Skip to contentSkip to conversation

libnspr: only enable thumb if BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2

PATCH New Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) 2 participants 3 messages Jan 15, 2016 – Jan 16, 2016

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 libnspr: only enable thumb if BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2

libnspr currently passes --enable-thumb2 if the CPU has thumb instructions. This option will pass -mthumb to the compiler. However, if an external multilib toolchain is used that has a thumb-specific variant, it will try to use that one. But we only copy a single variant to the sysroot, so the build will fail with:

In order to fix this, only enable thumb2 when we are really using thumb2. Note that it is still necessary to pass this option, cfr.
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/d7323831372050e425a34f5104a46d8cbd6be214

We could have chosen to still enable thumb2 with the internal toolchain. However, that would mean we create a discrepancy between the result of building with the same (buildroot) toolchain when it is used as an internal one or as an external one. To avoid potentially surprising results, just stick to the option chosen for the rest of the rootfs.

---
Build-tested with various combinations of thumb, thumb2, floating point, and external toolchains. I didn't test with an internal toolchain but what could go wrong there? :-)

---
 package/libnspr/libnspr.mk | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
package/libnspr/libnspr.mk +1 -1
index 8e58986..c9bfa0c 100644
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ LIBNSPR_INSTALL_STAGING_OPTS = DESTDIR=$(STAGING_DIR) LIBRARY= install
 endif
 
 ifeq ($(BR2_arm),y)
-ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_CPU_HAS_THUMB2),y)
+ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2),y)
 LIBNSPR_CONF_OPTS += --enable-thumb2
 else
 LIBNSPR_CONF_OPTS += --disable-thumb2
Signature · 1 line
2.7.0.rc3
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 libnspr: only enable thumb if BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2

Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

"Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <[email protected]> writes:

libnspr currently passes --enable-thumb2 if the CPU has thumb instructions. This option will pass -mthumb to the compiler. However, if an external multilib toolchain is used that has a thumb-specific variant, it will try to use that one. But we only copy a single variant to the sysroot, so the build will fail with:

In order to fix this, only enable thumb2 when we are really using thumb2. Note that it is still necessary to pass this option, cfr.
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/d7323831372050e425a34f5104a46d8cbd6be214

Quoted 5 lines

We could have chosen to still enable thumb2 with the internal toolchain. However, that would mean we create a discrepancy between the result of building with the same (buildroot) toolchain when it is used as an internal one or as an external one. To avoid potentially surprising results, just stick to the option chosen for the rest of the rootfs.

Why do we actually ever pass --enable-thumb2 / --disable-thumb2? As far as I can see, the only thing this does is adding -marm / -mthumb to CFLAGS, and we already pass the correct -m<arm/thumb> option in the toolchain wrapper.

Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 libnspr: only enable thumb if BR2_ARM_INSTRUCTIONS_THUMB2

Quoted 18 lines · Peter Korsgaard
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

"Arnout" == Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <[email protected]> writes:

libnspr currently passes --enable-thumb2 if the CPU has thumb instructions. This option will pass -mthumb to the compiler. However, if an external multilib toolchain is used that has a thumb-specific variant, it will try to use that one. But we only copy a single variant to the sysroot, so the build will fail with:

In order to fix this, only enable thumb2 when we are really using thumb2. Note that it is still necessary to pass this option, cfr.
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/d7323831372050e425a34f5104a46d8cbd6be214

Quoted 5 lines

We could have chosen to still enable thumb2 with the internal toolchain. However, that would mean we create a discrepancy between the result of building with the same (buildroot) toolchain when it is used as an internal one or as an external one. To avoid potentially surprising results, just stick to the option chosen for the rest of the rootfs.

Quoted 4 lines

Why do we actually ever pass --enable-thumb2 / --disable-thumb2? As far as I can see, the only thing this does is adding -marm / -mthumb to CFLAGS, and we already pass the correct -m<arm/thumb> option in the toolchain wrapper.

Well, if you don't pass anything, it will check if the _compiler_ supports
thumb by compiling (not linking) something which checks for __thumb2__. So we have to pass something.

Er, on second look, it uses that compile to set MOZ_THUMB2 and then doesn't do
anything with it... Still, there is a good chance that upstream will in the future do something with that symbol, so I think it's safer to explicitly en/disable thumb2.

Regards,
Arnout

Signature · 6 lines
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7493 020B C7E3 8618 8DEC 222C 82EB F404 F9AC 0DDF