Skip to contentSkip to conversation

the question about ext4 noacl mount option

DISCUSSION [email protected] 3 participants 4 messages Apr 15, 2022 – May 31, 2022

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi Teo

When I use mount option noacl on 5.18-rc2, I got the following warning

[  179.441511] EXT4-fs: Mount option "noacl" will be removed by 3.5
               Contact [email protected] if you think we should

keep it.

But now is 5.18-rc2, so ext4 do you plan to remove this option or keep the option util a fix version ie 5.20? Or, remove deprecated flag for this mount option?

Best Regards
Yang Xu

#1 lore raw

Hello!

Quoted 9 lines · On Fri 15-04-22 03:41:32, [email protected] wrote:

When I use mount option noacl on 5.18-rc2, I got the following warning

[  179.441511] EXT4-fs: Mount option "noacl" will be removed by 3.5
               Contact [email protected] if you think we should

keep it.

But now is 5.18-rc2, so ext4 do you plan to remove this option or keep the option util a fix version ie 5.20? Or, remove deprecated flag for this mount option?

Just submit a patch removing it. Thanks! :)

Honza

Signature · 2 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
#2 lore raw
In reply to [email protected]
Quoted 7 lines · On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 03:41:32AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:

Hi Teo

When I use mount option noacl on 5.18-rc2, I got the following warning

[  179.441511] EXT4-fs: Mount option "noacl" will be removed by 3.5
               Contact [email protected] if you think we should

keep it.

I'm curious... is there a reason why you use noacl? That is, if we made the noacl mount option a no-op (that is, it wouldn't disable Posix ACL's), would it make a difference for your use case?

- Ted

#3 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Theodore Ts'o
Quoted 7 lines · On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 03:41:32AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:

Hi Teo

When I use mount option noacl on 5.18-rc2, I got the following warning

[  179.441511] EXT4-fs: Mount option "noacl" will be removed by 3.5
                Contact [email protected] if you think we should

keep it.

Quoted 5 lines

I'm curious... is there a reason why you use noacl?

That is, if we
made the noacl mount option a no-op (that is, it wouldn't disable Posix ACL's), would it make a difference for your use case?

I don't have use case for this and I use noacl when I wrote a xfstests case[1] to verify setgid whether works correctly for my kernel patchset that move setgid stripping code into vfs[2].

noacl will affect setgid stripping logic.

The S_ISGID stripping logic is entangled with umask stripping.

If a filesystem doesn't support or enable POSIX ACLs then umask stripping is done directly in the vfs before calling into the filesystem.

If the filesystem does support POSIX ACLs then unmask stripping may be done in the filesystem itself when calling posix_acl_create().

[1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/fstests/patch/[email protected]/ [2]https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-fsdevel/list/?series=643645

Quoted 2 lines

- Ted