ocfs2: fix SGID not inherited issue
PATCH 1/1 ocfs2: fix SGID not inherited issue
commit 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue, SGID of sub dir was not inherited from its parents dir. It is because SGID is set into "inode->i_mode" in ocfs2_get_init_inode(), but is overwritten by "mode" which don't have SGID set later.
--- fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
fs/ocfs2/namei.c +1 -3
@@ -367,13 +367,11 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct inode *dir, goto leave; } - status =posix_acl_create (dir, &mode, &default_acl, &acl); + status =posix_acl_create (dir, &inode->i_mode, &default_acl, &acl);if (status) {mlog_errno (status); goto leave; } -/* update inode->i_mode after mask with "umask". */ - inode->i_mode = mode; handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, ocfs2_mknod_credits(osb->sb, S_ISDIR(mode),
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
PATCH 1/1 ocfs2: fix SGID not inherited issue
Thanks Junxiao!
Quoted 31 lines · Junxiao Bi
commit
8f1eb48758aa("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue, SGID of sub dir was not inherited from its parents dir. It is because SGID is set into "inode->i_mode" inocfs2_get_init_inode(), but is overwritten by "mode" which don't have SGID set later.Fixes 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue")Signed-off-by Junxiao Bi <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]>--- fs/ocfs2/namei.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)fs/ocfs2/namei.c +1
-3@@ -367,13 +367,11 @@ static int ocfs2_mknod(struct inode *dir, goto leave; } - status =posix_acl_create (dir, &mode, &default_acl, &acl); + status =posix_acl_create (dir, &inode->i_mode, &default_acl, &acl);if (status) {mlog_errno (status); goto leave; } -/* update inode->i_mode after mask with "umask". */ - inode->i_mode = mode; handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, ocfs2_mknod_credits(osb->sb, S_ISDIR(mode),
PATCH 1/1 ocfs2: fix SGID not inherited issue
In reply to Junxiao BiQuoted 8 lines · On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:09:06 +0800 Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> wrote:
commit
8f1eb48758aa("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue, SGID of sub dir was not inherited from its parents dir. It is because SGID is set into "inode->i_mode" inocfs2_get_init_inode(), but is overwritten by "mode" which don't have SGID set later.Fixes 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue")Signed-off-by Junxiao Bi <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]>
8f1eb48758aa is only in 4.4-rcX so I removed the cc:stable.
PATCH 1/1 ocfs2: fix SGID not inherited issue
Hi Andrew,
Quoted 7 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 5 lines · On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:09:06 +0800 Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> wrote:
commit
8f1eb48758aa("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue, SGID of sub dir was not inherited from its parents dir. It is because SGID is set into "inode->i_mode" inocfs2_get_init_inode(), but is overwritten by "mode" which don't have SGID set later.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Fixes 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue")Signed-off-by Junxiao Bi <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]>
8f1eb48758aais only in 4.4-rcX so I removed the cc:stable.
If 8f1eb48758aa is merged into stable, but this patch not, there will be a regression issue in stable branch?
Thanks,
Junxiao.
Quoted 1 line
PATCH 1/1 ocfs2: fix SGID not inherited issue
Quoted 10 lines · On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:28:17 +0800 Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Quoted 7 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 5 lines · On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:09:06 +0800 Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> wrote:
commit
8f1eb48758aa("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue, SGID of sub dir was not inherited from its parents dir. It is because SGID is set into "inode->i_mode" inocfs2_get_init_inode(), but is overwritten by "mode" which don't have SGID set later.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Fixes 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue")Signed-off-by Junxiao Bi <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]>
8f1eb48758aais only in 4.4-rcX so I removed the cc:stable.If
8f1eb48758aais merged into stable, but this patch not, there will be a regression issue in stable branch?
Ah, yes, right you are, thanks.