Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ftruncate04 broken on kernels without mandatory locking

LTP Jiri Jaburek 2 participants 2 messages Jun 8, 2016 – Jun 9, 2016

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Upstream kernel commit

9e8925b67a809bb27ce4b7d352d67f25cf1d7fc5
locks: Allow disabling mandatory locking at compile time

added a config option to remove support for mandatory locking (mount -o mand, MS_MANDLOCK), which went into v4.5.

Some distributions (like Fedora) already disable it, causing ftruncate04 to fail:

ftruncate04    0  TINFO  :  TMPDIR does not support mandatory locks
ftruncate04    0  TINFO  :  Found free device '/dev/loop0'
ftruncate04    0  TINFO  :  Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext2 opts=''

extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.42.13 (17-May-2015)
ftruncate04 1 TBROK : safe_macros.c:728: ftruncate04.c:247:
mount(/dev/loop0, dir/, ext2, 64, (nil)) failed: errno=EPERM(1):
Operation not permitted
ftruncate04 2 TBROK : safe_macros.c:728: Remaining cases broken

and indeed

$ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/
$ umount /mnt
$ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/ -o mand
mount: permission denied

The question is how to best fix the testcase - do the mount unsafely and assume EPERM should be TCONF? Or somehow check kernel config? Maybe do the mount first without MS_MANDLOCK (to rule out other perm issues) and then remount with MS_MANDLOCK, checking EPERM?

Any other ideas?

Thanks,
Jiri

#1 lore raw

Hi!

Quoted 28 lines

Upstream kernel commit

9e8925b67a809bb27ce4b7d352d67f25cf1d7fc5
locks: Allow disabling mandatory locking at compile time

added a config option to remove support for mandatory locking (mount -o mand, MS_MANDLOCK), which went into v4.5.

Some distributions (like Fedora) already disable it, causing ftruncate04 to fail:

ftruncate04    0  TINFO  :  TMPDIR does not support mandatory locks
ftruncate04    0  TINFO  :  Found free device '/dev/loop0'
ftruncate04    0  TINFO  :  Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext2 opts=''

extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.42.13 (17-May-2015)
ftruncate04 1 TBROK : safe_macros.c:728: ftruncate04.c:247:
mount(/dev/loop0, dir/, ext2, 64, (nil)) failed: errno=EPERM(1):
Operation not permitted
ftruncate04 2 TBROK : safe_macros.c:728: Remaining cases broken

and indeed

$ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/
$ umount /mnt
$ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/ -o mand
mount: permission denied
Quoted 4 lines

The question is how to best fix the testcase - do the mount unsafely and assume EPERM should be TCONF? Or somehow check kernel config? Maybe do the mount first without MS_MANDLOCK (to rule out other perm issues) and then remount with MS_MANDLOCK, checking EPERM?

Too bad that it returns EPERM rather than ENOSYS.

Parsing kernel config portably between major distributions is very troublesome if not impossible so I would like to avoid this path.

Checking for EPERM while remounting with MS_MANDLOCK sounds good to me.

Signature · 2 lines
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]