a negative ntfs superblock mft_lcn can cause a wild memory reference
If the ntfs superblock's mft_lcn is negative, that will pass tests such as
ll = le64_to_cpu(b->mft_lcn);
if (ll >= vol->nr_clusters) {and
vol->mft_zone_end = vol->mft_lcn + mft_zone_size;
while (vol->mft_zone_end >= vol->nr_clusters) {because the variables are signed.
The attached corrupt NTFS image exploits this to cause index to be out of bounds in ntfs_cluster_alloc(), e.g. for
if (vol->lcn_empty_bits_per_page[index] == 0)
goto next_bmp_pos;index is derived from mft_lcn via mft_zone_end, data1_zone_pos, zone_start, and bmp_pos.
# wget http://www.rtmrtm.org/rtm/ntfs8b.img.gz # gunzip ntfs8b.img.gz # cp ntfs8b.img junk # mount -t ntfs -o loop junk /mnt # echo x > /mnt/x ntfs: (device loop0): check_mft_mirror(): $MFT and $MFTMirr record 0 do not match. Run chkdsk. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff80010e38ef58 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 1264 Comm: tcsh Not tainted 7.2.0-rc7-00016-g3d6d817622b0 #40 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: FreeBSD BHYVE/BHYVE, BIOS 14.0 10/17/2021 RIP: 0010:ntfs_cluster_alloc+0x376/0x12a0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? inode_io_list_move_locked+0xa1/0xe0 ? folio_mark_dirty+0x33/0x60 ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock+0x15b/0xa30 ntfs_mft_record_alloc+0x921/0x1790 __ntfs_create+0x1c4/0xd40 ? ntfs_attr_put_search_ctx+0x3b/0x50 ? kmem_cache_free+0x207/0x2f0 ? __mark_inode_dirty+0x16a/0x3b0 ntfs_create+0xc1/0x170 path_openat+0xfe0/0x12f0 ? do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540 ? do_getname+0x2e/0x180 do_file_open+0xdf/0x1a0 do_sys_openat2+0x79/0xe0 __x64_sys_creat+0x49/0x70 x64_sys_call+0x1bfa/0x2130 do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540 ? exc_page_fault+0x76/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Robert Morris
[email protected]
Hi Robert,
I have submitted a patch to fix this issue:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
2026년 8월 18일 (화) 오전 6:03, <[email protected]>님이 작성:
Quoted 62 lines
If the ntfs superblock's
mft_lcnis negative, that will pass tests such asll = le64_to_cpu(b->mft_lcn); if (ll >= vol->nr_clusters) {and
vol->mft_zone_end = vol->mft_lcn + mft_zone_size; while (vol->mft_zone_end >= vol->nr_clusters) {because the variables are signed.
The attached corrupt NTFS image exploits this to cause index to be out of bounds in
ntfs_cluster_alloc(), e.g. forif (vol->lcn_empty_bits_per_page[index] == 0) goto next_bmp_pos;index is derived from
mft_lcnviamft_zone_end,data1_zone_pos,zone_start, andbmp_pos.# wget http://www.rtmrtm.org/rtm/ntfs8b.img.gz # gunzip ntfs8b.img.gz # cp ntfs8b.img junk # mount -t ntfs -o loop junk /mnt # echo x > /mnt/x ntfs: (device loop0): check_mft_mirror(): $MFT and $MFTMirr record 0 do not match. Run chkdsk. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff80010e38ef58 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 1264 Comm: tcsh Not tainted 7.2.0-rc7-00016-g3d6d817622b0 #40 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: FreeBSD BHYVE/BHYVE, BIOS 14.0 10/17/2021 RIP: 0010:ntfs_cluster_alloc+0x376/0x12a0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? inode_io_list_move_locked+0xa1/0xe0 ? folio_mark_dirty+0x33/0x60 ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock+0x15b/0xa30 ntfs_mft_record_alloc+0x921/0x1790 __ntfs_create+0x1c4/0xd40 ? ntfs_attr_put_search_ctx+0x3b/0x50 ? kmem_cache_free+0x207/0x2f0 ? __mark_inode_dirty+0x16a/0x3b0 ntfs_create+0xc1/0x170 path_openat+0xfe0/0x12f0 ? do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540 ? do_getname+0x2e/0x180 do_file_open+0xdf/0x1a0 do_sys_openat2+0x79/0xe0 __x64_sys_creat+0x49/0x70 x64_sys_call+0x1bfa/0x2130 do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540 ? exc_page_fault+0x76/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7fRobert Morris
[email protected]
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, Hyunchul