Skip to contentSkip to conversation

802.15.4 security

DISCUSSION Simon Vincent 3 participants 10 messages May 21, 2015 – Jun 18, 2015 IEEE 802.15.4

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

What is the status of the crypto-layer? I can see a lot of crypto functionality in the mac layer but I can't work out how to setup the keys and enable encryption/authentication. Will this be part of the wpan-tools?

- Simon

#1 lore raw

Hi Simon,

sorry for taking so long to reply. Unfortunately, there's currently no actual documentation for the crypto layer (and I probably won't come around to write any sometime soon), but I have built an application that works with llsec [1].

The process to set up a crypto config for a network is rougly outlined in [2] and [3]. There are more options to the crypto layer than are used there, but the process is pretty much the same: you add a number of devices you want to securely communicate with, add the keys those devices will use to communicate, and then set the general parameters for llsec (like default llsec, enabling the crypto layer and such).

Hope that helps a little,
Phoebe

[1]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm
[2]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L160
[3]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L90

Quoted 10 lines · On Thu, 21 May 2015 14:23:10 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

What is the status of the crypto-layer? I can see a lot of crypto functionality in the mac layer but I can't work out how to setup the keys and enable encryption/authentication. Will this be part of the wpan-tools?

- Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#2 lore raw

Hi Phoebe,

I am having some problems with the 802.15.4 security.

What kernel version/gitref did you last test the 802.15.4 security on? What level of security are you using? (1-7)

I can then have a look what has changed since and try and debug the problems I am seeing.

I find if I set the security level to 1,2,3 I get a kernel panic whenever a packet is sent. If I set the security level to 4 the packets sent are corrupt.
If I set the security level to 5-7 wireshark decodes the packets as MIC check failed.

Regards

Simon

Quoted 42 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Hi Simon,

sorry for taking so long to reply. Unfortunately, there's currently no actual documentation for the crypto layer (and I probably won't come around to write any sometime soon), but I have built an application that works with llsec [1].

The process to set up a crypto config for a network is rougly outlined in [2] and [3]. There are more options to the crypto layer than are used there, but the process is pretty much the same: you add a number of devices you want to securely communicate with, add the keys those devices will use to communicate, and then set the general parameters for llsec (like default llsec, enabling the crypto layer and such).

Hope that helps a little,
Phoebe

[1]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm
[2]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L160
[3]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L90

Quoted 10 lines · On Thu, 21 May 2015 14:23:10 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

What is the status of the crypto-layer? I can see a lot of crypto functionality in the mac layer but I can't work out how to setup the keys and enable encryption/authentication. Will this be part of the wpan-tools?

- Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#3 lore raw

Hi Simon,

the last kernel I used this with was 3.15-rc8, so actually quite a while ago. Unfortunately, I don't have the means to test things with a current kernel right now, because I don't remember things failing that hard when I last worked on that code. I usually used seclevel 5, which worked fine with our devices.

@wireshark: by default, without further configuration, wireshark can't check the MIC, because it doesn't have the necessary keys. There was a way to give wireshark those keys, but I don't remember off hand how that worked.

Quoted 65 lines · On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:12:19 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

Hi Phoebe,

I am having some problems with the 802.15.4 security.

What kernel version/gitref did you last test the 802.15.4 security on? What level of security are you using? (1-7)

I can then have a look what has changed since and try and debug the problems I am seeing.

I find if I set the security level to 1,2,3 I get a kernel panic whenever a packet is sent.
If I set the security level to 4 the packets sent are corrupt. If I set the security level to 5-7 wireshark decodes the packets as MIC check failed.

Regards

Simon

Quoted 43 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Hi Simon,

sorry for taking so long to reply. Unfortunately, there's currently no actual documentation for the crypto layer (and I probably won't come around to write any sometime soon), but I have built an application that works with llsec [1].

The process to set up a crypto config for a network is rougly outlined in [2] and [3]. There are more options to the crypto layer than are used there, but the process is pretty much the same: you add a number of devices you want to securely communicate with, add the keys those devices will use to communicate, and then set the general parameters for llsec (like default llsec, enabling the crypto layer and such).

Hope that helps a little,
Phoebe

[1]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm
[2]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L160
[3]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L90

Quoted 10 lines · On Thu, 21 May 2015 14:23:10 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

What is the status of the crypto-layer? I can see a lot of crypto functionality in the mac layer but I can't work out how to setup the keys and enable encryption/authentication. Will this be part of the wpan-tools?

- Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#4 lore raw

Found the bug for levels 1,2,3:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/mac802154/llsec.c#n680

Scatterlist length 0 is invalid. If I had properly built the scatterlists properly instead of setting single element lengths to 0 (because I thought that was allowed), things wouldn't die in a BUG(). Can't patch that now, though, I'm sorry :(

Quoted 87 lines · On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:13:30 +0200 Phoebe Buckheister…

Hi Simon,

the last kernel I used this with was 3.15-rc8, so actually quite a while ago. Unfortunately, I don't have the means to test things with a current kernel right now, because I don't remember things failing that hard when I last worked on that code. I usually used seclevel 5, which worked fine with our devices.

@wireshark: by default, without further configuration, wireshark can't check the MIC, because it doesn't have the necessary keys. There was a way to give wireshark those keys, but I don't remember off hand how that worked.

Quoted 16 lines · On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:12:19 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

Hi Phoebe,

I am having some problems with the 802.15.4 security.

What kernel version/gitref did you last test the 802.15.4 security on? What level of security are you using? (1-7)

I can then have a look what has changed since and try and debug the problems I am seeing.

I find if I set the security level to 1,2,3 I get a kernel panic whenever a packet is sent.
If I set the security level to 4 the packets sent are corrupt. If I set the security level to 5-7 wireshark decodes the packets as MIC check failed.

Quoted 50 lines

Regards

Simon

Quoted 44 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Hi Simon,

sorry for taking so long to reply. Unfortunately, there's currently no actual documentation for the crypto layer (and I probably won't come around to write any sometime soon), but I have built an application that works with llsec [1].

The process to set up a crypto config for a network is rougly outlined in [2] and [3]. There are more options to the crypto layer than are used there, but the process is pretty much the
same: you add a number of devices you want to securely communicate with, add the keys those devices will use to communicate, and then set the general parameters for llsec (like default llsec, enabling the crypto layer and such).

Hope that helps a little,
Phoebe

[1]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm
[2]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L160
[3]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L90

Quoted 11 lines · On Thu, 21 May 2015 14:23:10 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

What is the status of the crypto-layer? I can see a lot of crypto functionality in the mac layer but I can't work out how to setup the keys and enable encryption/authentication. Will this be part of the wpan-tools?

- Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#5 lore raw

No worries I will fix it.

Simon

Quoted 97 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Found the bug for levels 1,2,3:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/mac802154/llsec.c#n680

Scatterlist length 0 is invalid. If I had properly built the scatterlists properly instead of setting single element lengths to 0 (because I thought that was allowed), things wouldn't die in a BUG(). Can't patch that now, though, I'm sorry :(

Quoted 85 lines · On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:13:30 +0200 Phoebe Buckheister…

Hi Simon,

the last kernel I used this with was 3.15-rc8, so actually quite a while ago. Unfortunately, I don't have the means to test things with a current kernel right now, because I don't remember things failing that hard when I last worked on that code. I usually used seclevel 5, which worked fine with our devices.

@wireshark: by default, without further configuration, wireshark can't check the MIC, because it doesn't have the necessary keys. There was a way to give wireshark those keys, but I don't remember off hand how that worked.

Quoted 16 lines · On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:12:19 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

Hi Phoebe,

I am having some problems with the 802.15.4 security.

What kernel version/gitref did you last test the 802.15.4 security on? What level of security are you using? (1-7)

I can then have a look what has changed since and try and debug the problems I am seeing.

I find if I set the security level to 1,2,3 I get a kernel panic whenever a packet is sent.
If I set the security level to 4 the packets sent are corrupt. If I set the security level to 5-7 wireshark decodes the packets as MIC check failed.

Quoted 49 lines

Regards

Simon

Quoted 44 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Hi Simon,

sorry for taking so long to reply. Unfortunately, there's currently no actual documentation for the crypto layer (and I probably won't come around to write any sometime soon), but I have built an application that works with llsec [1].

The process to set up a crypto config for a network is rougly outlined in [2] and [3]. There are more options to the crypto layer than are used there, but the process is pretty much the
same: you add a number of devices you want to securely communicate with, add the keys those devices will use to communicate, and then set the general parameters for llsec (like default llsec, enabling the crypto layer and such).

Hope that helps a little,
Phoebe

[1]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm
[2]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L160
[3]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L90

Quoted 11 lines · On Thu, 21 May 2015 14:23:10 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

What is the status of the crypto-layer? I can see a lot of crypto functionality in the mac layer but I can't work out how to setup the keys and enable encryption/authentication. Will this be part of the wpan-tools?

- Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#6 lore raw
In reply to Phoebe Buckheister

I have managed to get security working now in all modes.

I will submit a patch to fix the scatterlist bug.

The other problem I had was the IV was being generated incorrectly. This was because I had used the iwpan tools to set the mac address. This does not set the ieee802154_llsec_params.hwaddr[1] which is used for creating the IV.[2]

I am not sure the best way to fix this issue. Do we need to keep to keep a copy of the pan_id, hwaddr, coord_hwaddr, coord_shortaddr in the llsec_params? It seems like it could easily get missed and not updated if one of these parameters change.

Simon

[1] - http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/net/ieee802154_netdev.h#L308
[2] - http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/mac802154/llsec.c#L627 and http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/mac802154/llsec.c#L656

Quoted 97 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Found the bug for levels 1,2,3:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/mac802154/llsec.c#n680

Scatterlist length 0 is invalid. If I had properly built the scatterlists properly instead of setting single element lengths to 0 (because I thought that was allowed), things wouldn't die in a BUG(). Can't patch that now, though, I'm sorry :(

Quoted 85 lines · On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:13:30 +0200 Phoebe Buckheister…

Hi Simon,

the last kernel I used this with was 3.15-rc8, so actually quite a while ago. Unfortunately, I don't have the means to test things with a current kernel right now, because I don't remember things failing that hard when I last worked on that code. I usually used seclevel 5, which worked fine with our devices.

@wireshark: by default, without further configuration, wireshark can't check the MIC, because it doesn't have the necessary keys. There was a way to give wireshark those keys, but I don't remember off hand how that worked.

Quoted 16 lines · On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:12:19 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

Hi Phoebe,

I am having some problems with the 802.15.4 security.

What kernel version/gitref did you last test the 802.15.4 security on? What level of security are you using? (1-7)

I can then have a look what has changed since and try and debug the problems I am seeing.

I find if I set the security level to 1,2,3 I get a kernel panic whenever a packet is sent.
If I set the security level to 4 the packets sent are corrupt. If I set the security level to 5-7 wireshark decodes the packets as MIC check failed.

Quoted 49 lines

Regards

Simon

Quoted 44 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Hi Simon,

sorry for taking so long to reply. Unfortunately, there's currently no actual documentation for the crypto layer (and I probably won't come around to write any sometime soon), but I have built an application that works with llsec [1].

The process to set up a crypto config for a network is rougly outlined in [2] and [3]. There are more options to the crypto layer than are used there, but the process is pretty much the
same: you add a number of devices you want to securely communicate with, add the keys those devices will use to communicate, and then set the general parameters for llsec (like default llsec, enabling the crypto layer and such).

Hope that helps a little,
Phoebe

[1]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm
[2]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L160
[3]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L90

Quoted 11 lines · On Thu, 21 May 2015 14:23:10 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

What is the status of the crypto-layer? I can see a lot of crypto functionality in the mac layer but I can't work out how to setup the keys and enable encryption/authentication. Will this be part of the wpan-tools?

- Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

maintainer
#7 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Simon Vincent

I have managed to get security working now in all modes.

I will submit a patch to fix the scatterlist bug.

The other problem I had was the IV was being generated incorrectly. This was because I had used the iwpan tools to set the mac address. This does not set the ieee802154_llsec_params.hwaddr[1] which is used for creating the IV.[2]

Yea, I actually also know that using both netlink interfaces and only the old one for security is broken, see [0]:

---

... I know currently there is some function "mac802154_wpan_update_llsec" which makes the security layer to work, because it's not called when setting short/panid anywhere else.

---

What I meant there was that if using nl802154 and updating address it will not call mac802154_wpan_update_llsec. If you like you can set patches for that.

Quoted 5 lines

I am not sure the best way to fix this issue. Do we need to keep to keep a copy of the pan_id, hwaddr, coord_hwaddr, coord_shortaddr in the llsec_params? It seems like it could easily get missed and not updated if one of these parameters change.

Well, I think there exists now better ways of course. But I would not trust the implementation and we _maybe_ overlooked more than just the missing calling of "mac802154_wpan_update_llsec".

We should go the way to support the crypto layer inside nl802154 and then removing the old interface stuff.

- Alex

[0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wpan/msg02098.html

#8 lore raw
In reply to Phoebe Buckheister

Hi Phoebe,

I have added the key to wireshark so it should be able to do decryption and MIC checks. Edit -> Preferences -> Protocols -> IEEE 802.15.4 -> Decryption key.
I assume this works...

What devices were you running on? Just wondering if it is an endian issue.

I will have a dig into the kernel and see if I can work out what is going wrong, I think a lot has changed since 3.15.

Simon

Quoted 80 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Hi Simon,

the last kernel I used this with was 3.15-rc8, so actually quite a while ago. Unfortunately, I don't have the means to test things with a current kernel right now, because I don't remember things failing that hard when I last worked on that code. I usually used seclevel 5, which worked fine with our devices.

@wireshark: by default, without further configuration, wireshark can't check the MIC, because it doesn't have the necessary keys. There was a way to give wireshark those keys, but I don't remember off hand how that worked.

Quoted 64 lines · On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:12:19 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

Hi Phoebe,

I am having some problems with the 802.15.4 security.

What kernel version/gitref did you last test the 802.15.4 security on? What level of security are you using? (1-7)

I can then have a look what has changed since and try and debug the problems I am seeing.

I find if I set the security level to 1,2,3 I get a kernel panic whenever a packet is sent.
If I set the security level to 4 the packets sent are corrupt. If I set the security level to 5-7 wireshark decodes the packets as MIC check failed.

Regards

Simon

Quoted 43 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Hi Simon,

sorry for taking so long to reply. Unfortunately, there's currently no actual documentation for the crypto layer (and I probably won't come around to write any sometime soon), but I have built an application that works with llsec [1].

The process to set up a crypto config for a network is rougly outlined in [2] and [3]. There are more options to the crypto layer than are used there, but the process is pretty much the same: you add a number of devices you want to securely communicate with, add the keys those devices will use to communicate, and then set the general parameters for llsec (like default llsec, enabling the crypto layer and such).

Hope that helps a little,
Phoebe

[1]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm
[2]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L160
[3]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L90

Quoted 10 lines · On Thu, 21 May 2015 14:23:10 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

What is the status of the crypto-layer? I can see a lot of crypto functionality in the mac layer but I can't work out how to setup the keys and enable encryption/authentication. Will this be part of the wpan-tools?

- Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

#9 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:42:16 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

Hi Phoebe,

I have added the key to wireshark so it should be able to do decryption and MIC checks.
Edit -> Preferences -> Protocols -> IEEE 802.15.4 -> Decryption key. I assume this works...

What devices were you running on? Just wondering if it is an endian issue.

Only our own Contiki devices, with a crypto layer that predates crypto as it is implemented in Contiki right now and grew out of horrible code and a lot of misunderstandings. May well be that the code is still wrong, even though I tried to fix it, and the kernel code is now broken to match.

Quoted 92 lines

I will have a dig into the kernel and see if I can work out what is going wrong, I think a lot has changed since 3.15.

Simon

Quoted 8 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Hi Simon,

the last kernel I used this with was 3.15-rc8, so actually quite a while ago. Unfortunately, I don't have the means to test things with a current kernel right now, because I don't remember things failing that hard when I last worked on that code. I usually used seclevel 5, which worked fine with our devices.

Quoted 73 lines

@wireshark: by default, without further configuration, wireshark can't check the MIC, because it doesn't have the necessary keys. There was a way to give wireshark those keys, but I don't remember off hand how that worked.

Quoted 65 lines · On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:12:19 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

Hi Phoebe,

I am having some problems with the 802.15.4 security.

What kernel version/gitref did you last test the 802.15.4 security on? What level of security are you using? (1-7)

I can then have a look what has changed since and try and debug the problems I am seeing.

I find if I set the security level to 1,2,3 I get a kernel panic whenever a packet is sent.
If I set the security level to 4 the packets sent are corrupt. If I set the security level to 5-7 wireshark decodes the packets as MIC check failed.

Regards

Simon

Quoted 44 lines · Phoebe Buckheister

Hi Simon,

sorry for taking so long to reply. Unfortunately, there's currently no actual documentation for the crypto layer (and I probably won't come around to write any sometime soon), but I have built an application that works with llsec [1].

The process to set up a crypto config for a network is rougly outlined in [2] and [3]. There are more options to the crypto layer than are used there, but the process is pretty much the
same: you add a number of devices you want to securely communicate with, add the keys those devices will use to communicate, and then set the general parameters for llsec (like default llsec, enabling the crypto layer and such).

Hope that helps a little,
Phoebe

[1]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm
[2]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L160
[3]
https://github.com/mysmartgrid/hexabus/blob/pb-crypto/hostsoftware/hxbnm/src/hxbnm.cpp#L90

Quoted 11 lines · On Thu, 21 May 2015 14:23:10 +0100 Simon Vincent <[email protected]>…

What is the status of the crypto-layer? I can see a lot of crypto functionality in the mac layer but I can't work out how to setup the keys and enable encryption/authentication. Will this be part of the wpan-tools?

- Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wpan" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html