OpenRISC RTEMS
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joel, Hi Hesham,
(included the new mailing list)
I am currently in the process of releasing prebuilt RTEMS toolchains for OpenRISC. We have started a tutorial repository for multiple targets and want to distribute baremetal, Linux and RTEMS examples with it.
For that I am bumping the GCC version to 4.9.3 and GDB to 7.9. I am adopting the patching mechanism that Hesham also used in RSB, but I found a critical difference during the build.
Joel supplied the RTEMS patch here:
https://github.com/openrisc/or1k-gcc/commit/1ee8ef4190f85934479fa00abbc29e164af80f00
In the target macros elfos.h is missing:
https://github.com/openrisc/or1k-gcc/commit/1ee8ef4190f85934479fa00abbc29e164af80f00#diff-fb3f1781891204d8e51adc85578e9a19R2179
Hesham's build includes elfos.h:
https://github.com/heshamelmatary/or1k-rtems/blob/master/patches/gcc-4.8.2-or1k-rtems.diff#L5701
After applying an or1k patch to GCC from our development branch, the critical part is the ASM_OUTPUT_ASCII macro:
https://github.com/openrisc/or1k-gcc/blob/or1k-4.9.3/gcc/config/or1k/or1k.h#L1022
The function used there is only defined in the ARM port, hence I think this is an artifact. In our standard builds the macro is overwritten by elfos.h.
I think the default fix is to include elfos.h in the target macros, but I was wondering if something speaks against it. Is it a decision to keep it out, Joel?
Sorry, I am not an expert on this stuff.
Best,
Stefan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlbtRmgACgkQuMYtsrn2U9wqyACfeEO2qA/R+DXo1cNXdZlTctwf mekAnRfjaHXcuanNMrKODCUa7XbJP8Wf
=xINJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Quoted 27 lines · Stefan Wallentowitz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1Hi Joel, Hi Hesham,
(included the new mailing list)
I am currently in the process of releasing prebuilt RTEMS toolchains for OpenRISC. We have started a tutorial repository for multiple targets and want to distribute baremetal, Linux and RTEMS examples with it.
For that I am bumping the GCC version to 4.9.3 and GDB to 7.9. I am adopting the patching mechanism that Hesham also used in RSB, but I found a critical difference during the build.
Joel supplied the RTEMS patch here:
https://github.com/openrisc/or1k-gcc/commit/1ee8ef4190f85934479fa00abbc29e164af80f00
In the target macroselfos.his missing:
https://github.com/openrisc/or1k-gcc/commit/1ee8ef4190f85934479fa00abbc29e164af80f00#diff-fb3f1781891204d8e51adc85578e9a19R2179
Hesham's build includeselfos.h:
https://github.com/heshamelmatary/or1k-rtems/blob/master/patches/gcc-4.8.2-or1k-rtems.diff#L5701After applying an or1k patch to GCC from our development branch, the critical part is the
ASM_OUTPUT_ASCIImacro:
https://github.com/openrisc/or1k-gcc/blob/or1k-4.9.3/gcc/config/or1k/or1k.h#L1022
Quoted 8 lines
The function used there is only defined in the ARM port, hence I think this is an artifact. In our standard builds the macro is overwritten by
elfos.h.I think the default fix is to include
elfos.hin the target macros, but I was wondering if something speaks against it. Is it a decision to keep it out, Joel?
FWIW when someone wants to do an RTEMS port, I try to do a first cut at the target adaptation. It is not much as I explain below but since I have FSF paperwork and can usually do it quickly, it saves hassle. A target for us starts with CPU-elf and then:
+ try to build binutils-gdb. There are a few config files in binutils, bfd, ld, and gdb where CPU-rtems might have to be added to switch statements.
+ newlib usually doesn't need anything done to compile. It may need setjmp added later.
+ gcc needs a gcc/config/CPU/rtems.h and a stanza in a gcc config file. Plus a stanza to match on in libgcc's config file.
In this case, it looks like my first cut missed a line.
Without testing, my first impression is that the target fragment for or1k should look like this:
or1k*-*-rtems*)
tm_file="${tm_file} dbxelf.h elfos.h newlib-stdint.h
${cpu_type}/elf.h"
tm_file="${tm_file} newlib-stdint.h or1k/rtems.h rtems.h"
extra_parts="crti.o crtbegin.o crtend.o crtn.o"
;;That's based on the fact that the or1knd*-*-elf* below it has the first line to setup the basic or1k stuff. Then we come behind and tweak that to ensure newlib is used, __rtems__ is predefined as the target OS, and then general rtems stuff.
or1k-rtems should be a minor tweak of or1k-elf. The file config/CPU/rtems.h does something like this as a minimum:
/* Target OS builtins. */
#undef TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS
#define TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS() \
do \
{ \
builtin_define ("__rtems__"); \
builtin_define ("__USE_INIT_FINI__"); \
builtin_assert ("system=rtems"); \
} \while (0)
This ensures the __rtems__ predefine and that the RTEMS init sequence knows the right C++ constructor code to use.
Quoted 2 lines
Sorry, I am not an expert on this stuff.
It is magical.
Quoted 9 lines
Best,
Stefan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2iEYEARECAAYFAlbtRmgACgkQuMYtsrn2U9wqyACfeEO2qA/R+DXo1cNXdZlTctwf mekAnRfjaHXcuanNMrKODCUa7XbJP8Wf
=xINJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Signature · 3 lines
-- Joel Sherrill Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Support and Training Available
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Quoted 8 lines · Joel Sherrill
Without testing, my first impression is that the target fragment for or1k should look like this:
or1k*-*-rtems*) tm_file="${tm_file}
dbxelf.helfos.hnewlib-stdint.h${cpu_type}/elf.h" tm_file="${tm_file}newlib-stdint.hor1k/rtems.hrtems.h" extra_parts="crti.o crtbegin.o crtend.o crtn.o" ;;
Excellent. I was hoping so, I have already tested something similar before and will push a release for the tools today.
Have a nice weekend!
Best,
Stefan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlbtbQkACgkQuMYtsrn2U9ytcgCdEZqvn9srrinyBW+jS/tLrfug LHEAn0v72OtAVvnOGUDO1ZCFuZ9/Y9Mz
=KLCW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----