pvcreate: don't support unpartitioned DASD devices with CDL formatted
PATCH 1/1 pvcreate: don't support unpartitioned DASD devices with CDL formatted
The former patch(dab3ebce4c7) is a little bit strict. For example, it is OK to create PV on unpartitioned DASD devices with LDL formatted. So after lvm version containing the patch, LVs created on those devices could not be found.
--- lib/Makefile.in | 1 + lib/device/dev-dasd.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/device/dev-type.c | 2 +- lib/device/dev-type.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 lib/device/dev-dasd.c
lib/Makefile.in +1 -0
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ SOURCES =\ device/dev-swap.c \ device/dev-type.c \ device/dev-luks.c \ + device/dev-dasd.c \ display/display.c \ error/errseg.c \ unknown/unknown.c \
lib/device/dev-dasd.c new file +75 -0
75 lines not on this page · raw message
lib/device/dev-type.c +1 -1
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static int _native_dev_is_partitioned(struct dev_types *dt, struct device *dev)return 0 ;/* Unpartitioned DASD devices are not supported. */ -if (MAJOR (dev->dev) == dt->dasd_major) +if ((MAJOR (dev->dev) == dt->dasd_major) &&dasd_is_cdl_formatted (dev))return 1 ;if (!dev_open_readonly_quiet (dev)) {
lib/device/dev-type.h +1 -0
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ int major_is_scsi_device(struct dev_types *dt, int major);int dev_is_md (struct device *dev,uint64_t *sb);int dev_is_swap (struct device *dev,uint64_t *signature);int dev_is_luks (struct device *dev,uint64_t *signature); +int dasd_is_cdl_formatted (struct device *dev);/* Signature wiping. */ #define TYPE_LVM1_MEMBER 0x001
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.4
PATCH 1/1 pvcreate: don't support unpartitioned DASD devices with CDL formatted
Dne 12.10.2015 v 09:09 Lidong Zhong napsal(a):
Quoted 5 lines
The former patch(dab3ebce4c7) is a little bit strict. For example, it is OK to create PV on unpartitioned DASD devices with LDL formatted. So after lvm version containing the patch, LVs created on those devices could not be found.
Thanks for code, upstreamed here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2015-October/msg00164.html
Regards
Zdenek