platform/chrome: add missing include in cros_ec_lpc driver
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 platform/chrome: add missing include in cros_ec_lpc driver
The newly added cros_ec_lpc driver is meant for x86 but can also be built on other architectures. However, the original version causes a compile error when built on ARM because of a missing #include:
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c: In function 'ec_response_timed_out':drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c:40:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'inb' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (!(inb(EC_LPC_ADDR_HOST_CMD) & EC_LPC_STATUS_BUSY_MASK))
^
This includes linux/io.h to make it compile reliably.
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c +1 -0
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@#include <linux/dmi.h> #include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/mfd/cros_ec.h> #include <linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h> #include <linux/module.h>
Hello Arnd,
Quoted 25 lines · Arnd Bergmann
The newly added
cros_ec_lpcdriver is meant for x86 but can also be built on other architectures. However, the original version causes a compile error when built on ARM because of a missing #include:
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c: In function 'ec_response_timed_out':drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c:40:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'inb' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (!(inb(EC_LPC_ADDR_HOST_CMD) &EC_LPC_STATUS_BUSY_MASK))
^This includes
linux/io.hto make it compile reliably.Signed-off-by Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>Fixes ec2f33ab582bf ("platform/chrome: Add cros_ec_lpc driver for x86 devices")Cc Bill Richardson <[email protected]>Cc Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>Cc Gwendal Grignou <[email protected]>Cc Olof Johansson <[email protected]>drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c +0
-0
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c line 29
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c +1
-0@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@#include <linux/dmi.h> #include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/mfd/cros_ec.h> #include <linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h> #include <linux/module.h>
I posted the exact same patch [0] on Friday along with other two fixes [1].
Besides this build error fix, in the series there is another patch to make the driver depends on X86 || COMPILE_TEST which I believe is the best trade off to avoid building it unnecesarily on ARM but still get build coverage.
Best regards,
Javier
[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/27/9
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/27/10