mm/memblock.c: fix NULL dereference error
PATCH 1/1 mm/memblock.c: fix NULL dereference error
Hi Andrew,
this patch is part of https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/26/347 and isn't merged in as you advised in another mail, i release this patch against linus's mainline for fixing relevant bugs completely, see test patch attached for verification details
Quoted 36 lines · zijun_hu
Hi Andrew,
this patch is part of https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/26/347 and isn't merged in as you advised in another mail, i release this patch against linus's mainline for fixing relevant bugs completely, see test patch attached for verification details
Quoted 1 line
From
5a74cb46b7754a45428ff95f4653ad27025c3131Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From:
zijun_hu<[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:35:28 +0800
Subject: [PATCH]mm/memblock.c: fix NULL dereference errorit causes NULL dereference error and failure to get type_a->regions[0] info if parameter
type_bof__next_mem_range_rev()== NULLthe bugs are fixed by checking before dereferring and initializing
idx_bto 0the approach is tested by dumping all types of region via
__memblock_dump_all()and__next_mem_range_rev()fixed to UART separately, the result is okay after checking the logsSigned-off-by zijun_hu <[email protected]>Tested-by zijun_hu <[email protected]>Acked-by Tejun Heo <[email protected]>--- mm/memblock.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)mm/memblock.c +0
-0@@ -994,7 +994,10 @@ void __init_memblock __next_mem_range_rev(u64 *idx, int nid, ulong flags,
mm/memblock.c void __init_memblock __next_mem_range_rev(u64 *idx, int nid, ulong flags, · line 1003
Quoted 10 lines
mm/memblock.c +4
-1if (*idx == (u64 )ULLONG_MAX ) { idx_a = type_a->cnt -1 ; - idx_b = type_b->cnt; +if (type_b !=NULL ) + idx_b = type_b->cnt; +else + idx_b =0 ; }for (; idx_a >=0 ; idx_a--) {
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
kbuild test robot
build botreproduce:
Hi zijun_hu,
[auto build test WARNING on mmotm/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.7 next-20160801]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/zijun_hu/mm-memblock-c-fix-NULL-dereference-error/20160802-130708 base: git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git master config: i386-randconfig-x009-201631 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=i386
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,
from mm/memblock.c:13:
mm/memblock.c: In function 'memblock_patch_verify':
>> mm/memblock.c:1713:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^
include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
#define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
^~~
>> mm/memblock.c:1713:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^~~~~~~
mm/memblock.c:1713:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^
include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
#define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
^~~
>> mm/memblock.c:1713:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^~~~~~~
mm/memblock.c:1719:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^
include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
#define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
^~~
mm/memblock.c:1719:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^~~~~~~
mm/memblock.c:1719:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^
include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
#define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
^~~
mm/memblock.c:1719:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^~~~~~~
mm/memblock.c:1726:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^
include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
#define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
^~~
mm/memblock.c:1726:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^~~~~~~
mm/memblock.c:1726:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^
include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt'
#define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
^~~
mm/memblock.c:1726:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'
pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
^~~~~~~vim +1713 mm/memblock.c
1697 pr_info(" memory size = %#llx reserved size = %#llx\n",
1698 (unsigned long long)memblock.memory.total_size,
1699 (unsigned long long)memblock.reserved.total_size);
1700
1701 memblock_dump(&memblock.memory, "memory");
1702 memblock_dump(&memblock.reserved, "reserved");
1703 }
1704
1705 void __init_memblock memblock_patch_verify(void)
1706 {
1707 u64 i;
1708 phys_addr_t this_start, this_end;
1709
1710 pr_info("in %s: memory\n", __func__);
1711 for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.memory, NULL, NUMA_NO_NODE,
1712 MEMBLOCK_NONE, &this_start, &this_end, NULL)
> 1713 pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", 1714 i, this_start, this_end);
1715
1716 pr_info("in %s: reserved\n", __func__);
1717 for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.reserved, NULL, NUMA_NO_NODE,
1718 MEMBLOCK_NONE, &this_start, &this_end, NULL)
1719 pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
1720 i, this_start, this_end);
1721
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
i am sorry, the second patch is only a test patch, please don't apply it i will send another mail for correct this
Quoted 102 lines · kbuild test robot
Hi
zijun_hu,[auto build test WARNING on mmotm/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.7 next-20160801]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/zijun_hu/mm-memblock-c-fix-NULL-dereference-error/20160802-130708 base: git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git master config: i386-randconfig-x009-201631 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=i386All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from
include/linux/kernel.h:13:0,from mm/memblock.c:13:
mm/memblock.c: In function 'memblock_patch_verify':Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
mm/memblock.c:1713:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t{aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^ include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt' #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt ^~~Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
mm/memblock.c:1713:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^~~~~~~ mm/memblock.c:1713:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^ include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt' #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt ^~~Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
mm/memblock.c:1713:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info'pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^~~~~~~ mm/memblock.c:1719:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^ include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt' #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt ^~~ mm/memblock.c:1719:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info' pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^~~~~~~ mm/memblock.c:1719:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^ include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt' #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt ^~~ mm/memblock.c:1719:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info' pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^~~~~~~ mm/memblock.c:1726:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^ include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt' #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt ^~~ mm/memblock.c:1726:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info' pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^~~~~~~ mm/memblock.c:1726:11: warning: format '%llx' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'phys_addr_t {aka unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^ include/linux/printk.h:260:21: note: in definition of macro 'pr_fmt' #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt ^~~ mm/memblock.c:1726:3: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_info' pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", ^~~~~~~vim +1713
mm/memblock.c1697 pr_info(" memory size = %#llx reserved size = %#llx\n",
1698 (unsigned long long)memblock.memory.total_size,
1699 (unsigned long long)memblock.reserved.total_size);
1700
1701memblock_dump(&memblock.memory, "memory");
1702memblock_dump(&memblock.reserved, "reserved");
1703 }
1704
1705 void__init_memblockmemblock_patch_verify(void)
1706 {
1707 u64 i;
1708phys_addr_tthis_start,this_end;
1709
1710pr_info("in %s: memory\n", __func__);
1711 for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.memory, NULL,NUMA_NO_NODE,
1712MEMBLOCK_NONE,&this_start,&this_end, NULL)Quoted 1 line
1713 pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
1714 i,
this_start,this_end);
1715
1716pr_info("in %s: reserved\n", __func__);
1717 for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.reserved, NULL,NUMA_NO_NODE,
1718MEMBLOCK_NONE,&this_start,&this_end, NULL)
1719 pr_info("[%#016llx]\t[%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
1720 i,this_start,this_end);
1721
Quoted 4 lines
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Hi All,
this mail correct the following mistakes in last mail 1, remove test patch attached
2, format patch to satisfy rules
i am so sorry for my mistake
Hi Andrew,
this patch is part of https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/26/347 and isn't merged in as you advised in another mail, i release this patch against linus's mainline for fixing relevant bugs completely