Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison

PATCH Superseded Tony Luck 3 participants 17 messages Feb 4, 2016 – Feb 11, 2016

Subsystems (4)

v10 of 11 Superseded Latest is v11 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Tony Luck

author
#0 lore raw

v10 cover Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison

This series is initially targeted at the folks doing filesystems on top of NVDIMMs. They really want to be able to return -EIO when there is a h/w error (just like spinning rust, and SSD does).

I plan to use the same infrastructure to write a machine check aware "copy_from_user()" that will SIGBUS the calling application when a syscall touches poison in user space (just like we do when the application touches the poison itself).

With this series applied Dan Williams can write:

static inline int arch_memcpy_from_pmem(void *dst, const void __pmem *src, size_t n)

{
	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MCRECOVERY)) {
		struct mcsafe_ret ret;

		ret = __mcsafe_copy(dst, (void __force *) src, n);
		if (ret.remain)
			return -EIO;
		return 0;
	}
	memcpy(dst, (void __force *) src, n);
	return 0;
}

I've dropped off the "reviewed-by" tags that I collected back prior to adding the new field to the exception table. Please send new ones if you can.

Changes
V9-V10
Andy: Commit comment in part 2 is stale - refers to "EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT"
Boris: Part1 - Numerous spelling, grammar, etc. fixes
Boris: Part2 - No longer need #include <linux/module.h> (in either file).

V8->V9
Boris: Create a synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery.

Changes V7-V8
Boris: Would be so much cleaner if we added a new field to the exception table
instead of squeezing bits into the fixup field. New field added
Tony: Documentation needs to be updated. Done

Changes V6-V7:

Boris:  Why add/subtract 0x20000000? Added better comment provided by Andy
Boris:  Churn. Part2 changes things only introduced in part1.

Merged parts 1&2 into one patch.
Ingo: Missing my sign off on part1. Added.

Changes V5-V6
Andy: Provoked massive re-write by providing what is now part1 of this
patch series. This frees up two bits in the exception table fixup field that can be used to tag exception table entries as different "classes". This means we don't need my separate exception table fro machine checks. Also avoids duplicating fixup actions for #PF and #MC cases that were in version 5.
Andy: Use C99 array initializers to tie the various class fixup
functions back to the defintions of each class. Also give the functions meanningful names (not fixup_class0() etc.).
Boris: Cleaned up my lousy assembly code removing many spurious 'l'
modifiers on instructions.
Boris: Provided some helper functions for the machine check severity
calculation that make the code more readable.
Boris: Have __mcsafe_copy() return a structure with the 'remaining bytes'
in a separate field from the fault indicator. Boris had suggested Linux -EFAULT/-EINVAL ... but I thought it made more sense to return the exception number (X86_TRAP_MC, etc.) This finally kills off BIT(63) which has been controversial throughout all the early versions of this patch series.

Changes V4-V5
Tony: Extended __mcsafe_copy() to have fixup entries for both machine
check and page fault.

Changes V3-V4:

Andy:   Simplify fixup_mcexception() by dropping used-once local variable
Andy:   "Reviewed-by" tag added to part1
Boris:  Moved new functions to memcpy_64.S and declaration to asm/string_64.h
Boris:  Changed name s/mcsafe_memcpy/__mcsafe_copy/ to make it clear that this

is an internal function and that return value doesn't follow memcpy() semantics.
Boris: "Reviewed-by" tag added to parts 1&2

Changes V2-V3:

Andy: Don't hack "regs->ax = BIT(63) | addr;" in the machine check
handler. Now have better fixup code that computes the number of remaining bytes (just like page-fault fixup).

Andy:   #define for BIT(63). Done, plus couple of extra macros using it.
Boris:  Don't clutter up generic code (like mm/extable.c) with this.

I moved everything under arch/x86 (the asm-generic change is a more generic #define).
Boris: Dependencies for CONFIG_MCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY are too generic.
I made it a real menu item with default "n". Dan Williams will use "select MCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY" from his persistent filesystem code.
Boris: Simplify conditionals in mce.c by moving tolerant/kill_it
checks earlier, with a skip to end if they aren't set.

Boris:  Miscellaneous grammar/punctuation. Fixed.
Boris:  Don't leak spurious __start_mcextable symbols into kernels

that didn't configure MCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY. Done.
Tony: New code doesn't belong in user_copy_64.S/uaccess*.h. Moved
to new .S/.h files
Elliott:Cacheing behavior non-optimal. Could use movntdqa, vmovntdqa
or vmovntdqa on source addresses. I didn't fix this yet. Think of the current mcsafe_memcpy() as the first of several functions. This one is useful for small copies (meta-data) where the overhead of saving SSE/AVX state isn't justified.

Changes V1->V2:

0-day:  Reported build errors and warnings on 32-bit systems. Fixed
0-day:  Reported bloat to tinyconfig. Fixed
Boris:  Suggestions to use extra macros to reduce code duplication in _ASM_*EXTABLE. Done
Boris:  Re-write "tolerant==3" check to reduce indentation level. See below.
Andy:   Check IP is valid before searching kernel exception tables. Done.
Andy:   Explain use of BIT(63) on return value from mcsafe_memcpy(). Done (added decode macros).
Andy:   Untangle mess of code in tail of do_machine_check() to make it

clear what is going on (e.g. that we only enter the ist_begin_non_atomic() if we were called from user code, not from kernel!). Done.

Tony Luck (4):
x86: Expand exception table to allow new handling options x86, mce: Check for faults tagged in EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT exception
table entries
x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery

 Documentation/x86/exception-tables.txt    |  35 ++++++++
 Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt |   4 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h                |  40 +++++----
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h         |   1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h                |   1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h          |   8 ++
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h            |  16 ++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c |  22 ++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c          |  81 ++++++++++--------
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c            |   2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c                   |   6 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c          |   2 +
 arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S                  | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/mm/extable.c                     | 100 +++++++++++++++-------
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c                       |   2 +-
 scripts/sortextable.c                     |  32 +++++++
 16 files changed, 393 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH v10 1/4 x86: Expand exception table to allow new handling options

Huge amounts of help from Andy Lutomirski and Borislav Petkov to produce this. Andy provided the inspiration to add classes to the exception table with a clever bit-squeezing trick, Boris pointed out how much cleaner it would all be if we just had a new field.

Linus Torvalds blessed the expansion with:
I'd rather not be clever in order to save just a tiny amount of space in the exception table, which isn't really criticial for anybody.

The third field is another relative function pointer, this one to a handler that executes the actions.

We start out with three handlers:

1: Legacy - just jumps the to fixup IP
2: Fault - provide the trap number in %ax to the fixup code 3: Cleaned up legacy for the uaccess error hack

---
 Documentation/x86/exception-tables.txt |  35 ++++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h             |  40 +++++++------
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h         |  16 +++---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c         |   2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c                |   6 +-
 arch/x86/mm/extable.c                  | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c                    |   2 +-
 scripts/sortextable.c                  |  32 +++++++++++
 8 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
Documentation/x86/exception-tables.txt +35 -0
index 32901aa36f0a..fed18187a8b8 100644
@@ -290,3 +290,38 @@ Due to the way that the exception table is built and needs to be ordered,
 only use exceptions for code in the .text section.  Any other section
 will cause the exception table to not be sorted correctly, and the
 exceptions will fail.
+
+Things changed when 64-bit support was added to x86 Linux. Rather than
+double the size of the exception table by expanding the two entries
+from 32-bits to 64 bits, a clever trick was used to store addresses
+as relative offsets from the table itself. The assembly code changed
+from:
+	.long 1b,3b
+to:
+        .long (from) - .
+        .long (to) - .
+
+and the C-code that uses these values converts back to absolute addresses
+like this:
+
+	ex_insn_addr(const struct exception_table_entry *x)
+	{
+		return (unsigned long)&x->insn + x->insn;
+	}
+
+In v4.5 the exception table entry was given a new field "handler".
+This is also 32-bits wide and contains a third relative function
+pointer which points to one of:
+
+1) int ex_handler_default(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup)
+   This is legacy case that just jumps to the fixup code
+2) int ex_handler_fault(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup)
+   This case provides the fault number of the trap that occurred at
+   entry->insn. It is used to distinguish page faults from machine
+   check.
+3) int ex_handler_ext(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup)
+   This case is used for uaccess_err ... we need to set a flag
+   in the task structure. Before the handler functions existed this
+   case was handled by adding a large offset to the fixup to tag
+   it as special.
+More functions can easily be added.
arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h +24 -16
index 189679aba703..f5063b6659eb 100644
@@ -44,19 +44,22 @@
 
 /* Exception table entry */
 #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
-# define _ASM_EXTABLE(from,to)					\
+# define _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, handler)			\
 	.pushsection "__ex_table","a" ;				\
-	.balign 8 ;						\
+	.balign 4 ;						\
 	.long (from) - . ;					\
 	.long (to) - . ;					\
+	.long (handler) - . ;					\
 	.popsection
 
-# define _ASM_EXTABLE_EX(from,to)				\
-	.pushsection "__ex_table","a" ;				\
-	.balign 8 ;						\
-	.long (from) - . ;					\
-	.long (to) - . + 0x7ffffff0 ;				\
-	.popsection
+# define _ASM_EXTABLE(from, to)					\
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_default)
+
+# define _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(from, to)				\
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_fault)
+
+# define _ASM_EXTABLE_EX(from, to)				\
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_ext)
 
 # define _ASM_NOKPROBE(entry)					\
 	.pushsection "_kprobe_blacklist","aw" ;			\
@@ -89,19 +92,24 @@
 	.endm
 
 #else
-# define _ASM_EXTABLE(from,to)					\
+# define _EXPAND_EXTABLE_HANDLE(x) #x
+# define _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, handler)			\
 	" .pushsection \"__ex_table\",\"a\"\n"			\
-	" .balign 8\n"						\
+	" .balign 4\n"						\
 	" .long (" #from ") - .\n"				\
 	" .long (" #to ") - .\n"				\
+	" .long (" _EXPAND_EXTABLE_HANDLE(handler) ") - .\n"	\
 	" .popsection\n"
 
-# define _ASM_EXTABLE_EX(from,to)				\
-	" .pushsection \"__ex_table\",\"a\"\n"			\
-	" .balign 8\n"						\
-	" .long (" #from ") - .\n"				\
-	" .long (" #to ") - . + 0x7ffffff0\n"			\
-	" .popsection\n"
+# define _ASM_EXTABLE(from, to)					\
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_default)
+
+# define _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(from, to)				\
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_fault)
+
+# define _ASM_EXTABLE_EX(from, to)				\
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_ext)
+
 /* For C file, we already have NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro */
 #endif
 
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +8 -8
index a4a30e4b2d34..c0f27d7ea7ff 100644
@@ -90,12 +90,11 @@ static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, un
 	likely(!__range_not_ok(addr, size, user_addr_max()))
 
 /*
- * The exception table consists of pairs of addresses relative to the
- * exception table enty itself: the first is the address of an
- * instruction that is allowed to fault, and the second is the address
- * at which the program should continue.  No registers are modified,
- * so it is entirely up to the continuation code to figure out what to
- * do.
+ * The exception table consists of triples of addresses relative to the
+ * exception table entry itself. The first address is of an instruction
+ * that is allowed to fault, the second is the target at which the program
+ * should continue. The third is a handler function to deal with the fault
+ * caused by the instruction in the first field.
  *
  * All the routines below use bits of fixup code that are out of line
  * with the main instruction path.  This means when everything is well,
@@ -104,13 +103,14 @@ static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, un
  */
 
 struct exception_table_entry {
-	int insn, fixup;
+	int insn, fixup, handler;
 };
 /* This is not the generic standard exception_table_entry format */
 #define ARCH_HAS_SORT_EXTABLE
 #define ARCH_HAS_SEARCH_EXTABLE
 
-extern int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr);
+extern bool ex_has_fault_handler(unsigned long ip);
 extern int early_fixup_exception(unsigned long *ip);
 
 /*
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c +1 -1
index 1deffe6cc873..0f05deeff5ce 100644
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
 		 * In case the user-specified fault handler returned
 		 * zero, try to fix up.
 		 */
-		if (fixup_exception(regs))
+		if (fixup_exception(regs, trapnr))
 			return 1;
 
 		/*
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c +3 -3
index ade185a46b1d..211c11c7bba4 100644
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ do_trap_no_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, int trapnr, char *str,
 	}
 
 	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
-		if (!fixup_exception(regs)) {
+		if (!fixup_exception(regs, trapnr)) {
 			tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
 			tsk->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;
 			die(str, regs, error_code);
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 
 	tsk = current;
 	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
-		if (fixup_exception(regs))
+		if (fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_GP))
 			return;
 
 		tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static void math_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int error_code, int trapnr)
 	conditional_sti(regs);
 
 	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
-		if (!fixup_exception(regs)) {
+		if (!fixup_exception(regs, trapnr)) {
 			task->thread.error_code = error_code;
 			task->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;
 			die(str, regs, error_code);
arch/x86/mm/extable.c +72 -28

143 lines not on this page · raw message

arch/x86/mm/fault.c +1 -1
index eef44d9a3f77..495946c3f9dd 100644
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 	int sig;
 
 	/* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
-	if (fixup_exception(regs)) {
+	if (fixup_exception(regs, X86_TRAP_PF)) {
 		/*
 		 * Any interrupt that takes a fault gets the fixup. This makes
 		 * the below recursive fault logic only apply to a faults from
scripts/sortextable.c +32 -0
index c2423d913b46..7b29fb14f870 100644
@@ -209,6 +209,35 @@ static int compare_relative_table(const void *a, const void *b)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void x86_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	i = 0;
+	while (i < image_size) {
+		uint32_t *loc = (uint32_t *)(extab_image + i);
+
+		w(r(loc) + i, loc);
+		w(r(loc + 1) + i + 4, loc + 1);
+		w(r(loc + 2) + i + 8, loc + 2);
+
+		i += sizeof(uint32_t) * 3;
+	}
+
+	qsort(extab_image, image_size / 12, 12, compare_relative_table);
+
+	i = 0;
+	while (i < image_size) {
+		uint32_t *loc = (uint32_t *)(extab_image + i);
+
+		w(r(loc) - i, loc);
+		w(r(loc + 1) - (i + 4), loc + 1);
+		w(r(loc + 2) - (i + 8), loc + 2);
+
+		i += sizeof(uint32_t) * 3;
+	}
+}
+
 static void sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -281,6 +310,9 @@ do_file(char const *const fname)
 		break;
 	case EM_386:
 	case EM_X86_64:
+		custom_sort = x86_sort_relative_table;
+		break;
+
 	case EM_S390:
 		custom_sort = sort_relative_table;
 		break;
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#2 lore raw

PATCH v10 2/4 x86, mce: Check for faults tagged in EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT exception table entries

In reply to Tony Luck

Extend the severity checking code to add a new context IN_KERN_RECOV which is used to indicate that the machine check was triggered by code in the kernel tagged with _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT() so that the ex_handler_fault() handler will provide the fixup code with the trap number.

Major re-work to the tail code in do_machine_check() to make all this readable/maintainable. One functional change is that tolerant=3 no longer stops recovery actions. Revert to only skipping sending SIGBUS to the current process.

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c | 22 +++++++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c          | 70 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c +20 -2
index 9c682c222071..5119766d9889 100644
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
 #include <asm/mce.h>
+#include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
 #include "mce-internal.h"
 
@@ -29,7 +30,7 @@
  * panic situations)
  */
 
-enum context { IN_KERNEL = 1, IN_USER = 2 };
+enum context { IN_KERNEL = 1, IN_USER = 2, IN_KERNEL_RECOV = 3 };
 enum ser { SER_REQUIRED = 1, NO_SER = 2 };
 enum exception { EXCP_CONTEXT = 1, NO_EXCP = 2 };
 
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ static struct severity {
 #define MCESEV(s, m, c...) { .sev = MCE_ ## s ## _SEVERITY, .msg = m, ## c }
 #define  KERNEL		.context = IN_KERNEL
 #define  USER		.context = IN_USER
+#define  KERNEL_RECOV	.context = IN_KERNEL_RECOV
 #define  SER		.ser = SER_REQUIRED
 #define  NOSER		.ser = NO_SER
 #define  EXCP		.excp = EXCP_CONTEXT
@@ -87,6 +89,10 @@ static struct severity {
 		EXCP, KERNEL, MCGMASK(MCG_STATUS_RIPV, 0)
 		),
 	MCESEV(
+		PANIC, "In kernel and no restart IP",
+		EXCP, KERNEL_RECOV, MCGMASK(MCG_STATUS_RIPV, 0)
+		),
+	MCESEV(
 		DEFERRED, "Deferred error",
 		NOSER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_UC|MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED|MCI_STATUS_POISON, MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED)
 		),
@@ -123,6 +129,11 @@ static struct severity {
 		MCGMASK(MCG_STATUS_RIPV|MCG_STATUS_EIPV, MCG_STATUS_RIPV)
 		),
 	MCESEV(
+		AR, "Action required: data load in error recoverable area of kernel",
+		SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD, MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD_DATA),
+		KERNEL_RECOV
+		),
+	MCESEV(
 		AR, "Action required: data load error in a user process",
 		SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD, MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD_DATA),
 		USER
@@ -170,6 +181,9 @@ static struct severity {
 		)	/* always matches. keep at end */
 };
 
+#define mc_recoverable(mcg) (((mcg) & (MCG_STATUS_RIPV|MCG_STATUS_EIPV)) == \
+				(MCG_STATUS_RIPV|MCG_STATUS_EIPV))
+
 /*
  * If mcgstatus indicated that ip/cs on the stack were
  * no good, then "m->cs" will be zero and we will have
@@ -183,7 +197,11 @@ static struct severity {
  */
 static int error_context(struct mce *m)
 {
-	return ((m->cs & 3) == 3) ? IN_USER : IN_KERNEL;
+	if ((m->cs & 3) == 3)
+		return IN_USER;
+	if (mc_recoverable(m->mcgstatus) && ex_has_fault_handler(m->ip))
+		return IN_KERNEL_RECOV;
+	return IN_KERNEL;
 }
 
 /*
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +36 -34

97 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 7 lines
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#3 lore raw

PATCH v10 3/4 x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()

In reply to Tony Luck

Make use of the EXTABLE_FAULT exception table entries. This routine returns a structure to indicate the result of the copy:

struct mcsafe_ret {
        u64 trapnr;
        u64 remain;
};

If the copy is successful, then both 'trapnr' and 'remain' are zero.

If we faulted during the copy, then 'trapnr' will say which type of trap (X86_TRAP_PF or X86_TRAP_MC) and 'remain' says how many bytes were not copied.

Note that this is probably the first of several copy functions. We can make new ones for non-temporal cache handling etc.

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h |   8 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c |   2 +
 arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S         | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h +8 -0
index ff8b9a17dc4b..5b24039463a4 100644
@@ -78,6 +78,14 @@ int strcmp(const char *cs, const char *ct);
 #define memset(s, c, n) __memset(s, c, n)
 #endif
 
+struct mcsafe_ret {
+	u64 trapnr;
+	u64 remain;
+};
+
+struct mcsafe_ret __mcsafe_copy(void *dst, const void __user *src, size_t cnt);
+extern void __mcsafe_copy_end(void);
+
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_STRING_64_H */
arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c +2 -0
index a0695be19864..fff245462a8c 100644
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_user_nocache);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(_copy_from_user);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(_copy_to_user);
 
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mcsafe_copy);
+
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(copy_page);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_page);
 
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +134 -0

137 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 7 lines
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
maintainer
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()

Quoted 23 lines · Tony Luck

Make use of the EXTABLE_FAULT exception table entries. This routine returns a structure to indicate the result of the copy:

struct mcsafe_ret {
        u64 trapnr;
        u64 remain;
};

If the copy is successful, then both 'trapnr' and 'remain' are zero.

If we faulted during the copy, then 'trapnr' will say which type of trap (X86_TRAP_PF or X86_TRAP_MC) and 'remain' says how many bytes were not copied.

Note that this is probably the first of several copy functions. We can make new ones for non-temporal cache handling etc.

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h |   8 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c |   2 +
 arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S         | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+)

...

Quoted 11 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +3 -0
index 16698bba87de..f576acad485e 100644
@@ -177,3 +177,137 @@ ENTRY(memcpy_orig)
 .Lend:
 	retq
 ENDPROC(memcpy_orig)
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_UML
+/*

arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 192

Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +10 -0
+ * __mcsafe_copy - memory copy with machine check exception handling
+ * Note that we only catch machine checks when reading the source addresses.
+ * Writes to target are posted and don't generate machine checks.
+ */
+ENTRY(__mcsafe_copy)
+	cmpl $8,%edx
+	jb 20f		/* less then 8 bytes, go to byte copy loop */
+
+	/* check for bad alignment of source */
+	movl %esi,%ecx

You can save yourself this MOV here in what is, I'm assuming, the general likely case where @src is aligned and do:

        /* check for bad alignment of source */
        testl $7, %esi
        /* already aligned? */
        jz 102f

        movl %esi,%ecx
        subl $8,%ecx
        negl %ecx
        subl %ecx,%edx
0:      movb (%rsi),%al
        movb %al,(%rdi)
        incq %rsi
        incq %rdi
        decl %ecx
        jnz 0b

arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 194

Quoted 2 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +2 -0
+	andl $7,%ecx
+	jz 102f				/* already aligned */

Please move side-comments over the line they're referring to.

Quoted 4 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +4 -0
+	subl $8,%ecx
+	negl %ecx
+	subl %ecx,%edx
+0:	movb (%rsi),%al

arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 208

Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +10 -0
+	movb %al,(%rdi)
+	incq %rsi
+	incq %rdi
+	decl %ecx
+	jnz 0b
+102:
+	movl %edx,%ecx
+	andl $63,%edx
+	shrl $6,%ecx
+	jz 17f

Please add a \n after the JMPs for better readability - those blocks are dense as it is. They could use some comments too.

arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 216

Quoted 8 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +8 -0
+1:	movq (%rsi),%r8
+2:	movq 1*8(%rsi),%r9
+3:	movq 2*8(%rsi),%r10
+4:	movq 3*8(%rsi),%r11
+	mov %r8,(%rdi)
+	mov %r9,1*8(%rdi)
+	mov %r10,2*8(%rdi)
+	mov %r11,3*8(%rdi)

You can say "movq" too here, for consistency.

arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 220

Quoted 4 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +4 -0
+9:	movq 4*8(%rsi),%r8
+10:	movq 5*8(%rsi),%r9
+11:	movq 6*8(%rsi),%r10
+12:	movq 7*8(%rsi),%r11

Why aren't we pushing %r12-%r15 on the stack after the "jz 17f" above and using them too and thus copying a whole cacheline in one go?

We would need to restore them when we're done with the cacheline-wise shuffle, of course.

Quoted 8 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +8 -0
+	mov %r8,4*8(%rdi)
+	mov %r9,5*8(%rdi)
+	mov %r10,6*8(%rdi)
+	mov %r11,7*8(%rdi)
+	leaq 64(%rsi),%rsi
+	leaq 64(%rdi),%rdi
+	decl %ecx
+	jnz 1b

...

Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()

Quoted 18 lines

You can save yourself this MOV here in what is, I'm assuming, the general likely case where @src is aligned and do:

        /* check for bad alignment of source */
        testl $7, %esi
        /* already aligned? */
        jz 102f

        movl %esi,%ecx
        subl $8,%ecx
        negl %ecx
        subl %ecx,%edx
0:      movb (%rsi),%al
        movb %al,(%rdi)
        incq %rsi
        incq %rdi
        decl %ecx
        jnz 0b

The "testl $7, %esi" just checks the low three bits ... it doesn't change %esi. But the code from the "subl $8" on down assumes that %ecx is a number in [1..7] as the count of bytes to copy until we achieve alignment.

So your "movl %esi,%ecx" needs to be somthing that just copies the low three bits and zeroes the high part of %ecx. Is there a cute way to do that in x86 assembler?

Quoted 5 lines

Why aren't we pushing %r12-%r15 on the stack after the "jz 17f" above and using them too and thus copying a whole cacheline in one go?

We would need to restore them when we're done with the cacheline-wise shuffle, of course.

I copied that loop from arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S:__copy_user_nocache() I guess the answer depends on whether you generally copy enough cache lines to save enough time to cover the cost of saving and restoring those registers.

-Tony

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>

maintainer
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()

Quoted 19 lines · Tony
Quoted 18 lines

You can save yourself this MOV here in what is, I'm assuming, the general likely case where @src is aligned and do:

        /* check for bad alignment of source */
        testl $7, %esi
        /* already aligned? */
        jz 102f

        movl %esi,%ecx
        subl $8,%ecx
        negl %ecx
        subl %ecx,%edx
0:      movb (%rsi),%al
        movb %al,(%rdi)
        incq %rsi
        incq %rdi
        decl %ecx
        jnz 0b
Quoted 4 lines

The "testl $7, %esi" just checks the low three bits ... it doesn't change %esi. But the code from the "subl $8" on down assumes that %ecx is a number in [1..7] as the count of bytes to copy until we achieve alignment.

Grr, sorry about that, I actually missed to copy-paste the AND:

        /* check for bad alignment of source */
        testl $7, %esi
        jz 102f                         /* already aligned */

        movl %esi,%ecx
        andl $7,%ecx
        subl $8,%ecx
        negl %ecx
        subl %ecx,%edx
0:      movb (%rsi),%al
        movb %al,(%rdi)
        incq %rsi
        incq %rdi
        decl %ecx
        jnz 0b

I basically am proposing to move the unlikely case out of line and optimize the likely one.

Quoted 3 lines

So your "movl %esi,%ecx" needs to be somthing that just copies the low three bits and zeroes the high part of %ecx. Is there a cute way to do that in x86 assembler?

We could do some funky games with byte-sized moves but those are generally slower anyway so doing the default operand size thing should be ok.

Quoted 4 lines

I copied that loop from arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S:__copy_user_nocache() I guess the answer depends on whether you generally copy enough cache lines to save enough time to cover the cost of saving and restoring those registers.

Well, that function will run on modern hw with a stack engine so I'd assume those 4 pushes and pops would be paid for by the increased registers count for the data shuffling.

But one could take out that function do some microbenchmarking with different sizes and once with the current version and once with the pushes and pops of r1[2-5] to see where the breakeven is.

Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()

Quoted 3 lines · Borislav Petkov

But one could take out that function do some microbenchmarking with different sizes and once with the current version and once with the pushes and pops of r1[2-5] to see where the breakeven is.

On a 4K page copy from a source address that isn't in the cache I see all sorts of answers.

On my desktop (i7-3960X) it is ~50 cycles slower to push and pop the four registers.

On my latest Xeon - I can't post benchmarks ... but also a bit slower.

On an older Xeon it is a few cycles faster (but even though I'm looking at the median of 10,000 runs I see more run-to-run variation that I see difference between register choices.

Here's what I tested:

	push %r12
	push %r13
	push %r14
	push %r15

	/* Loop copying whole cache lines */

1: movq (%rsi),%r8
2: movq 1*8(%rsi),%r9
3: movq 2*8(%rsi),%r10
4: movq 3*8(%rsi),%r11
9: movq 4*8(%rsi),%r12
10: movq 5*8(%rsi),%r13
11: movq 6*8(%rsi),%r14
12: movq 7*8(%rsi),%r15

	movq %r8,(%rdi)
	movq %r9,1*8(%rdi)
	movq %r10,2*8(%rdi)
	movq %r11,3*8(%rdi)
	movq %r12,4*8(%rdi)
	movq %r13,5*8(%rdi)
	movq %r14,6*8(%rdi)
	movq %r15,7*8(%rdi)
	leaq 64(%rsi),%rsi
	leaq 64(%rdi),%rdi
	decl %ecx
	jnz 1b

	pop %r15
	pop %r14
	pop %r13
	pop %r12

-Tony

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>

maintainer
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()

Quoted 8 lines · Tony
Quoted 3 lines · Borislav Petkov

But one could take out that function do some microbenchmarking with different sizes and once with the current version and once with the pushes and pops of r1[2-5] to see where the breakeven is.

On a 4K page copy from a source address that isn't in the cache I see all sorts of answers.

Quoted 8 lines

On my desktop (i7-3960X) it is ~50 cycles slower to push and pop the four registers.

On my latest Xeon - I can't post benchmarks ... but also a bit slower.

On an older Xeon it is a few cycles faster (but even though I'm looking at the median of 10,000 runs I see more run-to-run variation that I see difference between register choices.

Hmm, strange. Can you check whether perf doesn't show any significant differences too. Something like:

perf stat --repeat 100 --sync --pre 'echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' -- ./mcsafe_copy_1

and then

perf stat --repeat 100 --sync --pre 'echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' -- ./mcsafe_copy_2

That'll be interesting...

Thanks.

Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
maintainer
#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()

In reply to Tony Luck
Quoted 61 lines · Tony Luck

Make use of the EXTABLE_FAULT exception table entries. This routine returns a structure to indicate the result of the copy:

struct mcsafe_ret {
        u64 trapnr;
        u64 remain;
};

If the copy is successful, then both 'trapnr' and 'remain' are zero.

If we faulted during the copy, then 'trapnr' will say which type of trap (X86_TRAP_PF or X86_TRAP_MC) and 'remain' says how many bytes were not copied.

Note that this is probably the first of several copy functions. We can make new ones for non-temporal cache handling etc.

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h |   8 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c |   2 +
 arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S         | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h +8 -0
index ff8b9a17dc4b..5b24039463a4 100644
@@ -78,6 +78,14 @@ int strcmp(const char *cs, const char *ct);
 #define memset(s, c, n) __memset(s, c, n)
 #endif
 
+struct mcsafe_ret {
+	u64 trapnr;
+	u64 remain;
+};
+
+struct mcsafe_ret __mcsafe_copy(void *dst, const void __user *src, size_t cnt);
+extern void __mcsafe_copy_end(void);
+
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_STRING_64_H */
arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c +2 -0
index a0695be19864..fff245462a8c 100644
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_user_nocache);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(_copy_from_user);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(_copy_to_user);
 
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mcsafe_copy);
+
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(copy_page);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_page);
 
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +0 -0
index 16698bba87de..f576acad485e 100644

arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 181

Quoted 5 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +2 -0
@@ -177,3 +177,137 @@ ENTRY(memcpy_orig)
 .Lend:
 	retq
 ENDPROC(memcpy_orig)
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_UML

So this is because we get a link failure on UML:

arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x8): undefined reference to ex_handler_fault' arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x14): undefined reference to ex_handler_fault' arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x20): undefined reference to ex_handler_fault' arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x2c): undefined reference to ex_handler_fault' arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x38): undefined reference to ex_handler_fault' arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x44): more undefined references to ex_handler_fault' follow
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1

due to those

arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 306

Quoted 5 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +5 -0
+     _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(0b,30b)
+     _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(1b,31b)
+     _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(2b,32b)
+     _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(3b,33b)
+     _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(4b,34b)

things below and that's because ex_handler_fault() is defined in arch/x86/mm/extable.c and UML doesn't include that file in the build. It takes kernel/extable.c and lib/extable.c only.

Richi, what's the usual way to address that in UML? I.e., make an x86-only symbol visible to the UML build too? Define a dummy one, just so that it builds?

Quoted 133 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +131 -0
+ * __mcsafe_copy - memory copy with machine check exception handling
+ * Note that we only catch machine checks when reading the source addresses.
+ * Writes to target are posted and don't generate machine checks.
+ */
+ENTRY(__mcsafe_copy)
+	cmpl $8,%edx
+	jb 20f		/* less then 8 bytes, go to byte copy loop */
+
+	/* check for bad alignment of source */
+	movl %esi,%ecx
+	andl $7,%ecx
+	jz 102f				/* already aligned */
+	subl $8,%ecx
+	negl %ecx
+	subl %ecx,%edx
+0:	movb (%rsi),%al
+	movb %al,(%rdi)
+	incq %rsi
+	incq %rdi
+	decl %ecx
+	jnz 0b
+102:
+	movl %edx,%ecx
+	andl $63,%edx
+	shrl $6,%ecx
+	jz 17f
+1:	movq (%rsi),%r8
+2:	movq 1*8(%rsi),%r9
+3:	movq 2*8(%rsi),%r10
+4:	movq 3*8(%rsi),%r11
+	mov %r8,(%rdi)
+	mov %r9,1*8(%rdi)
+	mov %r10,2*8(%rdi)
+	mov %r11,3*8(%rdi)
+9:	movq 4*8(%rsi),%r8
+10:	movq 5*8(%rsi),%r9
+11:	movq 6*8(%rsi),%r10
+12:	movq 7*8(%rsi),%r11
+	mov %r8,4*8(%rdi)
+	mov %r9,5*8(%rdi)
+	mov %r10,6*8(%rdi)
+	mov %r11,7*8(%rdi)
+	leaq 64(%rsi),%rsi
+	leaq 64(%rdi),%rdi
+	decl %ecx
+	jnz 1b
+17:	movl %edx,%ecx
+	andl $7,%edx
+	shrl $3,%ecx
+	jz 20f
+18:	movq (%rsi),%r8
+	mov %r8,(%rdi)
+	leaq 8(%rsi),%rsi
+	leaq 8(%rdi),%rdi
+	decl %ecx
+	jnz 18b
+20:	andl %edx,%edx
+	jz 23f
+	movl %edx,%ecx
+21:	movb (%rsi),%al
+	movb %al,(%rdi)
+	incq %rsi
+	incq %rdi
+	decl %ecx
+	jnz 21b
+23:	xorq %rax, %rax
+	xorq %rdx, %rdx
+	/* copy successful. return 0 */
+	ret
+
+	.section .fixup,"ax"
+	/*
+	 * machine check handler loaded %rax with trap number
+	 * We just need to make sure %edx has the number of
+	 * bytes remaining
+	 */
+30:
+	add %ecx,%edx
+	ret
+31:
+	shl $6,%ecx
+	add %ecx,%edx
+	ret
+32:
+	shl $6,%ecx
+	lea -8(%ecx,%edx),%edx
+	ret
+33:
+	shl $6,%ecx
+	lea -16(%ecx,%edx),%edx
+	ret
+34:
+	shl $6,%ecx
+	lea -24(%ecx,%edx),%edx
+	ret
+35:
+	shl $6,%ecx
+	lea -32(%ecx,%edx),%edx
+	ret
+36:
+	shl $6,%ecx
+	lea -40(%ecx,%edx),%edx
+	ret
+37:
+	shl $6,%ecx
+	lea -48(%ecx,%edx),%edx
+	ret
+38:
+	shl $6,%ecx
+	lea -56(%ecx,%edx),%edx
+	ret
+39:
+	lea (%rdx,%rcx,8),%rdx
+	ret
+40:
+	mov %ecx,%edx
+	ret
+	.previous
+
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(0b,30b)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(1b,31b)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(2b,32b)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(3b,33b)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(4b,34b)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(9b,35b)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(10b,36b)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(11b,37b)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(12b,38b)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(18b,39b)
+	_ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(21b,40b)
+#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.5.0
Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()

Am 07.02.2016 um 17:55 schrieb Borislav Petkov:

Quoted 8 lines

due to those

arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 306

Quoted 5 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +5 -0
+     _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(0b,30b)
+     _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(1b,31b)
+     _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(2b,32b)
+     _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(3b,33b)
+     _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(4b,34b)
Quoted 7 lines

things below and that's because ex_handler_fault() is defined in arch/x86/mm/extable.c and UML doesn't include that file in the build. It takes kernel/extable.c and lib/extable.c only.

Richi, what's the usual way to address that in UML? I.e., make an x86-only symbol visible to the UML build too? Define a dummy one, just so that it builds?

As discussed on IRC with Boris, UML offers only minimal extable support. To get rid of the said #ifndef, UML would have to provide its own extable.c (mostly copy&paste from arch/x86) and an advanced struct exception_table_entry which includes the trap number. This implies also that UML can no longer use uaccess.h from asm-generic or has to add a new ifdef into uaccess.h to whiteout the minimal struct exception_table_entry from there.

So, I'd vote to keep the #ifndef CONFIG_UML in memcpy_64.S. As soon you need another #ifndef please ping me and I'll happily bite the bullet and implement the advanced extable stuff for UML. Deal?

Thanks,
//richard

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>

author
#11 lore raw

PATCH v10 4/4 x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery

In reply to Tony Luck

The Intel Software Developer Manual describes bit 24 in the MCG_CAP MSR:
MCG_SER_P (software error recovery support present) flag, bit 24 a?? Indicates (when set) that the processor supports software error recovery
But only some models with this capability bit set will actually generate recoverable machine checks.

Check the model name and set a synthetic capability bit. Provide a command line option to set this bit anyway in case the kernel doesn't recognise the model name.

---
 Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt |  4 ++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h         |  1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h                |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c          | 11 +++++++++++
 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt +4 -0
index 68ed3114c363..8423c04ae7b3 100644
@@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ Machine check
 		threshold to 1. Enabling this may make memory predictive failure
 		analysis less effective if the bios sets thresholds for memory
 		errors since we will not see details for all errors.
+   mce=recovery
+		Tell the kernel that this system can generate recoverable
+		machine checks (useful when the kernel doesn't recognize
+		the cpuid x86_model_id[])
 
    nomce (for compatibility with i386): same as mce=off
 
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h +1 -0
index 7ad8c9464297..06c6c2d2fea0 100644
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF	( 3*32+28) /* APERFMPERF */
 #define X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU	( 3*32+29) /* "eagerfpu" Non lazy FPU restore */
 #define X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3 ( 3*32+30) /* TSC doesn't stop in S3 state */
+#define X86_FEATURE_MCE_RECOVERY ( 3*32+31) /* cpu has recoverable machine checks */
 
 /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000001 (ecx), word 4 */
 #define X86_FEATURE_XMM3	( 4*32+ 0) /* "pni" SSE-3 */
arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h +1 -0
index 2ea4527e462f..18d2ba9c8e44 100644
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct mca_config {
 	bool ignore_ce;
 	bool disabled;
 	bool ser;
+	bool recovery;
 	bool bios_cmci_threshold;
 	u8 banks;
 	s8 bootlog;
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +11 -0
index 905f3070f412..16a3d0e29f84 100644
@@ -1696,6 +1696,15 @@ void mcheck_cpu_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * MCG_CAP.MCG_SER_P is necessary but not sufficient to know
+	 * whether this processor will actually generate recoverable
+	 * machine checks. Check to see if this is an E7 model Xeon.
+	 */
+	if (mca_cfg.recovery || (mca_cfg.ser &&
+		!strncmp(c->x86_model_id, "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-", 24)))
+		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_MCE_RECOVERY);
+
 	if (mce_gen_pool_init()) {
 		mca_cfg.disabled = true;
 		pr_emerg("Couldn't allocate MCE records pool!\n");
@@ -2030,6 +2039,8 @@ static int __init mcheck_enable(char *str)
 		cfg->bootlog = (str[0] == 'b');
 	else if (!strcmp(str, "bios_cmci_threshold"))
 		cfg->bios_cmci_threshold = true;
+	else if (!strcmp(str, "recovery"))
+		cfg->recovery = true;
 	else if (isdigit(str[0])) {
 		if (get_option(&str, &cfg->tolerant) == 2)
 			get_option(&str, &(cfg->monarch_timeout));
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
maintainer
#12 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery

Quoted 25 lines · Tony Luck

The Intel Software Developer Manual describes bit 24 in the MCG_CAP MSR:
MCG_SER_P (software error recovery support present) flag, bit 24 a?? Indicates (when set) that the processor supports software error recovery
But only some models with this capability bit set will actually generate recoverable machine checks.

Check the model name and set a synthetic capability bit. Provide a command line option to set this bit anyway in case the kernel doesn't recognise the model name.

---
 Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt |  4 ++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h         |  1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h                |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c          | 11 +++++++++++
 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt +0 -0
index 68ed3114c363..8423c04ae7b3 100644

Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt Machine check · line 66

Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt +4 -0
@@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ Machine check
 		threshold to 1. Enabling this may make memory predictive failure
 		analysis less effective if the bios sets thresholds for memory
 		errors since we will not see details for all errors.
+   mce=recovery
+		Tell the kernel that this system can generate recoverable
+		machine checks (useful when the kernel doesn't recognize
+		the cpuid x86_model_id[])

I'd say "Force-enable generation of recoverable MCEs."

and not mention implementation details in the description text.

Quoted 31 lines
Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt +0 -0
    nomce (for compatibility with i386): same as mce=off
 
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h +1 -0
index 7ad8c9464297..06c6c2d2fea0 100644
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF	( 3*32+28) /* APERFMPERF */
 #define X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU	( 3*32+29) /* "eagerfpu" Non lazy FPU restore */
 #define X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3 ( 3*32+30) /* TSC doesn't stop in S3 state */
+#define X86_FEATURE_MCE_RECOVERY ( 3*32+31) /* cpu has recoverable machine checks */
 
 /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000001 (ecx), word 4 */
 #define X86_FEATURE_XMM3	( 4*32+ 0) /* "pni" SSE-3 */
arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h +1 -0
index 2ea4527e462f..18d2ba9c8e44 100644
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct mca_config {
 	bool ignore_ce;
 	bool disabled;
 	bool ser;
+	bool recovery;
 	bool bios_cmci_threshold;
 	u8 banks;
 	s8 bootlog;
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +0 -0
index 905f3070f412..16a3d0e29f84 100644

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c void mcheck_cpu_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) · line 1705

Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +7 -0
@@ -1696,6 +1696,15 @@ void mcheck_cpu_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * MCG_CAP.MCG_SER_P is necessary but not sufficient to know
+	 * whether this processor will actually generate recoverable
+	 * machine checks. Check to see if this is an E7 model Xeon.
+	 */
+	if (mca_cfg.recovery || (mca_cfg.ser &&
+		!strncmp(c->x86_model_id, "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-", 24)))

Eeww, a model string check :-(

Lemme guess: those E7s can't be represented by a range of model/steppings, can they?

Similar to AMD_MODEL_RANGE() thing in cpu/amd.c, for example.

In any case, that chunk belongs in the Intel part of __mcheck_cpu_apply_quirks().

Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#13 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery

Quoted 7 lines

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c void mcheck_cpu_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) · line 1705

Quoted 2 lines
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +2 -0
+	if (mca_cfg.recovery || (mca_cfg.ser &&
+		!strncmp(c->x86_model_id, "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-", 24)))

Eeww, a model string check :-(

Lemme guess: those E7s can't be represented by a range of model/steppings, can they?

We use the same model number for E5 and E7 series. E.g. 63 for Haswell. The model_id string seems to be the only way to tell ahead of time whether you will get a recoverable machine check or die when you touch uncorrected memory.

-Tony

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>

maintainer
#14 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery

Quoted 4 lines · Tony

We use the same model number for E5 and E7 series. E.g. 63 for Haswell. The model_id string seems to be the only way to tell ahead of time whether you will get a recoverable machine check or die when you touch uncorrected memory.

What about MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID or some other MSR or register, for example?

I.e., isn't there some other, more reliable distinction between E5 and E7 besides the model ID?

Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
author
#15 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery

Quoted 2 lines · Borislav Petkov

What about MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID or some other MSR or register, for example?

Bits 52:50 give us "information concerning the intended platform for the processor" ... but we don't seem to decode that vague statement into anything that I can make use of.

Quoted 2 lines

I.e., isn't there some other, more reliable distinction between E5 and E7 besides the model ID?

Digging in the data sheet I found the CAPID0 register which does indicate in bit 4 whether this is an "EX" (a.k.a. "E7" part). But we invent a new PCI device ID for this every generation (0x0EC3 in Ivy Bridge, 0x2fc0 in Haswell, 0x6fc0 in Broadwell). The offset has stayed at 0x84 through all this.

I don't think that hunting the ever-changing PCI-id is a good choice ... the "E5/E7" naming convention has stuck for four generations[1] (Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, Haswell, Broadwell).

-Tony

[1] Although this probably means that marketing are about to think of something new ... they generally do when people start understanding the model names :-(

-Tony

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>

maintainer
#16 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery

Quoted 8 lines · Tony

Digging in the data sheet I found the CAPID0 register which does indicate in bit 4 whether this is an "EX" (a.k.a. "E7" part). But we invent a new PCI device ID for this every generation (0x0EC3 in Ivy Bridge, 0x2fc0 in Haswell, 0x6fc0 in Broadwell). The offset has stayed at 0x84 through all this.

I don't think that hunting the ever-changing PCI-id is a good choice ...

Right :-\

Quoted 8 lines

the "E5/E7" naming convention has stuck for
four generations[1] (Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, Haswell, Broadwell).

-Tony

[1] Although this probably means that marketing are about to think of something new ... they generally do when people start understanding the model names :-(

Yeah, customers shouldn't slack and relax into even thinking they know the model names. Fortunately there's wikipedia...

Thanks.

Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>