Skip to contentSkip to conversation

serial: Enable Freescale 16550 workaround on arm

PATCH New Scott Wood 2 participants 6 messages Oct 2, 2015 – Oct 8, 2015 TTY layer and serial drivers

lore
Share & tools
lore

Scott Wood

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 serial: Enable Freescale 16550 workaround on arm

The same serial hardware is present on LS2080A which is arm64, and LS1021A which is arm32, so don't limit the workaround to PPC.

Unlike PPC which uses arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c, the ARM targets use drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c, so add the handle_irq override check there as well.

---
 drivers/tty/serial/8250/Kconfig | 4 ++--
 drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c  | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/tty/serial/8250/Kconfig +2 -2
index e1de118..5a2ae57 100644
@@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ config SERIAL_8250_ACORN
 
 config SERIAL_8250_FSL
 	bool
-	depends on SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE && PPC_UDBG_16550
-	default PPC
+	depends on SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE
+	default PPC || ARM || ARM64
 
 config SERIAL_8250_DW
 	tristate "Support for Synopsys DesignWare 8250 quirks"
drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c +6 -0
index 6823df9..9cd0061 100644
@@ -150,6 +150,12 @@ static int of_platform_serial_setup(struct platform_device *ofdev,
 		break;
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL
+	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,ns16550") ||
+	    of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,16550-FIFO64"))
+		port->handle_irq = fsl8250_handle_irq;
+#endif
+
 	return 0;
 out:
 	if (info->clk)
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 serial: Enable Freescale 16550 workaround on arm

drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c static int of_platform_serial_setup(struct platform_device *ofdev, · line 158

Quoted 8 lines · On Thursday 01 October 2015 19:16:16 Scott Wood wrote:
drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c +6 -0
+#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL
+       if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,ns16550") ||
+           of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,16550-FIFO64"))
+               port->handle_irq = fsl8250_handle_irq;
+#endif
+

Can you change this to use

	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL)) && ...

The resulting code will be the same, it just get a little easier on the eye.

Other than that, I wonder if we should do this completely differently and have the respective entries in of_platform_serial_table[] with an appropriate PORT_* constant to handle the freescale case.

Arnd

author
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 serial: Enable Freescale 16550 workaround on arm

Quoted 12 lines · Arnd Bergmann

drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c static int of_platform_serial_setup(struct platform_device *ofdev, · line 158

Quoted 8 lines · On Thursday 01 October 2015 19:16:16 Scott Wood wrote:
drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c +6 -0
+#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL
+       if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,ns16550") ||
+           of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,16550-FIFO64"))
+               port->handle_irq = fsl8250_handle_irq;
+#endif
+

Can you change this to use

Quoted 4 lines
      if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL)) && ...

The resulting code will be the same, it just get a little easier on the eye.

Sure.

Quoted 3 lines

Other than that, I wonder if we should do this completely differently and have the respective entries in of_platform_serial_table[] with an appropriate PORT_* constant to handle the freescale case.

I'd considered that, but it seemed like it would be more complicated, with no real benefit. We'd need to add a new PORT for the non-fifo64 case, and it would need to otherwise behave like PORT_16550A. There's no room for an extra 8250-style PORT number unless we break PORT_MAX_8250 or renumber the "ARM specific type numbers", and for some reason these PORT numbers are defined in uapi (even if there's some legacy reason for that, do we really need to keep adding to it?). We'd also need to make sure that autoconfig() doesn't overwrite the new PORT number (or ignore the fact that it gets overwritten after using it to substitute handle_irq). It would also increase the discrepancy between how the same issue is handled on ARM versus PPC (with the latter using arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c which doesn't supply PORT numbers).

The above check wouldn't go away, as it's not something currently addressed by struct serial8250_config (unless you're also asking for a new flag for that struct, in which case it would merely be moved elsewhere); it would just require a bunch of changes elsewhere to support changing it from a simple compatible check to a PORT check.

-Scott

#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 serial: Enable Freescale 16550 workaround on arm

Quoted 17 lines · On Friday 02 October 2015 18:49:24 Scott Wood wrote:
Quoted 3 lines

Other than that, I wonder if we should do this completely differently and have the respective entries in of_platform_serial_table[] with an appropriate PORT_* constant to handle the freescale case.

I'd considered that, but it seemed like it would be more complicated, with no real benefit. We'd need to add a new PORT for the non-fifo64 case, and it would need to otherwise behave like PORT_16550A. There's no room for an extra 8250-style PORT number unless we break PORT_MAX_8250 or renumber the "ARM specific type numbers", and for some reason these PORT numbers are defined in uapi (even if there's some legacy reason for that, do we really need to keep adding to it?). We'd also need to make sure that autoconfig() doesn't overwrite the new PORT number (or ignore the fact that it gets overwritten after using it to substitute handle_irq). It would also increase the discrepancy between how the same issue is handled on ARM versus PPC (with the latter using arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c which doesn't supply PORT numbers).

Quoted 5 lines

The above check wouldn't go away, as it's not something currently addressed by struct serial8250_config (unless you're also asking for a new flag for that struct, in which case it would merely be moved elsewhere); it would just require a bunch of changes elsewhere to support changing it from a simple compatible check to a PORT check.

Ok, let's keep your version then, unless someone has a better idea.

FWIW, I think we should just move of_serial.c to drivers/tty/serial/8250/ now and remove the nwp specific bits.

Looking for a volunteer to actually do that work ;-)

Arnd

author
#4 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 serial: Enable Freescale 16550 workaround on arm

In reply to Scott Wood

The same serial hardware is present on LS2080A which is arm64, and LS1021A which is arm32, so don't limit the workaround to PPC.

Unlike PPC which uses arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c, the ARM targets use drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c, so add the handle_irq override check there as well.

---
v2: Use IS_ENABLED rather than ifdef

 drivers/tty/serial/8250/Kconfig | 4 ++--
 drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c  | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/tty/serial/8250/Kconfig +2 -2
index e1de118..5a2ae57 100644
@@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ config SERIAL_8250_ACORN
 
 config SERIAL_8250_FSL
 	bool
-	depends on SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE && PPC_UDBG_16550
-	default PPC
+	depends on SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE
+	default PPC || ARM || ARM64
 
 config SERIAL_8250_DW
 	tristate "Support for Synopsys DesignWare 8250 quirks"
drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c +5 -0
index 6823df9..fe241bd 100644
@@ -150,6 +150,11 @@ static int of_platform_serial_setup(struct platform_device *ofdev,
 		break;
 	}
 
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL) &&
+	    (of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,ns16550") ||
+	     of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,16550-FIFO64")))
+		port->handle_irq = fsl8250_handle_irq;
+
 	return 0;
 out:
 	if (info->clk)
Signature · 1 line
2.1.4
#5 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 serial: Enable Freescale 16550 workaround on arm

Quoted 9 lines · On Wednesday 07 October 2015 17:31:21 Scott Wood wrote:

The same serial hardware is present on LS2080A which is arm64, and LS1021A which is arm32, so don't limit the workaround to PPC.

Unlike PPC which uses arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c, the ARM targets use drivers/tty/serial/of_serial.c, so add the handle_irq override check there as well.