notifier: Fix soft lockup for notifier_call_chain().
Subsystems (3)
PATCH v2 1/1 notifier: Fix soft lockup for notifier_call_chain().
The problem was occurs in my system that a lot of drviers register its own handler to the notifiler call chain for netdev_chain, and then create 4095 vlan dev for one nic, and add several ipv6 address on each one of them, just like this:
for i in seq 1 4095; do ip link add link eth0 name eth0.$i type vlan id $i; done for i in seq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2001::$i dev eth0.$i; done for i in seq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2002::$i dev eth0.$i; done for i in seq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2003::$i dev eth0.$i; done
ifconfig eth0 up
ifconfig eth0 down
then it will halt several seconds, and occurs softlockup:
<0>[ 7620.364058]NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [ifconfig:19186] <0>[ 7620.364592]Call trace: <4>[ 7620.364599][<ffffffc000208f68>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x220 <4>[ 7620.364603][<ffffffc0002091a8>] show_stack+0x20/0x28 <4>[ 7620.364607][<ffffffc000691fac>] dump_stack+0x90/0xb0 <4>[ 7620.364612][<ffffffc0002cacbc>] watchdog_timer_fn+0x41c/0x460 <4>[ 7620.364617][<ffffffc000289ec8>] __run_hrtimer+0x98/0x2d8 <4>[ 7620.364620][<ffffffc00028a3e0>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x110/0x288 <4>[ 7620.364624][<ffffffc00059c0c8>] arch_timer_handler_phys+0x38/0x48 <4>[ 7620.364628][<ffffffc000276d2c>] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x9c/0x190 <4>[ 7620.364632][<ffffffc000271ef8>] generic_handle_irq+0x40/0x58 <4>[ 7620.364635][<ffffffc000272270>] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0 <4>[ 7620.364638][<ffffffc000200634>] gic_handle_irq+0xc4/0x1c8 <4>[ 7620.364641]Exception stack(0xffffffc0309b3640 to 0xffffffc0309b3770) <4>[ 7620.364644]3640: 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 ffffffc0309b37c0 ffffffbfa1019cf8 <4>[ 7620.364647]3660: 0000000080000145 ffffffc0309b3958 0000000000000000 ffffffbfa1013008 <4>[ 7620.364651]3680: 00000000000007f0 ffffffbfa131b770 ffffffd08aaadc40 ffffffbfa1019cf8 <4>[ 7620.364654]36a0: ffffffbfa1019cc4 ffffffd089c2b000 ffffffd08eff8000 ffffffc0309b3958 <4>[ 7620.364656]36c0: ffffffbfa101c5c0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffbfa101c66c <4>[ 7620.364659]36e0: 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f 0000000000000030 ffffffffffffffff ffff000000000000 <4>[ 7620.364662]3700: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffc000393d58 0000007f794d67b0 <4>[ 7620.364665]3720: 0000007fe62215d0 ffffffc0309b3830 ffffffc00021d8e0 ffffffbfa1049b68 <4>[ 7620.364668]3740: ffffffc000697578 ffffffc0006974b8 ffffffc0309b3958 0000000000000000 <4>[ 7620.364670]3760: ffffffbfa1013008 00000000000007f0 <4>[ 7620.364673][<ffffffc000203780>] el1_irq+0x80/0x100 <4>[ 7620.364692][<ffffffbfa1019ed4>] fib6_walk+0x3c/0x70 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364710][<ffffffbfa1019f70>] fib6_clean_tree+0x68/0x90 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364727][<ffffffbfa101a020>] __fib6_clean_all+0x88/0xc0 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364746][<ffffffbfa101c760>] fib6_clean_all+0x28/0x30 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364763][<ffffffbfa101933c>] rt6_ifdown+0x64/0x148 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364781][<ffffffbfa100e6d8>] addrconf_ifdown+0x68/0x540 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364798][<ffffffbfa1010f58>] addrconf_notify+0xd0/0x8b8 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364801][<ffffffc00023f83c>] notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0xa0 <4>[ 7620.364804][<ffffffc00023f9e0>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28 <4>[ 7620.364809][<ffffffc0005cbab4>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4c/0x80 <4>[ 7620.364812][<ffffffc0005cbfc8>] dev_close_many+0xd0/0x138 <4>[ 7620.364821][<ffffffbfa33be6e8>] vlan_device_event+0x4a8/0x6a0 [8021q] <4>[ 7620.364824][<ffffffc00023f83c>] notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0xa0 <4>[ 7620.364827][<ffffffc00023f9e0>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28 <4>[ 7620.364830][<ffffffc0005cbab4>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4c/0x80 <4>[ 7620.364833][<ffffffc0005d5148>] __dev_notify_flags+0xb8/0xe0 <4>[ 7620.364836][<ffffffc0005d5994>] dev_change_flags+0x54/0x68 <4>[ 7620.364840][<ffffffc00064a620>] devinet_ioctl+0x650/0x700 <4>[ 7620.364843][<ffffffc00064bea4>] inet_ioctl+0xa4/0xc8 <4>[ 7620.364847][<ffffffc0005b1094>] sock_do_ioctl+0x44/0x88 <4>[ 7620.364850][<ffffffc0005b1a3c>] sock_ioctl+0x23c/0x308 <4>[ 7620.364854][<ffffffc000393bc4>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x48c/0x620 <4>[ 7620.364857][<ffffffc000393dec>] SyS_ioctl+0x94/0xa8
=================================cut here========================================
It looks that the notifier_call_chain has to deal with too much handler, and will not feed the watchdog until finish the work, and the notifier_call_chain may be called in atomic context, so add touch_nmi_watchdog() in the loops to fix this problem, and it will not panic again.
v2: add cond_resched() will break the atomic context, so feed the watchdog in
the loops to fix this bug.
--- kernel/notifier.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
kernel/notifier.c +3 -0
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@#include <linux/rcupdate.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> #include <linux/reboot.h> +#include <linux/nmi.h> /* * Notifier list for kernel code which wants to be called
@@ -92,6 +93,8 @@ static int notifier_call_chain(struct notifier_block **nl,#endif ret = nb->notifier_call (nb, val, v); +touch_nmi_watchdog (); +if (nr_calls) (*nr_calls)++;
Signature · 1 line
1.9.0
Quoted 5 lines · Ding Tianhong
The problem was occurs in my system that a lot of drviers register its own handler to the notifiler call chain for
netdev_chain, and then create 4095 vlan dev for one nic, and add several ipv6 address on each one of them, just like this:
Quoted 7 lines
for i in
seq 1 4095; do ip link add link eth0 name eth0.$i type vlan id $i; done for i inseq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2001::$i dev eth0.$i; done for i inseq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2002::$i dev eth0.$i; done for i inseq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2003::$i dev eth0.$i; doneifconfig eth0 up
ifconfig eth0 down
I would very much prefer cond_resched() at a more appropriate place.
touch_nmi_watchdog() does not fundamentally solve the issue, as some process is holding one cpu for a very long time.
Probably in addrconf_ifdown(), as if you have 100,000 IPv6 addresses on a single netdev, this function might also trigger a soft lockup, without playing with 4096 vlans...
net/ipv6/addrconf.c +1 -0
@@ -3566,6 +3566,7 @@ restart: } }spin_unlock_bh (&addrconf_hash_lock); +cond_resched (); }write_lock_bh (&idev->lock);
Quoted 30 lines · Eric Dumazet
Quoted 5 lines · Ding Tianhong
The problem was occurs in my system that a lot of drviers register its own handler to the notifiler call chain for
netdev_chain, and then create 4095 vlan dev for one nic, and add several ipv6 address on each one of them, just like this:Quoted 7 lines
for i in
seq 1 4095; do ip link add link eth0 name eth0.$i type vlan id $i; done for i inseq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2001::$i dev eth0.$i; done for i inseq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2002::$i dev eth0.$i; done for i inseq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2003::$i dev eth0.$i; doneifconfig eth0 up
ifconfig eth0 downI would very much prefer
cond_resched()at a more appropriate place.
touch_nmi_watchdog()does not fundamentally solve the issue, as some process is holding one cpu for a very long time.Probably in
addrconf_ifdown(), as if you have 100,000 IPv6 addresses on a single netdev, this function might also trigger a soft lockup, without playing with 4096 vlans...net/ipv6/addrconf.c +0
-0
net/ipv6/addrconf.c restart: · line 3572
Quoted 7 lines
net/ipv6/addrconf.c +1
-0@@ -3566,6 +3566,7 @@ restart: } }spin_unlock_bh (&addrconf_hash_lock); +cond_resched (); }write_lock_bh (&idev->lock);
it looks like not enough, I still got this calltrace,
<4>[ 7618.596184]3840: ffffffbfa101a0a0 00000000000007f0 <4>[ 7618.596187][<ffffffc000203780>] el1_irq+0x80/0x100 <4>[ 7618.596255][<ffffffbfa1019d74>] fib6_walk_continue+0x1d4/0x200 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596275][<ffffffbfa1019ed4>] fib6_walk+0x3c/0x70 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596295][<ffffffbfa1019f70>] fib6_clean_tree+0x68/0x90 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596314][<ffffffbfa101a020>] __fib6_clean_all+0x88/0xc0 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596334][<ffffffbfa101c7f0>] fib6_run_gc+0x88/0x148 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596354][<ffffffbfa1021678>] ndisc_netdev_event+0x80/0x140 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596358][<ffffffc00023f83c>] notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0xa0 <4>[ 7618.596361][<ffffffc00023f9e0>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28 <4>[ 7618.596366][<ffffffc0005cbab4>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4c/0x80 <4>[ 7618.596369][<ffffffc0005cbfc8>] dev_close_many+0xd0/0x138 <4>[ 7618.596378][<ffffffbfa33be6e8>] vlan_device_event+0x4a8/0x6a0 [8021q] <4>[ 7618.596381][<ffffffc00023f83c>] notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0xa0 <4>[ 7618.596384][<ffffffc00023f9e0>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28 <4>[ 7618.596387][<ffffffc0005cbab4>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4c/0x80 <4>[ 7618.596390][<ffffffc0005d5148>] __dev_notify_flags+0xb8/0xe0 <4>[ 7618.596393][<ffffffc0005d5994>] dev_change_flags+0x54/0x68 <4>[ 7618.596397][<ffffffc00064a620>] devinet_ioctl+0x650/0x700 <4>[ 7618.596400][<ffffffc00064bea4>] inet_ioctl+0xa4/0xc8 <4>[ 7618.596405][<ffffffc0005b1094>] sock_do_ioctl+0x44/0x88 <4>[ 7618.596408][<ffffffc0005b1a3c>] sock_ioctl+0x23c/0x308 <4>[ 7618.596413][<ffffffc000393bc4>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x48c/0x620
Quoted 4 lines
.
Quoted 55 lines · Ding Tianhong
Quoted 30 lines · Eric Dumazet
Quoted 5 lines · Ding Tianhong
The problem was occurs in my system that a lot of drviers register its own handler to the notifiler call chain for
netdev_chain, and then create 4095 vlan dev for one nic, and add several ipv6 address on each one of them, just like this:Quoted 7 lines
for i in
seq 1 4095; do ip link add link eth0 name eth0.$i type vlan id $i; done for i inseq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2001::$i dev eth0.$i; done for i inseq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2002::$i dev eth0.$i; done for i inseq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2003::$i dev eth0.$i; doneifconfig eth0 up
ifconfig eth0 downI would very much prefer
cond_resched()at a more appropriate place.
touch_nmi_watchdog()does not fundamentally solve the issue, as some process is holding one cpu for a very long time.Probably in
addrconf_ifdown(), as if you have 100,000 IPv6 addresses on a single netdev, this function might also trigger a soft lockup, without playing with 4096 vlans...net/ipv6/addrconf.c +0
-0net/ipv6/addrconf.c restart: · line 3572
Quoted 7 lines
net/ipv6/addrconf.c +1
-0@@ -3566,6 +3566,7 @@ restart: } }spin_unlock_bh (&addrconf_hash_lock); +cond_resched (); }write_lock_bh (&idev->lock);it looks like not enough, I still got this calltrace,
<4>[ 7618.596184]3840: ffffffbfa101a0a0 00000000000007f0 <4>[ 7618.596187][<ffffffc000203780>] el1_irq+0x80/0x100 <4>[ 7618.596255][<ffffffbfa1019d74>] fib6_walk_continue+0x1d4/0x200 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596275][<ffffffbfa1019ed4>] fib6_walk+0x3c/0x70 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596295][<ffffffbfa1019f70>] fib6_clean_tree+0x68/0x90 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596314][<ffffffbfa101a020>] __fib6_clean_all+0x88/0xc0 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596334][<ffffffbfa101c7f0>] fib6_run_gc+0x88/0x148 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596354][<ffffffbfa1021678>] ndisc_netdev_event+0x80/0x140 [ipv6] <4>[ 7618.596358][<ffffffc00023f83c>] notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0xa0 <4>[ 7618.596361][<ffffffc00023f9e0>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28 <4>[ 7618.596366][<ffffffc0005cbab4>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4c/0x80 <4>[ 7618.596369][<ffffffc0005cbfc8>] dev_close_many+0xd0/0x138 <4>[ 7618.596378][<ffffffbfa33be6e8>] vlan_device_event+0x4a8/0x6a0 [8021q] <4>[ 7618.596381][<ffffffc00023f83c>] notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0xa0 <4>[ 7618.596384][<ffffffc00023f9e0>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28
Quoted 10 lines
<4>[ 7618.596387][<ffffffc0005cbab4>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4c/0x80 <4>[ 7618.596390][<ffffffc0005d5148>] __dev_notify_flags+0xb8/0xe0 <4>[ 7618.596393][<ffffffc0005d5994>] dev_change_flags+0x54/0x68 <4>[ 7618.596397][<ffffffc00064a620>] devinet_ioctl+0x650/0x700 <4>[ 7618.596400][<ffffffc00064bea4>] inet_ioctl+0xa4/0xc8 <4>[ 7618.596405][<ffffffc0005b1094>] sock_do_ioctl+0x44/0x88 <4>[ 7618.596408][<ffffffc0005b1a3c>] sock_ioctl+0x23c/0x308 <4>[ 7618.596413][<ffffffc000393bc4>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x48c/0x620
Follow the stack trace and add another cond_resched() where it is needed then ?
Lot of this code was written decade ago where nobody expected a root user was going to try hard to crash its host ;)
I did not check if the following is valid (Maybe __fib6_clean_all() is called with some spinlock/rwlock held)
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c +3 -2
@@ -1680,17 +1680,18 @@ static void __fib6_clean_all(struct net *net,struct hlist_head *head;unsigned int h; -rcu_read_lock ();for (h =0 ; h <FIB6_TABLE_HASHSZ ; h++) { head = &net->ipv6.fib_table_hash[h]; +rcu_read_lock ();hlist_for_each_entry_rcu (table, head, tb6_hlist) {write_lock_bh (&table->tb6_lock);fib6_clean_tree (net, &table->tb6_root, func, false, sernum, arg);write_unlock_bh (&table->tb6_lock); } +rcu_read_unlock (); +cond_resched (); } -rcu_read_unlock (); } void fib6_clean_all(struct net *net, int (*func)(struct rt6_info *, void *),
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Dumazet
Follow the stack trace and add another
cond_resched()where it is needed then ?Lot of this code was written decade ago where nobody expected a root user was going to try hard to crash its host ;)
I did not check if the following is valid (Maybe
__fib6_clean_all()is called with some spinlock/rwlock held)
Well, fib6_run_gc() can call it with spin_lock_bh(&net->ipv6.fib6_gc_lock) so this wont work.
We need more invasive changes.
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Dumazet
Quoted 6 lines · Eric Dumazet
Follow the stack trace and add another
cond_resched()where it is needed then ?Lot of this code was written decade ago where nobody expected a root user was going to try hard to crash its host ;)
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I did not check if the following is valid (Maybe
__fib6_clean_all()is called with some spinlock/rwlock held)Well,
fib6_run_gc()can call it withspin_lock_bh(&net->ipv6.fib6_gc_lock)so this wont work.We need more invasive changes.
Hi Eric:
I debug this problem, and found that the __fib6_clean_all() would not hold the cpu more than 1 second event though there is a lot of ipv6 address to deal with, but the notifier_chian would call the ipv6 notifier several times and hold the cpu for a long time, so add cond_resched() in the addrconf_ifdown could solve the problem correctly, I think your first solution is the good way to fix this bug.
Thanks
Ding
Quoted 7 lines · Ding Tianhong
I debug this problem, and found that the
__fib6_clean_all()would not hold the cpu more than 1 second event though there
is a lot of ipv6 address to deal with, but thenotifier_chianwould call the ipv6 notifier several times and hold the cpu
for a long time, so addcond_resched()in theaddrconf_ifdowncould solve the problem correctly, I think your first solution is the good way to fix this bug.
I am traveling these days, so please send an official patch once you've tested it, thanks !
Quoted 2 lines · Eric Dumazet
Lot of this code was written decade ago where nobody expected a root user was going to try hard to crash its host ;)
+1
Adding cond_resched() to appropriate network notifiers sounds better.