patman: use -D option for git format-patch
PATCH 1/1 patman: use -D option for git format-patch
This allows Patman to generate smaller patches for file removal.
Signed-off-by Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
---
tools/patman/gitutil.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/patman/gitutil.py +1 -1
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ def CreatePatches(start, count, series): """ if series.get('version'): version = '%s ' % series['version'] - cmd = ['git', 'format-patch', '-M', '--signoff'] + cmd = ['git', 'format-patch', '-D', '-M', '--signoff'] if series.get('cover'): cmd.append('--cover-letter') prefix = series.GetPatchPrefix()
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 1/1 patman: use -D option for git format-patch
Quoted 7 lines · Masahiro Yamada
This allows Patman to generate smaller patches for file removal.
Signed-off-by Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>---
tools/patman/gitutil.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Acked-by Simon Glass <[email protected]>
PATCH 1/1 patman: use -D option for git format-patch
In reply to Masahiro YamadaHello Masahiro,
Am 18.08.2015 um 04:30 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
Quoted 7 lines
This allows Patman to generate smaller patches for file removal.
Signed-off-by Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>---
tools/patman/gitutil.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks!
Acked-by Heiko Schocher <[email protected]>
bye,
Heiko
Signature · 2 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
PATCH 1/1 patman: use -D option for git format-patch
Hi,
Quoted 9 lines · Heiko Schocher
Hello Masahiro,
Am 18.08.2015 um 04:30 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
Quoted 6 lines
This allows Patman to generate smaller patches for file removal.
Signed-off-by Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>---
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
tools/patman/gitutil.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)Thanks!
Acked-by Heiko Schocher <[email protected]>
I'm picking this up now since I think the current behaviour is actually wrong.
Applied to u-boot-x86, thanks!