bpf: fix trivial comment typo
Subsystems (4)
PATCH 1/1 bpf: fix trivial comment typo
bpf: fix trivial comment typo
kernel/bpf/core.c +1 -1
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ select_insn:/* ARG1 at this point is guaranteed to point to CTX from * the verifier side due to the fact that the tail call is -* handeled like a helper, that is, bpf_tail_call_proto, +* handled like a helper, that is, bpf_tail_call_proto, * where arg1_type is ARG_PTR_TO_CTX. */ insn = prog->insnsi;
David Miller
maintainerFrom: Matthew Fernandez <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:59:03 +1100
Quoted 3 lines
bpf: fix trivial comment typo
Signed-off-by Matthew Fernandez <[email protected]>
This doesn't apply to any tree.
Quoted 8 lines · David Miller
From: Matthew Fernandez <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:59:03 +1100Quoted 3 lines
bpf: fix trivial comment typo
Signed-off-by Matthew Fernandez <[email protected]>This doesn't apply to any tree.
I'm sorry, I think I must be missing something. This seems to apply cleanly to the current tip of mainline (e86328c489d7) to me. Was this not in the expected format? It wasn't my intention to waste your time, so I apologise for any newbie errors.
Daniel Borkmann
maintainerQuoted 11 lines · Matthew Fernandez
Quoted 8 lines · David Miller
From: Matthew Fernandez <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:59:03 +1100Quoted 3 lines
bpf: fix trivial comment typo
Signed-off-by Matthew Fernandez <[email protected]>This doesn't apply to any tree.
I'm sorry, I think I must be missing something. This seems to apply cleanly to the current tip of mainline (
e86328c489d7) to me. Was this not in the expected format? It wasn't my intention to waste your time, so I apologise for any newbie errors.
You might want to check Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt ;), and rebase your spelling fix f.e. to the latest net-next tree.
Quoted 9 lines · Daniel Borkmann
Quoted 8 lines · Matthew Fernandez
Quoted 7 lines · David Miller
From: Matthew Fernandez <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:59:03 +1100Quoted 3 lines
bpf: fix trivial comment typo
Signed-off-by Matthew Fernandez <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
This doesn't apply to any tree.
I'm sorry, I think I must be missing something. This seems to apply cleanly to the current tip of mainline (
e86328c489d7) to me. Was this not in the expected format? It wasn't my intention to waste your time, so I apologise for any newbie errors.You might want to check
Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt;), and rebase your spelling fix f.e. to the latest net-next tree.
Ah right, sorry about that. Thanks for the info, Daniel. From netdev-FAQ it sounds like this patch would be more appropriate for the net tree, but as the target file is identical in both right now I'll leave it to someone else's discretion to decide which is more suitable. Will rebase and resubmit.