ARM: omap2: am437x: rollback to use omap3_gptimer_timer_init()
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 ARM: omap2: am437x: rollback to use omap3_gptimer_timer_init()
The commit 55ee7017ee31 ("arm: omap2: board-generic: use omap4_local_timer_init for AM437x") unintentionally changes the clocksource devices for AM437x from OMAP GP Timer to SyncTimer32K.
Unfortunately, the SyncTimer32K is starving from frequency deviation as mentioned in commit 5b5c01359152 ("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") and, as reported by Franklin [1], even its monotonic nature is under question (most probably there is a HW issue, but it's still under investigation).
Taking into account above facts It's reasonable to rollback to the use of omap3_gptimer_timer_init().
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg127425.html
--- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c | 7 +++++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c +1 -1
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(AM43_DT, "Generic AM43 (Flattened Device Tree)") .init_late = am43xx_init_late, .init_irq = omap_gic_of_init, .init_machine = omap_generic_init, - .init_time = omap4_local_timer_init, + .init_time = omap3_gptimer_timer_init, .dt_compat = am43_boards_compat, .restart = omap44xx_restart,MACHINE_END
arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c +5 -2
@@ -500,16 +500,19 @@ void __init omap3_secure_sync32k_timer_init(void) }#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 */ -#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 ) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_AM33XX ) +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 ) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_AM33XX ) || \ + defined(CONFIG_SOC_AM43XX )void __init omap3_gptimer_timer_init (void ) {__omap_sync32k_timer_init (2 ,"timer_sys_ck" ,NULL ,1 ,"timer_sys_ck" ,"ti,timer-alwon" , true); +if (of_have_populated_dt ()) +clocksource_probe (); }#endif #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4 ) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5 ) || \ - defined(CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX ) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_AM43XX ) + defined(CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX )static void __init omap4_sync32k_timer_init (void ) { __omap_sync32k_timer_init(1, "timer_32k_ck", "ti,timer-alwon",
Signature · 1 line
2.8.1
PATCH 1/1 ARM: omap2: am437x: rollback to use omap3_gptimer_timer_init()
Quoted 4 lines · Grygorii Strashko
The commit
55ee7017ee31("arm: omap2: board-generic: useomap4_local_timer_initfor AM437x") unintentionally changes the clocksource devices for AM437x from OMAP GP Timer to SyncTimer32K.
Quoted 8 lines
Unfortunately, the SyncTimer32K is starving from frequency deviation as mentioned in commit
5b5c01359152("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") and, as reported by Franklin [1], even its monotonic nature is under question (most probably there is a HW issue, but it's still under investigation).Taking into account above facts It's reasonable to rollback to the use of
omap3_gptimer_timer_init().
I tested this patch and was not able to reproduce this issue after rebooting the AM437 GP evm 30 times. I then tried without this patch and the issue showed up after rebooting the board for the 5th time.
Quoted 51 lines
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg127425.html
Cc Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>Cc Lokesh Vutla <[email protected]>Reported-by Cooper Jr., Franklin <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Grygorii Strashko <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c | 7 +++++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c +1
-1@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(AM43_DT, "Generic AM43 (Flattened Device Tree)") .init_late = am43xx_init_late, .init_irq = omap_gic_of_init, .init_machine = omap_generic_init, - .init_time = omap4_local_timer_init, + .init_time = omap3_gptimer_timer_init, .dt_compat = am43_boards_compat, .restart = omap44xx_restart,MACHINE_END arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c +5
-2@@ -500,16 +500,19 @@ void __init omap3_secure_sync32k_timer_init(void) }#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 */ -#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 ) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_AM33XX ) +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 ) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_AM33XX ) || \ + defined(CONFIG_SOC_AM43XX )void __init omap3_gptimer_timer_init (void ) {__omap_sync32k_timer_init (2 ,"timer_sys_ck" ,NULL ,1 ,"timer_sys_ck" ,"ti,timer-alwon" , true); +if (of_have_populated_dt ()) +clocksource_probe (); }#endif #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4 ) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5 ) || \ - defined(CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX ) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_AM43XX ) + defined(CONFIG_SOC_DRA7XX )static void __init omap4_sync32k_timer_init (void ) { __omap_sync32k_timer_init(1, "timer_32k_ck", "ti,timer-alwon",
Tony Lindgren
maintainerPATCH 1/1 ARM: omap2: am437x: rollback to use omap3_gptimer_timer_init()
Quoted 13 lines · Franklin S Cooper Jr.
Quoted 10 lines · Grygorii Strashko
The commit
55ee7017ee31("arm: omap2: board-generic: useomap4_local_timer_initfor AM437x") unintentionally changes the clocksource devices for AM437x from OMAP GP Timer to SyncTimer32K.Unfortunately, the SyncTimer32K is starving from frequency deviation as mentioned in commit
5b5c01359152("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") and, as reported by Franklin [1], even its monotonic nature is under question (most probably there is a HW issue, but it's still under investigation).
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Taking into account above facts It's reasonable to rollback to the use of
omap3_gptimer_timer_init().I tested this patch and was not able to reproduce this issue after rebooting the AM437 GP evm 30 times. I then tried without this patch and the issue showed up after rebooting the board for the 5th time.
What's the problem that happens? Would be good to have it in the description so people know.
Regards,
Tony
Tony Lindgren
maintainerPATCH 1/1 ARM: omap2: am437x: rollback to use omap3_gptimer_timer_init()
In reply to Grygorii StrashkoQuoted 4 lines · Grygorii Strashko
The commit
55ee7017ee31("arm: omap2: board-generic: useomap4_local_timer_initfor AM437x") unintentionally changes the clocksource devices for AM437x from OMAP GP Timer to SyncTimer32K.
Quoted 8 lines
Unfortunately, the SyncTimer32K is starving from frequency deviation as mentioned in commit
5b5c01359152("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") and, as reported by Franklin [1], even its monotonic nature is under question (most probably there is a HW issue, but it's still under investigation).Taking into account above facts It's reasonable to rollback to the use of
omap3_gptimer_timer_init().
I thought only the ePOS EVM does not have the 32k clock available? Maybe this is the the old sync timer autocorrection drift issue?
Regards,
Tony
PATCH 1/1 ARM: omap2: am437x: rollback to use omap3_gptimer_timer_init()
Quoted 11 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 10 lines · Grygorii Strashko
The commit
55ee7017ee31("arm: omap2: board-generic: useomap4_local_timer_initfor AM437x") unintentionally changes the clocksource devices for AM437x from OMAP GP Timer to SyncTimer32K.Unfortunately, the SyncTimer32K is starving from frequency deviation as mentioned in commit
5b5c01359152("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") and, as reported by Franklin [1], even its monotonic nature is under question (most probably there is a HW issue, but it's still under investigation).
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Taking into account above facts It's reasonable to rollback to the use of
omap3_gptimer_timer_init().I thought only the ePOS EVM does not have the 32k clock available? Maybe this is the the old sync timer autocorrection drift issue?
May be, as i mentioned in [1] it could be errata same as for Watchdog Advisory 22 (or OMAP_TIMER_ERRATA_I103_I767).
But as per commit 5b5c01359152 ("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") there is no reason to use SyncTimer32K as clocksource any way (not only on epos):
commit 5b5c01359152f3ddaa1aa0e5d1141bc2b29ba2c5
Author: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]> Date: Fri Feb 7 15:51:26 2014 +0530
ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource
The SyncTimer in AM43x is clocked using the following two sources:
1) An inaccuarte 32k clock (CLK_32KHZ) derived from PER DPLL, causing system time to go slowly (~10% deviation).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2) external 32KHz RTC clock, which may not always be available on board like in the case of ePOS EVM
Use gptimer as clocksource instead, as is done in the case of AM335x (which does not have a SyncTimer). With this, system time keeping works accurately.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg127425.html
Signature · 2 lines
regards, -grygorii
Tony Lindgren
maintainerPATCH 1/1 ARM: omap2: am437x: rollback to use omap3_gptimer_timer_init()
Quoted 30 lines · Grygorii Strashko
Quoted 11 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 10 lines · Grygorii Strashko
The commit
55ee7017ee31("arm: omap2: board-generic: useomap4_local_timer_initfor AM437x") unintentionally changes the clocksource devices for AM437x from OMAP GP Timer to SyncTimer32K.Unfortunately, the SyncTimer32K is starving from frequency deviation as mentioned in commit
5b5c01359152("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") and, as reported by Franklin [1], even its monotonic nature is under question (most probably there is a HW issue, but it's still under investigation).Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Taking into account above facts It's reasonable to rollback to the use of
omap3_gptimer_timer_init().I thought only the ePOS EVM does not have the 32k clock available? Maybe this is the the old sync timer autocorrection drift issue?
May be, as i mentioned in [1] it could be errata same as for Watchdog Advisory 22 (or
OMAP_TIMER_ERRATA_I103_I767).But as per commit
5b5c01359152("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") there is no reason to use SyncTimer32K as clocksource any way (not only on epos):commit
5b5c01359152f3ddaa1aa0e5d1141bc2b29ba2c5Author: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]> Date: Fri Feb 7 15:51:26 2014 +0530
Quoted 8 lines
ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource
The SyncTimer in AM43x is clocked using the following two sources:
1) An inaccuarte 32k clock (CLK_32KHZ) derived from PER DPLL, causing system time to go slowly (~10% deviation).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2) external 32KHz RTC clock, which may not always be available on board like in the case of ePOS EVM
This sounds similar to recent "ARM: dts: dra7: Correct clock tree for sys_32k_ck", can you see if similar changes help for am43x?
Regards,
Tony
PATCH 1/1 ARM: omap2: am437x: rollback to use omap3_gptimer_timer_init()
Quoted 31 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 30 lines · Grygorii Strashko
Quoted 11 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 10 lines · Grygorii Strashko
The commit
55ee7017ee31("arm: omap2: board-generic: useomap4_local_timer_initfor AM437x") unintentionally changes the clocksource devices for AM437x from OMAP GP Timer to SyncTimer32K.Unfortunately, the SyncTimer32K is starving from frequency deviation as mentioned in commit
5b5c01359152("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") and, as reported by Franklin [1], even its monotonic nature is under question (most probably there is a HW issue, but it's still under investigation).Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Taking into account above facts It's reasonable to rollback to the use of
omap3_gptimer_timer_init().I thought only the ePOS EVM does not have the 32k clock available? Maybe this is the the old sync timer autocorrection drift issue?
May be, as i mentioned in [1] it could be errata same as for Watchdog Advisory 22 (or
OMAP_TIMER_ERRATA_I103_I767).But as per commit
5b5c01359152("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") there is no reason to use SyncTimer32K as clocksource any way (not only on epos):commit
5b5c01359152f3ddaa1aa0e5d1141bc2b29ba2c5Author: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]> Date: Fri Feb 7 15:51:26 2014 +0530
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource
The SyncTimer in AM43x is clocked using the following two sources:
1) An inaccuarte 32k clock (CLK_32KHZ) derived from PER DPLL, causing system time to go slowly (~10% deviation).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't think this statement is right. If clock from PER DPLL is inaccurate then all the IPs which uses PER DPLL are in danger. It is the On-Chip 32K RC Osc clock that is not an accurate clock-source as per the design/spec.
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
2) external 32KHz RTC clock, which may not always be available on board like in the case of ePOS EVM
Also this 32KHz RTC clock is not enabled by default and is handled by RTC.
IMO, it is better to change the clock source of sync timer to CLK_32KHz(like it is done in case of am43x-epos). Or do you have any other reason to shift to gptimer?
Thanks and regards,
Lokesh
PATCH 1/1 ARM: omap2: am437x: rollback to use omap3_gptimer_timer_init()
Quoted 46 lines · Lokesh Vutla
Quoted 31 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 30 lines · Grygorii Strashko
Quoted 11 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 10 lines · Grygorii Strashko
The commit
55ee7017ee31("arm: omap2: board-generic: useomap4_local_timer_initfor AM437x") unintentionally changes the clocksource devices for AM437x from OMAP GP Timer to SyncTimer32K.Unfortunately, the SyncTimer32K is starving from frequency deviation as mentioned in commit
5b5c01359152("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") and, as reported by Franklin [1], even its monotonic nature is under question (most probably there is a HW issue, but it's still under investigation).Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Taking into account above facts It's reasonable to rollback to the use of
omap3_gptimer_timer_init().I thought only the ePOS EVM does not have the 32k clock available? Maybe this is the the old sync timer autocorrection drift issue?
May be, as i mentioned in [1] it could be errata same as for Watchdog Advisory 22 (or
OMAP_TIMER_ERRATA_I103_I767).But as per commit
5b5c01359152("ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource") there is no reason to use SyncTimer32K as clocksource any way (not only on epos):commit
5b5c01359152f3ddaa1aa0e5d1141bc2b29ba2c5Author: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]> Date: Fri Feb 7 15:51:26 2014 +0530Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: Use gptimer as clocksource
The SyncTimer in AM43x is clocked using the following two sources:
1) An inaccuarte 32k clock (CLK_32KHZ) derived from PER DPLL, causing system time to go slowly (~10% deviation).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^I don't think this statement is right. If clock from PER DPLL is inaccurate then all the IPs which uses PER DPLL are in danger. It is the On-Chip 32K RC Osc clock that is not an accurate clock-source as per the design/spec.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
2) external 32KHz RTC clock, which may not always be available on board like in the case of ePOS EVM
Also this 32KHz RTC clock is not enabled by default and is handled by RTC.
IMO, it is better to change the clock source of sync timer to
CLK_32KHz(like it is done in case of am43x-epos). Or do you have any other reason to shift to gptimer?
In my opinion this is because of HW issue - OMAP4 errata i103, which, for some reasons, is not mentioned for am437x (and I do not have confirmation).
Originally issue was described and fix implemented for OMAP4 by commit
commit 73152a98a25392a451bb0d588a1fbe2796b3c909
Author: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
Date: Mon Mar 12 20:34:45 2012 +0530
OMAP4: Workaround the OCP synchronisation issue with 32K synctimer.
I saw exactly similar behavior by my self:
- for some reason ti_32k_read_cycles() return value lower the previously read value
- this causes timekeeping_get_delta() to return negative value
- which, in turn, causes big jiffies shift: 4294939981 -> 13079884
- and this blow up Timekeeping core brain and causes RCU stall error messages, which is reasonable because all jiffies based timeout will misbehave.
Quoted 1 line
From registers I can see that 32K synctimer is in no-idle mode
32K synctimer.SYSC = 0x00000008PRCM_CM_WKUP_SYNCTIMER_CLKCTRL = 0x00000102
and, seems, it's impossible to use static dep on am437x.
So, right now, I don't know how this issues can be W/A, so rallback.
Signature · 2 lines
regards, -grygorii