Skip to contentSkip to conversation

virtio_net: fix virtnet_open and virtnet_probe competing for try_fill_recv

PATCH Superseded wangyunjian 4 participants 4 messages May 26, 2016 – May 30, 2016

Subsystems (3)

v2 of 3 Superseded Latest is v3 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 virtio_net: fix virtnet_open and virtnet_probe competing for try_fill_recv

In function virtnet_open() and virtnet_probe(), func try_fill_recv() will be executed at the same time. VQ in virtqueue_add() is not protected well and BUG_ON will be triggered when virito_net.ko being removed.

---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 18 ++----------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
drivers/net/virtio_net.c +2 -16
index 49d84e5..e0638e5 100644
@@ -1925,24 +1925,11 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 
        virtio_device_ready(vdev);
 
-       /* Last of all, set up some receive buffers. */
-       for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
-               try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL);
-
-               /* If we didn't even get one input buffer, we're useless. */
-               if (vi->rq[i].vq->num_free ==
-                   virtqueue_get_vring_size(vi->rq[i].vq)) {
-                       free_unused_bufs(vi);
-                       err = -ENOMEM;
-                       goto free_recv_bufs;
-               }
-       }
-
        vi->nb.notifier_call = &virtnet_cpu_callback;
        err = register_hotcpu_notifier(&vi->nb);
        if (err) {
                pr_debug("virtio_net: registering cpu notifier failed\n");
-               goto free_recv_bufs;
+               goto free_unregister_netdev;
        }
 
        /* Assume link up if device can't report link status,
@@ -1960,10 +1947,9 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 
        return 0;
 
-free_recv_bufs:
+free_unregister_netdev:
        vi->vdev->config->reset(vdev);
 
-       free_receive_bufs(vi);
        unregister_netdev(dev);
 free_vqs:
        cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
Acked-by on v2 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · wangyunjian

In function virtnet_open() and virtnet_probe(), func try_fill_recv() will be executed at the same time. VQ in virtqueue_add() is not protected well and BUG_ON will be triggered when virito_net.ko being removed.

---
  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 18 ++----------------
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

The patch is needed for stable.

Quoted 47 lines
drivers/net/virtio_net.c +2 -17
index 49d84e5..e0638e5 100644
@@ -1925,24 +1925,11 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 
         virtio_device_ready(vdev);
 
-       /* Last of all, set up some receive buffers. */
-       for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
-               try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL);
-
-               /* If we didn't even get one input buffer, we're useless. */
-               if (vi->rq[i].vq->num_free ==
-                   virtqueue_get_vring_size(vi->rq[i].vq)) {
-                       free_unused_bufs(vi);
-                       err = -ENOMEM;
-                       goto free_recv_bufs;
-               }
-       }
-
         vi->nb.notifier_call = &virtnet_cpu_callback;
         err = register_hotcpu_notifier(&vi->nb);
         if (err) {
                 pr_debug("virtio_net: registering cpu notifier failed\n");
-               goto free_recv_bufs;
+               goto free_unregister_netdev;
         }
 
         /* Assume link up if device can't report link status,
@@ -1960,10 +1947,9 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 
         return 0;
 
-free_recv_bufs:
+free_unregister_netdev:
         vi->vdev->config->reset(vdev);
 
-       free_receive_bufs(vi);
         unregister_netdev(dev);
  free_vqs:
         cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
--

1.7.12.4

maintainer Acked-by on v2 1/1
#2 lore raw
In reply to wangyunjian
Quoted 5 lines · wangyunjian

In function virtnet_open() and virtnet_probe(), func try_fill_recv() will be executed at the same time. VQ in virtqueue_add() is not protected well and BUG_ON will be triggered when virito_net.ko being removed.

Quoted 49 lines
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 18 ++----------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
drivers/net/virtio_net.c +2 -17
index 49d84e5..e0638e5 100644
@@ -1925,24 +1925,11 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 
        virtio_device_ready(vdev);
 
-       /* Last of all, set up some receive buffers. */
-       for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++) {
-               try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL);
-
-               /* If we didn't even get one input buffer, we're useless. */
-               if (vi->rq[i].vq->num_free ==
-                   virtqueue_get_vring_size(vi->rq[i].vq)) {
-                       free_unused_bufs(vi);
-                       err = -ENOMEM;
-                       goto free_recv_bufs;
-               }
-       }
-
        vi->nb.notifier_call = &virtnet_cpu_callback;
        err = register_hotcpu_notifier(&vi->nb);
        if (err) {
                pr_debug("virtio_net: registering cpu notifier failed\n");
-               goto free_recv_bufs;
+               goto free_unregister_netdev;
        }
 
        /* Assume link up if device can't report link status,
@@ -1960,10 +1947,9 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 
        return 0;
 
-free_recv_bufs:
+free_unregister_netdev:
        vi->vdev->config->reset(vdev);
 
-       free_receive_bufs(vi);
        unregister_netdev(dev);
 free_vqs:
        cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
--

1.7.12.4

maintainer
#3 lore raw
In reply to wangyunjian

From: wangyunjian <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:27:59 +0800

Quoted 5 lines

In function virtnet_open() and virtnet_probe(), func try_fill_recv() will be executed at the same time. VQ in virtqueue_add() is not protected well and BUG_ON will be triggered when virito_net.ko being removed.

Patch is whitespace damanged by your email client.

Fix this, email a test patch to yourself, and do not try to resubmit this patch to the mailing list until you can successfully apply one of those test patches.

Thanks.