -233,6 +274,18 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) } out: +switch (hw->mac.type) { +/* restore MDICNFG to have phy's addr */ +case e1000_i210: +case e1000_i211: + mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); + mdicnfg |= (hw->phy.addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); +wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); +break ;Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) · line 207
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +3
-0+default : +break ; + }return ret_val; }This bit doesn't add any value. You could definitely drop this.
Quoted 4 lines
This is likely more relevant to the 2nd patch that allows a phy address to be passed in.
Tim
What I was trying to get at is in the 3rd patch you pretty much locked down the PHY address by setting a mask that excludes everything but the address contained in the MDICNFG register. So instead of rewriting the register every time you access the PHY you could probably just skip these first two patches, and ignore the PHY address passed to you from phylib.
- Alex
PATCH 2/3 net: igb: add phy read/write functions that accept phy addr
In reply to Tim HarveyAdd igb_write_reg_gs40g/igb_read_reg_gs40g that can be passed a phy address. The existing igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g/igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g become wrappers to this function.
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 4 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.h | 6 ++- 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +2 -2
@@ -2129,7 +2129,7 @@ static s32 igb_read_phy_reg_82580(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data)if (ret_val) goto out; - ret_val =igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (hw, offset, data); + ret_val =igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (hw, hw->phy.addr, offset, data); hw->phy.ops.release (hw);
@@ -2154,7 +2154,7 @@ static s32 igb_write_phy_reg_82580(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data)if (ret_val) goto out; - ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, offset, data); + ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, hw->phy.addr, offset, data); hw->phy.ops.release (hw);
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +50 -20
168 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.h +4 -2
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ s32 igb_phy_has_link(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 iterations,void igb_power_up_phy_copper (struct e1000_hw *hw);void igb_power_down_phy_copper (struct e1000_hw *hw);s32 igb_phy_init_script_igp3 (struct e1000_hw *hw); -s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data); -s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data); +s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 *data); +s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 data);s32 igb_read_phy_reg_i2c (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data);s32 igb_write_phy_reg_i2c (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data);s32 igb_read_sfp_data_byte (struct e1000_hw *hw,u16 offset,u8 *data);
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ s32 igb_phy_force_speed_duplex_82580(struct e1000_hw *hw);s32 igb_get_cable_length_82580 (struct e1000_hw *hw);s32 igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data);s32 igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data); +s32 igb_read_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 *data); +s32 igb_write_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 data);s32 igb_check_polarity_m88 (struct e1000_hw *hw);/* IGP01E1000 Specific Registers */
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 2/3 net: igb: add phy read/write functions that accept phy addr
Quoted 5 lines · Tim Harvey
Add igb_write_reg_gs40g/igb_read_reg_gs40g that can be passed a phy address. The existing igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g/igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g become wrappers to this function.
Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>
I'm pretty sure this isn't useful as well. You really should not be doing any phy address/MDICNFG manipulation in these calls.
Quoted 238 lines
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 4 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.h | 6 ++- 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +2
-2@@ -2129,7 +2129,7 @@ static s32 igb_read_phy_reg_82580(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data)if (ret_val) goto out; - ret_val =igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (hw, offset, data); + ret_val =igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (hw, hw->phy.addr, offset, data); hw->phy.ops.release (hw);@@ -2154,7 +2154,7 @@ static s32 igb_write_phy_reg_82580(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data)if (ret_val) goto out; - ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, offset, data); + ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, hw->phy.addr, offset, data); hw->phy.ops.release (hw);drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c +50
-20@@ -132,9 +132,8 @@ out:* Reads the MDI control regsiter in the PHY at offset and stores the * information read to data. **/ -s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data) +s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 *data) { -struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy;u32 i, mdicnfg, mdic =0 ;s32 ret_val =0 ;@@ -153,14 +152,14 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data)case e1000_i211: mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); mdicnfg &= ~(E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ); - mdicnfg |= (phy->addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ); + mdicnfg |= (addr <<E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT );wr32 (E1000_MDICNFG , mdicnfg); mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ ));break ;default : mdic = ((offset <<E1000_MDIC_REG_SHIFT ) | - (phy->addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | + (addr <<E1000_MDIC_PHY_SHIFT ) | (E1000_MDIC_OP_READ ));break ; }@@ -214,9 +213,8 @@ out:* * Writes data to MDI control register in the PHY at offset. **/ -s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data) +s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 data) { -struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy;u32 i, mdicnfg, mdic =0 ;s32 ret_val =0 ;@@ -464,7 +462,7 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_igp(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) goto out;if (offset >MAX_PHY_MULTI_PAGE_REG ) { - ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, + ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, hw->phy.addr,IGP01E1000_PHY_PAGE_SELECT , (u16 )offset);if (ret_val) {@@ -473,8 +471,8 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_igp(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data) } } - ret_val =igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (hw,MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS & offset, - data); + ret_val =igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (hw, hw->phy.addr, +MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS & offset, data); hw->phy.ops.release (hw);@@ -503,7 +501,7 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_igp(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) goto out;if (offset >MAX_PHY_MULTI_PAGE_REG ) { - ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, + ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, hw->phy.addr,IGP01E1000_PHY_PAGE_SELECT , (u16 )offset);if (ret_val) {@@ -512,8 +510,8 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_igp(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data) } } - ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw,MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS & offset, - data); + ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, hw->phy.addr, +MAX_PHY_REG_ADDRESS & offset, data); hw->phy.ops.release (hw);@@ -2464,8 +2462,9 @@ out: }/** -* igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g - Write GS40G PHY register +* igb_write_reg_gs40g - Write GS40G PHY register * @hw: pointer to the HW structure +* @addr: phy address to write to * @offset: lower half is register offset to write to * upper half is page to use. * @data: data to write at register offset @@ -2473,7 +2472,7 @@ out:* Acquires semaphore, if necessary, then writes the data to PHY register * at the offset. Release any acquired semaphores before exiting. **/ -s32 igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data) +s32 igb_write_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 data) {s32 ret_val;u16 page = offset >>GS40G_PAGE_SHIFT ;@@ -2483,10 +2482,10 @@ s32 igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 data)if (ret_val)return ret_val; - ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw,GS40G_PAGE_SELECT , page); + ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, addr,GS40G_PAGE_SELECT , page);if (ret_val) goto release; - ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, offset, data); + ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, addr, offset, data); release: hw->phy.ops.release (hw);@@ -2494,8 +2493,24 @@ release: }/** -* igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g - Read GS40G PHY register +* igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g - Write GS40G PHY register +* @hw: pointer to the HW structure +* @offset: lower half is register offset to write to +* upper half is page to use. +* @data: data to write at register offset +* +* Acquires semaphore, if necessary, then writes the data to PHY register +* at the offset. Release any acquired semaphores before exiting. +**/ +s32 igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data) +{ +return igb_write_reg_gs40g (hw, hw->phy.addr, offset, data); +} + +/** +* igb_read_reg_gs40g - Read GS40G PHY register * @hw: pointer to the HW structure +* @addr: phy address to read from * @offset: lower half is register offset to read to * upper half is page to use. * @data: data to read at register offset @@ -2503,7 +2518,7 @@ release:* Acquires semaphore, if necessary, then reads the data in the PHY register * at the offset. Release any acquired semaphores before exiting. **/ -s32 igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data) +s32 igb_read_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 *data) {s32 ret_val;u16 page = offset >>GS40G_PAGE_SHIFT ;@@ -2513,10 +2528,10 @@ s32 igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 offset, u16 *data)if (ret_val)return ret_val; - ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw,GS40G_PAGE_SELECT , page); + ret_val =igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (hw, addr,GS40G_PAGE_SELECT , page);if (ret_val) goto release; - ret_val =igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (hw, offset, data); + ret_val =igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (hw, addr, offset, data); release: hw->phy.ops.release (hw);@@ -2524,6 +2539,21 @@ release: }/** +* igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g - Read GS40G PHY register +* @hw: pointer to the HW structure +* @offset: lower half is register offset to read to +* upper half is page to use. +* @data: data to read at register offset +* +* Acquires semaphore, if necessary, then reads the data in the PHY register +* at the offset. Release any acquired semaphores before exiting. +**/ +s32 igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data) +{ +return igb_read_reg_gs40g (hw, hw->phy.addr, offset, data); +} + +/** * igb_set_master_slave_mode - Setup PHY for Master/slave mode * @hw: pointer to the HW structure * drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.h +4
-2@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ s32 igb_phy_has_link(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 iterations,void igb_power_up_phy_copper (struct e1000_hw *hw);void igb_power_down_phy_copper (struct e1000_hw *hw);s32 igb_phy_init_script_igp3 (struct e1000_hw *hw); -s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data); -s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data); +s32 igb_read_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 *data); +s32 igb_write_phy_reg_mdic (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 data);s32 igb_read_phy_reg_i2c (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data);s32 igb_write_phy_reg_i2c (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data);s32 igb_read_sfp_data_byte (struct e1000_hw *hw,u16 offset,u8 *data);@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ s32 igb_phy_force_speed_duplex_82580(struct e1000_hw *hw);s32 igb_get_cable_length_82580 (struct e1000_hw *hw);s32 igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 *data);s32 igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u32 offset,u16 data); +s32 igb_read_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 *data); +s32 igb_write_reg_gs40g (struct e1000_hw *hw,u8 addr,u32 offset,u16 data);s32 igb_check_polarity_m88 (struct e1000_hw *hw);/* IGP01E1000 Specific Registers */
PATCH 2/3 net: igb: add phy read/write functions that accept phy addr
Quoted 8 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 7 lines · Tim Harvey
Add igb_write_reg_gs40g/igb_read_reg_gs40g that can be passed a phy address.
The existing igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g/igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g become wrappers
to this function.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>I'm pretty sure this isn't useful as well. You really should not be doing any phy address/MDICNFG manipulation in these calls.
Alexander,
This patch is to support phylib which requires mdio functions that can pass a phy address rather than take it from the e1000_phy_info structure.
Tim
PATCH 2/3 net: igb: add phy read/write functions that accept phy addr
Quoted 13 lines · Tim Harvey
Quoted 11 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 7 lines · Tim Harvey
Add igb_write_reg_gs40g/igb_read_reg_gs40g that can be passed a phy address.
The existing igb_write_phy_reg_gs40g/igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g become wrappers
to this function.Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>I'm pretty sure this isn't useful as well. You really should not be doing any phy address/MDICNFG manipulation in these calls.
Quoted 7 lines
Alexander,
This patch is to support phylib which requires mdio functions that can pass a phy address rather than take it from the
e1000_phy_infostructure.Tim
Tim,
You only require PHY address support if you support multiple addresses. From what I can tell you don't. You lock it down to only one address via the mask field when you are initializing the phylib structures.
- Alex
PATCH 3/3 net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
In reply to Tim HarveyIf an i210 is configured for 1000BASE-BX link_mode and has an external phy specified, then register an mii bus using the external phy address as a mask.
An i210 hooked to an external standard phy will be configured with a link_mode of SGMII in which case phy ops will be configured and used internal in the igb driver for link status. However, in certain cases one might be using a backplane SerDes connection to something that talks on the mdio bus but is not a standard phy, such as a switch. In this case by registering an mdio bus a phy driver can manage the device.
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 16 +++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h | 7 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +16 -0
@@ -598,13 +598,26 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)switch (link_mode) {case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_1000BASE_KX : hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_internal_serdes; +if (igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575 (hw)) { +u32 mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + + mdicnfg &=E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ; + hw->phy.addr = mdicnfg >>E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ; +hw_dbg ("1000BASE_KX w/ external MDIO device at 0x%x\n" , + hw->phy.addr); + }else { +hw_dbg ("1000BASE_KX" ); + }break ;case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_SGMII :/* Get phy control interface type set (MDIO vs. I2C)*/ if (igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575 (hw)) { hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_copper; dev_spec->sgmii_active = true; +hw_dbg ("SGMII with external MDIO PHY" );break ; + }else { +hw_dbg ("SGMII with external I2C PHY" ); }/* fall through for I2C based SGMII */ case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_PCIE_SERDES :
@@ -621,8 +634,11 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw) hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_copper; dev_spec->sgmii_active = true; } +hw_dbg ("SERDES with external SFP" );break ; + }else { +hw_dbg ("SERDES" ); }/* do not change link mode for 100BaseFX */
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h +7 -0
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/netdevice.h> +#include <linux/phy.h> #include "e1000_regs.h" #include "e1000_defines.h"
@@ -543,6 +544,12 @@ struct e1000_hw {struct e1000_mbx_info mbx;struct e1000_host_mng_dhcp_cookie mng_cookie; +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +/* Phylib and MDIO interface */ +struct mii_bus *mii_bus; +struct phy_device *phy_dev; +phy_interface_t phy_interface; +#endif union {struct e1000_dev_spec_82575 _82575; } dev_spec;
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +158 -5
209 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 3/3 net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
Quoted 4 lines · Tim Harvey
If an i210 is configured for 1000BASE-BX
link_modeand has an external phy specified, then register an mii bus using the external phy address as a mask.
Quoted 8 lines
An i210 hooked to an external standard phy will be configured with a
link_modeof SGMII in which case phy ops will be configured and used internal in the igb driver for link status. However, in certain cases one might be using a backplane SerDes connection to something that talks on the mdio bus but is not a standard phy, such as a switch. In this case by registering an mdio bus a phy driver can manage the device.Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>
So I think I am staring to see a pattern here between the i210 and the i354 it looks like the EEPROMs for these interfaces are not getting set up correctly. Unfortunately for the i210 you cannot change the EEPROM from ethtool so you would need to work out with your manufacturer how to get that fixed for your device.
As far as the code below I think there may be an easy way to work around a bunch of this code. The quick trick for most of this would be to update igb_init_phy_params_82575 to return a new value, maybe make up something like E1000_ERR_PHY_UNKNOWN when the PHY ID is unrecognized. Then you could add the phylib code as a handler for if you encounter that error code.
Also in terms of naming I would recommend sticking with one convention.
Either igb_mdio_ or igb_mii_ for all of these functions. It is kind
of confusing to be switching back and forth and I don't really see the point of adding the "enet" to the prefixes.
Quoted 15 lines
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 16 +++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h | 7 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +1
-0@@ -598,13 +598,26 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)switch (link_mode) {case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_1000BASE_KX : hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_internal_serdes; +if (igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575 (hw)) {
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw) · line 611
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +9
-0+u32 mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + + mdicnfg &=E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ; + hw->phy.addr = mdicnfg >>E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ; +hw_dbg ("1000BASE_KX w/ external MDIO device at 0x%x\n" , + hw->phy.addr); + }else { +hw_dbg ("1000BASE_KX" ); + }break ;
You should not be running SGMII under KX mode. If you are then you have an EEPROM bug. The correct link mode is SGMII below. Unfortunately you would need to check with your vendor on that one as I believe the EEPROMs for i210/i211 parts are not writable via ethtool.
As for a hack workaround for now what you could do is use a !igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575() check to determine if you want to break, or to clear the LINK_MODE field and rewrite it as SGMII and then just fall though to SGMII which will help to clear up many issues you are probably seeing. You might keep that as a separate local patch until you can get the EEPROM issue resolved.
As far as pulling the phy.addr value that should be taken care of by igb_get_phy_id_82575 if the link mode is correctly updated in the EEPROM to LINK_MODE_SGMII.
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw) · line 623
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +3
-0case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_SGMII :/* Get phy control interface type set (MDIO vs. I2C)*/ if (igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575 (hw)) { hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_copper; dev_spec->sgmii_active = true; +hw_dbg ("SGMII with external MDIO PHY" );break ; + }else { +hw_dbg ("SGMII with external I2C PHY" ); }/* fall through for I2C based SGMII */ case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_PCIE_SERDES :
These hw_dbg messages can probably be dropped since they aren't adding much value.
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw) · line 644
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +3
-0@@ -621,8 +634,11 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw) hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_copper; dev_spec->sgmii_active = true; } +hw_dbg ("SERDES with external SFP" );break ; + }else { +hw_dbg ("SERDES" ); }/* do not change link mode for 100BaseFX */
Same for these.
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h +1
-0@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/netdevice.h> +#include <linux/phy.h> #include "e1000_regs.h" #include "e1000_defines.h" @@ -543,6 +544,12 @@ struct e1000_hw {struct e1000_mbx_info mbx;struct e1000_host_mng_dhcp_cookie mng_cookie;
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h struct e1000_hw { · line 555
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h +6
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +/* Phylib and MDIO interface */ +struct mii_bus *mii_bus; +struct phy_device *phy_dev; +phy_interface_t phy_interface; +#endif union {struct e1000_dev_spec_82575 _82575; } dev_spec;
Just to save the Intel guys a ton of grief you may want to consider moving these into the igb_adapter struct instead of the e1000_hw struct.
The fact is these are all Linux specific interfaces and the e1000_hw
is meant to be more-or-less OS agnostic.
Quoted 19 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +4
-0@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@#include <linux/if_vlan.h> #include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h> +#include <linux/phy.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/ip.h> @@ -2223,6 +2224,121 @@ static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter)return status; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +static int igb_enet_mdio_read (struct mii_bus *bus,int mii_id,int regnum) +{
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter) · line 2239
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +10
-0+struct e1000_hw *hw = bus->priv; +u16 out; +int err; + + err =igb_read_reg_gs40g (hw, mii_id, regnum, &out); +if (err) +return err; +return out; +} +
I'm not really a fan of the igb_enet_ stuff, why not just igb_mdio_read, igb_mdio_write, etc..?
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter) · line 2247
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +8
-0+static int igb_enet_mdio_write (struct mii_bus *bus,int mii_id,int regnum, +u16 val) +{ +struct e1000_hw *hw = bus->priv; + +return igb_write_reg_gs40g (hw, mii_id, regnum, val); +} +
There shouldn't be any need to actually pass the PHY address assuming you let the driver code take care of pulling the address of the PHY from the EEPROM before hand. As such you can probably just not use the mii_id value.
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter) · line 2253
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +6
-0+static int igb_enet_mdio_reset (struct mii_bus *bus) +{ +usleep_range (1000 ,2000 ); +return 0 ; +} +
Is there a reason for having a sleep here if you aren't doing anything?
You could probably just not define this since it doesn't do anything.
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter) · line 2257
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +4
-0+static void igb_enet_mii_link (struct net_device *netdev) +{ +} +
Seems like there should probably be something here, but I don't know enough about phylib yet to say what.
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +5
-0+/* Probe the mdio bus for phys and connect them */ +static int igb_enet_mii_probe (struct net_device *netdev) +{ +struct igb_adapter *adapter =netdev_priv (netdev); +struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter) · line 2272
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +10
-0+struct phy_device *phy_dev =NULL ; +int phy_id; + +/* check for attached phy */ +for (phy_id =0 ; (phy_id <PHY_MAX_ADDR ); phy_id++) { +if (hw->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_id]) { + phy_dev = hw->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_id]; +break ; + } + }
There is code that should have already figured this out in the driver. We just need to check the PHY addr after get_invarians has been called, assuming the EEPROM is correct. So you should be able to just get the phy.addr from the e1000_hw struct.
Quoted 76 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +69
-0+if (!phy_dev) { +netdev_err (netdev,"no PHY found\n" ); +return -ENODEV ; + } + + hw->phy_interface =PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII ; + phy_dev =phy_connect (netdev,dev_name (&phy_dev->dev), + igb_enet_mii_link, hw->phy_interface); +if (IS_ERR (phy_dev)) { +netdev_err (netdev,"could not attach to PHY\n" ); +return PTR_ERR (phy_dev); + } + + hw->phy_dev = phy_dev; +netdev_info (netdev,"igb PHY driver [%s] (mii_bus:phy_addr=%s)\n" , + hw->phy_dev->drv->name,dev_name (&hw->phy_dev->dev)); + + return 0; +} + +/* Create and register mdio bus */ +static int igb_enet_mii_init (struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ +struct mii_bus *mii_bus; +struct net_device *netdev =pci_get_drvdata (pdev); +struct igb_adapter *adapter =netdev_priv (netdev); +struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; +int err; + + mii_bus =mdiobus_alloc (); +if (!mii_bus) { + err = -ENOMEM ; + goto err_out; + } + + mii_bus->name ="igb_enet_mii_bus" ; + mii_bus->read = igb_enet_mdio_read; + mii_bus->write = igb_enet_mdio_write; + mii_bus->reset = igb_enet_mdio_reset; +snprintf (mii_bus->id,MII_BUS_ID_SIZE ,"%s-%x" , +pci_name (pdev), hw->device_id +1 ); + mii_bus->priv = hw; + mii_bus->parent = &pdev->dev; + mii_bus->phy_mask = ~(1 << hw->phy.addr); + + err =mdiobus_register (mii_bus); +if (err) { +netdev_err (netdev,"failed to register mii_bus: %d\n" , err); + goto err_out_free_mdiobus; + } + hw->mii_bus = mii_bus; + +return 0 ; + +err_out_free_mdiobus: +mdiobus_free (mii_bus); +err_out: +return err; +} + +static void igb_enet_mii_remove (struct e1000_hw *hw) +{ +if (hw->mii_bus) { +mdiobus_unregister (hw->mii_bus); +mdiobus_free (hw->mii_bus); + } +} +#endif /* CONFIG_PHYLIB */ +/** * igb_probe - Device Initialization Routine * @pdev: PCI device information struct @@ -2645,6 +2761,13 @@ static int igb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) } }pm_runtime_put_noidle (&pdev->dev);
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static int igb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) · line 2773
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +7
-0+ +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +/* create and register the mdio bus if using ext phy */ +if (rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ) &E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO ) +igb_enet_mii_init (pdev); +#endif +return 0 ; err_register:
The MDICNFG register doesn't exist for all devices as I recall. What you may want to do is make enabling the mii_bus optional dependent on get_invariants returning an error that the PHY is not recognized.
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static void igb_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) · line 2920
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +4
-0@@ -2788,6 +2911,10 @@ static void igb_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;pm_runtime_get_noresume (&pdev->dev); +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +if (rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ) &E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO ) +igb_enet_mii_remove (hw); +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_IGB_HWMON igb_sysfs_exit (adapter);#endif
Same thing here. I would say what you could do is just check to see if a mii_bus is allocated and if so remove it. You could probably push the check inside of igb_mii_remove.
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static int __igb_open(struct net_device *netdev, bool resuming) · line 3231
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +6
-0@@ -3093,6 +3220,12 @@ static int __igb_open(struct net_device *netdev, bool resuming)if (!resuming)pm_runtime_put (&pdev->dev); +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +/* Probe and connect to PHY if using ext phy */ +if (rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ) &E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO ) +igb_enet_mii_probe (netdev); +#endif +/* start the watchdog. */ hw->mac.get_link_status =1 ;schedule_work (&adapter->watchdog_task);
Same here, use the existance of a mii_bus, not the register check.
Quoted 38 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +18
-5@@ -7127,21 +7260,41 @@ void igb_alloc_rx_buffers(struct igb_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count)static int igb_mii_ioctl (struct net_device *netdev,struct ifreq *ifr,int cmd) {struct igb_adapter *adapter =netdev_priv (netdev); +struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;struct mii_ioctl_data *data =if_mii (ifr); -if (adapter->hw.phy.media_type != e1000_media_type_copper) +if (adapter->hw.phy.media_type != e1000_media_type_copper && + !(rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ) &E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO ))return -EOPNOTSUPP ;switch (cmd) {case SIOCGMIIPHY : - data->phy_id = adapter->hw.phy.addr; + data->phy_id = hw->phy.addr;break ;case SIOCGMIIREG : -if (igb_read_phy_reg (&adapter->hw, data->reg_num &0x1F , - &data->val_out)) -return -EIO ; +if (hw->mac.type == e1000_i210 || hw->mac.type == e1000_i211) { +if (igb_read_reg_gs40g (&adapter->hw, data->phy_id, + data->reg_num &0x1F , + &data->val_out)) +return -EIO ; + }else { +if (igb_read_phy_reg (&adapter->hw, data->reg_num &0x1F , + &data->val_out)) +return -EIO ; + }break ;case SIOCSMIIREG : +if (hw->mac.type == e1000_i210 || hw->mac.type == e1000_i211) { +if (igb_write_reg_gs40g (hw, data->phy_id, + data->reg_num &0x1F , + data->val_in))
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c void igb_alloc_rx_buffers(struct igb_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count) · line 7300
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +7
-0+return -EIO ; + }else { +if (igb_write_phy_reg (hw, data->reg_num &0x1F , + data->val_in)) +return -EIO ; + } +break ;default :return -EOPNOTSUPP ; }
These changes just shouldn't be needed. I'd say they could be dropped.
The phy_id should be static and configured by the hardware before the
driver is even loaded.
PATCH 3/3 net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
Quoted 17 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 5 lines · Tim Harvey
If an i210 is configured for 1000BASE-BX
link_modeand has an external phy specified, then register an mii bus using the external phy address as a mask.Quoted 8 lines
An i210 hooked to an external standard phy will be configured with a
link_modeof SGMII in which case phy ops will be configured and used internal in the igb driver for link status. However, in certain cases one might be using a backplane SerDes connection to something that talks on the mdio bus but is not a standard phy, such as a switch. In this case by registering an mdio bus a phy driver can manage the device.Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>
Quoted 5 lines
So I think I am staring to see a pattern here between the i210 and the i354 it looks like the EEPROMs for these interfaces are not getting set up correctly. Unfortunately for the i210 you cannot change the EEPROM from ethtool so you would need to work out with your manufacturer how to get that fixed for your device.
Alexander,
Thanks for the review!
I think much of my patchset is more clear if I give a bit more background of how we use the i210 on our GW16083
(http://www.gateworks.com/product/item/ventana-gw16083-mezzanine).
This board is an i210 connected to a Marvell MV88E6176 6-port switch via SGMII and MDIO. The MV88E6176 uses MDIO for its control access and instead of having a register interface that utilizes a single phy address, it uses several addresses between 0x10 and 0x1d. The link between the two chips is thus 1gbps full-duplex without the need of link management (why I consider it phy-less).
I configured the EEPROM with the following details:
- link-mode: 1000BASE-KX for phy-less operation
- external-mdio
- phy_addr 0x10 (the first one used by the MV88E6176 and the one that
maps more closely to standard phy registers than any others)
- device_id: 0x157C (SerDes flashless - looking back perhaps this
should have been 0x1537 but then this isn't used in igb to distinguish any details so its a don't-care)
The i210 datasheet defines the following link-modes:
0 - Internal PHY
1 - 1000BASE-KX
2 - SGMII
3 - SerDes/1000BASE-BX
The differences are still not crystal clear to me and is really all about how the igb driver uses this value. When I wrote support for the GW16083 a year ago I sent out a query to the e1000-devel list regarding link_mode and how I should proceed but I received no reply's
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.e1000.devel/13942) and unfortunately am only now getting back to a point of having any bandwidth to try to mainline my changes.
I would have to dig a bit to find where I got this info but my understanding was that 1000BASE-KX was for fixed 1gbps 'phy-less' SerDes links (requiring no link negotiation) and because I have the i210 connected in to a port on the MV88E6176 that is always 1gpbs full-duplex this made sense to me to let the driver treat it as 'phy-less'.
Quoted 6 lines
As far as the code below I think there may be an easy way to work around a bunch of this code. The quick trick for most of this would be to update
igb_init_phy_params_82575to return a new value, maybe make up something likeE1000_ERR_PHY_UNKNOWNwhen the PHY ID is unrecognized. Then you could add the phylib code as a handler for if you encounter that error code.
Are you sure this shouldn't be based off of link mode? It seems to me that if your link-mode indicates an external phy then this is exactly when you would want to register an mii bus with phylib. However, also doing so as a fallback if PHY ID can't be recognized also makes sense in general for perhaps boards with mis-programmed EEPROM's.
Quoted 5 lines
Also in terms of naming I would recommend sticking with one convention. Either
igb_mdio_origb_mii_for all of these functions. It is kind of confusing to be switching back and forth and I don't really see the point of adding the "enet" to the prefixes.
sure - I saw your comment about getting rid of the igb_enet notation and I can do this in a next-rev patch.
Quoted 37 lines
Quoted 20 lines
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 16 +++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h | 7 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +2
-0@@ -598,13 +598,26 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)switch (link_mode) {case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_1000BASE_KX : hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_internal_serdes; +if (igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575 (hw)) { +u32 mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG );drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw · line 613
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +8
-0+ + mdicnfg &=E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ; + hw->phy.addr = mdicnfg >>E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ; + hw_dbg("1000BASE_KX w/ external MDIO device at 0x%x\n", + hw->phy.addr); + }else { +hw_dbg ("1000BASE_KX" ); + }break ;You should not be running SGMII under KX mode. If you are then you have an EEPROM bug. The correct link mode is SGMII below. Unfortunately you would need to check with your vendor on that one as I believe the EEPROMs for i210/i211 parts are not writable via ethtool.
Quoted 6 lines
As for a hack workaround for now what you could do is use a !igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575() check to determine if you want to break, or to clear the
LINK_MODEfield and rewrite it as SGMII and then just fall though to SGMII which will help to clear up many issues you are probably seeing. You might keep that as a separate local patch until you can get the EEPROM issue resolved.
I certainly hope this isn't considered an EEPROM programming issue because at the time I could get no clarification from the community or my Intel FAE on what mode we should be using (the FAE understandably likely didn't know because this is an implementation detail within the driver the way I see it).
We have been shipping boards for a year supported by a phylib driver and it would not be easy to field update these because the i210 nvram is only supported via the non-redistributable licensed eepromARMtool (yuck!). One of the key U-Boot developers tried to get Intel to allow him to add source to U-Boot for EEPROM programming and was denied. (again... yuck!).
Quoted 35 lines
As far as pulling the phy.addr value that should be taken care of by
igb_get_phy_id_82575if the link mode is correctly updated in the EEPROM toLINK_MODE_SGMII.Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +3
-0case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_SGMII :/* Get phy control interface type set (MDIO vs. I2C)*/ if (igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575 (hw)) { hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_copper; dev_spec->sgmii_active = true; +hw_dbg ("SGMII with external MDIO PHY" );break ; + }else { +hw_dbg ("SGMII with external I2C PHY" ); }Quoted 2 lines
/* fall through for I2C based SGMII */ case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_PCIE_SERDES:These
hw_dbgmessages can probably be dropped since they aren't adding much value.Quoted 13 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +3
-0@@ -621,8 +634,11 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw) hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_copper; dev_spec->sgmii_active = true; } +hw_dbg ("SERDES with external SFP" );break ; + }else { +hw_dbg ("SERDES" ); }
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
/* do not change link mode for 100BaseFX */Same for these.
ok
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h +1
-0@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/netdevice.h> +#include <linux/phy.h> #include "e1000_regs.h" #include "e1000_defines.h" @@ -543,6 +544,12 @@ struct e1000_hw {struct e1000_mbx_info mbx;struct e1000_host_mng_dhcp_cookie mng_cookie;
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h struct e1000_hw { · line 555
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h +6
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +/* Phylib and MDIO interface */ +struct mii_bus *mii_bus; +struct phy_device *phy_dev; +phy_interface_t phy_interface; +#endif union {struct e1000_dev_spec_82575 _82575; } dev_spec;Just to save the Intel guys a ton of grief you may want to consider moving these into the
igb_adapterstruct instead of thee1000_hwstruct. The fact is these are all Linux specific interfaces and thee1000_hwis meant to be more-or-less OS agnostic.
ok
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 30 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +10
-0@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@#include <linux/if_vlan.h> #include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h> +#include <linux/phy.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/ip.h> @@ -2223,6 +2224,121 @@ static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter)return status; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +static int igb_enet_mdio_read (struct mii_bus *bus,int mii_id,int regnum) +{ +struct e1000_hw *hw = bus->priv; +u16 out; +int err; + + err =igb_read_reg_gs40g (hw, mii_id, regnum, &out); +if (err)
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter) · line 2239
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +4
-0+return err; +return out; +} +I'm not really a fan of the
igb_enet_stuff, why not justigb_mdio_read,igb_mdio_write, etc..?
sure, I can rename them.
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter) · line 2247
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +8
-0+static int igb_enet_mdio_write (struct mii_bus *bus,int mii_id,int regnum, +u16 val) +{ +struct e1000_hw *hw = bus->priv; + +return igb_write_reg_gs40g (hw, mii_id, regnum, val); +} +There shouldn't be any need to actually pass the PHY address assuming you let the driver code take care of pulling the address of the PHY from the EEPROM before hand. As such you can probably just not use the
mii_idvalue.
Again, the reason for not using the address from the EEPROM is this use case where there is not a single phy address. This is also why I'm patching the mdio read/write functions to take a parameter instead of using the internal value (and creating wrappers for when they are used internally in igb).
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter) · line 2253
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +6
-0+static int igb_enet_mdio_reset (struct mii_bus *bus) +{ +usleep_range (1000 ,2000 ); +return 0 ; +} +Is there a reason for having a sleep here if you aren't doing anything? You could probably just not define this since it doesn't do anything.
I can drop this - I think I may have been trying to meet some delay spec after reset but since as you say this doesn't actually reset something it shouldn't go here anyway.
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter *adapter) · line 2257
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +4
-0+static void igb_enet_mii_link (struct net_device *netdev) +{ +} +Seems like there should probably be something here, but I don't know enough about phylib yet to say what.
I'm not sure either. Perhaps someone with more knowledge of phylib can comment.
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +13
-0+/* Probe the mdio bus for phys and connect them */ +static int igb_enet_mii_probe (struct net_device *netdev) +{ +struct igb_adapter *adapter =netdev_priv (netdev); +struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; +struct phy_device *phy_dev =NULL ; +int phy_id; + +/* check for attached phy */ +for (phy_id =0 ; (phy_id <PHY_MAX_ADDR ); phy_id++) { +if (hw->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_id]) { + phy_dev = hw->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_id]; +break ;
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static s32 igb_init_i2c(struct igb_adapter · line 2275
Quoted 2 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +2
-0+ } + }There is code that should have already figured this out in the driver. We just need to check the PHY addr after
get_invarianshas been called, assuming the EEPROM is correct. So you should be able to just get the phy.addr from thee1000_hwstruct.
It is true that in igb_enet_mii_init() where the mii bus is registered with phylib that I set the phy_mask to include only the phy address from the eeprom. In my case I put 0x10 in the EEPROM as the phy address as that is the first phy address that the switch responds to and so I use that as a way to detect the phy.
I can remove the loop and just set phy_dev =
hw->mii_bus->phy_map[hw->phy.addr] in this case.
Quoted 118 lines
Quoted 89 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +48
-0+if (!phy_dev) { +netdev_err (netdev,"no PHY found\n" ); +return -ENODEV ; + } + + hw->phy_interface =PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII ; + phy_dev =phy_connect (netdev,dev_name (&phy_dev->dev), + igb_enet_mii_link, hw->phy_interface); +if (IS_ERR (phy_dev)) { +netdev_err (netdev,"could not attach to PHY\n" ); +return PTR_ERR (phy_dev); + } + + hw->phy_dev = phy_dev; +netdev_info (netdev,"igb PHY driver [%s] (mii_bus:phy_addr=%s)\n" , + hw->phy_dev->drv->name,dev_name (&hw->phy_dev->dev)); + +return 0 ; +} + +/* Create and register mdio bus */ +static int igb_enet_mii_init (struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ +struct mii_bus *mii_bus; +struct net_device *netdev =pci_get_drvdata (pdev); +struct igb_adapter *adapter =netdev_priv (netdev); +struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; +int err; + + mii_bus =mdiobus_alloc (); +if (!mii_bus) { + err = -ENOMEM ; + goto err_out; + } + + mii_bus->name ="igb_enet_mii_bus" ; + mii_bus->read = igb_enet_mdio_read; + mii_bus->write = igb_enet_mdio_write; + mii_bus->reset = igb_enet_mdio_reset; +snprintf (mii_bus->id,MII_BUS_ID_SIZE ,"%s-%x" , +pci_name (pdev), hw->device_id +1 ); + mii_bus->priv = hw; + mii_bus->parent = &pdev->dev; + mii_bus->phy_mask = ~(1 << hw->phy.addr); + + err =mdiobus_register (mii_bus); +if (err) { + netdev_err(netdev, "failed to register mii_bus: %d\n",err);
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +28
-0+ goto err_out_free_mdiobus; + } + hw->mii_bus = mii_bus; + +return 0 ; + +err_out_free_mdiobus: +mdiobus_free (mii_bus); +err_out: +return err; +} + +static void igb_enet_mii_remove (struct e1000_hw *hw) +{ +if (hw->mii_bus) { +mdiobus_unregister (hw->mii_bus); +mdiobus_free (hw->mii_bus); + } +} +#endif /* CONFIG_PHYLIB */ +/** * igb_probe - Device Initialization Routine * @pdev: PCI device information struct @@ -2645,6 +2761,13 @@ static int igb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) } }pm_runtime_put_noidle (&pdev->dev); + +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +/* create and register the mdio bus if using ext phy */ +if (rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ) &E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO ) +igb_enet_mii_init (pdev); +#endif +return 0 ;Quoted 1 line
err_register:The MDICNFG register doesn't exist for all devices as I recall. What you may want to do is make enabling the
mii_busoptional dependent onget_invariantsreturning an error that the PHY is not recognized.drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c static void igb_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) · line 2920
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +4
-0@@ -2788,6 +2911,10 @@ static void igb_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;pm_runtime_get_noresume (&pdev->dev); +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +if (rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ) &E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO ) +igb_enet_mii_remove (hw); +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_IGB_HWMON igb_sysfs_exit (adapter);#endif Same thing here. I would say what you could do is just check to see if a
mii_busis allocated and if so remove it. You could probably push the check inside ofigb_mii_remove.Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +0
-0@@ -3093,6 +3220,12 @@ static int __igb_open(struct net_device *netdev, bool resuming)if (!resuming)pm_runtime_put (&pdev->dev);
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +6
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +/* Probe and connect to PHY if using ext phy */ +if (rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ) &E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO ) +igb_enet_mii_probe (netdev); +#endif +/* start the watchdog. */ hw->mac.get_link_status =1 ;schedule_work(&adapter->watchdog_task);Same here, use the existance of a
mii_bus, not the register check.
This goes back to the discussion on how to decide if we should register with phylib and will depend on how that discussion plays out. There are about 4 places I need to know if we're using phylib and whatever mechanism is agree'd upon can be used in all these cases:
igb_probe() - register the mii bus with phylib igb_remove() - remove the mii bus
igb_open() - to call the mii probe
igb_mii_ioctl() - to know to use the mdio read/write wrappers
Quoted 50 lines
Quoted 50 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +15
-5@@ -7127,21 +7260,41 @@ void igb_alloc_rx_buffers(struct igb_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count) static int igb_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd) { struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); + struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; struct mii_ioctl_data *data = if_mii(ifr); -if (adapter->hw.phy.media_type != e1000_media_type_copper) + if (adapter->hw.phy.media_type != e1000_media_type_copper && + !(rd32(E1000_MDICNFG) & E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; switch (cmd) { case SIOCGMIIPHY: - data->phy_id = adapter->hw.phy.addr; + data->phy_id = hw->phy.addr; break; case SIOCGMIIREG: -if (igb_read_phy_reg (&adapter->hw, data->reg_num &0x1F , - &data->val_out)) -return -EIO ; + if (hw->mac.type == e1000_i210 || hw->mac.type == e1000_i211) { + if (igb_read_reg_gs40g(&adapter->hw, data->phy_id, + data->reg_num & 0x1F, + &data->val_out)) + return -EIO; + } else { + if (igb_read_phy_reg(&adapter->hw, data->reg_num & 0x1F, + &data->val_out)) + return -EIO; + } break; case SIOCSMIIREG: + if (hw->mac.type == e1000_i210 || hw->mac.type ==
e1000_i211) {drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +10
-0+if (igb_write_reg_gs40g (hw, data->phy_id, + data->reg_num &0x1F , + data->val_in)) +return -EIO ; + }else { +if (igb_write_phy_reg (hw, data->reg_num &0x1F , + data->val_in)) +return -EIO ; + } +break ;
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
default: return -EOPNOTSUPP; }These changes just shouldn't be needed. I'd say they could be dropped. The
phy_idshould be static and configured by the hardware before the driver is even loaded.
The above also adds SIOCGMIIREG which previously was not supported, but I also need to allow multiple phy addresses here and thus can't just default to igb_write_phy_reg() which uses the single phy addr from the EEPROM (unless I move multi-addr support there).
Tim
PATCH 3/3 net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
Quoted 26 lines · Tim Harvey
Quoted 12 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 11 lines · Tim Harvey
If an i210 is configured for 1000BASE-BX
link_modeand has an external phy specified, then register an mii bus using the external phy address as a mask.An i210 hooked to an external standard phy will be configured with a
link_modeof SGMII in which case phy ops will be configured and used internal in the igb driver for link status. However, in certain cases one might be using a backplane SerDes connection to something that talks on the mdio bus but is not a standard phy, such as a switch. In this case by registering an mdio bus a phy driver can manage the device.Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>So I think I am staring to see a pattern here between the i210 and the i354 it looks like the EEPROMs for these interfaces are not getting set up correctly. Unfortunately for the i210 you cannot change the EEPROM from ethtool so you would need to work out with your manufacturer how to get that fixed for your device.
Alexander,
Thanks for the review!
Quoted 9 lines
I think much of my patchset is more clear if I give a bit more background of how we use the i210 on our GW16083
(http://www.gateworks.com/product/item/ventana-gw16083-mezzanine).
This board is an i210 connected to a Marvell MV88E6176 6-port switch via SGMII and MDIO. The MV88E6176 uses MDIO for its control access and instead of having a register interface that utilizes a single phy address, it uses several addresses between0x10and0x1d. The link between the two chips is thus 1gbps full-duplex without the need of link management (why I consider it phy-less).
Okay, so this is likely much more complicated then your original patch let on. What you are actually doing is enabling phylib so that you can enable a DSA switch on top of the i210 interface, do I have that right?
Quoted 15 lines
I configured the EEPROM with the following details:
- link-mode: 1000BASE-KX for phy-less operation
- external-mdio
-phy_addr0x10(the first one used by the MV88E6176 and the one that
maps more closely to standard phy registers than any others)
-device_id:0x157C(SerDes flashless - looking back perhaps this
should have been0x1537but then this isn't used in igb to distinguish any details so its a don't-care)The i210 datasheet defines the following link-modes:
0 - Internal PHY
1 - 1000BASE-KX
2 - SGMII
3 - SerDes/1000BASE-BX
Quoted 7 lines
The differences are still not crystal clear to me and is really all about how the igb driver uses this value. When I wrote support for the GW16083 a year ago I sent out a query to the e1000-devel list regarding
link_modeand how I should proceed but I received no reply's
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.e1000.devel/13942) and unfortunately am only now getting back to a point of having any bandwidth to try to mainline my changes.
It looks like you are learning the same lesson many have when it comes to this kind of stuff. Upstream first is usually a much better policy because then you figure out all of these issues much earlier and you aren't stuck supporting something that has implementation issues you weren't aware of.
Quoted 6 lines
I would have to dig a bit to find where I got this info but my understanding was that 1000BASE-KX was for fixed 1gbps 'phy-less' SerDes links (requiring no link negotiation) and because I have the i210 connected in to a port on the MV88E6176 that is always 1gpbs full-duplex this made sense to me to let the driver treat it as 'phy-less'.
The 1000BASE-KX is really meant for pure SerDes configuration where there will be no PHY attached at all. So for example if you were going to connect directly to another 1000BASE-KX port on either a backplane switch or another adapter. It is implied that by using this you aren't going to use the MDIO interface at all. There are essentially 3 modes that do external 1gbs 'phy-less' and the problem is that KX implies a special mode that is typically used for backplane w/o any link negotiation. Since there is a PHY like entity on the other end you would want SGMII, and in this case the variant that uses the MDIO registers for configuration.
The 1000Base-BX was probably closer to what you had envisioned. That is meant to be used for pure SerDes with some sort of transceiver in between. As such it is normally used for configurations such as fiber since it supports standard 1Gb/s Ethernet over fiber.
Really if you were planning to connect to an external switch or PHY that required MDIO configuration you should have gone with SGMII as it is essentially the same as the 1000Base-BX however it includes the configuration bits for managing an external PHY over either I2C or the MDIO interfaces.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 5 lines
As far as the code below I think there may be an easy way to work around a bunch of this code. The quick trick for most of this would be to update
igb_init_phy_params_82575to return a new value, maybe make up something likeE1000_ERR_PHY_UNKNOWNwhen the PHY ID is unrecognized. Then you could add the phylib code as a handler for if you encounter that error code.Are you sure this shouldn't be based off of link mode? It seems to me that if your link-mode indicates an external phy then this is exactly when you would want to register an mii bus with phylib. However, also doing so as a fallback if PHY ID can't be recognized also makes sense in general for perhaps boards with mis-programmed EEPROM's.
The problem is the link mode doesn't tell you anything other than the type of interface being used. So in your case you want to advertise the interface as SGMII because you will want SerDes and to perform configuration via the external MDIO interface.
Quoted 41 lines
Quoted 35 lines
Quoted 19 lines
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 16 +++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h | 7 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +2
-0@@ -598,13 +598,26 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)switch (link_mode) {case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_1000BASE_KX : hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_internal_serdes; +if (igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575 (hw)) { +u32 mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG );drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw · line 613
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +8
-0+ + mdicnfg &=E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ; + hw->phy.addr = mdicnfg >>E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT ; + hw_dbg("1000BASE_KX w/ external MDIO device at 0x%x\n", + hw->phy.addr); + }else { +hw_dbg ("1000BASE_KX" ); + }break ;You should not be running SGMII under KX mode. If you are then you have an EEPROM bug. The correct link mode is SGMII below. Unfortunately you would need to check with your vendor on that one as I believe the EEPROMs for i210/i211 parts are not writable via ethtool.
Quoted 6 lines
As for a hack workaround for now what you could do is use a !igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575() check to determine if you want to break, or to clear the
LINK_MODEfield and rewrite it as SGMII and then just fall though to SGMII which will help to clear up many issues you are probably seeing. You might keep that as a separate local patch until you can get the EEPROM issue resolved.
Quoted 5 lines
I certainly hope this isn't considered an EEPROM programming issue because at the time I could get no clarification from the community or my Intel FAE on what mode we should be using (the FAE understandably likely didn't know because this is an implementation detail within the driver the way I see it).
The problem is KX has a very specific meaning, and is supposed to be reserved for backplane Ethernet connections between MACs. It makes assumptions about things that could have an impact on link negotiation. Odds are if it is working for you it is because it is "good enough" however it isn't really meant for the type of connection you are using it for.
You might try working things out with Intel to see if you get get either a driver quirk directly added to igb, or possibly have something added to the PCI quirks in the Linux kernel. All that really needs to happen is to update the KX go SGMII at driver load, or during PCI bus probe as the value should be persistent through reboots. In your EEPROM implementation did you do anything that could be used to uniquely identify your device. For example, is there a sub-device or sub-vendor ID registered in the PCI config?
Quoted 6 lines
We have been shipping boards for a year supported by a phylib driver and it would not be easy to field update these because the i210 nvram is only supported via the non-redistributable licensed eepromARMtool (yuck!). One of the key U-Boot developers tried to get Intel to allow him to add source to U-Boot for EEPROM programming and was denied. (again... yuck!).
Yeah, very yuck indeed. Unfortunately you are adding PHY support to a link mode that doesn't support external PHYs. The likelihood of that causing regressions for other implementations is very high. That is why if nothing else it would be better to add a specific quirk for your i210 w/ KX than something that just takes all KX and converts it into something like SGMII.
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +4
-0+static int igb_enet_mdio_write (struct mii_bus *bus,int mii_id,int regnum, +u16 val) +{ +struct e1000_hw *hw = bus->priv;Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw · line 622
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +4
-0+ +return igb_write_reg_gs40g (hw, mii_id, regnum, val); +} +There shouldn't be any need to actually pass the PHY address assuming you let the driver code take care of pulling the address of the PHY from the EEPROM before hand. As such you can probably just not use the
mii_idvalue.
Quoted 5 lines
Again, the reason for not using the address from the EEPROM is this use case where there is not a single phy address. This is also why I'm patching the mdio read/write functions to take a parameter instead of using the internal value (and creating wrappers for when they are used internally in igb).
Okay, so in the case of your switch the phy_mask applies to probe only then. I was thinking of traditional PHYs where there is usually only one address that applies to the PHY belonging to a given MAC.
What you may want to do is look at adding your own igb_mii_write/read functions based off of something like the igb_(write/read)_phy_reg_82580 code. The gs40g has some very specific logic built into it to convert a 32b register into a page and offset which you likely don't need. The only change you would need from the 82580 functions would be to add a few lines for configuring the MDICNFG address.
I wouldn't bother with restoring the address after you have performed your operation. There is always a possible scenario where something gets hung or crashes in the middle of your operation and that will foul up the MDICNFG register. Instead I would recommend looking at something like modifying igb_reset_mdicnfg_82580 as it might be preferable to have it apply to all hardware 82580 and newer instead of just limiting it to 82580. That way the value is restored on reset or driver load so that as long as the EEPROM is there you will always read the correct value.
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +12
-0+/* Probe the mdio bus for phys and connect them */ +static int igb_enet_mii_probe (struct net_device *netdev) +{ +struct igb_adapter *adapter =netdev_priv (netdev); +struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; +struct phy_device *phy_dev =NULL ; +int phy_id; + +/* check for attached phy */ +for (phy_id =0 ; (phy_id <PHY_MAX_ADDR ); phy_id++) { +if (hw->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_id]) { + phy_dev = hw->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_id];Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c
Quoted 3 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +3
-0+break ; + } + }There is code that should have already figured this out in the driver. We just need to check the PHY addr after
get_invarianshas been called, assuming the EEPROM is correct. So you should be able to just get the phy.addr from thee1000_hwstruct.
Quoted 8 lines
It is true that in
igb_enet_mii_init()where the mii bus is registered with phylib that I set thephy_maskto include only the phy address from the eeprom. In my case I put0x10in the EEPROM as the phy address as that is the first phy address that the switch responds to and so I use that as a way to detect the phy.I can remove the loop and just set
phy_dev=
hw->mii_bus->phy_map[hw->phy.addr] in this case.
Yes, that probably would be cleaner.
Quoted 128 lines
Quoted 116 lines
Quoted 89 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +48
-0+if (!phy_dev) { +netdev_err (netdev,"no PHY found\n" ); +return -ENODEV ; + } + + hw->phy_interface =PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII ; + phy_dev =phy_connect (netdev,dev_name (&phy_dev->dev), + igb_enet_mii_link, hw->phy_interface); +if (IS_ERR (phy_dev)) { +netdev_err (netdev,"could not attach to PHY\n" ); +return PTR_ERR (phy_dev); + } + + hw->phy_dev = phy_dev; +netdev_info (netdev,"igb PHY driver [%s] (mii_bus:phy_addr=%s)\n" , + hw->phy_dev->drv->name,dev_name (&hw->phy_dev->dev)); + +return 0 ; +} + +/* Create and register mdio bus */ +static int igb_enet_mii_init (struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ +struct mii_bus *mii_bus; +struct net_device *netdev =pci_get_drvdata (pdev); +struct igb_adapter *adapter =netdev_priv (netdev); +struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; +int err; + + mii_bus =mdiobus_alloc (); +if (!mii_bus) { + err = -ENOMEM ; + goto err_out; + } + + mii_bus->name ="igb_enet_mii_bus" ; + mii_bus->read = igb_enet_mdio_read; + mii_bus->write = igb_enet_mdio_write; + mii_bus->reset = igb_enet_mdio_reset; +snprintf (mii_bus->id,MII_BUS_ID_SIZE ,"%s-%x" , +pci_name (pdev), hw->device_id +1 ); + mii_bus->priv = hw; + mii_bus->parent = &pdev->dev; + mii_bus->phy_mask = ~(1 << hw->phy.addr); + + err =mdiobus_register (mii_bus); +if (err) { + netdev_err(netdev, "failed to register mii_bus: %d\n",err);
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +28
-0+ goto err_out_free_mdiobus; + } + hw->mii_bus = mii_bus; + +return 0 ; + +err_out_free_mdiobus: +mdiobus_free (mii_bus); +err_out: +return err; +} + +static void igb_enet_mii_remove (struct e1000_hw *hw) +{ +if (hw->mii_bus) { +mdiobus_unregister (hw->mii_bus); +mdiobus_free (hw->mii_bus); + } +} +#endif /* CONFIG_PHYLIB */ +/** * igb_probe - Device Initialization Routine * @pdev: PCI device information struct @@ -2645,6 +2761,13 @@ static int igb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) } }pm_runtime_put_noidle (&pdev->dev); + +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +/* create and register the mdio bus if using ext phy */ +if (rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ) &E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO ) +igb_enet_mii_init (pdev); +#endif +return 0 ;Quoted 1 line
err_register:The MDICNFG register doesn't exist for all devices as I recall. What you may want to do is make enabling the
mii_busoptional dependent onget_invariantsreturning an error that the PHY is not recognized.drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c static void igb_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) · line 2920
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +4
-0@@ -2788,6 +2911,10 @@ static void igb_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;pm_runtime_get_noresume (&pdev->dev); +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +if (rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ) &E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO ) +igb_enet_mii_remove (hw); +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_IGB_HWMON igb_sysfs_exit (adapter);#endif Same thing here. I would say what you could do is just check to see if a
mii_busis allocated and if so remove it. You could probably push the check inside ofigb_mii_remove.Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +0
-0@@ -3093,6 +3220,12 @@ static int __igb_open(struct net_device *netdev, bool resuming)if (!resuming)pm_runtime_put (&pdev->dev);Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +6
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB +/* Probe and connect to PHY if using ext phy */ +if (rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ) &E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO ) +igb_enet_mii_probe (netdev); +#endif +/* start the watchdog. */ hw->mac.get_link_status =1 ;schedule_work(&adapter->watchdog_task);Same here, use the existance of a
mii_bus, not the register check.
Quoted 8 lines
This goes back to the discussion on how to decide if we should register with phylib and will depend on how that discussion plays out. There are about 4 places I need to know if we're using phylib and whatever mechanism is agree'd upon can be used in all these cases:
igb_probe()- register the mii bus with phylibigb_remove()- remove the mii bus
igb_open()- to call the mii probe
igb_mii_ioctl()- to know to use the mdio read/write wrappers
I really think you would be better off just performing any kind of check in igb_probe. Specifically if the link_mode is SGMII, and there is a PHY, but it is unrecognized then we should be using phylib and should setup an mii_bus. That way it should play well with other implementations such as the stuff the Cumulus guys will need. Otherwise the mii_bus should not be configured. Then all of the other calls can simply check to see if the mii_bus exists and queue off of that for the phylib calls.
Quoted 56 lines
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 48 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +15
-5@@ -7127,21 +7260,41 @@ void igb_alloc_rx_buffers(struct igb_ring *rx_ring, u16 cleaned_count) static int igb_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd) { struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); + struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; struct mii_ioctl_data *data = if_mii(ifr); -if (adapter->hw.phy.media_type != e1000_media_type_copper) + if (adapter->hw.phy.media_type != e1000_media_type_copper && + !(rd32(E1000_MDICNFG) & E1000_MDICNFG_EXT_MDIO)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; switch (cmd) { case SIOCGMIIPHY: - data->phy_id = adapter->hw.phy.addr; + data->phy_id = hw->phy.addr; break; case SIOCGMIIREG: -if (igb_read_phy_reg (&adapter->hw, data->reg_num &0x1F , - &data->val_out)) -return -EIO ; + if (hw->mac.type == e1000_i210 || hw->mac.type == e1000_i211) { + if (igb_read_reg_gs40g(&adapter->hw, data->phy_id, + data->reg_num & 0x1F, + &data->val_out)) + return -EIO; + } else { + if (igb_read_phy_reg(&adapter->hw, data->reg_num & 0x1F, + &data->val_out)) + return -EIO; + } break; case SIOCSMIIREG: + if (hw->mac.type == e1000_i210 || hw->mac.type ==
e1000_i211) {drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +9
-0+if (igb_write_reg_gs40g (hw, data->phy_id, + data->reg_num &0x1F , + data->val_in)) +return -EIO ; + }else { +if (igb_write_phy_reg (hw, data->reg_num &0x1F , + data->val_in)) +return -EIO ; + }Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+ break; default: return -EOPNOTSUPP; }These changes just shouldn't be needed. I'd say they could be dropped. The
phy_idshould be static and configured by the hardware before the driver is even loaded.
Quoted 6 lines
The above also adds SIOCGMIIREG which previously was not supported, but I also need to allow multiple phy addresses here and thus can't just default to
igb_write_phy_reg()which uses the single phy addr from the EEPROM (unless I move multi-addr support there).Tim
The problem with SIOCSMIIREG is that you are basically opening the door for a user-space driver of some sort to manage the PHY, or at least that is what I would assume. The Cumulus guys had a similar patch that they have withdrawn as it was mostly just for debugging. You might want to pull this block out and place it in some sort of separate patch. You would need to justify why you need to expose this functionality.
PATCH 3/3 net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
Quoted 12 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 11 lines · Tim Harvey
Quoted 8 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 6 lines · Tim Harvey
If an i210 is configured for 1000BASE-BX
link_modeand has an external phy specified, then register an mii bus using the external phy address as
a mask.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
An i210 hooked to an external standard phy will be configured with a
link_modeof SGMII in which case phy ops will be configured and used internal in the igb driver for link status. However, in certain cases one might be using a backplane SerDes connection to something that
talks
Quoted 31 lines
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
on the mdio bus but is not a standard phy, such as a switch. In this case
by registering an mdio bus a phy driver can manage the device.Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>Quoted 7 lines
So I think I am staring to see a pattern here between the i210 and the i354
it looks like the EEPROMs for these interfaces are not getting set up correctly. Unfortunately for the i210 you cannot change the EEPROM from ethtool so you would need to work out with your manufacturer how to get that
fixed for your device.Alexander,
Thanks for the review!
Quoted 9 lines
I think much of my patchset is more clear if I give a bit more background of how we use the i210 on our GW16083
(http://www.gateworks.com/product/item/ventana-gw16083-mezzanine).
This board is an i210 connected to a Marvell MV88E6176 6-port switch via SGMII and MDIO. The MV88E6176 uses MDIO for its control access and instead of having a register interface that utilizes a single phy address, it uses several addresses between0x10and0x1d. The link between the two chips is thus 1gbps full-duplex without the need of link management (why I consider it phy-less).
Quoted 2 lines
Okay, so this is likely much more complicated then your original patch let on. What you are actually doing is enabling phylib so that you can
enable a
Quoted 1 line
DSA switch on top of the i210 interface, do I have that right?
correct but note that the MV88E6176 data interface to the i210 is SERDES, not SGMII.
Quoted 1 line
<snip>
Quoted 3 lines
The 1000BASE-KX is really meant for pure SerDes configuration where there will be no PHY attached at all. So for example if you were going to
connect
Quoted 1 line
directly to another 1000BASE-KX port on either a backplane switch or
another
Quoted 1 line
adapter. It is implied that by using this you aren't going to use the
MDIO
Quoted 3 lines
interface at all. There are essentially 3 modes that do external 1gbs 'phy-less' and the problem is that KX implies a special mode that is typically used for backplane w/o any link negotiation. Since there is a
PHY
Quoted 8 lines
like entity on the other end you would want SGMII, and in this case the variant that uses the MDIO registers for configuration.
The 1000Base-BX was probably closer to what you had envisioned. That is meant to be used for pure SerDes with some sort of transceiver in between. As such it is normally used for configurations such as fiber since it supports standard 1Gb/s Ethernet over fiber.
Quoted 4 lines
Really if you were planning to connect to an external switch or PHY that required MDIO configuration you should have gone with SGMII as it is essentially the same as the 1000Base-BX however it includes the configuration bits for managing an external PHY over either I2C or the
MDIO
Quoted 2 lines
interfaces.
<snip>
Quoted 4 lines
The problem is the link mode doesn't tell you anything other than the type of interface being used. So in your case you want to advertise the interface as SGMII because you will want SerDes and to perform
configuration
Quoted 3 lines
via the external MDIO interface.
<snip
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 23 lines
Quoted 21 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +0
-0@@ -598,13 +598,26 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct
e1000_hw
*hw)switch (link_mode) { case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_1000BASE_KX: hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_internal_serdes;drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +5
-0+if (igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575 (hw)) { +u32 mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + + mdicnfg &=E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ; + hw->phy.addr = mdicnfg >>
E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT;
+ hw_dbg("1000BASE_KX w/ external MDIO device at
0x%x\n",drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +4
-0+ hw->phy.addr); + }else { +hw_dbg ("1000BASE_KX" ); + }break ;
<snip>
Quoted 5 lines
The problem is KX has a very specific meaning, and is supposed to be reserved for backplane Ethernet connections between MACs. It makes assumptions about things that could have an impact on link negotiation. Odds are if it is working for you it is because it is "good enough"
however
Quoted 1 line
it isn't really meant for the type of connection you are using it for.
For clarity, our whole discussion about EEPROM configuration (link-mode, external MDIO, and phy-address) revolves around the patch above.
I initially did try to go with link-mode of SGMII but I find that hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_copper just plain doesn't work for my configuration and I need hw->phy.media_type = e1000_media_type_internal_serdes. That's when I realized that SERDES != RGMII and that the i210 SerDes interface needs to be powered up instead of setting up the internal phy.ops.read/write/reset media-detect functions. Even though the MV88E6176 has a phy-like interface it uses SerDes wired on the PCB instead of link negotiation.
The MAC<->MAC case you describe 1000BASE_KX being intended for is truely what I have but I do want an external MDIO for the purpose of phylib to the switch. I don't know who is currently using 1000BASE_KX but if they are not using external MDIO then my changes should not affect them and the use of MDICNFG.Destination (what igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575 uses for i210) makes sense for enabling phylib.
The way I read the use of link_mode in igb_get_invariants_82575 before my patch is:
- 1000BASE_KX: uses internal serdes instead of copper with phy read/write/reset hooks
- SGMII: uses copper with phy read/write/reset hooks and phy negotiation and can be internal or external MDIO
- SERDES - reads SFP info via i2c to determine media type
I still can see the logic in using a return of -E1000_PHY_ERR from get_invariants also as a condition for enabling phylib support and that my be what Johnathan needs for his phy.
Quoted 3 lines
You might try working things out with Intel to see if you get get either a driver quirk directly added to igb, or possibly have something added to
the
Quoted 2 lines
PCI quirks in the Linux kernel. All that really needs to happen is to update the KX go SGMII at driver load, or during PCI bus probe as the
value
Quoted 1 line
should be persistent through reboots. In your EEPROM implementation did
you
Quoted 12 lines
do anything that could be used to uniquely identify your device. For example, is there a sub-device or sub-vendor ID registered in the PCI config?
Quoted 6 lines
We have been shipping boards for a year supported by a phylib driver and it would not be easy to field update these because the i210 nvram is only supported via the non-redistributable licensed eepromARMtool (yuck!). One of the key U-Boot developers tried to get Intel to allow him to add source to U-Boot for EEPROM programming and was denied. (again... yuck!).
Quoted 1 line
Yeah, very yuck indeed. Unfortunately you are adding PHY support to a
link
Quoted 4 lines
mode that doesn't support external PHYs. The likelihood of that causing regressions for other implementations is very high. That is why if nothing else it would be better to add a specific quirk for your i210 w/ KX than something that just takes all KX and converts it into something like
SGMII.
Quoted 1 line
Assuming you are able to convince me that my EEPROM/NVRAM config 'is' wrong and we somehow figure out how to make it work with SGMII and external PHY support, I can see either a device-tree binding link-mode property being added that overrides EEPROM/NVRAM or a PCI quirk/fixup working.
Quoted 1 line
<snip>
Quoted 2 lines
Okay, so in the case of your switch the
phy_maskapplies to probe only
then.
Quoted 6 lines
I was thinking of traditional PHYs where there is usually only one address that applies to the PHY belonging to a given MAC.
What you may want to do is look at adding your own igb_mii_write/read functions based off of something like the igb_(write/read)_phy_reg_82580 code. The gs40g has some very specific logic built into it to convert a
32b
Quoted 3 lines
register into a page and offset which you likely don't need. The only change you would need from the 82580 functions would be to add a few lines for configuring the MDICNFG address.
Yes this is where I need advise from people like you that know the various chipsets supported by igb. I have no idea what is old, what is new, what is fragile and shouldn't be touched. The igb driver is a big mysterious (hate to say mess) of chip identifiers and its difficult to understand exactly what Intel chipsets are supported (would love to see a list/table in Kconfig or source!).
So I patched the generic igb_{read,write}_phy_reg_mdic to accept an addr which are called by both igb_read_phy_reg_82580 and igb_read_phy_reg_gs40g. I have no idea what the gs40g is, but note that igb_{read,write}_phy_reg_gs40g are used for i210/i211 for copper media mode phy negotiation. What enum e1000_mac_type values are capable of MDIO and applicable for phylib? Do some/all of these have a register bit such as the i210 MDICNFG.Destination that indicates external MDIO vs internal that can be used?
What is the difference between an 82580 and 82585 and how do i350/i354 and i210/i211 relate to them?
Quoted 3 lines
I wouldn't bother with restoring the address after you have performed your operation. There is always a possible scenario where something gets hung
or
Quoted 4 lines
crashes in the middle of your operation and that will foul up the MDICNFG register. Instead I would recommend looking at something like modifying
igb_reset_mdicnfg_82580as it might be preferable to have it apply to all hardware 82580 and newer instead of just limiting it to 82580. That way
the
Quoted 2 lines
value is restored on reset or driver load so that as long as the EEPROM is there you will always read the correct value.
Makes sense, but this would involve the chip information that I'm asking for above - I only know the i210.
When you say '82580 and newer' I don't know what that means. It sounds like your talking about various enum e1000_mac_type values.
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +10
-0+/* Probe the mdio bus for phys and connect them */ +static int igb_enet_mii_probe (struct net_device *netdev) +{ +struct igb_adapter *adapter =netdev_priv (netdev); +struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; +struct phy_device *phy_dev =NULL ; +int phy_id; + +/* check for attached phy */ +for (phy_id =0 ; (phy_id <PHY_MAX_ADDR ); phy_id++) {
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +5
-0+if (hw->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_id]) { + phy_dev = hw->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_id]; +break ; + } + }There is code that should have already figured this out in the driver.
We
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 3 lines
just need to check the PHY addr after
get_invarianshas been called, assuming the EEPROM is correct. So you should be able to just get the phy.addr from thee1000_hwstruct.It is true that in
igb_enet_mii_init()where the mii bus is registered with phylib that I set thephy_maskto include only the phy address from the eeprom. In my case I put0x10in the EEPROM as the phy address as that is the first phy address that the switch responds to and so I use that as a way to detect the phy.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I can remove the loop and just set
phy_dev=
hw->mii_bus->phy_map[hw->phy.addr] in this case.Yes, that probably would be cleaner.
this is in my pending v2 changes
Quoted 2 lines
<snip>
Quoted 2 lines
I really think you would be better off just performing any kind of check
in
Quoted 1 line
igb_probe. Specifically if thelink_modeis SGMII, and there is a PHY,
but
Quoted 6 lines
it is unrecognized then we should be using phylib and should setup an
mii_bus. That way it should play well with other implementations such as the stuff the Cumulus guys will need. Otherwise themii_busshould not be configured. Then all of the other calls can simply check to see if themii_busexists and queue off of that for the phylib calls.
agreed - this is in my pending v2 changes to make the decision to register the MDIO bus in igb_probe (as a field in struct igb_adapter now) of the and the other places that operate on it just check for a non-null adapter->mii_bus.
Quoted 1 line
<snip>
Quoted 2 lines
The problem with SIOCSMIIREG is that you are basically opening the door
for
Quoted 1 line
a user-space driver of some sort to manage the PHY, or at least that is
what
Quoted 4 lines
I would assume. The Cumulus guys had a similar patch that they have withdrawn as it was mostly just for debugging. You might want to pull this block out and place it in some sort of separate patch. You would need to justify why you need to expose this functionality.
agreed - I will separate this into a different patch. I think SIOCGMIIREG/SIOCSMIIREG are useful for debugging and various userspace tools like ethtool and others that allow direct mii register access. I'm not clear what the general consusus is but there do seem to be many ethernet drivers that support SIOCMIIREG including the phylib default ioctl handler.
Regards,
Tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20150512/8c1f0dc0/attachment-0001.html>
PATCH 3/3 net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
Quoted 56 lines · Tim Harvey
Quoted 8 lines · On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck at…
Quoted 7 lines · Tim Harvey
Quoted 4 lines · On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck at gmail.com…
Quoted 2 lines · Tim Harvey
If an i210 is configured for 1000BASE-BX
link_modeand has anexternal
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
phy specified, then register an mii bus using the external phy
address
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
as
a mask.An i210 hooked to an external standard phy will be configured with a
link_modeof SGMII in which case phy ops will be configured and used internal in the igb driver for link status. However, in certain cases one might be using a backplane SerDes connection to somethingthat talks
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
on the mdio bus but is not a standard phy, such as a switch. In this case
by registering an mdio bus a phy driver can manage the device.Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
So I think I am staring to see a pattern here between the i210 and the i354
it looks like the EEPROMs for these interfaces are not getting set up correctly. Unfortunately for the i210 you cannot change theEEPROM from
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
ethtool so you would need to work out with your manufacturer how
to get
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 2 lines
that
fixed for your device.Alexander,
Thanks for the review!
I think much of my patchset is more clear if I give a bit more background of how we use the i210 on our GW16083
(http://www.gateworks.com/product/item/ventana-gw16083-mezzanine).
This board is an i210 connected to a Marvell MV88E6176 6-port switch via SGMII and MDIO. The MV88E6176 uses MDIO for its control access and instead of having a register interface that utilizes a single phy address, it uses several addresses between0x10and0x1d. The link between the two chips is thus 1gbps full-duplex without the need of link management (why I consider it phy-less).
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
Okay, so this is likely much more complicated then your original
patch let
Quoted 1 line
on. What you are actually doing is enabling phylib so that you can
enable a
Quoted 1 line
DSA switch on top of the i210 interface, do I have that right?
correct but note that the MV88E6176 data interface to the i210 is SERDES, not SGMII.
It is essentially the same thing. Either of those two modes should work if I recall correctly. The only problem is the expectations on the PHY in the case of SGMII.
Quoted 73 lines
Quoted 1 line
<snip>
Quoted 2 lines
The 1000BASE-KX is really meant for pure SerDes configuration where
there
Quoted 1 line
will be no PHY attached at all. So for example if you were going to
connect
Quoted 1 line
directly to another 1000BASE-KX port on either a backplane switch or
another
Quoted 1 line
adapter. It is implied that by using this you aren't going to use
the MDIO
Quoted 3 lines
interface at all. There are essentially 3 modes that do external 1gbs 'phy-less' and the problem is that KX implies a special mode that is typically used for backplane w/o any link negotiation. Since there
is a PHY
Quoted 5 lines
like entity on the other end you would want SGMII, and in this case the variant that uses the MDIO registers for configuration.
The 1000Base-BX was probably closer to what you had envisioned. That is meant to be used for pure SerDes with some sort of transceiver in
between.
Quoted 7 lines
As such it is normally used for configurations such as fiber since it supports standard 1Gb/s Ethernet over fiber.
Really if you were planning to connect to an external switch or PHY that required MDIO configuration you should have gone with SGMII as it is essentially the same as the 1000Base-BX however it includes the configuration bits for managing an external PHY over either I2C or
the MDIO
Quoted 2 lines
interfaces.
<snip>
Quoted 2 lines
The problem is the link mode doesn't tell you anything other than
the type
Quoted 2 lines
of interface being used. So in your case you want to advertise the interface as SGMII because you will want SerDes and to perform
configuration
Quoted 3 lines
via the external MDIO interface.
<snip
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +0
-0@@ -598,13 +598,26 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct
e1000_hw
*hw)switch (link_mode) { case E1000_CTRL_EXT_LINK_MODE_1000BASE_KX: hw->phy.media_type =
e1000_media_type_internal_serdes;Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +5
-0+if (igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575 (hw)) { +u32 mdicnfg =rd32 (E1000_MDICNFG ); + + mdicnfg &=E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_MASK ; + hw->phy.addr = mdicnfg >>
E1000_MDICNFG_PHY_SHIFT;
+ hw_dbg("1000BASE_KX w/ external MDIOdevice at
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
0x%x\n",
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +4
-0+ hw->phy.addr); + }else { +hw_dbg ("1000BASE_KX" ); + }break ;<snip>
Quoted 5 lines
The problem is KX has a very specific meaning, and is supposed to be reserved for backplane Ethernet connections between MACs. It makes assumptions about things that could have an impact on link negotiation. Odds are if it is working for you it is because it is "good enough"
Quoted 6 lines
however
Quoted 1 line
it isn't really meant for the type of connection you are using it for.
For clarity, our whole discussion about EEPROM configuration (link-mode, external MDIO, and phy-address) revolves around the patch above.
Yes. KX has a very specific meaning in terms of what is present on the adapter.
Quoted 8 lines
I initially did try to go with link-mode of SGMII but I find that
hw->phy.media_type=e1000_media_type_copperjust plain doesn't work for my configuration and I needhw->phy.media_type=e1000_media_type_internal_serdes. That's when I realized that SERDES != RGMII and that the i210 SerDes interface needs to be powered up instead of setting up the internal phy.ops.read/write/reset media-detect functions. Even though the MV88E6176 has a phy-like interface it uses SerDes wired on the PCB instead of link negotiation.
So does SGMII. SGMII is essentially just GMII over SerDes. If you look at the code for SGMII it is going through and powering on the SerDes link and then trying to send commands across the MII interface to the PHY, if that fails it tries to get the info over I2C.
The problems you ran into are likely due to the fact that the switch was being treated as an unsupported PHY. From what I can tell there would be a couple of spots that you need to skip over code if you have an "unknown phy" that is being handled by phylib.
Quoted 7 lines
The MAC<->MAC case you describe 1000BASE_KX being intended for is truely what I have but I do want an external MDIO for the purpose of phylib to the switch. I don't know who is currently using 1000BASE_KX but if they are not using external MDIO then my changes should not affect them and the use of MDICNFG.Destination (what
igb_sgmii_uses_mdio_82575uses for i210) makes sense for enabling phylib.
The problem is what you have isn't MAC<->MAC. If it was we wouldn't need the MDIO interface and that is where things get messy. It isn't clearly documented what the behavior is if you try to read I2C/MDIO pins that aren't connected to anything and in the KX case that is exactly what we could be looking at. The other problem is we have no way to verify what bits are or are not set in any of the number of KX interfaces out there. This could very well introduce some very odd issues if floating pins are read/written, or unused EEPROM bits are now read.
Quoted 7 lines
The way I read the use of
link_modeinigb_get_invariants_82575before my patch is:
- 1000BASE_KX: uses internal serdes instead of copper with phy read/write/reset hooks
- SGMII: uses copper with phy read/write/reset hooks and phy negotiation and can be internal or external MDIO
SGMII uses SerDes as well. So for all intents and purposes it is SerDes that includes supports reading a PHY over either I2C or MDIO.
Quoted 1 line
- SERDES - reads SFP info via i2c to determine media type
This probably would have been a better match for your setup than the KX, the difference between the two is that SerDes is technically 1000Base-BX which is your standard 1Gb/s over SerDes, and you are expected to have the I2C pins connected to something either MDIO or I2C based.
Quoted 4 lines
I still can see the logic in using a return of -E1000_PHY_ERR from
get_invariantsalso as a condition for enabling phylib support and that my be what Johnathan needs for his phy.
Yes you would probably need to return something like -E1000_ERR_UNKNOWN_PHY (error value TBD) and then you might also need to modify the code in a few spots so that if the phy_type values is phy_unknown you don't poke any of the registers and just leave it to phylib. Either that or you could have the media type changed back to serdes from copper when you detect an unknown PHY.
We will also should audit the driver code to clean out all of the spots that think that the only external PHY supported is a Marvell such as igb_phy_hw_reset_sgmii_82575().
Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 3 lines
You might try working things out with Intel to see if you get get
either a
Quoted 1 line
driver quirk directly added to igb, or possibly have something added
to the
Quoted 2 lines
PCI quirks in the Linux kernel. All that really needs to happen is to update the KX go SGMII at driver load, or during PCI bus probe as
the value
Quoted 1 line
should be persistent through reboots. In your EEPROM implementation
did you
Quoted 12 lines
do anything that could be used to uniquely identify your device. For example, is there a sub-device or sub-vendor ID registered in the PCI config?
Quoted 6 lines
We have been shipping boards for a year supported by a phylib driver and it would not be easy to field update these because the i210 nvram is only supported via the non-redistributable licensed eepromARMtool (yuck!). One of the key U-Boot developers tried to get Intel to allow him to add source to U-Boot for EEPROM programming and was denied. (again... yuck!).
Quoted 1 line
Yeah, very yuck indeed. Unfortunately you are adding PHY support to
a link
Quoted 2 lines
mode that doesn't support external PHYs. The likelihood of that causing regressions for other implementations is very high. That is why if
nothing
Quoted 2 lines
else it would be better to add a specific quirk for your i210 w/ KX than something that just takes all KX and converts it into something like
Quoted 8 lines
SGMII.
Quoted 1 line
Assuming you are able to convince me that my EEPROM/NVRAM config 'is' wrong and we somehow figure out how to make it work with SGMII and external PHY support, I can see either a device-tree binding link-mode property being added that overrides EEPROM/NVRAM or a PCI quirk/fixup working.
That works. All you really need is something that will overwrite the link mode bits in the CTRL_EXT register before the driver is loaded. If I recall those bits are not cleared in reset so you would only need to do it once.
The problem is we have to make multiple scenarios work with the phylib logic and SGMII would be the preferred type to have reported since you aren't using I2C. As I said though if we can workaround it in software it would be best to have something that makes it clear this is a quirk so it doesn't become the way things are done as otherwise it will just make stuff messier.
Quoted 35 lines
Quoted 2 lines
<snip>
Quoted 2 lines
Okay, so in the case of your switch the
phy_maskapplies to probeonly then.
Quoted 1 line
I was thinking of traditional PHYs where there is usually only one
address
Quoted 5 lines
that applies to the PHY belonging to a given MAC.
What you may want to do is look at adding your own igb_mii_write/read functions based off of something like the igb_(write/read)_phy_reg_82580 code. The gs40g has some very specific logic built into it to
convert a 32b
Quoted 2 lines
register into a page and offset which you likely don't need. The only change you would need from the 82580 functions would be to add a few
lines
Quoted 1 line
for configuring the MDICNFG address.
Yes this is where I need advise from people like you that know the various chipsets supported by igb. I have no idea what is old, what is new, what is fragile and shouldn't be touched. The igb driver is a big mysterious (hate to say mess) of chip identifiers and its difficult to understand exactly what Intel chipsets are supported (would love to see a list/table in
Kconfigor source!).So I patched the generic igb_{read,write}_phy_reg_mdic to accept an addr which are called by both
igb_read_phy_reg_82580andigb_read_phy_reg_gs40g. I have no idea what the gs40g is, but note that igb_{read,write}_phy_reg_gs40g are used for i210/i211 for copper media mode phy negotiation. What enume1000_mac_typevalues are capable of MDIO and applicable for phylib? Do some/all of these have a register bit such as the i210 MDICNFG.Destination that indicates external MDIO vs internal that can be used?
Quoted 2 lines
What is the difference between an 82580 and 82585 and how do i350/i354 and i210/i211 relate to them?
The 82580 is basically the head of family for the i350/i354/i210/i211 parts. The reason why I suggested using it is because it is a simplified version of things if I recall correctly as the PHY only had the standard registers and didn't go into the pages like the other parts did to support things like energy efficient Ethernet. The extra overhead for the other read/write_phy calls is from the fact that they encoded the page number into the PHY offsets and had to update the page number on each read/write to a register to make sure they accessed the correct page in the PHY.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I wouldn't bother with restoring the address after you have
performed your
Quoted 1 line
operation. There is always a possible scenario where something gets
hung or
Quoted 1 line
crashes in the middle of your operation and that will foul up the
MDICNFG
Quoted 2 lines
register. Instead I would recommend looking at something like modifying
igb_reset_mdicnfg_82580as it might be preferable to have it applyto all
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
hardware 82580 and newer instead of just limiting it to 82580. That
way the
Quoted 1 line
value is restored on reset or driver load so that as long as the
EEPROM is
Quoted 1 line
there you will always read the correct value.
Makes sense, but this would involve the chip information that I'm asking for above - I only know the i210.
Well I worked on the 82580 and i350 back in the day. The i350/i354 should be able to take the same workaround with no side effects. All you are doing is restoring bits that would have been written from the EEPROM at power on.
Although I just realized that the workaround doesn't cover the PHY address itself. For that you would have to read NVM_INIT_CTRL_4. The register layout is defined in the i210 data sheet, and it should be the same for every part since the 82580.
Quoted 4 lines
When you say '82580 and newer' I don't know what that means. It sounds like your talking about various enum
e1000_mac_typevalues.
Yes, if you look into igb_reset_mdicnfg_82580 there is a bit of logic that says hw->mac.type == e1000_mac_82580, what I am suggesting is you replace the == with >=.
Quoted 31 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +10
-0+/* Probe the mdio bus for phys and connect them */ +static int igb_enet_mii_probe (struct net_device *netdev) +{ +struct igb_adapter *adapter =netdev_priv (netdev); +struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; +struct phy_device *phy_dev =NULL ; +int phy_id; + +/* check for attached phy */ +for (phy_id =0 ; (phy_id <PHY_MAX_ADDR ); phy_id++) {Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c +5
-0+if (hw->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_id]) { + phy_dev = hw->mii_bus->phy_map[phy_id]; +break ; + } + }There is code that should have already figured this out in the
driver. We
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 3 lines
just need to check the PHY addr after
get_invarianshas been called, assuming the EEPROM is correct. So you should be able to just get the phy.addr from thee1000_hwstruct.It is true that in
igb_enet_mii_init()where the mii bus is registered with phylib that I set thephy_maskto include only the phy address from the eeprom. In my case I put0x10in the EEPROM as the phy address as that is the first phy address that the switch responds to and so I use that as a way to detect the phy.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I can remove the loop and just set
phy_dev=
hw->mii_bus->phy_map[hw->phy.addr] in this case.Yes, that probably would be cleaner.
this is in my pending v2 changes
Okay.
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 3 lines
<snip>
Quoted 2 lines
I really think you would be better off just performing any kind of
check in
Quoted 1 line
igb_probe. Specifically if thelink_modeis SGMII, and there is aPHY, but
Quoted 2 lines
it is unrecognized then we should be using phylib and should setup an
mii_bus. That way it should play well with other implementationssuch as
Quoted 1 line
the stuff the Cumulus guys will need. Otherwise the
mii_busshouldnot be
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
configured. Then all of the other calls can simply check to see if the
mii_busexists and queue off of that for the phylib calls.agreed - this is in my pending v2 changes to make the decision to register the MDIO bus in
igb_probe(as a field in structigb_adapternow) of the and the other places that operate on it just check for a non-nulladapter->mii_bus.
Okay.
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 1 line
<snip>
Quoted 2 lines
The problem with SIOCSMIIREG is that you are basically opening the
door for
Quoted 1 line
a user-space driver of some sort to manage the PHY, or at least that
is what
Quoted 2 lines
I would assume. The Cumulus guys had a similar patch that they have withdrawn as it was mostly just for debugging. You might want to
pull this
Quoted 1 line
block out and place it in some sort of separate patch. You would
need to
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
justify why you need to expose this functionality.
agreed - I will separate this into a different patch. I think SIOCGMIIREG/SIOCSMIIREG are useful for debugging and various userspace tools like ethtool and others that allow direct mii register access. I'm not clear what the general consusus is but there do seem to be many ethernet drivers that support SIOCMIIREG including the phylib default ioctl handler.
My advice would be to leave the SIOCGMIIREG as is but add the ability to read any phy address/offset pair for e1000_phy_unknown. I would say you could probably make SIOCSMIIREG only work w/ e1000_phy_unknown, as that way you allow managing a PHY that cannot be managed by the driver.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20150512/4f128de5/attachment-0001.html>
PATCH 3/3 net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
In reply to Tim HarveyQuoted 7 lines · Tim Harvey
agreed - I will separate this into a different patch. I think SIOCGMIIREG/SIOCSMIIREG are useful for debugging and various userspace tools like ethtool and others that allow direct mii register access. I'm not clear what the general consusus is but there do seem to be many ethernet drivers that support SIOCMIIREG including the phylib default ioctl handler.
I am on holiday, will get a chance to read over the thread this weekend.
Regards,
-Jon
PATCH 3/3 net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
Quoted 11 lines · Jonathan Toppins
Quoted 8 lines · Tim Harvey
agreed - I will separate this into a different patch. I think SIOCGMIIREG/SIOCSMIIREG are useful for debugging and various userspace tools like ethtool and others that allow direct mii register access. I'm not clear what the general consusus is but there do seem to be many ethernet drivers that support SIOCMIIREG including the phylib default ioctl handler.
Quoted 4 lines
I am on holiday, will get a chance to read over the thread this weekend.
Regards,
-Jon
Jon,
I will be posting a followup patch very soon (hopefully in the next couple of days) for adding phylib support to igb hopefully addressing Alexander's comments and concerns noted in this thread. My phylib phy driver is an un-posted work-in-progress and because my phy operates likely different from yours, you will need to write a phylib phy driver to test the patch when its posted.
Tim
PATCH 3/3 net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
Quoted 20 lines · Tim Harvey
Quoted 11 lines · Jonathan Toppins
Quoted 8 lines · Tim Harvey
agreed - I will separate this into a different patch. I think SIOCGMIIREG/SIOCSMIIREG are useful for debugging and various userspace tools like ethtool and others that allow direct mii register access. I'm not clear what the general consusus is but there do seem to be many ethernet drivers that support SIOCMIIREG including the phylib default ioctl handler.
Quoted 4 lines
I am on holiday, will get a chance to read over the thread this weekend.
Regards,
-JonJon,
Quoted 9 lines
I will be posting a followup patch very soon (hopefully in the next couple of days) for adding phylib support to igb hopefully addressing Alexander's comments and concerns noted in this thread. My phylib phy driver is an un-posted work-in-progress and because my phy operates likely different from yours, you will need to write a phylib phy driver to test the patch when its posted.
Tim
Thanks for the update Tim. I have not had time to look at this for now but also have not seen your v2 series either, did I miss that?
-Jon
PATCH 3/3 net: igb: register mii_bus for SerDes w/ external phy
Quoted 1 line · Jonathan Toppins
On 5/20/15 11:46 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
<snip>
Quoted 5 lines
Thanks for the update Tim. I have not had time to look at this for now but also have not seen your v2 series either, did I miss that?
-Jon
Jon,
You haven't missed it - I've gotten pulled off onto some other things and haven't gotten back to it. Where it stands right now I have a patch that should be completely 'safe' and eliminate any backwards compatibility concerns however I'm not convinced I'm skipping enough phy related code when phylib mode is used. Arguably those could come later as issues are found with phylib phy drivers, but I feel like if I can just get another half day into it I could possibly work out those issues as well.
Tim
cover igb: add i210/i211 external phy support
In reply to Tim HarveyQuoted 10 lines · Tim Harvey
The i210/i211 can use an external phy and there is support built into igb
for several. However if you instead want to use the Linux phydev driver API
the igb driver needs to register an MDIO bus with Linux.This patch series fixes mdio read/write capability for i210/i211 and registers an MDIO bus if the EEPROM is configured with an external phy.
Quoted 5 lines
This has only been tested on an i210 with an external phy as that is all I
have access to. Testing is needed.Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>
Tried to apply your patch series and it does not apply cleanly to my next-queue tree (dev-queue branch). Please update your series to my latest tree and re-submit.
Quoted 5 lines
Tim Harvey (3):
net: igb: add i210/i211 support for phy read/write
net: igb: add phy read/write functions that accept phy addr
net: igb: registermii_busfor SerDes w/ external phy
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 20 +++- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h | 7 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++----- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.h | 6 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 5 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20150504/50ff339a/attachment.asc>
cover igb: add i210/i211 external phy support
Quoted 15 lines · Jeff Kirsher
Quoted 14 lines · Tim Harvey
The i210/i211 can use an external phy and there is support built into igb
for several. However if you instead want to use the Linux phydev driver API
the igb driver needs to register an MDIO bus with Linux.This patch series fixes mdio read/write capability for i210/i211 and registers an MDIO bus if the EEPROM is configured with an external phy.
This has only been tested on an i210 with an external phy as that is all I
have access to. Testing is needed.
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>Tried to apply your patch series and it does not apply cleanly to my next-queue tree (dev-queue branch). Please update your series to my latest tree and re-submit.
Quoted 13 lines
Tim Harvey (3):
net: igb: add i210/i211 support for phy read/write
net: igb: add phy read/write functions that accept phy addr
net: igb: registermii_busfor SerDes w/ external phydrivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 20 +++- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h | 7 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++----- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.h | 6 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 5 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
Jeff,
The first patch was to add i210/i211 support for phy read/write (when using i210/i211 with an external phy) which I should split out from the other two which are to add phylib support to igb. This first patch however is colliding with 'igb: add PHY support for Broadcom 5461S'
[1] which I believe you just nak'd. I guess patch submissions automatically get applied to next-queue/dev-queue? What should I rebase against?
Regards,
Tim
cover igb: add i210/i211 external phy support
Quoted 44 lines · Tim Harvey
Quoted 2 lines · Jeff Kirsher
Quoted 1 line · Tim Harvey
The i210/i211 can use an external phy and there is support built
into
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
igb
for several. However if you instead want to use the Linux phydev driver API
the igb driver needs to register an MDIO bus with Linux.This patch series fixes mdio read/write capability for i210/i211
and
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
registers an MDIO bus if the EEPROM is configured with an external phy.
This has only been tested on an i210 with an external phy as that
is
Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 4 lines
all I
have access to. Testing is needed.Signed-off-by Tim Harvey <[email protected]>Tried to apply your patch series and it does not apply cleanly to my next-queue tree (dev-queue branch). Please update your series to my latest tree and re-submit.
Quoted 13 lines
Tim Harvey (3):
net: igb: add i210/i211 support for phy read/write
net: igb: add phy read/write functions that accept phy addr
net: igb: registermii_busfor SerDes w/ external phydrivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 20 +++- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_hw.h | 7 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++----- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_phy.h | 6 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 5 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)Jeff,
Quoted 7 lines
The first patch was to add i210/i211 support for phy read/write (when using i210/i211 with an external phy) which I should split out from the other two which are to add phylib support to igb. This first patch however is colliding with 'igb: add PHY support for Broadcom 5461S'
[1] which I believe you just nak'd. I guess patch submissions automatically get applied to next-queue/dev-queue? What should I rebase against?
I applied it so that Aaron could do regression testing on it, while we
were reviewing the changes. I popped off that last series from
Jonathan, so you should be able to rebase your patches on my dev-queue
branch now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20150507/6d9f8f7f/attachment.asc>