Problem about CPU stalling in hrtimer_intterrupts()
Subsystems (2)
Hi Thomas,
I got the following call trace when I called some set time syscalls in userspace.
---start---
Jan 01 00:02:29 Linux kernel: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: Jan 01 00:02:29 Linux kernel: 0: (2 GPs behind) idle=913/1/0 softirq=59289/59291 fqs=488 Jan 01 00:02:29 Linux kernel: (detected by 20, t=5252 jiffies, g=35769, c=35768, q=567) Jan 01 00:02:29 Linux kernel: Task dump for CPU 0: Jan 01 00:02:29 Linux kernel: swapper/0 R running task 0 0 0 0x00000002 Jan 01 00:02:29 Linux kernel: Call trace: Jan 01 00:02:29 Linux kernel: [<ffffffc000086c5c>] __switch_to+0x74/0x8c Jan 01 00:02:29 Linux kernel: rcu_sched kthread starved for 4764 jiffies! Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [swapper/0:0] Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.1.6+ #184 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: task: ffffffc00091cdf0 ti: ffffffc000910000 task.ti: ffffffc000910000 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: PC is at arch_cpu_idle+0x10/0x18 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: LR is at arch_cpu_idle+0xc/0x18 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: pc : [<ffffffc00008686c>] lr : [<ffffffc000086868>] pstate: 60000145 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: sp : ffffffc000913f20 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x29: ffffffc000913f20 x28: 000000003f4bbab0 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x27: ffffffc00091669c x26: ffffffc00096e000 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x25: ffffffc000804000 x24: ffffffc000913f30 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffffffc0006817f8 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x21: ffffffc0008fdb00 x20: ffffffc000916618 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x19: ffffffc000910000 x18: 00000000ffffffff Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x17: 0000007f9d6f682c x16: ffffffc0001e19d0 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x15: 0000000000000061 x14: 0000000000000072 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x13: 0000000000000067 x12: ffffffc000682528 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x11: 0000000000000005 x10: 00000001000faf9a Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x9 : ffffffc000913e60 x8 : ffffffc00091d350 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 002b24c4f00026aa Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x5 : 0000001ffd5c6000 x4 : ffffffc000913ea0 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x3 : ffffffdffdec3b44 x2 : ffffffdffdec3b44 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000
---end---
I use the kernel-4.1.6 running on arm64.
My testcase is that it calls clock_settime and clock_adjtime alternately with random params on each core. My system has 32 cores.
I found the cpu stalling in hrtimer_intterrupts(). So I added some debug info in hrtimer_intterrupts() and found that the while loop runs 1020437660 times and takes 98761 jiffies(HZ=250).
Some debug log is here:
---start---
Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: hrtimer_interrupt: 12827864 callbacks suppressed [....] Jan 01 00:08:43 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4805395417269 ccpu0 timer:ffffffef90390a98, timer->function:ffffffc00052bcb8 Jan 01 00:08:43 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4805395417269 ccpu0 timer:ffffffef90390a98, timer->function:ffffffc00052bcb8 Jan 01 00:08:43 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4805395417269 ccpu0 timer:ffffffef90390a98, timer->function:ffffffc00052bcb8 Jan 01 00:08:43 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4805395417269 ccpu0 timer:ffffffef90390a98, timer->function:ffffffc00052bcb8 Jan 01 00:08:43 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4805395417269 ccpu0 timer:ffffffef90390a98, timer->function:ffffffc00052bcb8 Jan 01 00:08:43 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4805395417269 ccpu0 timer:ffffffef90390a98, timer->function:ffffffc00052bcb8 Jan 01 00:08:43 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4809295433162 ccpu0 Jan 01 00:08:43 Linux kernel: i:0 while_cnt:1020437660, cost
jiffies:98761, ccpu0
---end---
Is there maybe a bug or do you have any opinions ?
Thanks,
Yang
Quoted 8 lines · Yang Yingliang
I use the kernel-4.1.6 running on arm64.
My testcase is that it callsclock_settimeandclock_adjtimealternately with random params on each core. My system has 32 cores.I found the cpu stalling in
hrtimer_intterrupts(). So I added some debug info inhrtimer_intterrupts()and found that the while loop runs 1020437660 times and takes 98761 jiffies(HZ=250).
Quoted 7 lines
Some debug log is here:
---start---Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0
Something is rearming a timer over and over with expiry time in the past.
Thanks,
tglx
Quoted 17 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 8 lines · Yang Yingliang
I use the kernel-4.1.6 running on arm64.
My testcase is that it callsclock_settimeandclock_adjtimealternately with random params on each core. My system has 32 cores.I found the cpu stalling in
hrtimer_intterrupts(). So I added some debug info inhrtimer_intterrupts()and found that the while loop runs 1020437660 times and takes 98761 jiffies(HZ=250).Quoted 7 lines
Some debug log is here:
---start---Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0
Quoted 7 lines
Something is rearming a timer over and over with expiry time in the past.
Thanks,
tglx
Hi Thomas:
This problem could only occur on the system with 32 cores, when I cut the cores to 16, this problem disappeared, so I think there is some parallel problem when the 32 core set clock time together:
I try to reproduce the scene:
1.do_settimeofday64
2.update tk time
3.update base time offset
4.update expires_next
the 3 and 4 will be called in softirq, but the hrtimer_interrupt may break the order and run before 3, I am not sure whether this could make the problem, do we need to update base time and expires_next in the hrtimer_interrupt? maybe I miss something, thanks for any suggestion.
kernel/time/hrtimer.c +0 -0
@@ -1254,6 +1254,7 @@ void hrtimer_interrupt(struct clock_event_device *dev)
raw_spin_lock(&cpu_base->lock);entry_time = now = hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
+ hrtimer_force_reprogram(cpu_base, 0);
retry:cpu_base->in_hrtirq = 1;
Thanks
Ding
Quoted 6 lines
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Quoted 18 lines · Ding Tianhong
Quoted 5 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 5 lines
Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0
This problem could only occur on the system with 32 cores, when I cut the cores to 16, this problem disappeared, so I think there is some parallel problem when the 32 core set clock time together:
I try to reproduce the scene:
1.do_settimeofday64
2.update tk time
3.update base time offset
4.updateexpires_next
Quoted 5 lines
the 3 and 4 will be called in softirq, but the
hrtimer_interruptmay break the order and run before 3, I am not sure whether this could make the problem, do we need to update base time andexpires_nextin thehrtimer_interrupt? maybe I miss something, thanks for any suggestion.
Base offset is updated in hrtimer_interrupt as
well. hrtimer_update_base() does that. So that's not the problem.
Can you apply the patch below and enable the hrtimer tracepoints and collect trace data across the point where the problem happens?
Thanks,
tglx
----
kernel/time/timekeeping.c +12 -1
@@ -575,8 +575,14 @@ static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned int action)update_fast_timekeeper (&tk->tkr_mono, &tk_fast_mono);update_fast_timekeeper (&tk->tkr_raw, &tk_fast_raw); -if (action &TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET ) +if (action &TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET ) { tk->clock_was_set_seq++; +trace_printk ("TK: Seq: %u R: %lld B: %lld T: %lld\n" , + tk->clock_was_set_seq, + tk->offs_real, + tk->offs_boot, + tk->offs_tai); + }/* * The mirroring of the data to the shadow-timekeeper needs * to happen last here to ensure we don't over-write the
@@ -1954,6 +1960,11 @@ ktime_t ktime_get_update_offsets_now(unsigned int *cwsseq, ktime_t *offs_real, base =ktime_add_ns (base, nsecs);if (*cwsseq != tk->clock_was_set_seq) { +trace_printk ("HR: Seq: %u R: %lld B: %lld T: %lld\n" , + tk->clock_was_set_seq, + tk->offs_real, + tk->offs_boot, + tk->offs_tai); *cwsseq = tk->clock_was_set_seq; *offs_real = tk->offs_real; *offs_boot = tk->offs_boot;
Quoted 69 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 18 lines · Ding Tianhong
Quoted 5 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 5 lines
Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830 hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0 timer:ffffffdffdec6138, timer->function:ffffffc000129b84 Jan 01 00:03:32 Linux kernel: i:0 basenow.tv64:4809284991830hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer):4440120000000 ccpu0
This problem could only occur on the system with 32 cores, when I cut the cores to 16, this problem disappeared, so I think there is some parallel problem when the 32 core set clock time together:
I try to reproduce the scene:
1.do_settimeofday64
2.update tk time
3.update base time offset
4.updateexpires_nextQuoted 5 lines
the 3 and 4 will be called in softirq, but the
hrtimer_interruptmay break the order and run before 3, I am not sure whether this could make the problem, do we need to update base time andexpires_nextin thehrtimer_interrupt? maybe I miss something, thanks for any suggestion.Base offset is updated in
hrtimer_interruptas
well.hrtimer_update_base()does that. So that's not the problem.Can you apply the patch below and enable the hrtimer tracepoints and collect trace data across the point where the problem happens?
Thanks,
tglx
----kernel/time/timekeeping.c +12
-1@@ -575,8 +575,14 @@ static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned int action)update_fast_timekeeper (&tk->tkr_mono, &tk_fast_mono);update_fast_timekeeper (&tk->tkr_raw, &tk_fast_raw); -if (action &TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET ) +if (action &TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET ) { tk->clock_was_set_seq++; +trace_printk ("TK: Seq: %u R: %lld B: %lld T: %lld\n" , + tk->clock_was_set_seq, + tk->offs_real, + tk->offs_boot, + tk->offs_tai); + }/* * The mirroring of the data to the shadow-timekeeper needs * to happen last here to ensure we don't over-write the @@ -1954,6 +1960,11 @@ ktime_t ktime_get_update_offsets_now(unsigned int *cwsseq, ktime_t *offs_real, base =ktime_add_ns (base, nsecs);if (*cwsseq != tk->clock_was_set_seq) { +trace_printk ("HR: Seq: %u R: %lld B: %lld T: %lld\n" , + tk->clock_was_set_seq, + tk->offs_real, + tk->offs_boot, + tk->offs_tai); *cwsseq = tk->clock_was_set_seq; *offs_real = tk->offs_real; *offs_boot = tk->offs_boot;
Quoted 2 lines
.
I don't try this patch yet.
But I found out when the cpu is stalling, basenow.tv64(7676664221321) is bigger than ktime_get().tv64(7336008904750) in hrtimer_interrupt() and the timer->_softexpires is 7336288000000. This makes it can not finish the while loop until ktime_get().tv64 arrives basenow.tv64.
Is it correct that basenow bigger than ktime_get() ?
Thanks,
Yang
Quoted 6 lines · Yang Yingliang
But I found out when the cpu is stalling,
basenow.tv64(7676664221321)is bigger than ktime_get().tv64(7336008904750) inhrtimer_interrupt()and thetimer->_softexpiresis 7336288000000. This makes it can not finish the while loop until ktime_get().tv64 arrives basenow.tv64.Is it correct that basenow bigger than
ktime_get()?
You only can compare basenow and ktime_get() for the clock monotonic base. If you are actually observing this on clock monotonic base then base->offset of clock monotonic is not 0, which should never happen.
Thanks,
tglx