musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
PATCH 1/1 musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
Musl does not provide a 'sys/queue.h' implementation, and this has been a problem for packages that depend on it.
So lets create a package called sys-queue that will install 'sys/queue.h' in the staging directory when enabled.
Musl toolchain and external toolchain packages will depend on this package, so that 'sys/queue.h' will be always installed when compiling with a musl based toolchain.
Tested on ARM and x86 in the following cases:
- Buildroot musl toolchain.
- External musl toolchain without 'sys/queue.h'.
- External musl toolchain with 'sys/queue.h'.
Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/24bad2d06ab40024dacf136bee722072d587f84e
And possibly many others.
--- package/musl/musl.mk | 5 + package/sys-queue/Config.in | 8 + package/sys-queue/queue.h | 846 +++++++++++++++++++++ package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk | 23 + toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external.mk | 7 + 5 files changed, 889 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/sys-queue/Config.in create mode 100644 package/sys-queue/queue.h create mode 100644 package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk
package/musl/musl.mk +5 -0
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ MUSL_LICENSE_FILES = COPYRIGHT # cross-compiler and the kernel headers MUSL_DEPENDENCIES = host-gcc-initial linux-headers +# musl does not provide a sys/queue.h implementation, so add the +# sys-queue package that will install a sys/queue.h file in the +# staging directory based on the NetBSD implementation. +MUSL_DEPENDENCIES += sys-queue + # musl is part of the toolchain so disable the toolchain dependency MUSL_ADD_TOOLCHAIN_DEPENDENCY = NO
package/sys-queue/Config.in new file +8 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_SYS_QUEUE + bool "sys/queue.h support" + help + Musl does not provide a 'sys/queue.h' implementation, and this would + be a problem for packages that depend on it. + + This package provides an implementation of 'sys/queue.h', based on + the NetBSD implementation.
package/sys-queue/queue.h new file +846 -0
846 lines not on this page · raw message
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +23 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# sys-queue +# +################################################################################ + +# source included in buildroot +SYS_QUEUE_SOURCE = +SYS_QUEUE_VERSION = 1.70 + +SYS_QUEUE_LICENSE = BSD +SYS_QUEUE_LICENSE_FILES = queue.h + +SYS_QUEUE_INSTALL_STAGING = YES + +define SYS_QUEUE_INSTALL_STAGING_CMDS + if [ ! -f $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/sys/queue.h ]; then \ + $(INSTALL) -D -m 0644 package/sys-queue/queue.h \ + $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/sys/queue.h; \ + fi +endef + +$(eval $(generic-package))
toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external.mk +7 -0
@@ -237,6 +237,13 @@ TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_CFLAGS += -msoft-float TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_TOOLCHAIN_WRAPPER_ARGS += -DBR_SOFTFLOAT=1 endif +# musl does not provide a sys/queue.h implementation, so add the +# sys-queue package that will install a sys/queue.h file in the +# staging directory based on the NetBSD implementation. +ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_MUSL),y) +TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_DEPENDENCIES += sys-queue +endif + # The Linaro ARMhf toolchain expects the libraries in # {/usr,}/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf, but Buildroot copies them to # {/usr,}/lib, so we need to create a symbolic link.
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
PATCH 1/1 musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
Hi Sergio,
Quoted 15 lines · Sergio Prado
Musl does not provide a '
sys/queue.h' implementation, and this has been a problem for packages that depend on it.So lets create a package called sys-queue that will install '
sys/queue.h' in the staging directory when enabled.Musl toolchain and external toolchain packages will depend on this package, so that '
sys/queue.h' will be always installed when compiling with a musl based toolchain.Tested on ARM and x86 in the following cases:
- Buildroot musl toolchain.
- External musl toolchain without 'sys/queue.h'.
- External musl toolchain with 'sys/queue.h'.
Quoted 6 lines
Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/24bad2d06ab40024dacf136bee722072d587f84eAnd possibly many others.
Signed-off-by Sergio Prado <[email protected]>
Thanks for working on this.
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 17
Quoted 2 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +2
-0+define SYS_QUEUE_INSTALL_STAGING_CMDS + if [ ! -f $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/sys/queue.h ]; then \
We generally don't check for existence of files in target/staging, just overwrite them. Is there a reason to do this here? As I understand sys-queue is now a dependency of the toolchain, so if the toolchain provides sys/queue.h it will overwrite this one anyway.
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 21
Quoted 4 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +4
-0+ $(INSTALL) -D -m 0644 package/sys-queue/queue.h \ + $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/sys/queue.h; \ + fi +endef
baruch
Signature · 3 lines
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -PATCH 1/1 musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
Hi Baruch,
2015-12-01 2:38 GMT-02:00 Baruch Siach <[email protected]>:
Quoted 31 lines
Hi Sergio,
Quoted 10 lines · Sergio Prado
Musl does not provide a '
sys/queue.h' implementation, and this has been a problem for packages that depend on it.So lets create a package called sys-queue that will install '
sys/queue.h' in the staging directory when enabled.Musl toolchain and external toolchain packages will depend on this package, so that '
sys/queue.h' will be always installed when compiling with a musl based toolchain.Quoted 7 lines
Tested on ARM and x86 in the following cases:
- Buildroot musl toolchain.
- External musl toolchain without 'sys/queue.h'.
- External musl toolchain with 'sys/queue.h'.Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/24bad2d06ab40024dacf136bee722072d587f84e
Quoted 4 lines
And possibly many others.
Signed-off-by Sergio Prado <[email protected]>Thanks for working on this.
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 17
Quoted 2 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +2
-0+define SYS_QUEUE_INSTALL_STAGING_CMDS + if [ ! -f $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/sys/queue.h ]; then \
Quoted 7 lines
We generally don't check for existence of files in target/staging, just overwrite them. Is there a reason to do this here? As I understand sys-queue
is now a dependency of the toolchain, so if the toolchain providessys/queue.h
it will overwrite this one anyway.
You are right. Initially, sys-queue would be installed after the external toolchain package, so this would prevents from overriding the toolchain's sys/queue.h implementation. But that's not the case anymore, so I'm OK with removing this check.
Thanks!
Quoted 6 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 21
Quoted 5 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +4
-0+ $(INSTALL) -D -m 0644 package/sys-queue/queue.h \ + $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/sys/queue.h; \ + fi +endef
Quoted 8 lines
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open
Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20151201/dc644e9e/attachment.html>
PATCH 1/1 musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
In reply to Sergio PradoSergio,
Quoted 3 lines · Sergio Prado
package/musl/musl.mk | 5 + package/sys-queue/Config.in | 8 + package/sys-queue/queue.h | 846 +++++++++++++++++++++
Rather than bundling the queue.h file, can we download it from some location ? For example, you could use
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/queue.h?rev=1.30.
Quoted 6 lines
package/sys-queue/Config.in new file +0
-0
package/sys-queue/Config.in line 8
Quoted 8 lines
package/sys-queue/Config.in new file +8
-0@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_SYS_QUEUE + bool "sys/queue.h support" + help + Musl does not provide a 'sys/queue.h' implementation, and this would + be a problem for packages that depend on it. + + This package provides an implementation of 'sys/queue.h', based on + the NetBSD implementation.
Do we really need this package to have a prompt? I think it could remain a hidden package, no?
Quoted 6 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +0
-0
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 9
Quoted 9 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +9
-0@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +################################################################################ +# +# sys-queue +# +################################################################################ + +# source included in buildroot +SYS_QUEUE_SOURCE = +SYS_QUEUE_VERSION = 1.70
Where is this version coming from ?
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 11
Quoted 2 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +2
-0+ +SYS_QUEUE_LICENSE = BSD
BSD-3c
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 21
Quoted 10 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +10
-0+SYS_QUEUE_LICENSE_FILES = queue.h + +SYS_QUEUE_INSTALL_STAGING = YES + +define SYS_QUEUE_INSTALL_STAGING_CMDS + if [ ! -f $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/sys/queue.h ]; then \ + $(INSTALL) -D -m 0644 package/sys-queue/queue.h \ + $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/sys/queue.h; \ + fi +endef
As Baruch said, please install unconditionally.
Otherwise, looks good to me.
Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH 1/1 musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
Hello Thomas,
2015-12-01 8:29 GMT-02:00 Thomas Petazzoni <
[email protected]>:
Quoted 4 lines
Sergio,
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:02:15 -0200, Sergio Prado wrote:
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
package/musl/musl.mk | 5 + package/sys-queue/Config.in | 8 + package/sys-queue/queue.h | 846+++++++++++++++++++++
Rather than bundling the
queue.hfile, can we download it from some location ? For example, you could use
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/queue.h?rev=1.30.
One of my first questions was if we should keep queue.h inside Buildroot or download it from somewhere. And you say we could keep it inside Buildroot, and point me to package/makedevs/ that has a source code inside it. But I can change it if that's a problem.
Quoted 11 lines
package/sys-queue/Config.in line 4
Quoted 10 lines
package/sys-queue/Config.in new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +config BR2_PACKAGE_SYS_QUEUE + bool "sys/queue.h support" + help + Musl does not provide a 'sys/queue.h' implementation, and thiswould
Quoted 9 lines
package/sys-queue/Config.in
Quoted 3 lines
package/sys-queue/Config.in new file +3
-0+ be a problem for packages that depend on it. + + This package provides an implementation of 'sys/queue.h', basedon
package/sys-queue/Config.in line 8
Quoted 1 line
package/sys-queue/Config.in new file +1
-0+ the NetBSD implementation.Do we really need this package to have a prompt? I think it could remain a hidden package, no?
Since it is not included in the package/Config.in, it is still hidden, right? At least I can't find it when searching inside menuconfig. I created this file just as a matter of documentation, but I can remove if it is not necessary.
Quoted 15 lines
package/sys-queue/
Quoted 2 lines
package/sys-queue/ renamed from package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk +0
-0sys-queue.mk
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk
Quoted 6 lines
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..053ef8fd9e0dpackage/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +0
-0@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@+################################################################################
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 4
Quoted 4 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +3
-0+# +# sys-queue +#+################################################################################
Quoted 7 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 9
Quoted 4 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +4
-0+ +# source included in buildroot +SYS_QUEUE_SOURCE = +SYS_QUEUE_VERSION = 1.70Where is this version coming from ?
From the source code.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/queue.h?rev=1.70
Quoted 6 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 11
Quoted 3 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +2
-0+ +SYS_QUEUE_LICENSE = BSDBSD-3c
Quoted 13 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 21
Quoted 10 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +10
-0+SYS_QUEUE_LICENSE_FILES = queue.h + +SYS_QUEUE_INSTALL_STAGING = YES + +define SYS_QUEUE_INSTALL_STAGING_CMDS + if [ ! -f $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/sys/queue.h ]; then \ + $(INSTALL) -D -m 0644 package/sys-queue/queue.h \ + $(STAGING_DIR)/usr/include/sys/queue.h; \ + fi +endefAs Baruch said, please install unconditionally.
OK.
Quoted 5 lines
Otherwise, looks good to me.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Quoted 7 lines
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20151201/7ac828e0/attachment.html>
PATCH 1/1 musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
Sergio,
Quoted 6 lines · Sergio Prado
Quoted 3 lines
Rather than bundling the
queue.hfile, can we download it from some location ? For example, you could use
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/queue.h?rev=1.30.One of my first questions was if we should keep
queue.hinside Buildroot or download it from somewhere. And you say we could keep it inside Buildroot,
Hum, are you sure your question was whether we should download it or keep it inside Buildroot? I think your question was more "is it possible to keep it inside Buildroot?", to which I answered yes, indeed :-)
But anyway, doesn't really matter. I personally believe it's better to download stuff when we can rather than bundling it. Hopefully others will agree with me.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Do we really need this package to have a prompt? I think it could remain a hidden package, no?
Since it is not included in the package/Config.in, it is still hidden, right? At least I can't find it when searching inside menuconfig. I created this file just as a matter of documentation, but I can remove if it is not necessary.
A Config.in that is not included anywhere is not useful at all, so it shouldn't exist.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 9
Quoted 3 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +3
-0+# source included in buildroot +SYS_QUEUE_SOURCE = +SYS_QUEUE_VERSION = 1.70Where is this version coming from ?
From the source code.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/queue.h?rev=1.70
Alright, so it can be used in <pkg>_SOURCE. You will have to overwrite the EXTRACT_CMDS however, because it's not a tarball. See jquery.mk for example.
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH 1/1 musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
2015-12-01 9:00 GMT-02:00 Thomas Petazzoni <
[email protected]>:
Quoted 13 lines
Sergio,
Quoted 5 lines · Sergio Prado
Quoted 3 lines
Rather than bundling the
queue.hfile, can we download it from some location ? For example, you could use
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/queue.h?rev=1.30.One of my first questions was if we should keep
queue.hinside Buildrootor
Quoted 1 line
download it from somewhere. And you say we could keep it inside
Buildroot,
Quoted 9 lines
Hum, are you sure your question was whether we should download it or keep it inside Buildroot? I think your question was more "is it possible to keep it inside Buildroot?", to which I answered yes, indeed :-)
But anyway, doesn't really matter. I personally believe it's better to download stuff when we can rather than bundling it. Hopefully others will agree with me.
OK. I'll do it.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Do we really need this package to have a prompt? I think it could remain a hidden package, no?
Since it is not included in the package/Config.in, it is still hidden, right? At least I can't find it when searching inside menuconfig. I
Quoted 8 lines
created
Quoted 1 line
this file just as a matter of documentation, but I can remove if it is
not
Quoted 1 line
necessary.
A Config.in that is not included anywhere is not useful at all, so it shouldn't exist.
Right.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 6 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk line 9
Quoted 4 lines
package/sys-queue/sys-queue.mk new file +3
-0+# source included in buildroot +SYS_QUEUE_SOURCE = +SYS_QUEUE_VERSION = 1.70Where is this version coming from ?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
From the source code.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/queue.h?rev=1.70Alright, so it can be used in <pkg>_SOURCE. You will have to overwrite the
EXTRACT_CMDShowever, because it's not a tarball. See jquery.mk for example.
OK, thanks.
Quoted 7 lines
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20151201/e2357a96/attachment.html>
PATCH 1/1 musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
In reply to Sergio PradoHi all,
Quoted 4 lines · Sergio Prado
Musl does not provide a '
sys/queue.h' implementation, and this has been
a problem for packages that depend on it.
Quoted 9 lines
So lets create a package called sys-queue that will install '
sys/queue.h'
in the staging directory when enabled.Musl toolchain and external toolchain packages will depend on this package, so that '
sys/queue.h' will be always installed when compiling
with a musl based toolchain.
Maybe we can handle this similiar to the gettext integration and define a BR2_NEEDS_SYS_QUEUE for toolchains not providing a queue library.
Packages that need a queue implementation can use 'select BR2_PACKAGE_NETBSD_QUEUE if BR2_NEEDS_SYS_QUEUE' in their Config.in file and add a '$(if $(BR2_NEEDS_SYS_QUEUE),netbsd-queue)' to their dependencies in the .mk file.?
This means we have a package 'netbsd-queue' with the sources of the NetBSD project you proposed. Note, there exists more implementations of the queue library, e.g. OpenBSD, Apple, so I would prefer to use the name of the implementation as there is no *the* sys/queue.h.
Furthermore, we allow a package to use, for whatever reasons, to select a different queue implementation.
On the other hand, maybe it is to confusing for the package maintainer to have different options for a queue library, so we just provide a default package named 'sys-queue' using the sources of NetBSD?
Best regards
J?rg Krause
PATCH 1/1 musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
Quoted 17 lines · J?rg Krause
Hi all,
Quoted 4 lines · Sergio Prado
Musl does not provide a '
sys/queue.h' implementation, and this has been
a problem for packages that depend on it.Quoted 9 lines
So lets create a package called sys-queue that will install '
sys/queue.h'
in the staging directory when enabled.Musl toolchain and external toolchain packages will depend on this package, so that '
sys/queue.h' will be always installed when compiling
with a musl based toolchain.
Quoted 7 lines
Maybe we can handle this similiar to the gettext integration and define a
BR2_NEEDS_SYS_QUEUEfor toolchains not providing a queue library.Packages that need a queue implementation can use 'select
BR2_PACKAGE_NETBSD_QUEUEifBR2_NEEDS_SYS_QUEUE' in their Config.in file and add a '$(if $(BR2_NEEDS_SYS_QUEUE),netbsd-queue)' to their dependencies in the .mk file.
This would add quite a lot of complexity. Unconditionally installingsys/queue.h for musl libraries is really a lot simpler.
Quoted 5 lines
This means we have a package 'netbsd-queue' with the sources of the NetBSD project you proposed. Note, there exists more implementations of the queue library, e.g. OpenBSD, Apple, so I would prefer to use the name of the implementation as there is no *the*
sys/queue.h.
That's a good idea. Not that I expect we'll ever carry another queue
implementation (actually we already have two: uClibc and glibc).
Regards,
Arnout
Quoted 15 lines
Furthermore, we allow a package to use, for whatever reasons, to select a different queue implementation.
On the other hand, maybe it is to confusing for the package maintainer to have different options for a queue library, so we just provide a default package named 'sys-queue' using the sources of NetBSD?
Best regards
J?rg Krause
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot at busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
PATCH 1/1 musl: add a sys/queue.h implementation
2015-12-01 18:34 GMT-02:00 Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]>:
Quoted 30 lines · J?rg Krause
Quoted 17 lines
Hi all,
Quoted 4 lines · Sergio Prado
Musl does not provide a '
sys/queue.h' implementation, and this has been
a problem for packages that depend on it.Quoted 9 lines
So lets create a package called sys-queue that will install '
sys/queue.h'
in the staging directory when enabled.Musl toolchain and external toolchain packages will depend on this package, so that '
sys/queue.h' will be always installed when compiling
with a musl based toolchain.Quoted 7 lines
Maybe we can handle this similiar to the gettext integration and define a
BR2_NEEDS_SYS_QUEUEfor toolchains not providing a queue library.Packages that need a queue implementation can use 'select
BR2_PACKAGE_NETBSD_QUEUEifBR2_NEEDS_SYS_QUEUE' in their Config.in file and add a '$(if $(BR2_NEEDS_SYS_QUEUE),netbsd-queue)' to their dependencies in the .mk file.This would add quite a lot of complexity. Unconditionally installing
sys/queue.hfor musl libraries is really a lot simpler.Quoted 1 line
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
This means we have a package 'netbsd-queue' with the sources of the NetBSD project you proposed. Note, there exists more implementations of the queue library, e.g. OpenBSD, Apple, so I would prefer to use the name of the implementation as there is no *the*
sys/queue.h.That's a good idea. Not that I expect we'll ever carry another queue
implementation (actually we already have two: uClibc and glibc).
I liked the idea. I'll rename the package to netbsd-queue.
Quoted 20 lines
Regards,
ArnoutQuoted 8 lines
Furthermore, we allow a package to use, for whatever reasons, to select a different queue implementation.
On the other hand, maybe it is to confusing for the package maintainer to have different options for a queue library, so we just provide a default package named 'sys-queue' using the sources of NetBSD?
Quoted 7 lines
Best regards
J?rg Krause
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot at busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Quoted 8 lines
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20151201/59ac6a1a/attachment.html>