ipv6: Fix soft lockup for ipv6 network notifier.
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 ipv6: Fix soft lockup for ipv6 network notifier.
The problem was occurs in my system that a lot of drviers register its own handler to the notifiler call chain for netdev_chain, and then create 4095 vlan dev for one nic, and add several ipv6 address on each one of them, just like this:
for i in seq 1 4095; do ip link add link eth0 name eth0.$i type vlan id $i; done for i in seq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2001::$i dev eth0.$i; done for i in seq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2002::$i dev eth0.$i; done for i in seq 1 4095; do ip -6 addr add 2003::$i dev eth0.$i; done
ifconfig eth0 up
ifconfig eth0 down
then it will halt several seconds, and occurs softlockup:
<0>[ 7620.364058]NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [ifconfig:19186] <0>[ 7620.364592]Call trace: <4>[ 7620.364599][<ffffffc000208f68>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x220 <4>[ 7620.364603][<ffffffc0002091a8>] show_stack+0x20/0x28 <4>[ 7620.364607][<ffffffc000691fac>] dump_stack+0x90/0xb0 <4>[ 7620.364612][<ffffffc0002cacbc>] watchdog_timer_fn+0x41c/0x460 <4>[ 7620.364617][<ffffffc000289ec8>] __run_hrtimer+0x98/0x2d8 <4>[ 7620.364620][<ffffffc00028a3e0>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x110/0x288 <4>[ 7620.364624][<ffffffc00059c0c8>] arch_timer_handler_phys+0x38/0x48 <4>[ 7620.364628][<ffffffc000276d2c>] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x9c/0x190 <4>[ 7620.364632][<ffffffc000271ef8>] generic_handle_irq+0x40/0x58 <4>[ 7620.364635][<ffffffc000272270>] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0 <4>[ 7620.364638][<ffffffc000200634>] gic_handle_irq+0xc4/0x1c8 <4>[ 7620.364641]Exception stack(0xffffffc0309b3640 to 0xffffffc0309b3770) <4>[ 7620.364644]3640: 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 ffffffc0309b37c0 ffffffbfa1019cf8 <4>[ 7620.364647]3660: 0000000080000145 ffffffc0309b3958 0000000000000000 ffffffbfa1013008 <4>[ 7620.364651]3680: 00000000000007f0 ffffffbfa131b770 ffffffd08aaadc40 ffffffbfa1019cf8 <4>[ 7620.364654]36a0: ffffffbfa1019cc4 ffffffd089c2b000 ffffffd08eff8000 ffffffc0309b3958 <4>[ 7620.364656]36c0: ffffffbfa101c5c0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffbfa101c66c <4>[ 7620.364659]36e0: 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f 0000000000000030 ffffffffffffffff ffff000000000000 <4>[ 7620.364662]3700: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffc000393d58 0000007f794d67b0 <4>[ 7620.364665]3720: 0000007fe62215d0 ffffffc0309b3830 ffffffc00021d8e0 ffffffbfa1049b68 <4>[ 7620.364668]3740: ffffffc000697578 ffffffc0006974b8 ffffffc0309b3958 0000000000000000 <4>[ 7620.364670]3760: ffffffbfa1013008 00000000000007f0 <4>[ 7620.364673][<ffffffc000203780>] el1_irq+0x80/0x100 <4>[ 7620.364692][<ffffffbfa1019ed4>] fib6_walk+0x3c/0x70 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364710][<ffffffbfa1019f70>] fib6_clean_tree+0x68/0x90 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364727][<ffffffbfa101a020>] __fib6_clean_all+0x88/0xc0 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364746][<ffffffbfa101c760>] fib6_clean_all+0x28/0x30 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364763][<ffffffbfa101933c>] rt6_ifdown+0x64/0x148 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364781][<ffffffbfa100e6d8>] addrconf_ifdown+0x68/0x540 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364798][<ffffffbfa1010f58>] addrconf_notify+0xd0/0x8b8 [ipv6] <4>[ 7620.364801][<ffffffc00023f83c>] notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0xa0 <4>[ 7620.364804][<ffffffc00023f9e0>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28 <4>[ 7620.364809][<ffffffc0005cbab4>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4c/0x80 <4>[ 7620.364812][<ffffffc0005cbfc8>] dev_close_many+0xd0/0x138 <4>[ 7620.364821][<ffffffbfa33be6e8>] vlan_device_event+0x4a8/0x6a0 [8021q] <4>[ 7620.364824][<ffffffc00023f83c>] notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0xa0 <4>[ 7620.364827][<ffffffc00023f9e0>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0x28 <4>[ 7620.364830][<ffffffc0005cbab4>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x4c/0x80 <4>[ 7620.364833][<ffffffc0005d5148>] __dev_notify_flags+0xb8/0xe0 <4>[ 7620.364836][<ffffffc0005d5994>] dev_change_flags+0x54/0x68 <4>[ 7620.364840][<ffffffc00064a620>] devinet_ioctl+0x650/0x700 <4>[ 7620.364843][<ffffffc00064bea4>] inet_ioctl+0xa4/0xc8 <4>[ 7620.364847][<ffffffc0005b1094>] sock_do_ioctl+0x44/0x88 <4>[ 7620.364850][<ffffffc0005b1a3c>] sock_ioctl+0x23c/0x308 <4>[ 7620.364854][<ffffffc000393bc4>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x48c/0x620 <4>[ 7620.364857][<ffffffc000393dec>] SyS_ioctl+0x94/0xa8
=================================cut here========================================
It looks that the notifier_call_chain has to deal with too much handler, and will not feed the watchdog until finish the work, and the notifier_call_chain would call the ipv6_dev_notf several times and hold the cpu for a long time, so add cond_resched() in the ipv6_dev_notf in order to schedule out in the network notifiers to avoid softlocking to fix this problem.
--- net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
net/ipv6/addrconf.c +6 -0
@@ -3284,6 +3284,12 @@ restart:spin_unlock_bh (&addrconf_hash_lock); } +/* +* It is safe here to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt +* is disabled. +*/ +cond_resched (); +write_lock_bh (&idev->lock);addrconf_del_rs_timer (idev);
Signature · 1 line
1.9.0
On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 15:38 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
...
Quoted 10 lines
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)net/ipv6/addrconf.c +0
-0@@ -3284,6 +3284,12 @@ restart:spin_unlock_bh (&addrconf_hash_lock); }
net/ipv6/addrconf.c restart: · line 3295
Quoted 10 lines
net/ipv6/addrconf.c +6
-0+/* +* It is safe here to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt +* is disabled. +*/ +cond_resched (); +write_lock_bh (&idev->lock);addrconf_del_rs_timer (idev);
Seeing you apparently cooked your patch against an old kernel (which one ?) ...
I tried vanilla net-next kernel, and apparently I could not trigger the softlockup you mentioned.
Are you sure current kernel has a bug to begin with ?
Thanks.
Quoted 26 lines · Eric Dumazet
On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 15:38 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
...Quoted 10 lines
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)net/ipv6/addrconf.c +0
-0@@ -3284,6 +3284,12 @@ restart:spin_unlock_bh (&addrconf_hash_lock); }net/ipv6/addrconf.c restart: · line 3295
Quoted 10 lines
net/ipv6/addrconf.c +6
-0+/* +* It is safe here to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt +* is disabled. +*/ +cond_resched (); +write_lock_bh (&idev->lock);addrconf_del_rs_timer (idev);Seeing you apparently cooked your patch against an old kernel (which one ?) ...
Quoted 5 lines
I tried vanilla net-next kernel, and apparently I could not trigger the softlockup you mentioned.
Are you sure current kernel has a bug to begin with ?
have you disable the preempt? The problem will disappear if you enable the preempt voluntary or preempt. CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
I test the 4.1 lts kernel and found this problem, and I didn't found any patch to fix this from linux 4.1, but I will try to test in 4.7 kernel version.
Thanks
Ding
Quoted 7 lines
Thanks.
.
Quoted 30 lines · Ding Tianhong
Quoted 29 lines · Eric Dumazet
On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 15:38 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
...Quoted 10 lines
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)net/ipv6/addrconf.c +0
-0@@ -3284,6 +3284,12 @@ restart:spin_unlock_bh (&addrconf_hash_lock); }net/ipv6/addrconf.c restart: · line 3295
Quoted 10 lines
net/ipv6/addrconf.c +6
-0+/* +* It is safe here to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt +* is disabled. +*/ +cond_resched (); +write_lock_bh (&idev->lock);addrconf_del_rs_timer (idev);Seeing you apparently cooked your patch against an old kernel (which one ?) ...
I tried vanilla net-next kernel, and apparently I could not trigger the softlockup you mentioned.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Are you sure current kernel has a bug to begin with ?
have you disable the preempt? The problem will disappear if you enable the preempt voluntary or preempt.
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
#CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARYis not set
#CONFIG_PREEMPTis not setI test the 4.1 lts kernel and found this problem, and I didn't found any patch to fix this from linux 4.1, but I will try to test in 4.7 kernel version.
I usually do not have PREEMPT enabled in my kernels.
$ grep PREEMPT .config CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
Also the whole script is quite fast on latest kernels. I am guessing you are chasing an already fixed problem.
Quoted 42 lines · Eric Dumazet
Quoted 30 lines · Ding Tianhong
Quoted 29 lines · Eric Dumazet
On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 15:38 +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
...Quoted 10 lines
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)net/ipv6/addrconf.c +0
-0@@ -3284,6 +3284,12 @@ restart:spin_unlock_bh (&addrconf_hash_lock); }net/ipv6/addrconf.c restart: · line 3295
Quoted 10 lines
net/ipv6/addrconf.c +6
-0+/* +* It is safe here to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt +* is disabled. +*/ +cond_resched (); +write_lock_bh (&idev->lock);addrconf_del_rs_timer (idev);Seeing you apparently cooked your patch against an old kernel (which one ?) ...
I tried vanilla net-next kernel, and apparently I could not trigger the softlockup you mentioned.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Are you sure current kernel has a bug to begin with ?
have you disable the preempt? The problem will disappear if you enable the preempt voluntary or preempt.
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
#CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARYis not set
#CONFIG_PREEMPTis not setI test the 4.1 lts kernel and found this problem, and I didn't found any patch to fix this from linux 4.1, but I will try to test in 4.7 kernel version.
I usually do not have PREEMPT enabled in my kernels.
Quoted 10 lines
$ grep PREEMPT .config CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS=y CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not setAlso the whole script is quite fast on latest kernels. I am guessing you are chasing an already fixed problem.
Hi Eric:
I had found out that the patch aaf92f(netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup) solve the problem, this patch add cond_sched() in the nf_ct_iterate_cleanup() which will be called in the net notifier chain every time, and I revert this patch at kernel 4.7-rc4 , it will panic for soft lockup, so I am not sure whether our patch is need, it looks like if I disable the CONFIG for netfilter that would register the nf_ct_iterate_cleanup as notifier, the problem still be exist.
Thanks.
Ding
Quoted 4 lines
.
Quoted 11 lines · Ding Tianhong
Hi Eric:
I had found out that the patch
aaf92f(netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup)solve the problem,
this patch addcond_sched()in thenf_ct_iterate_cleanup()which will be called in the net notifier chain every time,
and I revert this patch at kernel 4.7-rc4 , it will panic for soft lockup, so I am not sure whether our patch is need,
it looks like if I disable the CONFIG for netfilter that would register thenf_ct_iterate_cleanupas notifier, the problem still be exist.
Well, I do not have conntrack on my kernels, and I can not reproduce the issue.
So I am guessing other patches also solved a scalability issue, between 4.1 and 4.7
I am aware of something that David did for IPv4, but this might help as well for IPv6.
commit fbd40ea0180a2d328c5adc61414dc8bab9335ce2
ipv4: Don't do expensive useless work during inetdev destroy.
Quoted 16 lines · Eric Dumazet
Quoted 11 lines · Ding Tianhong
Hi Eric:
I had found out that the patch
aaf92f(netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup)solve the problem,
this patch addcond_sched()in thenf_ct_iterate_cleanup()which will be called in the net notifier chain every time,
and I revert this patch at kernel 4.7-rc4 , it will panic for soft lockup, so I am not sure whether our patch is need,
it looks like if I disable the CONFIG for netfilter that would register thenf_ct_iterate_cleanupas notifier, the problem still be exist.Well, I do not have conntrack on my kernels, and I can not reproduce the issue.
Quoted 9 lines
So I am guessing other patches also solved a scalability issue, between 4.1 and 4.7
I am aware of something that David did for IPv4, but this might help as well for IPv6.
commit
fbd40ea0180a2d328c5adc61414dc8bab9335ce2
ipv4: Don't do expensive useless work during inetdev destroy.
Hi Eric:
I check this patch:
[root@localhost linux]# git name-rev fbd40ea0180a2d328c5adc61414dc8bab9335ce2 fbd40ea0180a2d328c5adc61414dc8bab9335ce2 tags/v4.6-rc1~91^2~63
So the kernel4.7-RC4 already has this patch, but it have no effort if I revert the commit aaf92f(netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup), So I don't think David's patch could fix this problem.
Thanks
Ding