gpio: pisosr: Use devm_gpiod_get_optional for gpio->load_gpio
PATCH 1/1 gpio: pisosr: Use devm_gpiod_get_optional for gpio->load_gpio
gpio->load_gpio is optional, so use devm_gpiod_get_optional instead.
--- drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c +4 -7
@@ -125,15 +125,12 @@ static int pisosr_gpio_probe(struct spi_device *spi)if (!gpio->buffer)return -ENOMEM ; - gpio->load_gpio =devm_gpiod_get (dev,"load" ,GPIOD_OUT_LOW ); + gpio->load_gpio =devm_gpiod_get_optional (dev,"load" ,GPIOD_OUT_LOW );if (IS_ERR (gpio->load_gpio)) { ret =PTR_ERR (gpio->load_gpio); -if (ret != -ENOENT && ret != -ENOSYS ) { -if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER ) -dev_err (dev,"Unable to allocate load GPIO\n" ); -return ret; - } - gpio->load_gpio =NULL ; +if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER ) +dev_err (dev,"Unable to allocate load GPIO\n" ); +return ret; }mutex_init (&gpio->lock);
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
Quoted 22 lines · Axel Lin
gpio->load_gpiois optional, so usedevm_gpiod_get_optionalinstead.Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c +1
-3@@ -125,15 +125,12 @@ static int pisosr_gpio_probe(struct spi_device *spi)if (!gpio->buffer)return -ENOMEM ; - gpio->load_gpio =devm_gpiod_get (dev,"load" ,GPIOD_OUT_LOW ); + gpio->load_gpio =devm_gpiod_get_optional (dev,"load" ,GPIOD_OUT_LOW );if (IS_ERR (gpio->load_gpio)) { ret =PTR_ERR (gpio->load_gpio); -if (ret != -ENOENT && ret != -ENOSYS ) { -if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER )
drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c static int pisosr_gpio_probe(struct spi_device *spi) · line 136
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c +3
-4-dev_err (dev,"Unable to allocate load GPIO\n" ); -return ret; - } - gpio->load_gpio =NULL ; +if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER ) +dev_err (dev,"Unable to allocate load GPIO\n" ); +return ret; }mutex_init (&gpio->lock);
How does this work when the GPIO subsystem is disabled? It looks like we get will get -ENOSYS and fail probe. The issue is then that devm_gpiod_get_optional returns an error when it cant get the optional GPIO in that case, when it should probably just return NULL, I would think all the optional functions should.
2016-02-22 23:43 GMT+08:00 Andrew F. Davis <[email protected]>:
Quoted 34 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 33 lines
gpio->load_gpiois optional, so usedevm_gpiod_get_optionalinstead.Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c +4
-7@@ -125,15 +125,12 @@ static int pisosr_gpio_probe(struct spi_device *spi)if (!gpio->buffer)return -ENOMEM ; - gpio->load_gpio =devm_gpiod_get (dev,"load" ,GPIOD_OUT_LOW ); + gpio->load_gpio =devm_gpiod_get_optional (dev,"load" ,GPIOD_OUT_LOW );if (IS_ERR (gpio->load_gpio)) { ret =PTR_ERR (gpio->load_gpio); -if (ret != -ENOENT && ret != -ENOSYS ) { -if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER ) -dev_err (dev,"Unable to allocate load GPIO\n"); -return ret; - } - gpio->load_gpio =NULL ; +if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER ) +dev_err (dev,"Unable to allocate load GPIO\n" ); +return ret; }
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
mutex_init(&gpio->lock);How does this work when the GPIO subsystem is disabled? It looks like we get will get
-ENOSYSand fail probe. The issue is then that
I think it's no problem for this driver as it is in drivers/gpio/ folder, it's always build with GPIOLIB.
Quoted 3 lines
devm_gpiod_get_optionalreturns an error when it cant get the optional GPIO in that case, when it should probably just return NULL, I would think all the optional functions should.
I had similar question when I mad this change.
When !GPIOLIB, all the gpio APIs return error.
But for (devm_)gpiod_get_optional, it seems reasonable to return NULL in !GPIOLIB case
because it's optional anyway.
Andrew F. Davis
Acked-byQuoted 48 lines · Axel Lin
2016-02-22 23:43 GMT+08:00 Andrew F. Davis <[email protected]>:
Quoted 34 lines · Axel Lin
Quoted 33 lines
gpio->load_gpiois optional, so usedevm_gpiod_get_optionalinstead.Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)drivers/gpio/gpio-pisosr.c +4
-7@@ -125,15 +125,12 @@ static int pisosr_gpio_probe(struct spi_device *spi)if (!gpio->buffer)return -ENOMEM ; - gpio->load_gpio =devm_gpiod_get (dev,"load" ,GPIOD_OUT_LOW ); + gpio->load_gpio =devm_gpiod_get_optional (dev,"load" ,GPIOD_OUT_LOW );if (IS_ERR (gpio->load_gpio)) { ret =PTR_ERR (gpio->load_gpio); -if (ret != -ENOENT && ret != -ENOSYS ) { -if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER ) -dev_err (dev,"Unable to allocate load GPIO\n"); -return ret; - } - gpio->load_gpio =NULL ; +if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER ) +dev_err (dev,"Unable to allocate load GPIO\n" ); +return ret; }Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
mutex_init(&gpio->lock);How does this work when the GPIO subsystem is disabled? It looks like we get will get
-ENOSYSand fail probe. The issue is then thatI think it's no problem for this driver as it is in
drivers/gpio/folder, it's always build with GPIOLIB.Quoted 3 lines
devm_gpiod_get_optionalreturns an error when it cant get the optional GPIO in that case, when it should probably just return NULL, I would think all the optional functions should.
Quoted 6 lines
I had similar question when I mad this change.
When !GPIOLIB, all the gpio APIs return error.
But for (devm_)gpiod_get_optional, it seems reasonable to return NULL in !GPIOLIB case
because it's optional anyway.
Well I guess that's work for another patch, for this one I see no issues.
Quoted 3 lines · Axel Lin
gpio->load_gpiois optional, so usedevm_gpiod_get_optionalinstead.Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>
Patch applied with Andrew's ACK.
Yours,
Linus Walleij