Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison
Subsystems (4)
v10 cover Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison
This series is initially targeted at the folks doing filesystems on top of NVDIMMs. They really want to be able to return -EIO when there is a h/w error (just like spinning rust, and SSD does).
I plan to use the same infrastructure to write a machine check aware "copy_from_user()" that will SIGBUS the calling application when a syscall touches poison in user space (just like we do when the application touches the poison itself).
With this series applied Dan Williams can write:
static inline int arch_memcpy_from_pmem(void *dst, const void __pmem *src, size_t n)
{
if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MCRECOVERY)) {
struct mcsafe_ret ret;
ret = __mcsafe_copy(dst, (void __force *) src, n);
if (ret.remain)
return -EIO;
return 0;
}
memcpy(dst, (void __force *) src, n);
return 0;
}I've dropped off the "reviewed-by" tags that I collected back prior to adding the new field to the exception table. Please send new ones if you can.
Changes
V9-V10
Andy: Commit comment in part 2 is stale - refers to "EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT"
Boris: Part1 - Numerous spelling, grammar, etc. fixes
Boris: Part2 - No longer need #include <linux/module.h> (in either file).
V8->V9
Boris: Create a synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery.
Changes V7-V8
Boris: Would be so much cleaner if we added a new field to the exception table
instead of squeezing bits into the fixup field. New field added
Tony: Documentation needs to be updated. Done
Changes V6-V7:
Boris: Why add/subtract 0x20000000? Added better comment provided by Andy Boris: Churn. Part2 changes things only introduced in part1.
Merged parts 1&2 into one patch.
Ingo: Missing my sign off on part1. Added.
Changes V5-V6
Andy: Provoked massive re-write by providing what is now part1 of this
patch series. This frees up two bits in the exception table fixup field that can be used to tag exception table entries as different "classes". This means we don't need my separate exception table fro machine checks. Also avoids duplicating fixup actions for #PF and #MC cases that were in version 5.
Andy: Use C99 array initializers to tie the various class fixup
functions back to the defintions of each class. Also give the functions meanningful names (not fixup_class0() etc.).
Boris: Cleaned up my lousy assembly code removing many spurious 'l'
modifiers on instructions.
Boris: Provided some helper functions for the machine check severity
calculation that make the code more readable.
Boris: Have __mcsafe_copy() return a structure with the 'remaining bytes'
in a separate field from the fault indicator. Boris had suggested Linux -EFAULT/-EINVAL ... but I thought it made more sense to return the exception number (X86_TRAP_MC, etc.) This finally kills off BIT(63) which has been controversial throughout all the early versions of this patch series.
Changes V4-V5
Tony: Extended __mcsafe_copy() to have fixup entries for both machine
check and page fault.
Changes V3-V4:
Andy: Simplify fixup_mcexception() by dropping used-once local variable Andy: "Reviewed-by" tag added to part1 Boris: Moved new functions to memcpy_64.S and declaration to asm/string_64.h Boris: Changed name s/mcsafe_memcpy/__mcsafe_copy/ to make it clear that this
is an internal function and that return value doesn't follow memcpy() semantics.
Boris: "Reviewed-by" tag added to parts 1&2
Changes V2-V3:
Andy: Don't hack "regs->ax = BIT(63) | addr;" in the machine check
handler. Now have better fixup code that computes the number of remaining bytes (just like page-fault fixup).
Andy: #define for BIT(63). Done, plus couple of extra macros using it. Boris: Don't clutter up generic code (like mm/extable.c) with this.
I moved everything under arch/x86 (the asm-generic change is a more generic #define).
Boris: Dependencies for CONFIG_MCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY are too generic.
I made it a real menu item with default "n". Dan Williams will use "select MCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY" from his persistent filesystem code.
Boris: Simplify conditionals in mce.c by moving tolerant/kill_it
checks earlier, with a skip to end if they aren't set.
Boris: Miscellaneous grammar/punctuation. Fixed. Boris: Don't leak spurious __start_mcextable symbols into kernels
that didn't configure MCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY. Done.
Tony: New code doesn't belong in user_copy_64.S/uaccess*.h. Moved
to new .S/.h files
Elliott:Cacheing behavior non-optimal. Could use movntdqa, vmovntdqa
or vmovntdqa on source addresses. I didn't fix this yet. Think of the current mcsafe_memcpy() as the first of several functions. This one is useful for small copies (meta-data) where the overhead of saving SSE/AVX state isn't justified.
Changes V1->V2:
0-day: Reported build errors and warnings on 32-bit systems. Fixed 0-day: Reported bloat to tinyconfig. Fixed Boris: Suggestions to use extra macros to reduce code duplication in _ASM_*EXTABLE. Done Boris: Re-write "tolerant==3" check to reduce indentation level. See below. Andy: Check IP is valid before searching kernel exception tables. Done. Andy: Explain use of BIT(63) on return value from mcsafe_memcpy(). Done (added decode macros). Andy: Untangle mess of code in tail of do_machine_check() to make it
clear what is going on (e.g. that we only enter the ist_begin_non_atomic() if we were called from user code, not from kernel!). Done.
Tony Luck (4):
x86: Expand exception table to allow new handling options x86, mce: Check for faults tagged in EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT exception
table entries
x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery
Documentation/x86/exception-tables.txt | 35 ++++++++ Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt | 4 + arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h | 40 +++++---- arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h | 8 ++ arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 16 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c | 22 ++++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 81 ++++++++++-------- arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 6 +- arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c | 2 + arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 100 +++++++++++++++------- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 2 +- scripts/sortextable.c | 32 +++++++ 16 files changed, 393 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v10 1/4 x86: Expand exception table to allow new handling options
Huge amounts of help from Andy Lutomirski and Borislav Petkov to produce this. Andy provided the inspiration to add classes to the exception table with a clever bit-squeezing trick, Boris pointed out how much cleaner it would all be if we just had a new field.
Linus Torvalds blessed the expansion with:
I'd rather not be clever in order to save just a tiny amount of space in the exception table, which isn't really criticial for anybody.
The third field is another relative function pointer, this one to a handler that executes the actions.
We start out with three handlers:
1: Legacy - just jumps the to fixup IP
2: Fault - provide the trap number in %ax to the fixup code 3: Cleaned up legacy for the uaccess error hack
--- Documentation/x86/exception-tables.txt | 35 ++++++++++++ arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h | 40 +++++++------ arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 16 +++--- arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 6 +- arch/x86/mm/extable.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 2 +- scripts/sortextable.c | 32 +++++++++++ 8 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
Documentation/x86/exception-tables.txt +35 -0
@@ -290,3 +290,38 @@ Due to the way that the exception table is built and needs to be ordered, only use exceptions for code in the .text section. Any other section will cause the exception table to not be sorted correctly, and the exceptions will fail. + +Things changed when 64-bit support was added to x86 Linux. Rather than +double the size of the exception table by expanding the two entries +from 32-bits to 64 bits, a clever trick was used to store addresses +as relative offsets from the table itself. The assembly code changed +from: + .long 1b,3b +to: + .long (from) - . + .long (to) - . + +and the C-code that uses these values converts back to absolute addresses +like this: + + ex_insn_addr(const struct exception_table_entry *x) + { + return (unsigned long)&x->insn + x->insn; + } + +In v4.5 the exception table entry was given a new field "handler". +This is also 32-bits wide and contains a third relative function +pointer which points to one of: + +1) int ex_handler_default(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup) + This is legacy case that just jumps to the fixup code +2) int ex_handler_fault(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup) + This case provides the fault number of the trap that occurred at + entry->insn. It is used to distinguish page faults from machine + check. +3) int ex_handler_ext(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup) + This case is used for uaccess_err ... we need to set a flag + in the task structure. Before the handler functions existed this + case was handled by adding a large offset to the fixup to tag + it as special. +More functions can easily be added.
arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h +24 -16
@@ -44,19 +44,22 @@/* Exception table entry */ #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__ -# define _ASM_EXTABLE (from,to) \ +# define _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE (from, to, handler) \ .pushsection "__ex_table","a" ; \ - .balign 8 ; \ + .balign 4 ; \ .long (from) - . ; \ .long (to) - . ; \ + .long (handler) - . ; \ .popsection -# define _ASM_EXTABLE_EX (from,to) \ - .pushsection "__ex_table","a" ; \ - .balign 8 ; \ - .long (from) - . ; \ - .long (to) - . + 0x7ffffff0 ; \ - .popsection +# define _ASM_EXTABLE (from, to) \ + _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_default) + +# define _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT (from, to) \ + _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_fault) + +# define _ASM_EXTABLE_EX (from, to) \ + _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_ext)# define _ASM_NOKPROBE (entry) \ .pushsection "_kprobe_blacklist","aw" ; \
@@ -89,19 +92,24 @@ .endm#else -# define _ASM_EXTABLE (from,to) \ +# define _EXPAND_EXTABLE_HANDLE (x) #x +# define _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE (from, to, handler) \ " .pushsection \"__ex_table\",\"a\"\n" \ - " .balign 8\n" \ + " .balign 4\n" \ " .long (" #from ") - .\n" \ " .long (" #to ") - .\n" \ + " .long (" _EXPAND_EXTABLE_HANDLE(handler) ") - .\n" \ " .popsection\n" -# define _ASM_EXTABLE_EX (from,to) \ - " .pushsection \"__ex_table\",\"a\"\n" \ - " .balign 8\n" \ - " .long (" #from ") - .\n" \ - " .long (" #to ") - . + 0x7ffffff0\n" \ - " .popsection\n" +# define _ASM_EXTABLE (from, to) \ + _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_default) + +# define _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT (from, to) \ + _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_fault) + +# define _ASM_EXTABLE_EX (from, to) \ + _ASM_EXTABLE_HANDLE(from, to, ex_handler_ext) +/* For C file, we already have NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro */ #endif
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h +8 -8
@@ -90,12 +90,11 @@ static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, unlikely (!__range_not_ok (addr, size,user_addr_max ()))/* -* The exception table consists of pairs of addresses relative to the -* exception table enty itself: the first is the address of an -* instruction that is allowed to fault, and the second is the address -* at which the program should continue. No registers are modified, -* so it is entirely up to the continuation code to figure out what to -* do. +* The exception table consists of triples of addresses relative to the +* exception table entry itself. The first address is of an instruction +* that is allowed to fault, the second is the target at which the program +* should continue. The third is a handler function to deal with the fault +* caused by the instruction in the first field. * * All the routines below use bits of fixup code that are out of line * with the main instruction path. This means when everything is well,
@@ -104,13 +103,14 @@ static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, un*/ struct exception_table_entry { -int insn, fixup; +int insn, fixup, handler; };/* This is not the generic standard exception_table_entry format */ #define ARCH_HAS_SORT_EXTABLE #define ARCH_HAS_SEARCH_EXTABLE -extern int fixup_exception (struct pt_regs *regs); +extern int fixup_exception (struct pt_regs *regs,int trapnr); +extern bool ex_has_fault_handler (unsigned long ip);extern int early_fixup_exception (unsigned long *ip);/*
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c +1 -1
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)* In case the user-specified fault handler returned * zero, try to fix up. */ -if (fixup_exception (regs)) +if (fixup_exception (regs, trapnr))return 1 ;/*
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c +3 -3
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ do_trap_no_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, int trapnr, char *str, }if (!user_mode (regs)) { -if (!fixup_exception (regs)) { +if (!fixup_exception (regs, trapnr)) { tsk->thread.error_code = error_code; tsk->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;die (str, regs, error_code);
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code) tsk = current;if (!user_mode (regs)) { -if (fixup_exception (regs)) +if (fixup_exception (regs,X86_TRAP_GP ))return ; tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static void math_error(struct pt_regs *regs, int error_code, int trapnr)conditional_sti (regs);if (!user_mode (regs)) { -if (!fixup_exception (regs)) { +if (!fixup_exception (regs, trapnr)) { task->thread.error_code = error_code; task->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;die (str, regs, error_code);
arch/x86/mm/extable.c +72 -28
143 lines not on this page · raw message
arch/x86/mm/fault.c +1 -1
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,int sig;/* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */ -if (fixup_exception (regs)) { +if (fixup_exception (regs,X86_TRAP_PF )) {/* * Any interrupt that takes a fault gets the fixup. This makes * the below recursive fault logic only apply to a faults from
scripts/sortextable.c +32 -0
@@ -209,6 +209,35 @@ static int compare_relative_table(const void *a, const void *b)return 0 ; } +static void x86_sort_relative_table (char *extab_image,int image_size) +{ +int i; + + i =0 ; +while (i < image_size) { +uint32_t *loc = (uint32_t *)(extab_image + i); + +w (r (loc) + i, loc); +w (r (loc +1 ) + i +4 , loc +1 ); +w (r (loc +2 ) + i +8 , loc +2 ); + + i +=sizeof (uint32_t ) *3 ; + } + +qsort (extab_image, image_size /12 ,12 , compare_relative_table); + + i =0 ; +while (i < image_size) { +uint32_t *loc = (uint32_t *)(extab_image + i); + +w (r (loc) - i, loc); +w (r (loc +1 ) - (i +4 ), loc +1 ); +w (r (loc +2 ) - (i +8 ), loc +2 ); + + i +=sizeof (uint32_t ) *3 ; + } +} +static void sort_relative_table (char *extab_image,int image_size) {int i;
@@ -281,6 +310,9 @@ do_file(char const *const fname)break ;case EM_386 :case EM_X86_64 : + custom_sort = x86_sort_relative_table; +break ; +case EM_S390 : custom_sort = sort_relative_table;break ;
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v10 2/4 x86, mce: Check for faults tagged in EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT exception table entries
In reply to Tony LuckExtend the severity checking code to add a new context IN_KERN_RECOV which is used to indicate that the machine check was triggered by code in the kernel tagged with _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT() so that the ex_handler_fault() handler will provide the fixup code with the trap number.
Major re-work to the tail code in do_machine_check() to make all this readable/maintainable. One functional change is that tolerant=3 no longer stops recovery actions. Revert to only skipping sending SIGBUS to the current process.
--- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c | 22 +++++++++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c +20 -2
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@#include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/debugfs.h> #include <asm/mce.h> +#include <asm/uaccess.h> #include "mce-internal.h"
@@ -29,7 +30,7 @@* panic situations) */ -enum context {IN_KERNEL =1 ,IN_USER =2 }; +enum context {IN_KERNEL =1 ,IN_USER =2 ,IN_KERNEL_RECOV =3 };enum ser {SER_REQUIRED =1 ,NO_SER =2 };enum exception {EXCP_CONTEXT =1 ,NO_EXCP =2 };
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ static struct severity { #define MCESEV(s, m, c...) { .sev = MCE_ ## s ## _SEVERITY, .msg = m, ## c }#define KERNEL .context = IN_KERNEL#define USER .context = IN_USER +#define KERNEL_RECOV .context = IN_KERNEL_RECOV#define SER .ser = SER_REQUIRED#define NOSER .ser = NO_SER#define EXCP .excp = EXCP_CONTEXT
@@ -87,6 +89,10 @@ static struct severity { EXCP, KERNEL, MCGMASK(MCG_STATUS_RIPV, 0) ),MCESEV ( +PANIC ,"In kernel and no restart IP" , +EXCP ,KERNEL_RECOV ,MCGMASK (MCG_STATUS_RIPV ,0 ) + ), +MCESEV (DEFERRED ,"Deferred error" ,NOSER ,MASK (MCI_STATUS_UC |MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED |MCI_STATUS_POISON ,MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED ) ),
@@ -123,6 +129,11 @@ static struct severity {MCGMASK (MCG_STATUS_RIPV |MCG_STATUS_EIPV ,MCG_STATUS_RIPV ) ),MCESEV ( +AR ,"Action required: data load in error recoverable area of kernel" , +SER ,MASK (MCI_STATUS_OVER |MCI_UC_SAR |MCI_ADDR |MCACOD ,MCI_UC_SAR |MCI_ADDR |MCACOD_DATA ), +KERNEL_RECOV + ), +MCESEV (AR ,"Action required: data load error in a user process" ,SER ,MASK (MCI_STATUS_OVER |MCI_UC_SAR |MCI_ADDR |MCACOD ,MCI_UC_SAR |MCI_ADDR |MCACOD_DATA ), USER
@@ -170,6 +181,9 @@ static struct severity { ) /* always matches. keep at end */ }; +#define mc_recoverable (mcg) (((mcg) & (MCG_STATUS_RIPV|MCG_STATUS_EIPV)) == \ + (MCG_STATUS_RIPV|MCG_STATUS_EIPV)) +/* * If mcgstatus indicated that ip/cs on the stack were * no good, then "m->cs" will be zero and we will have
@@ -183,7 +197,11 @@ static struct severity {*/ static int error_context (struct mce *m) { -return ((m->cs &3 ) ==3 ) ?IN_USER :IN_KERNEL ; +if ((m->cs &3 ) ==3 ) +return IN_USER ; +if (mc_recoverable (m->mcgstatus) &&ex_has_fault_handler (m->ip)) +return IN_KERNEL_RECOV ; +return IN_KERNEL ; }/*
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +36 -34
97 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v10 3/4 x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
In reply to Tony LuckMake use of the EXTABLE_FAULT exception table entries. This routine returns a structure to indicate the result of the copy:
struct mcsafe_ret {
u64 trapnr;
u64 remain;
};If the copy is successful, then both 'trapnr' and 'remain' are zero.
If we faulted during the copy, then 'trapnr' will say which type of trap (X86_TRAP_PF or X86_TRAP_MC) and 'remain' says how many bytes were not copied.
Note that this is probably the first of several copy functions. We can make new ones for non-temporal cache handling etc.
--- arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h | 8 +++ arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c | 2 + arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h +8 -0
@@ -78,6 +78,14 @@ int strcmp(const char *cs, const char *ct);#define memset (s, c, n) __memset(s, c, n)#endif +struct mcsafe_ret { +u64 trapnr; +u64 remain; +}; + +struct mcsafe_ret __mcsafe_copy (void *dst,const void __user *src,size_t cnt); +extern void __mcsafe_copy_end (void ); +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ #endif /* _ASM_X86_STRING_64_H */
arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c +2 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_user_nocache);EXPORT_SYMBOL (_copy_from_user);EXPORT_SYMBOL (_copy_to_user); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (__mcsafe_copy); +EXPORT_SYMBOL (copy_page);EXPORT_SYMBOL (clear_page);
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +134 -0
137 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Borislav Petkov
maintainerRe: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
Quoted 23 lines · Tony Luck
Make use of the
EXTABLE_FAULTexception table entries. This routine returns a structure to indicate the result of the copy:struct mcsafe_ret { u64 trapnr; u64 remain; };If the copy is successful, then both 'trapnr' and 'remain' are zero.
If we faulted during the copy, then 'trapnr' will say which type of trap (
X86_TRAP_PForX86_TRAP_MC) and 'remain' says how many bytes were not copied.Note that this is probably the first of several copy functions. We can make new ones for non-temporal cache handling etc.
Signed-off-by Tony Luck <[email protected]>--- arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h | 8 +++ arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c | 2 + arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
...
Quoted 11 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +3
-0@@ -177,3 +177,137 @@ ENTRY(memcpy_orig) .Lend: retq ENDPROC(memcpy_orig) + +#ifndef CONFIG_UML +/*
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 192
Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +10
-0+ * __mcsafe_copy - memory copy with machine check exception handling + * Note that we only catch machine checks when reading the source addresses. + * Writes to target are posted and don't generate machine checks. + */ +ENTRY(__mcsafe_copy) + cmpl $8,%edx + jb 20f /* less then 8 bytes, go to byte copy loop */ + + /* check for bad alignment of source */ + movl %esi,%ecx
You can save yourself this MOV here in what is, I'm assuming, the general likely case where @src is aligned and do:
/* check for bad alignment of source */
testl $7, %esi
/* already aligned? */
jz 102f
movl %esi,%ecx
subl $8,%ecx
negl %ecx
subl %ecx,%edx
0: movb (%rsi),%al
movb %al,(%rdi)
incq %rsi
incq %rdi
decl %ecx
jnz 0barch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 194
Quoted 2 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +2
-0+ andl $7,%ecx + jz 102f /* already aligned */
Please move side-comments over the line they're referring to.
Quoted 4 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +4
-0+ subl $8,%ecx + negl %ecx + subl %ecx,%edx +0: movb (%rsi),%al
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 208
Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +10
-0+ movb %al,(%rdi) + incq %rsi + incq %rdi + decl %ecx + jnz 0b +102: + movl %edx,%ecx + andl $63,%edx + shrl $6,%ecx + jz 17f
Please add a \n after the JMPs for better readability - those blocks are dense as it is. They could use some comments too.
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 216
Quoted 8 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +8
-0+1: movq (%rsi),%r8 +2: movq 1*8(%rsi),%r9 +3: movq 2*8(%rsi),%r10 +4: movq 3*8(%rsi),%r11 + mov %r8,(%rdi) + mov %r9,1*8(%rdi) + mov %r10,2*8(%rdi) + mov %r11,3*8(%rdi)
You can say "movq" too here, for consistency.
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 220
Quoted 4 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +4
-0+9: movq 4*8(%rsi),%r8 +10: movq 5*8(%rsi),%r9 +11: movq 6*8(%rsi),%r10 +12: movq 7*8(%rsi),%r11
Why aren't we pushing %r12-%r15 on the stack after the "jz 17f" above and using them too and thus copying a whole cacheline in one go?
We would need to restore them when we're done with the cacheline-wise shuffle, of course.
Quoted 8 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +8
-0+ mov %r8,4*8(%rdi) + mov %r9,5*8(%rdi) + mov %r10,6*8(%rdi) + mov %r11,7*8(%rdi) + leaq 64(%rsi),%rsi + leaq 64(%rdi),%rdi + decl %ecx + jnz 1b
...
Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
Quoted 18 lines
You can save yourself this MOV here in what is, I'm assuming, the general likely case where @src is aligned and do:
/* check for bad alignment of source */ testl $7, %esi /* already aligned? */ jz 102f movl %esi,%ecx subl $8,%ecx negl %ecx subl %ecx,%edx 0: movb (%rsi),%al movb %al,(%rdi) incq %rsi incq %rdi decl %ecx jnz 0b
The "testl $7, %esi" just checks the low three bits ... it doesn't change %esi. But the code from the "subl $8" on down assumes that %ecx is a number in [1..7] as the count of bytes to copy until we achieve alignment.
So your "movl %esi,%ecx" needs to be somthing that just copies the low three bits and zeroes the high part of %ecx. Is there a cute way to do that in x86 assembler?
Quoted 5 lines
Why aren't we pushing %r12-%r15 on the stack after the "jz 17f" above and using them too and thus copying a whole cacheline in one go?
We would need to restore them when we're done with the cacheline-wise shuffle, of course.
I copied that loop from arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S:__copy_user_nocache() I guess the answer depends on whether you generally copy enough cache lines to save enough time to cover the cost of saving and restoring those registers.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Borislav Petkov
maintainerRe: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
Quoted 19 lines · Tony
Quoted 18 lines
You can save yourself this MOV here in what is, I'm assuming, the general likely case where @src is aligned and do:
/* check for bad alignment of source */ testl $7, %esi /* already aligned? */ jz 102f movl %esi,%ecx subl $8,%ecx negl %ecx subl %ecx,%edx 0: movb (%rsi),%al movb %al,(%rdi) incq %rsi incq %rdi decl %ecx jnz 0b
Quoted 4 lines
The "testl $7, %esi" just checks the low three bits ... it doesn't change %esi. But the code from the "subl $8" on down assumes that %ecx is a number in [1..7] as the count of bytes to copy until we achieve alignment.
Grr, sorry about that, I actually missed to copy-paste the AND:
/* check for bad alignment of source */
testl $7, %esi
jz 102f /* already aligned */
movl %esi,%ecx
andl $7,%ecx
subl $8,%ecx
negl %ecx
subl %ecx,%edx
0: movb (%rsi),%al
movb %al,(%rdi)
incq %rsi
incq %rdi
decl %ecx
jnz 0bI basically am proposing to move the unlikely case out of line and optimize the likely one.
Quoted 3 lines
So your "movl %esi,%ecx" needs to be somthing that just copies the low three bits and zeroes the high part of %ecx. Is there a cute way to do that in x86 assembler?
We could do some funky games with byte-sized moves but those are generally slower anyway so doing the default operand size thing should be ok.
Quoted 4 lines
I copied that loop from arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S:__copy_user_nocache() I guess the answer depends on whether you generally copy enough cache lines to save enough time to cover the cost of saving and restoring those registers.
Well, that function will run on modern hw with a stack engine so I'd assume those 4 pushes and pops would be paid for by the increased registers count for the data shuffling.
But one could take out that function do some microbenchmarking with different sizes and once with the current version and once with the pushes and pops of r1[2-5] to see where the breakeven is.
Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
Quoted 3 lines · Borislav Petkov
But one could take out that function do some microbenchmarking with different sizes and once with the current version and once with the pushes and pops of r1[2-5] to see where the breakeven is.
On a 4K page copy from a source address that isn't in the cache I see all sorts of answers.
On my desktop (i7-3960X) it is ~50 cycles slower to push and pop the four registers.
On my latest Xeon - I can't post benchmarks ... but also a bit slower.
On an older Xeon it is a few cycles faster (but even though I'm looking at the median of 10,000 runs I see more run-to-run variation that I see difference between register choices.
Here's what I tested:
push %r12 push %r13 push %r14 push %r15 /* Loop copying whole cache lines */
1: movq (%rsi),%r8
2: movq 1*8(%rsi),%r9
3: movq 2*8(%rsi),%r10
4: movq 3*8(%rsi),%r11
9: movq 4*8(%rsi),%r12
10: movq 5*8(%rsi),%r13
11: movq 6*8(%rsi),%r14
12: movq 7*8(%rsi),%r15
movq %r8,(%rdi) movq %r9,1*8(%rdi) movq %r10,2*8(%rdi) movq %r11,3*8(%rdi) movq %r12,4*8(%rdi) movq %r13,5*8(%rdi) movq %r14,6*8(%rdi) movq %r15,7*8(%rdi) leaq 64(%rsi),%rsi leaq 64(%rdi),%rdi decl %ecx jnz 1b pop %r15 pop %r14 pop %r13 pop %r12
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Borislav Petkov
maintainerRe: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
Quoted 8 lines · Tony
Quoted 3 lines · Borislav Petkov
But one could take out that function do some microbenchmarking with different sizes and once with the current version and once with the pushes and pops of r1[2-5] to see where the breakeven is.
On a 4K page copy from a source address that isn't in the cache I see all sorts of answers.
Quoted 8 lines
On my desktop (i7-3960X) it is ~50 cycles slower to push and pop the four registers.
On my latest Xeon - I can't post benchmarks ... but also a bit slower.
On an older Xeon it is a few cycles faster (but even though I'm looking at the median of 10,000 runs I see more run-to-run variation that I see difference between register choices.
Hmm, strange. Can you check whether perf doesn't show any significant differences too. Something like:
perf stat --repeat 100 --sync --pre 'echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' -- ./mcsafe_copy_1
and then
perf stat --repeat 100 --sync --pre 'echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' -- ./mcsafe_copy_2
That'll be interesting...
Thanks.
Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>Borislav Petkov
maintainerRe: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
In reply to Tony LuckQuoted 61 lines · Tony Luck
Make use of the
EXTABLE_FAULTexception table entries. This routine returns a structure to indicate the result of the copy:struct mcsafe_ret { u64 trapnr; u64 remain; };If the copy is successful, then both 'trapnr' and 'remain' are zero.
If we faulted during the copy, then 'trapnr' will say which type of trap (
X86_TRAP_PForX86_TRAP_MC) and 'remain' says how many bytes were not copied.Note that this is probably the first of several copy functions. We can make new ones for non-temporal cache handling etc.
Signed-off-by Tony Luck <[email protected]>--- arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h | 8 +++ arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c | 2 + arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+)arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h +8
-0@@ -78,6 +78,14 @@ int strcmp(const char *cs, const char *ct);#define memset (s, c, n) __memset(s, c, n)#endif +struct mcsafe_ret { +u64 trapnr; +u64 remain; +}; + +struct mcsafe_ret __mcsafe_copy (void *dst,const void __user *src,size_t cnt); +extern void __mcsafe_copy_end (void ); +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ #endif /* _ASM_X86_STRING_64_H */ arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c +2
-0@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_user_nocache);EXPORT_SYMBOL (_copy_from_user);EXPORT_SYMBOL (_copy_to_user); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (__mcsafe_copy); +EXPORT_SYMBOL (copy_page);EXPORT_SYMBOL (clear_page);arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +0
-0
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 181
Quoted 5 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +2
-0@@ -177,3 +177,137 @@ ENTRY(memcpy_orig) .Lend: retq ENDPROC(memcpy_orig) + +#ifndef CONFIG_UML
So this is because we get a link failure on UML:
arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x8): undefined reference to ex_handler_fault' arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x14): undefined reference to ex_handler_fault' arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x20): undefined reference to ex_handler_fault' arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x2c): undefined reference to ex_handler_fault' arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x38): undefined reference to ex_handler_fault' arch/x86/um/built-in.o:(__ex_table+0x44): more undefined references to ex_handler_fault' follow
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
due to those
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 306
Quoted 5 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +5
-0+ _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(0b,30b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(1b,31b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(2b,32b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(3b,33b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(4b,34b)
things below and that's because ex_handler_fault() is defined in arch/x86/mm/extable.c and UML doesn't include that file in the build. It takes kernel/extable.c and lib/extable.c only.
Richi, what's the usual way to address that in UML? I.e., make an x86-only symbol visible to the UML build too? Define a dummy one, just so that it builds?
Quoted 133 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +131
-0+ * __mcsafe_copy - memory copy with machine check exception handling + * Note that we only catch machine checks when reading the source addresses. + * Writes to target are posted and don't generate machine checks. + */ +ENTRY(__mcsafe_copy) + cmpl $8,%edx + jb 20f /* less then 8 bytes, go to byte copy loop */ + + /* check for bad alignment of source */ + movl %esi,%ecx + andl $7,%ecx + jz 102f /* already aligned */ + subl $8,%ecx + negl %ecx + subl %ecx,%edx +0: movb (%rsi),%al + movb %al,(%rdi) + incq %rsi + incq %rdi + decl %ecx + jnz 0b +102: + movl %edx,%ecx + andl $63,%edx + shrl $6,%ecx + jz 17f +1: movq (%rsi),%r8 +2: movq 1*8(%rsi),%r9 +3: movq 2*8(%rsi),%r10 +4: movq 3*8(%rsi),%r11 + mov %r8,(%rdi) + mov %r9,1*8(%rdi) + mov %r10,2*8(%rdi) + mov %r11,3*8(%rdi) +9: movq 4*8(%rsi),%r8 +10: movq 5*8(%rsi),%r9 +11: movq 6*8(%rsi),%r10 +12: movq 7*8(%rsi),%r11 + mov %r8,4*8(%rdi) + mov %r9,5*8(%rdi) + mov %r10,6*8(%rdi) + mov %r11,7*8(%rdi) + leaq 64(%rsi),%rsi + leaq 64(%rdi),%rdi + decl %ecx + jnz 1b +17: movl %edx,%ecx + andl $7,%edx + shrl $3,%ecx + jz 20f +18: movq (%rsi),%r8 + mov %r8,(%rdi) + leaq 8(%rsi),%rsi + leaq 8(%rdi),%rdi + decl %ecx + jnz 18b +20: andl %edx,%edx + jz 23f + movl %edx,%ecx +21: movb (%rsi),%al + movb %al,(%rdi) + incq %rsi + incq %rdi + decl %ecx + jnz 21b +23: xorq %rax, %rax + xorq %rdx, %rdx + /* copy successful. return 0 */ + ret + + .section .fixup,"ax" + /* + * machine check handler loaded %rax with trap number + * We just need to make sure %edx has the number of + * bytes remaining + */ +30: + add %ecx,%edx + ret +31: + shl $6,%ecx + add %ecx,%edx + ret +32: + shl $6,%ecx + lea -8(%ecx,%edx),%edx + ret +33: + shl $6,%ecx + lea -16(%ecx,%edx),%edx + ret +34: + shl $6,%ecx + lea -24(%ecx,%edx),%edx + ret +35: + shl $6,%ecx + lea -32(%ecx,%edx),%edx + ret +36: + shl $6,%ecx + lea -40(%ecx,%edx),%edx + ret +37: + shl $6,%ecx + lea -48(%ecx,%edx),%edx + ret +38: + shl $6,%ecx + lea -56(%ecx,%edx),%edx + ret +39: + lea (%rdx,%rcx,8),%rdx + ret +40: + mov %ecx,%edx + ret + .previous + + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(0b,30b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(1b,31b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(2b,32b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(3b,33b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(4b,34b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(9b,35b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(10b,36b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(11b,37b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(12b,38b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(18b,39b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(21b,40b) +#endifSignature · 1 line
2.5.0
Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()
Am 07.02.2016 um 17:55 schrieb Borislav Petkov:
Quoted 8 lines
due to those
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ENTRY(memcpy_orig) · line 306
Quoted 5 lines
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S +5
-0+ _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(0b,30b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(1b,31b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(2b,32b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(3b,33b) + _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(4b,34b)
Quoted 7 lines
things below and that's because
ex_handler_fault()is defined inarch/x86/mm/extable.cand UML doesn't include that file in the build. It takeskernel/extable.candlib/extable.conly.Richi, what's the usual way to address that in UML? I.e., make an x86-only symbol visible to the UML build too? Define a dummy one, just so that it builds?
As discussed on IRC with Boris, UML offers only minimal extable support. To get rid of the said #ifndef, UML would have to provide its own extable.c (mostly copy&paste from arch/x86) and an advanced struct exception_table_entry which includes the trap number. This implies also that UML can no longer use uaccess.h from asm-generic or has to add a new ifdef into uaccess.h to whiteout the minimal struct exception_table_entry from there.
So, I'd vote to keep the #ifndef CONFIG_UML in memcpy_64.S. As soon you need another #ifndef please ping me and I'll happily bite the bullet and implement the advanced extable stuff for UML. Deal?
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
PATCH v10 4/4 x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery
In reply to Tony LuckThe Intel Software Developer Manual describes bit 24 in the MCG_CAP MSR:
MCG_SER_P (software error recovery support present) flag, bit 24 a?? Indicates (when set) that the processor supports software error recovery
But only some models with this capability bit set will actually generate recoverable machine checks.
Check the model name and set a synthetic capability bit. Provide a command line option to set this bit anyway in case the kernel doesn't recognise the model name.
--- Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt | 4 ++++ arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 11 +++++++++++ 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt +4 -0
@@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ Machine check threshold to 1. Enabling this may make memory predictive failure analysis less effective if the bios sets thresholds for memory errors since we will not see details for all errors. + mce=recovery + Tell the kernel that this system can generate recoverable + machine checks (useful when the kernel doesn't recognize + the cpuid x86_model_id[]) nomce (for compatibility with i386): same as mce=off
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h +1 -0
@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@#define X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF ( 3*32+28)/* APERFMPERF */ #define X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU ( 3*32+29)/* "eagerfpu" Non lazy FPU restore */ #define X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3 ( 3*32+30)/* TSC doesn't stop in S3 state */ +#define X86_FEATURE_MCE_RECOVERY ( 3*32+31)/* cpu has recoverable machine checks */ /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000001 (ecx), word 4 */ #define X86_FEATURE_XMM3 ( 4*32+ 0)/* "pni" SSE-3 */
arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h +1 -0
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct mca_config {bool ignore_ce;bool disabled;bool ser; +bool recovery;bool bios_cmci_threshold;u8 banks;s8 bootlog;
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +11 -0
@@ -1696,6 +1696,15 @@ void mcheck_cpu_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)return ; } +/* +* MCG_CAP.MCG_SER_P is necessary but not sufficient to know +* whether this processor will actually generate recoverable +* machine checks. Check to see if this is an E7 model Xeon. +*/ +if (mca_cfg.recovery || (mca_cfg.ser && + !strncmp (c->x86_model_id,"Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-" ,24 ))) +set_cpu_cap (c,X86_FEATURE_MCE_RECOVERY ); +if (mce_gen_pool_init ()) { mca_cfg.disabled = true;pr_emerg ("Couldn't allocate MCE records pool!\n" );
@@ -2030,6 +2039,8 @@ static int __init mcheck_enable(char *str) cfg->bootlog = (str[0 ] =='b' ); else if (!strcmp(str, "bios_cmci_threshold")) cfg->bios_cmci_threshold = true; + else if (!strcmp(str, "recovery")) + cfg->recovery = true; else if (isdigit(str[0])) {if (get_option (&str, &cfg->tolerant) ==2 )get_option (&str, &(cfg->monarch_timeout));
Signature · 7 lines
2.5.0 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Borislav Petkov
maintainerRe: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery
Quoted 25 lines · Tony Luck
The Intel Software Developer Manual describes bit 24 in the
MCG_CAPMSR:
MCG_SER_P(software error recovery support present) flag, bit 24 a?? Indicates (when set) that the processor supports software error recovery
But only some models with this capability bit set will actually generate recoverable machine checks.Check the model name and set a synthetic capability bit. Provide a command line option to set this bit anyway in case the kernel doesn't recognise the model name.
Signed-off-by Tony Luck <[email protected]>--- Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt | 4 ++++ arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 11 +++++++++++ 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+)Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt +0
-0
Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt Machine check · line 66
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt +4
-0@@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ Machine check threshold to 1. Enabling this may make memory predictive failure analysis less effective if the bios sets thresholds for memory errors since we will not see details for all errors. + mce=recovery + Tell the kernel that this system can generate recoverable + machine checks (useful when the kernel doesn't recognize + the cpuid x86_model_id[])
I'd say "Force-enable generation of recoverable MCEs."
and not mention implementation details in the description text.
Quoted 31 lines
Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt +0
-0nomce (for compatibility with i386): same as mce=offarch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h +1
-0@@ -106,6 +106,7 @@#define X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF ( 3*32+28)/* APERFMPERF */ #define X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU ( 3*32+29)/* "eagerfpu" Non lazy FPU restore */ #define X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3 ( 3*32+30)/* TSC doesn't stop in S3 state */ +#define X86_FEATURE_MCE_RECOVERY ( 3*32+31)/* cpu has recoverable machine checks */ /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000001 (ecx), word 4 */ #define X86_FEATURE_XMM3 ( 4*32+ 0)/* "pni" SSE-3 */ arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h +1
-0@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct mca_config {bool ignore_ce;bool disabled;bool ser; +bool recovery;bool bios_cmci_threshold;u8 banks;s8 bootlog;arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +0
-0
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c void mcheck_cpu_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) · line 1705
Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +7
-0@@ -1696,6 +1696,15 @@ void mcheck_cpu_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)return ; } +/* +* MCG_CAP.MCG_SER_P is necessary but not sufficient to know +* whether this processor will actually generate recoverable +* machine checks. Check to see if this is an E7 model Xeon. +*/ +if (mca_cfg.recovery || (mca_cfg.ser && + !strncmp (c->x86_model_id,"Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-" ,24 )))
Eeww, a model string check :-(
Lemme guess: those E7s can't be represented by a range of model/steppings, can they?
Similar to AMD_MODEL_RANGE() thing in cpu/amd.c, for example.
In any case, that chunk belongs in the Intel part of __mcheck_cpu_apply_quirks().
Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery
Quoted 7 lines
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c void mcheck_cpu_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) · line 1705
Quoted 2 lines
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c +2
-0+if (mca_cfg.recovery || (mca_cfg.ser && + !strncmp (c->x86_model_id,"Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-" ,24 )))Eeww, a model string check :-(
Lemme guess: those E7s can't be represented by a range of model/steppings, can they?
We use the same model number for E5 and E7 series. E.g. 63 for Haswell. The model_id string seems to be the only way to tell ahead of time whether you will get a recoverable machine check or die when you touch uncorrected memory.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Borislav Petkov
maintainerRe: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery
Quoted 4 lines · Tony
We use the same model number for E5 and E7 series. E.g. 63 for Haswell. The
model_idstring seems to be the only way to tell ahead of time whether you will get a recoverable machine check or die when you touch uncorrected memory.
What about MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID or some other MSR or register, for example?
I.e., isn't there some other, more reliable distinction between E5 and E7 besides the model ID?
Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>Re: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery
Quoted 2 lines · Borislav Petkov
What about
MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_IDor some other MSR or register, for example?
Bits 52:50 give us "information concerning the intended platform for the processor" ... but we don't seem to decode that vague statement into anything that I can make use of.
Quoted 2 lines
I.e., isn't there some other, more reliable distinction between E5 and E7 besides the model ID?
Digging in the data sheet I found the CAPID0 register which does indicate in bit 4 whether this is an "EX" (a.k.a. "E7" part). But we invent a new PCI device ID for this every generation (0x0EC3 in Ivy Bridge, 0x2fc0 in Haswell, 0x6fc0 in Broadwell). The offset has stayed at 0x84 through all this.
I don't think that hunting the ever-changing PCI-id is a good choice ... the "E5/E7" naming convention has stuck for four generations[1] (Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, Haswell, Broadwell).
-Tony
[1] Although this probably means that marketing are about to think of something new ... they generally do when people start understanding the model names :-(
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Borislav Petkov
maintainerRe: [PATCH v10 4/4] x86: Create a new synthetic cpu capability for machine check recovery
Quoted 8 lines · Tony
Digging in the data sheet I found the CAPID0 register which does indicate in bit 4 whether this is an "EX" (a.k.a. "E7" part). But we invent a new PCI device ID for this every generation (
0x0EC3in Ivy Bridge,0x2fc0in Haswell,0x6fc0in Broadwell). The offset has stayed at0x84through all this.I don't think that hunting the ever-changing PCI-id is a good choice ...
Right :-\
Quoted 8 lines
the "E5/E7" naming convention has stuck for
four generations[1] (Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, Haswell, Broadwell).-Tony
[1] Although this probably means that marketing are about to think of something new ... they generally do when people start understanding the model names :-(
Yeah, customers shouldn't slack and relax into even thinking they know the model names. Fortunately there's wikipedia...
Thanks.
Signature · 10 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>