Prepare dpll for async.
Subsystems (2)
v2 cover Prepare dpll for async.
With the conversion of the driver to support async updates dpll state can no longer be updated in place.
dpll->config still contains the committed state, while concurrent access is protected by dpll->mutex.
This is a resend because ander's patch series got a conflict which required a rewrite of the patches.
Maarten Lankhorst (4):
drm/i915: Use a crtc mask instead of a refcount for dpll functions,
v2.
drm/i915: Perform dpll commit first, v2. drm/i915: Move pll power state to crtc power domains. drm/i915: Add locking to pll updates, v2.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++---------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 4 ++- 4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
Signature · 6 lines
2.1.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
PATCH v2 1/4 drm/i915: Use a crtc mask instead of a refcount for dpll functions, v2.
This makes it easier to verify correct dpll setup with only a single crtc. It is also useful to detect double dpll enable/disable.
Changes since v1:
- Rebase on top of Ander's dpll rework.
- Change debugfs active to a mask.
- Change enabled_crtcs and active_crtcs to unsigned.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 35 +++++++++++++++------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 2 +- 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +2 -2
@@ -3208,8 +3208,8 @@ static int i915_shared_dplls_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[i];seq_printf (m,"DPLL%i: %s, id: %i\n" , i, pll->name, pll->id); -seq_printf (m," crtc_mask: 0x%08x, active: %d, on: %s\n" , - pll->config.crtc_mask, pll->active,yesno (pll->on)); +seq_printf (m," crtc_mask: 0x%08x, active: 0x%x, on: %s\n" , + pll->config.crtc_mask, pll->active_mask,yesno (pll->on));seq_printf (m," tracked hardware state:\n" );seq_printf (m," dpll: 0x%08x\n" , pll->config.hw_state.dpll); seq_printf(m, " dpll_md: 0x%08x\n",
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +21 -22
80 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +19 -16
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ void intel_prepare_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)return ;WARN_ON (!pll->config.crtc_mask); -if (pll->active ==0 ) { +if (pll->active_mask ==0 ) {DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER ("setting up %s\n" , pll->name);WARN_ON (pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_disabled (dev_priv, pll);
@@ -112,18 +112,23 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc->config->shared_dpll; +unsigned crtc_mask =1 <<drm_crtc_index (&crtc->base); +unsigned old_mask = pll->active_mask;if (WARN_ON (pll ==NULL ))return ; -if (WARN_ON (pll->config.crtc_mask ==0 )) +if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask)) || +WARN_ON (pll->active_mask & crtc_mask))return ; -DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("enable %s (active %d, on? %d) for crtc %d\n" , - pll->name, pll->active, pll->on, + pll->active_mask |= crtc_mask; + +DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("enable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n" , + pll->name, pll->active_mask, pll->on, crtc->base.base.id); -if (pll->active++) { +if (old_mask) {WARN_ON (!pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_enabled (dev_priv, pll);return ;
@@ -142,6 +147,7 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc->config->shared_dpll; +unsigned crtc_mask =1 <<drm_crtc_index (&crtc->base);/* PCH only available on ILK+ */ if (INTEL_INFO (dev)->gen <5 )
@@ -150,21 +156,18 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (pll ==NULL )return ; -if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & (1 <<drm_crtc_index (&crtc->base))))) +if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask)))return ; -DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disable %s (active %d, on? %d) for crtc %d\n" , - pll->name, pll->active, pll->on, +DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n" , + pll->name, pll->active_mask, pll->on, crtc->base.base.id); -if (WARN_ON (pll->active ==0 )) { -assert_shared_dpll_disabled (dev_priv, pll); -return ; - } -assert_shared_dpll_enabled (dev_priv, pll);WARN_ON (!pll->on); -if (--pll->active) + + pll->active_mask &= ~crtc_mask; +if (pll->active_mask)return ;DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disabling %s\n" , pll->name);
@@ -197,10 +200,10 @@ intel_find_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,if (memcmp (&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, &shared_dpll[i].hw_state,sizeof (crtc_state->dpll_hw_state)) ==0 ) { -DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("CRTC:%d sharing existing %s (crtc mask 0x%08x, ative %d)\n" , +DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("CRTC:%d sharing existing %s (crtc mask 0x%08x, active %x)\n" , crtc->base.base.id, pll->name, shared_dpll[i].crtc_mask, - pll->active); + pll->active_mask);return pll; } }
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h +1 -1
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs {struct intel_shared_dpll {struct intel_shared_dpll_config config; -int active;/* count of number of active CRTCs (i.e. DPMS on) */ +unsigned active_mask;/* mask of active CRTCs (i.e. DPMS on) */ bool on;/* is the PLL actually active? Disabled during modeset */ const char *name;/* should match the index in the dev_priv->shared_dplls array */
Signature · 6 lines
2.1.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [PATCH v2 (rebased) 1/4] drm/i915: Use a crtc mask instead of a refcount for dpll functions, v2.
Quoted 9 lines · Maarten Lankhorst
This makes it easier to verify correct dpll setup with only a single crtc. It is also useful to detect double dpll enable/disable.
Changes since v1:
- Rebase on top of Ander's dpll rework.
- Change debugfs active to a mask.
- Changeenabled_crtcsandactive_crtcsto unsigned.Signed-off-by Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Quoted 232 lines
--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++-----------------(quoted diff) +0
-1- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 35 +++++++++++++++------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 2 +- 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +2
-5@@ -3208,8 +3208,8 @@ static int i915_shared_dplls_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[i]; seq_printf(m, "DPLL%i: %s, id: %i\n", i, pll->name, pll->id); -seq_printf (m," crtc_mask: 0x%08x, active: %d, on: %s\n" , - pll->config.crtc_mask, pll->active,yesno (pll ->on)); + seq_printf(m, " crtc_mask: 0x%08x, active: 0x%x, on: %s\n", + pll->config.crtc_mask, pll->active_mask, yesno(pll ->on)); seq_printf(m, " tracked hardware state:\n"); seq_printf(m, " dpll: 0x%08x\n", pll ->config.hw_state.dpll); seq_printf(m, " dpll_md: 0x%08x\n",drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +8
-9@@ -12973,7 +12973,7 @@ check_shared_dpll_state(struct drm_device *dev)for (i =0 ; i < dev_priv->num_shared_dpll; i++) {struct intel_shared_dpll *pll =intel_get_shared_dpll_by_id (dev_priv, i); -int enabled_crtcs =0 , active_crtcs =0 ; +unsigned enabled_crtcs =0 , active_crtcs =0 ;bool active;memset (&dpll_hw_state,0 ,sizeof (dpll_hw_state));@@ -12982,15 +12982,15 @@ check_shared_dpll_state(struct drm_device *dev) active = pll->funcs.get_hw_state (dev_priv, pll, &dpll_hw_state); -I915_STATE_WARN (pll->active >hweight32 (pll ->config.crtc_mask), -"more active pll users than references: %i vs %i\n" , - pll->active,hweight32 (pll->config.crtc_mask)); -I915_STATE_WARN (pll->active && !pll->on, -"pll in active use but not on in sw tracking\n" ); +I915_STATE_WARN (pll->active_mask & ~pll->config.crtc_mask, +"more active pll users than references: %x vs %x\n" , + pll->active_mask, pll->config.crtc_mask);if (!(pll->flags &INTEL_DPLL_ALWAYS_ON )) { -I915_STATE_WARN (pll->on && !pll->active, -"pll in on but not on in use in sw tracking\n" ); +I915_STATE_WARN (!pll->on && pll->active_mask, +"pll in active use but not on in sw tracking\n"); +I915_STATE_WARN (pll->on && !pll->active_mask, +"pll is on but not used by any active crtc\n" ); I915_STATE_WARN(pll->on != active, "pll on state mismatch (expected %i, found%i)\n",
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +10
-13pll->on, active);@@ -12998,16 +12998,17 @@ check_shared_dpll_state(struct drm_device *dev)for_each_intel_crtc (dev, crtc) { if (crtc->base.state->enable && crtc->config ->shared_dpll == pll) - enabled_crtcs++; -if (crtc->active && crtc->config->shared_dpll == pll) - active_crtcs++; + enabled_crtcs |= 1 << drm_crtc_index(&crtc ->base); + if (crtc->base.state->active && crtc->config ->shared_dpll == pll) + active_crtcs |= 1 << drm_crtc_index(&crtc ->base); } -I915_STATE_WARN (pll->active != active_crtcs, -"pll active crtcs mismatch (expected %i, found %i)\n" , - pll->active, active_crtcs); -I915_STATE_WARN (hweight32 (pll->config.crtc_mask) != enabled_crtcs, -"pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected %i, found %i)\n" , -hweight32 (pll->config.crtc_mask), enabled_crtcs); + + I915_STATE_WARN(pll->active_mask != active_crtcs, + "pll active crtcs mismatch (expected %x, found %x)\n", + pll->active_mask, active_crtcs); + I915_STATE_WARN(pll->config.crtc_mask != enabled_crtcs, + "pll enabled crtcs mismatch (expected %x, found %x)\n", + pll->config.crtc_mask, enabled_crtcs); I915_STATE_WARN(pll->on && memcmp(&pll->config.hw_state,
&dpll_hw_state,drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +2
-4sizeof(dpll_hw_state)),@@ -15720,14 +15721,12 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev) pll->on = pll->funcs.get_hw_state(dev_priv, pll, &pll->config.hw_state); - pll->active =0 ; pll->config.crtc_mask =0 ;for_each_intel_crtc (dev, crtc) { -if (crtc->active && crtc->config->shared_dpll == pll) { - pll->active++; +if (crtc->active && crtc->config->shared_dpll == pll) pll->config.crtc_mask |=1 << crtc->pipe; - } } + pll->active_mask = pll->config.crtc_mask;DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s hw state readout:
crtc_mask0x%08x, on
%i\n",drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +1
-2pll->name, pll->config.crtc_mask, pll->on);@@ -15851,7 +15850,7 @@ intel_modeset_setup_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)for (i =0 ; i < dev_priv->num_shared_dpll; i++) {struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[i]; -if (!pll->on || pll->active) +if (!pll->on || pll->active_mask)continue ; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s enabled but not in use, disabling\n", pll ->name);drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +19
-17@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ void intel_prepare_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)return ;WARN_ON (!pll->config.crtc_mask); -if (pll->active ==0 ) { +if (pll->active_mask ==0 ) {DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER ("setting up %s\n" , pll->name);WARN_ON (pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_disabled (dev_priv, pll);@@ -112,18 +112,23 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc->config->shared_dpll; +unsigned crtc_mask =1 <<drm_crtc_index (&crtc->base); +unsigned old_mask = pll->active_mask;if (WARN_ON (pll ==NULL ))return ; -if (WARN_ON (pll->config.crtc_mask ==0 )) +if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask)) || +WARN_ON (pll->active_mask & crtc_mask))return ; -DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("enable %s (active %d, on? %d) for crtc %d\n" , - pll->name, pll->active, pll->on, + pll->active_mask |= crtc_mask; + +DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("enable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n" , + pll->name, pll->active_mask, pll->on, crtc->base.base.id); -if (pll->active++) { +if (old_mask) {WARN_ON (!pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_enabled (dev_priv, pll);return ;@@ -142,6 +147,7 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc->config->shared_dpll; +unsigned crtc_mask =1 <<drm_crtc_index (&crtc->base);/* PCH only available on ILK+ */ if (INTEL_INFO (dev)->gen <5 )@@ -150,21 +156,18 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (pll ==NULL )return ; -if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & (1 <<drm_crtc_index (&crtc ->base))))) +if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask)))return ; -DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disable %s (active %d, on? %d) for crtc %d\n" , - pll->name, pll->active, pll->on, +DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n" , + pll->name, pll->active_mask, pll->on, crtc->base.base.id); -if (WARN_ON (pll->active ==0 )) { -assert_shared_dpll_disabled (dev_priv, pll); -return ; - } -assert_shared_dpll_enabled (dev_priv, pll);WARN_ON (!pll->on); -if (--pll->active) + + pll->active_mask &= ~crtc_mask; +if (pll->active_mask)return ;DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disabling %s\n" , pll->name);@@ -197,10 +200,10 @@ intel_find_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,if (memcmp (&crtc_state->dpll_hw_state, &shared_dpll[i].hw_state,sizeof (crtc_state->dpll_hw_state)) ==0 ) { - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("CRTC:%d sharing existing %s (crtc mask 0x%08x, ative %d)\n", + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("CRTC:%d sharing existing %s (crtc mask 0x%08x, active %x)\n", crtc->base.base.id, pll->name, shared_dpll[i].crtc_mask, - pll->active); + pll->active_mask);return pll;drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +0
-0} }drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h +0
-0
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs { · line 121
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h +1
-1@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs {struct intel_shared_dpll {struct intel_shared_dpll_config config; -int active;/* count of number of active CRTCs (i.e. DPMS on) */ +unsigned active_mask;/* mask of active CRTCs (i.e. DPMS on) */ bool on;/* is the PLL actually active? Disabled during modeset */ const char *name;/* should match the index in the dev_priv->shared_dplls array */
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
PATCH v2 2/4 drm/i915: Perform dpll commit first, v2.
In reply to Maarten LankhorstWarn for the wrong mask in enable only. Disable will have the wrong mask now because the new state is committed before disabling the old state.
Changes since v1:
- Use crtc_mask (Durgadoss)
- Rebase.
--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 ++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +2 -3
@@ -13536,7 +13536,8 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev, }drm_atomic_helper_swap_state (dev, state); - dev_priv->wm.config =to_intel_atomic_state (state)->wm_config; + dev_priv->wm.config = intel_state->wm_config; +intel_shared_dpll_commit (state);if (intel_state->modeset) { memcpy(dev_priv->min_pixclk, intel_state->min_pixclk,
@@ -13588,8 +13589,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,intel_modeset_update_crtc_state (state);if (intel_state->modeset) { -intel_shared_dpll_commit (state); -drm_atomic_helper_update_legacy_modeset_state (state->dev, state); if (dev_priv->display.modeset_commit_cdclk &&
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +1 -1
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (pll ==NULL )return ; -if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask))) +if (WARN_ON (!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask)))return ; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n",
Signature · 6 lines
2.1.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [PATCH v2 (rebased) 2/4] drm/i915: Perform dpll commit first, v2.
Quoted 6 lines · Maarten Lankhorst
Warn for the wrong mask in enable only. Disable will have the wrong mask now because the new state is committed before disabling the old state.
Changes since v1:
- Usecrtc_mask(Durgadoss)
- Rebase.
Quoted 38 lines
Signed-off-by Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 ++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +2
-3@@ -13536,7 +13536,8 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev, }drm_atomic_helper_swap_state (dev, state); - dev_priv->wm.config =to_intel_atomic_state (state)->wm_config; + dev_priv->wm.config = intel_state->wm_config; +intel_shared_dpll_commit (state);if (intel_state->modeset) { memcpy(dev_priv->min_pixclk, intel_state->min_pixclk,@@ -13588,8 +13589,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,intel_modeset_update_crtc_state (state);if (intel_state->modeset) { -intel_shared_dpll_commit (state); -drm_atomic_helper_update_legacy_modeset_state (state->dev, state);drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +0
-0if (dev_priv->display.modeset_commit_cdclk &&drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +0
-0
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc) · line 162
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +1
-1@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (pll ==NULL )return ; -if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask))) +if (WARN_ON (!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask)))return ; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n",
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
PATCH v2 3/4 drm/i915: Move pll power state to crtc power domains.
In reply to Maarten Lankhorst--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 ---- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +3 -3
@@ -5276,6 +5276,9 @@ static unsigned long get_crtc_power_domains(struct drm_crtc *crtc, mask |=BIT (intel_display_port_power_domain (intel_encoder)); } +if (crtc_state->shared_dpll) + mask |=BIT (POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS ); +return mask; }
@@ -15729,9 +15732,6 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("%s hw state readout: crtc_mask 0x%08x, on %i\n" , pll->name, pll->config.crtc_mask, pll->on); - -if (pll->config.crtc_mask) -intel_display_power_get (dev_priv,POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS ); }for_each_intel_encoder (dev, encoder) {
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +0 -4
@@ -135,8 +135,6 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc) }WARN_ON (pll->on); -intel_display_power_get (dev_priv,POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS ); -DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("enabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.enable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = true;
@@ -173,8 +171,6 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.disable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = false; - -intel_display_power_put (dev_priv,POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS ); } static struct intel_shared_dpll *
Signature · 6 lines
2.1.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [PATCH v2 (rebased) 3/4] drm/i915: Move pll power state to crtc power domains.
Quoted 1 line · Maarten Lankhorst
Signed-off-by Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Quoted 48 lines
--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 ---- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +3
-3@@ -5276,6 +5276,9 @@ static unsigned long get_crtc_power_domains(struct drm_crtc *crtc, mask |=BIT (intel_display_port_power_domain (intel_encoder)); } +if (crtc_state->shared_dpll) + mask |=BIT (POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS ); +return mask; }@@ -15729,9 +15732,6 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev) DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s hw state readout: crtc_mask 0x%08x, on %i\n", pll->name, pll->config.crtc_mask, pll->on); - -if (pll->config.crtc_mask) -intel_display_power_get (dev_priv,POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS ); }drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +0
-0for_each_intel_encoder (dev, encoder) {drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +0
-2@@ -135,8 +135,6 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc) }WARN_ON (pll->on); -intel_display_power_get (dev_priv,POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS ); -DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("enabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.enable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = true;
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc) · line 176
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +0
-2@@ -173,8 +171,6 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.disable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = false; - -intel_display_power_put (dev_priv,POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS ); } static struct intel_shared_dpll *
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
PATCH v2 4/4 drm/i915: Add locking to pll updates, v2.
In reply to Maarten LankhorstWith async modesets this is no longer protected with connection_mutex, so ensure that each pll has its own lock. The pll configuration state is still protected; it's only the pll updates that need locking against concurrency.
Changes since v1:
- Rebased.
- Fix locking to protect all accesses. (Durgadoss)
--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +19 -6
@@ -89,14 +89,16 @@ void intel_prepare_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (WARN_ON (pll ==NULL ))return ; +mutex_lock (&pll->lock);WARN_ON (!pll->config.crtc_mask); -if (pll->active_mask ==0 ) { +if (!pll->active_mask) {DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER ("setting up %s\n" , pll->name);WARN_ON (pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_disabled (dev_priv, pll); pll->funcs.mode_set (dev_priv, pll); } +mutex_unlock (&pll->lock); }/**
@@ -113,14 +115,17 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc->config->shared_dpll;unsigned crtc_mask =1 <<drm_crtc_index (&crtc->base); -unsigned old_mask = pll->active_mask; +unsigned old_mask;if (WARN_ON (pll ==NULL ))return ; +mutex_lock (&pll->lock); + old_mask = pll->active_mask; +if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask)) ||WARN_ON (pll->active_mask & crtc_mask)) -return ; + goto out; pll->active_mask |= crtc_mask;
@@ -131,13 +136,16 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (old_mask) {WARN_ON (!pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_enabled (dev_priv, pll); -return ; + goto out; }WARN_ON (pll->on);DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("enabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.enable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = true; + +out: +mutex_unlock (&pll->lock); }void intel_disable_shared_dpll (struct intel_crtc *crtc)
@@ -154,8 +162,9 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (pll ==NULL )return ; +mutex_lock (&pll->lock);if (WARN_ON (!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask))) -return ; + goto out; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n", pll->name, pll->active_mask, pll->on,
@@ -166,11 +175,14 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc) pll->active_mask &= ~crtc_mask;if (pll->active_mask) -return ; + goto out;DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.disable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = false; + +out: +mutex_unlock (&pll->lock); } static struct intel_shared_dpll *
@@ -1742,6 +1754,7 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_device *dev)for (i =0 ; dpll_info[i].id >=0 ; i++) {WARN_ON (i != dpll_info[i].id); +mutex_init (&dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].lock); dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].id = dpll_info[i].id; dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].name = dpll_info[i].name; dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].funcs = *dpll_info[i].funcs;
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h +2 -0
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs { };struct intel_shared_dpll { +struct mutex lock; +struct intel_shared_dpll_config config;unsigned active_mask;/* mask of active CRTCs (i.e. DPMS on) */
Signature · 6 lines
2.1.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [PATCH v2 (rebased) 4/4] drm/i915: Add locking to pll updates, v2.
Quoted 4 lines · Maarten Lankhorst
With async modesets this is no longer protected with
connection_mutex, so ensure that each pll has its own lock. The pll configuration state is still protected; it's only the pll updates that need locking against concurrency.
I think I need to look at your async branch, since I'm not really sure how async will work. But locking the individual plls might fail in SKL with the current code. The register DPLL_CTRL1 controls all 4 plls, and currently it is updated with a read-modify-write in the enable hook, so we can't update two plls concurrently.
Ander
Quoted 112 lines
Changes since v1:
- Rebased.
- Fix locking to protect all accesses. (Durgadoss)Signed-off-by Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +19
-6@@ -89,14 +89,16 @@ void intel_prepare_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (WARN_ON (pll ==NULL ))return ; +mutex_lock (&pll->lock);WARN_ON (!pll->config.crtc_mask); -if (pll->active_mask ==0 ) { +if (!pll->active_mask) {DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER ("setting up %s\n" , pll->name);WARN_ON (pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_disabled (dev_priv, pll); pll->funcs.mode_set (dev_priv, pll); } +mutex_unlock (&pll->lock); }/** @@ -113,14 +115,17 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc->config->shared_dpll;unsigned crtc_mask =1 <<drm_crtc_index (&crtc->base); -unsigned old_mask = pll->active_mask; +unsigned old_mask;if (WARN_ON (pll ==NULL ))return ; +mutex_lock (&pll->lock); + old_mask = pll->active_mask; +if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask)) ||WARN_ON (pll->active_mask & crtc_mask)) -return ; + goto out; pll->active_mask |= crtc_mask;@@ -131,13 +136,16 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (old_mask) {WARN_ON (!pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_enabled (dev_priv, pll); -return ; + goto out; }WARN_ON (pll->on);DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("enabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.enable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = true; + +out: +mutex_unlock (&pll->lock); }void intel_disable_shared_dpll (struct intel_crtc *crtc)@@ -154,8 +162,9 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (pll ==NULL )return ; +mutex_lock (&pll->lock);if (WARN_ON (!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask))) -return ; + goto out; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n", pll->name, pll->active_mask, pll->on,@@ -166,11 +175,14 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc) pll->active_mask &= ~crtc_mask;if (pll->active_mask) -return ; + goto out;DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.disable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = false; + +out: +mutex_unlock (&pll->lock); } static struct intel_shared_dpll *@@ -1742,6 +1754,7 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_device *dev)for (i =0 ; dpll_info[i].id >=0 ; i++) {WARN_ON (i != dpll_info[i].id); +mutex_init (&dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].lock); dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].id = dpll_info[i].id; dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].name = dpll_info[i].name; dev_priv->shared_dplls[i].funcs = *dpll_info[i].funcs;drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h +0
-0
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs { · line 120
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.h +2
-0@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ struct intel_shared_dpll_funcs { };struct intel_shared_dpll { +struct mutex lock; +struct intel_shared_dpll_config config;unsigned active_mask;/* mask of active CRTCs (i.e. DPMS on) */
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [PATCH v2 (rebased) 4/4] drm/i915: Add locking to pll updates, v2.
Op 16-03-16 om 17:19 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira:
Quoted 11 lines · Maarten Lankhorst
Quoted 4 lines
With async modesets this is no longer protected with
connection_mutex, so ensure that each pll has its own lock. The pll configuration state is still protected; it's only the pll updates that need locking against concurrency.I think I need to look at your async branch, since I'm not really sure how async will work. But locking the individual plls might fail in SKL with the current code. The register
DPLL_CTRL1controls all 4 plls, and currently it is updated with a read-modify-write in the enable hook, so we can't update two plls concurrently.
Would making the dpll lock global help? I don't think in practice the locks will be contended much, it's not a performance sensitive path.
~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [PATCH v2 (rebased) 4/4] drm/i915: Add locking to pll updates, v2.
Quoted 15 lines · Maarten Lankhorst
Op 16-03-16 om 17:19 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira:
Quoted 5 lines · Maarten Lankhorst
Quoted 4 lines
With async modesets this is no longer protected with
connection_mutex, so ensure that each pll has its own lock. The pll configuration state is still protected; it's only the pll updates that need locking against concurrency.Quoted 9 lines
I think I need to look at your async branch, since I'm not really sure how async
will work. But locking the individual plls might fail in SKL with the current
code. The registerDPLL_CTRL1controls all 4 plls, and currently it is updated
with a read-modify-write in the enable hook, so we can't update two plls concurrently.
Quoted 3 lines
Would making the dpll lock global help? I don't think in practice the locks will be contended much,
it's not a performance sensitive path.
Yeah, I think that should be enough.
Ander
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
PATCH v3 4/4 drm/i915: Add locking to pll updates, v3.
With async modesets this is no longer protected with connection_mutex, so ensure that each pll has its own lock. The pll configuration state is still protected; it's only the pll updates that need locking against concurrency.
Changes since v1:
- Rebased.
- Fix locking to protect all accesses. (Durgadoss) Changes since v2:
- Make the dpll_lock global to protect concurrent updates to the same register, for example DPLL_CTRL1 on skl. (Ander)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +7 -0
@@ -1854,6 +1854,13 @@ struct drm_i915_private {struct intel_shared_dpll shared_dplls[I915_NUM_PLLS ];const struct intel_dpll_mgr *dpll_mgr; +/* +* dpll_lock serializes intel_{prepare,enable,disable}_shared_dpll. +* Must be global rather than per dpll, because on some platforms +* plls share registers. +*/ +struct mutex dpll_lock; +unsigned int active_crtcs;unsigned int min_pixclk[I915_MAX_PIPES ];
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +19 -6
@@ -89,14 +89,16 @@ void intel_prepare_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (WARN_ON (pll ==NULL ))return ; +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock);WARN_ON (!pll->config.crtc_mask); -if (pll->active_mask ==0 ) { +if (!pll->active_mask) {DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER ("setting up %s\n" , pll->name);WARN_ON (pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_disabled (dev_priv, pll); pll->funcs.mode_set (dev_priv, pll); } +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock); }/**
@@ -113,14 +115,17 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc->config->shared_dpll;unsigned crtc_mask =1 <<drm_crtc_index (&crtc->base); -unsigned old_mask = pll->active_mask; +unsigned old_mask;if (WARN_ON (pll ==NULL ))return ; +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock); + old_mask = pll->active_mask; +if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask)) ||WARN_ON (pll->active_mask & crtc_mask)) -return ; + goto out; pll->active_mask |= crtc_mask;
@@ -131,13 +136,16 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (old_mask) {WARN_ON (!pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_enabled (dev_priv, pll); -return ; + goto out; }WARN_ON (pll->on);DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("enabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.enable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = true; + +out: +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock); }void intel_disable_shared_dpll (struct intel_crtc *crtc)
@@ -154,8 +162,9 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (pll ==NULL )return ; +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock);if (WARN_ON (!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask))) -return ; + goto out; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n", pll->name, pll->active_mask, pll->on,
@@ -166,11 +175,14 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc) pll->active_mask &= ~crtc_mask;if (pll->active_mask) -return ; + goto out;DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.disable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = false; + +out: +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock); } static struct intel_shared_dpll *
@@ -1750,6 +1762,7 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_device *dev) dev_priv->dpll_mgr = dpll_mgr; dev_priv->num_shared_dpll = i; +mutex_init (&dev_priv->dpll_lock);BUG_ON (dev_priv->num_shared_dpll >I915_NUM_PLLS );
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [PATCH v3 (rebased) 4/4] drm/i915: Add locking to pll updates, v3.
Quoted 5 lines · Maarten Lankhorst
With async modesets this is no longer protected with
connection_mutex, so ensure that each pll has its own lock. The pll configuration state is still protected; it's only the pll updates that need locking against concurrency.
Quoted 8 lines
Changes since v1:
- Rebased.
- Fix locking to protect all accesses. (Durgadoss) Changes since v2:
- Make thedpll_lockglobal to protect concurrent updates to the same register, for exampleDPLL_CTRL1on skl. (Ander)Signed-off-by Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Quoted 109 lines
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +7
-0@@ -1854,6 +1854,13 @@ struct drm_i915_private {struct intel_shared_dpll shared_dplls[I915_NUM_PLLS ];const struct intel_dpll_mgr *dpll_mgr; +/* +* dpll_lock serializes intel_{prepare,enable,disable}_shared_dpll. +* Must be global rather than per dpll, because on some platforms +* plls share registers. +*/ +struct mutex dpll_lock; +unsigned int active_crtcs;unsigned int min_pixclk[I915_MAX_PIPES ];drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +18
-6@@ -89,14 +89,16 @@ void intel_prepare_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (WARN_ON (pll ==NULL ))return ; +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock);WARN_ON (!pll->config.crtc_mask); -if (pll->active_mask ==0 ) { +if (!pll->active_mask) {DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER ("setting up %s\n" , pll->name);WARN_ON (pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_disabled (dev_priv, pll); pll->funcs.mode_set (dev_priv, pll); } +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock); }/** @@ -113,14 +115,17 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc->config->shared_dpll;unsigned crtc_mask =1 <<drm_crtc_index (&crtc->base); -unsigned old_mask = pll->active_mask; +unsigned old_mask;if (WARN_ON (pll ==NULL ))return ; +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock); + old_mask = pll->active_mask; +if (WARN_ON (!(pll->config.crtc_mask & crtc_mask)) ||WARN_ON (pll->active_mask & crtc_mask)) -return ; + goto out; pll->active_mask |= crtc_mask;@@ -131,13 +136,16 @@ void intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (old_mask) {WARN_ON (!pll->on);assert_shared_dpll_enabled (dev_priv, pll); -return ; + goto out; }WARN_ON (pll->on);DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("enabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.enable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = true; + +out: +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock); }void intel_disable_shared_dpll (struct intel_crtc *crtc)@@ -154,8 +162,9 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)if (pll ==NULL )return ; +mutex_lock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock);if (WARN_ON (!(pll->active_mask & crtc_mask))) -return ; + goto out; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disable %s (active %x, on? %d) for crtc %d\n", pll->name, pll->active_mask, pll->on,@@ -166,11 +175,14 @@ void intel_disable_shared_dpll(struct intel_crtc *crtc) pll->active_mask &= ~crtc_mask;if (pll->active_mask) -return ; + goto out;DRM_DEBUG_KMS ("disabling %s\n" , pll->name); pll->funcs.disable (dev_priv, pll); pll->on = false; + +out: +mutex_unlock (&dev_priv->dpll_lock); } static struct intel_shared_dpll *
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_device *dev) · line 1768
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c +1
-0@@ -1750,6 +1762,7 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_init(struct drm_device *dev) dev_priv->dpll_mgr = dpll_mgr; dev_priv->num_shared_dpll = i; +mutex_init (&dev_priv->dpll_lock);BUG_ON (dev_priv->num_shared_dpll >I915_NUM_PLLS );
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Patchwork
CI✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Prepare dpll for async. (rev2)
In reply to Maarten Lankhorst== Series Details ==
== Series Details ==
Series: Prepare dpll for async. (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/3914/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Series 3914v2 Prepare dpll for async.
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3914/revisions/2/mbox/
Test core_auth:
Subgroup basic-auth:
incomplete -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p)
Test gem_ctx_param_basic:
Subgroup invalid-ctx-set:
incomplete -> SKIP (ilk-hp8440p)
Test gem_exec_basic:
Subgroup basic-render:
incomplete -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p)
Subgroup gtt-blt:
incomplete -> SKIP (ilk-hp8440p)
Test gem_exec_parse:
Subgroup basic-rejected:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (byt-nuc)
Test gem_mmap_gtt:
Subgroup basic-read-no-prefault:
incomplete -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p)
Subgroup basic-small-copy:
incomplete -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p)
Test gem_ringfill:
Subgroup basic-default-child:
incomplete -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p)
Subgroup basic-default-s4:
incomplete -> SKIP (ilk-hp8440p)
Test kms_addfb_basic:
Subgroup clobberred-modifier:
incomplete -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p)
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (bsw-nuc-2)
incomplete -> PASS (byt-nuc)
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2)
pass -> DMESG-WARN (hsw-brixbox)
Subgroup basic-plain-flip:
incomplete -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2)
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup hang-read-crc-pipe-b:
incomplete -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p)
Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-a:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (hsw-gt2)
pass -> INCOMPLETE (byt-nuc)
Subgroup nonblocking-crc-pipe-c:
incomplete -> SKIP (ilk-hp8440p)
Subgroup read-crc-pipe-a:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (byt-nuc)
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (hsw-gt2)
Test kms_psr_sink_crc:
Subgroup psr_basic:
incomplete -> SKIP (ilk-hp8440p)
Test kms_sink_crc_basic:
skip -> INCOMPLETE (byt-nuc)
Test pm_rpm:
Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (hsw-brixbox)
Subgroup basic-rte:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (snb-dellxps)bdw-nuci7 total:194 pass:182 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12 bdw-ultra total:194 pass:173 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 bsw-nuc-2 total:185 pass:148 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 byt-nuc total:194 pass:151 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:34 hsw-brixbox total:194 pass:171 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22 hsw-gt2 total:88 pass:83 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:4 ilk-hp8440p total:194 pass:125 dwarn:5 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:63 ivb-t430s total:194 pass:169 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:25 skl-i5k-2 total:194 pass:171 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 skl-i7k-2 total:194 pass:171 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 skl-nuci5 total:194 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11 snb-dellxps total:194 pass:159 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:34
Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1587/
10e4a34b0d08030f2287405c855f42afbc568f46 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-03m-14d-07h-22m-53s UTC integration manifest e6d2d7b22762ab67d6b7aeb306a404e241b94f65 drm/i915: Add locking to pll updates, v2. 5719b18d0fdf850dc972d46bc6d17b9a5f94a4e5 drm/i915: Move pll power state to crtc power domains. b9c930663eb083354d7ce3b0e6379d38412bd006 drm/i915: Perform dpll commit first, v2. 1d8b01dcba8a50dfc6a5f25280e1251ca06e40d0 drm/i915: Use a crtc mask instead of a refcount for dpll functions, v2.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx