ARM: at91: fix warnings in pm.c
PATCH 1/1 ARM: at91: fix warnings in pm.c
Fix a pair of missing statics on un-exported functions and include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h> to provide the declaration of at91_suspend_entering_slow_clock() to fix the following sparse warnings:
arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c:127:5: warning: symbol 'at91_suspend_entering_slow_clock' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c:358:6: warning: symbol 'at91rm9200_idle' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c:367:6: warning: symbol 'at91sam9_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?
---
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <[email protected]>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
--- arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c +3 -2
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@#include <linux/of_platform.h> #include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/clk/at91_pmc.h>
@@ -355,7 +356,7 @@ static __init void at91_dt_ramc(void)at91_pm_set_standby (standby); } -void at91rm9200_idle (void ) +static void at91rm9200_idle (void ) {/* * Disable the processor clock. The processor will be automatically
@@ -364,7 +365,7 @@ void at91rm9200_idle(void)writel (AT91_PMC_PCK , pmc +AT91_PMC_SCDR ); } -void at91sam9_idle (void ) +static void at91sam9_idle (void ) {writel (AT91_PMC_PCK , pmc +AT91_PMC_SCDR );cpu_do_idle ();
Signature · 1 line
2.8.1
PATCH 1/1 ARM: at91: fix warnings in pm.c
Le 17/06/2016 17:34, Ben Dooks a ?crit :
Quoted 5 lines
Fix a pair of missing statics on un-exported functions and include <
linux/platform_data/atmel.h> to provide the declaration ofat91_suspend_entering_slow_clock()to fix the following sparse warnings:
Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c:127:5: warning: symbol 'at91_suspend_entering_slow_clock' was not declared. Should it be static?arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c:358:6: warning: symbol 'at91rm9200_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c:367:6: warning: symbol 'at91sam9_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?Signed-off-by Ben Dooks <[email protected]>---
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
Thanks Ben!
Bye,
Quoted 38 lines
Cc Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>Cc Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <[email protected]>Cc linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org--- arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c +3
-2@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@#include <linux/of_platform.h> #include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/clk/at91_pmc.h> @@ -355,7 +356,7 @@ static __init void at91_dt_ramc(void)at91_pm_set_standby (standby); } -void at91rm9200_idle (void ) +static void at91rm9200_idle (void ) {/* * Disable the processor clock. The processor will be automatically @@ -364,7 +365,7 @@ void at91rm9200_idle(void)writel (AT91_PMC_PCK , pmc +AT91_PMC_SCDR ); } -void at91sam9_idle (void ) +static void at91sam9_idle (void ) {writel (AT91_PMC_PCK , pmc +AT91_PMC_SCDR );cpu_do_idle ();
Signature · 1 line
Nicolas Ferre