Improve block layer scheduling fairness
Subsystems (2)
cover Improve block layer scheduling fairness
Recent tests revealed that on kernels with CONFIG_PREEMPT disabled and with kernel debugging options like CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled that block/SCSI/dm workloads with a high queue depth cause soft lockup complaints to appear. Avoid this by voluntarily giving up the CPU in time for such workloads. The patches in this series are:
0001-kernel-kthread.c-Avoid-CPU-lockups.patch 0002-block-Limit-work-processed-in-softirq-context.patch 0003-Avoid-that-I-O-completion-processing-triggers-lockup.patch
PATCH 1/3 kernel/kthread.c: Avoid CPU lockups
Avoid that complaints similar to the one below are reported against a debug kernel:
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [kdmwork-25 4:2:23313]
irq event stamp: 16320042 hardirqs last enabled at (16320041): [<ffffffff815992c7>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x40 hardirqs last disabled at (16320042): [<ffff8803ffbe3cd8>] 0xffff8803ffbe3cd8 softirqs last enabled at (16319960): [<ffffffff8105bcdb>] __do_softirq+0x1cb/0x230 softirqs last disabled at (16319715): [<ffffffff8105bec8>] irq_exit+0xa8/0xb0 CPU: 1 PID: 23313 Comm: kdmwork-254:2 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff815992cf>] [<ffffffff815992cf>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2f/0x40 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813f702f>] scsi_request_fn+0x11f/0x630 [<ffffffff812977fe>] __blk_run_queue+0x2e/0x40 [<ffffffff81297065>] __elv_add_request+0x75/0x1f0 [<ffffffff8129ba91>] blk_insert_cloned_request+0x101/0x190 [<ffffffffa0189f1a>] map_request+0x16a/0x1b0 [dm_mod] [<ffffffffa0189f7d>] map_tio_request+0x1d/0x40 [dm_mod] [<ffffffff81077812>] kthread_worker_fn+0x82/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8107771a>] kthread+0xea/0x100 [<ffffffff81599b72>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40
--- kernel/kthread.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
kernel/kthread.c +1 -0
@@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ repeat:if (work) {__set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING ); work->func (work); +cond_resched_rcu_qs (); }else if (!freezing (current))schedule ();
Signature · 1 line
2.7.3
PATCH 2/3 block: Limit work processed in softirq context
In reply to Bart Van AsscheAvoid that complaints like the one below are reported against a debug kernel:
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [disk11_0:2708]
irq event stamp: 17120809 hardirqs last enabled at (17120808): [<ffffffff81599191>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x31/0x50 hardirqs last disabled at (17120809): [<ffff88046f223bd0>] 0xffff88046f223bd0 softirqs last enabled at (17120794): [<ffffffffa060aa67>] scst_check_blocked_dev+0x77/0x1c0 [scst] softirqs last disabled at (17120795): [<ffffffff8159acbc>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81599193>] [<ffffffff81599193>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x33/0x50 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff81171450>] free_debug_processing+0x270/0x3a0 [<ffffffff8117277a>] __slab_free+0x17a/0x2c0 [<ffffffff81172a74>] kmem_cache_free+0x1b4/0x1d0 [<ffffffff8111a6c2>] mempool_free_slab+0x12/0x20 [<ffffffff8111a846>] mempool_free+0x26/0x80 [<ffffffff81294cb9>] bio_free+0x49/0x60 [<ffffffff81294cee>] bio_put+0x1e/0x30 [<ffffffffa0199d31>] end_clone_bio+0x21/0x70 [dm_mod] [<ffffffff81294d52>] bio_endio+0x52/0x60 [<ffffffff8129aaec>] blk_update_request+0x7c/0x2a0 [<ffffffff813f4a8e>] scsi_end_request+0x2e/0x1d0 [<ffffffff813f7674>] scsi_io_completion+0xb4/0x610 [<ffffffff813ee79a>] scsi_finish_command+0xca/0x120 [<ffffffff813f6ef0>] scsi_softirq_done+0x120/0x140 [<ffffffff812a26e6>] blk_done_softirq+0x76/0x90 [<ffffffff8105bc1f>] __do_softirq+0x10f/0x230 [<ffffffff8159acbc>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30 <EOI>
--- block/blk-softirq.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
block/blk-softirq.c +20 -0
@@ -21,10 +21,22 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, blk_cpu_done);static void blk_done_softirq (struct softirq_action *h) {struct list_head *cpu_list, local_list; +struct request *e; +bool reraise = false; +int i =0 ;local_irq_disable (); cpu_list =this_cpu_ptr (&blk_cpu_done); +list_for_each_entry (e, cpu_list, ipi_list) { +if (++i <256 ) +continue ; +list_cut_position (&local_list, cpu_list, &e->ipi_list); + reraise = true; + goto enable_irq; + }list_replace_init (cpu_list, &local_list); + +enable_irq:local_irq_enable ();while (!list_empty (&local_list)) {
@@ -34,6 +46,14 @@ static void blk_done_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)list_del_init (&rq->ipi_list); rq->q->softirq_done_fn (rq); } + +if (!reraise) +return ; + +local_irq_disable (); +if (!list_empty (cpu_list)) +raise_softirq_irqoff (BLOCK_SOFTIRQ ); +local_irq_enable (); }#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
Signature · 1 line
2.7.3
PATCH 3/3 Avoid that I/O completion processing triggers lockup complaints
In reply to Bart Van AsscheAvoid that I/O completion processing triggers the following complaints if kernel debug options that slow down the kernel significantly are enabled:
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [kdmwork-254:2:358]
irq event stamp: 15233868 hardirqs last enabled at (15233867): [<ffffffff81578167>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x40 hardirqs last disabled at (15233868): [<ffffffff81579664>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x84/0x90 softirqs last enabled at (15233850): [<ffffffff8105a55b>] __do_softirq+0x1cb/0x230 softirqs last disabled at (15233743): [<ffffffff8105a748>] irq_exit+0xa8/0xb0 CPU: 3 PID: 358 Comm: kdmwork-254:2 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8157816f>] [<ffffffff8157816f>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2f/0x40 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813dbe28>] scsi_request_fn+0x118/0x600 [<ffffffff8128190e>] __blk_run_queue+0x2e/0x40 [<ffffffff81281175>] __elv_add_request+0x75/0x1f0 [<ffffffff81285b11>] blk_insert_cloned_request+0x101/0x190 [<ffffffffa0170eee>] map_request+0x18e/0x210 [dm_mod] [<ffffffffa0170f8d>] map_tio_request+0x1d/0x40 [dm_mod] [<ffffffff81075a0d>] kthread_worker_fn+0x7d/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8107591a>] kthread+0xea/0x100 [<ffffffff81578c7f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU 3-...: (6497 ticks this GP) idle=fb9/140000000000002/0 softirq=2044956/2045037 fqs=5414 (t=6500 jiffies g=219289 c=219288 q=7233211) Task dump for CPU 3: kdmwork-254:2 R running task 0 358 2 0x00000008 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff8108195f>] sched_show_task+0xbf/0x150 [<ffffffff81084742>] dump_cpu_task+0x32/0x40 [<ffffffff810b5e79>] rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x89/0xe0 [<ffffffff810b9999>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x439/0x730 [<ffffffff810bc1c4>] update_process_times+0x34/0x60 [<ffffffff810caaa0>] tick_sched_handle.isra.18+0x20/0x50 [<ffffffff810cb148>] tick_sched_timer+0x38/0x70 [<ffffffff810bc865>] __hrtimer_run_queues+0xa5/0x1c0 [<ffffffff810bcef6>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xa6/0x1b0 [<ffffffff81038ba3>] smp_trace_apic_timer_interrupt+0x63/0x90 [<ffffffff81038bd9>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x9/0x10 [<ffffffff81579669>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x89/0x90 [<ffffffff811640d6>] __slab_free+0xc6/0x270 [<ffffffff811643d9>] kmem_cache_free+0x159/0x160 [<ffffffff811d0a12>] kiocb_free+0x32/0x40 [<ffffffff811d1b75>] aio_complete+0x1e5/0x3c0 [<ffffffff811bef45>] dio_complete+0x75/0x1d0 [<ffffffff811bf11a>] dio_bio_end_aio+0x7a/0x130 [<ffffffff812800da>] bio_endio+0x3a/0x60 [<ffffffff81284b7c>] blk_update_request+0x7c/0x2a0 [<ffffffffa016fcc1>] end_clone_bio+0x41/0x70 [dm_mod] [<ffffffff812800da>] bio_endio+0x3a/0x60 [<ffffffff81284b7c>] blk_update_request+0x7c/0x2a0 [<ffffffff813da01e>] scsi_end_request+0x2e/0x1d0 [<ffffffff813dc444>] scsi_io_completion+0xb4/0x610 [<ffffffff813d3e0a>] scsi_finish_command+0xca/0x120 [<ffffffff813dbcf0>] scsi_softirq_done+0x120/0x140 [<ffffffff8128c742>] blk_done_softirq+0x72/0x90 [<ffffffff8105a49f>] __do_softirq+0x10f/0x230 [<ffffffff8105a748>] irq_exit+0xa8/0xb0 [<ffffffff810065a5>] do_IRQ+0x65/0x110 [<ffffffff815793c9>] common_interrupt+0x89/0x89 <EOI> [<ffffffffa010f815>] __multipath_map.isra.16+0x145/0x260 [dm_multipath] [<ffffffffa010f962>] multipath_map+0x12/0x20 [dm_multipath] [<ffffffffa0170da3>] map_request+0x43/0x210 [dm_mod] [<ffffffffa0170f8d>] map_tio_request+0x1d/0x40 [dm_mod] [<ffffffff81075a0d>] kthread_worker_fn+0x7d/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8107591a>] kthread+0xea/0x100 [<ffffffff81578c7f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
--- drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c +7 -3
@@ -1770,13 +1770,14 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)struct Scsi_Host *shost;struct scsi_cmnd *cmd;struct request *req; +int i;/* -* To start with, we keep looping until the queue is empty, or until -* the host is no longer able to accept any more requests. +* Loop until the queue is empty, until the host is no longer able to +* accept any more requests or until 256 requests have been processed. */ shost = sdev->host; -for (;;) { +for (i =256 ; i >0 ; i--) {int rtn;/* * get next queueable request. We do this early to make sure
@@ -1861,6 +1862,9 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)spin_lock_irq (q->queue_lock); } +if (unlikely (i ==0 )) +blk_delay_queue (q,0 ); +return ; host_not_ready:
Signature · 1 line
2.7.3