Bluetooth: btmtk: Fix null pointer when processing coredump
Subsystems (2)
PATCH v3 1/1 Bluetooth: btmtk: Fix null pointer when processing coredump
There may be a potential null pointer risk if offset value is less than 0 when doing memcmp in btmtk_process_coredump(). Checking offset is valid before doing memcmp.
---
v2: fix typo
v3: fix bot checking error
--- drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +8 -8
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_register_coredump);int btmtk_process_coredump (struct hci_dev *hdev,struct sk_buff *skb) {struct btmediatek_data *data =hci_get_priv (hdev); -int err; +int err, offset;if (!IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP ))return 0 ;
@@ -392,15 +392,15 @@ int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)if (err <0 )break ; data->cd_info.cnt++; + offset = skb->len -sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END );/* Mediatek coredump data would be more than MTK_COREDUMP_NUM */ -if (data->cd_info.cnt >MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && - skb->len >sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) && - !memcmp ((char *)&skb->data[skb->len -sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END )], -MTK_COREDUMP_END ,sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) -1 )) { -bt_dev_info (hdev,"Mediatek coredump end" ); -hci_devcd_complete (hdev); - } +if (data->cd_info.cnt >MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && offset >0 ) +if (!memcmp ((char *)&skb->data[offset],MTK_COREDUMP_END , +sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) -1 )) { +bt_dev_info (hdev,"Mediatek coredump end" ); +hci_devcd_complete (hdev); + }break ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.18.0
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=764645
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch PASS 0.63 seconds GitLint PASS 0.28 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.09 seconds BuildKernel PASS 35.31 seconds CheckAllWarning PASS 38.53 seconds CheckSparse PASS 43.91 seconds CheckSmatch PASS 117.28 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 33.93 seconds TestRunnerSetup PASS 498.54 seconds TestRunner_l2cap-tester PASS 23.75 seconds TestRunner_iso-tester PASS 42.87 seconds TestRunner_bnep-tester PASS 10.73 seconds TestRunner_mgmt-tester PASS 219.56 seconds TestRunner_rfcomm-tester PASS 16.09 seconds TestRunner_sco-tester PASS 17.10 seconds TestRunner_ioctl-tester PASS 18.26 seconds TestRunner_mesh-tester PASS 13.55 seconds TestRunner_smp-tester PASS 14.53 seconds TestRunner_userchan-tester PASS 11.33 seconds IncrementalBuild PASS 30.74 seconds
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
Dear Chris,
Am 12.07.23 um 07:18 schrieb Chris Lu:
Quoted 3 lines
There may be a potential null pointer risk if offset value is less than 0 when doing memcmp in
btmtk_process_coredump(). Checking offset is valid before doing memcmp.
Use imperative mood: Check offset …
Quoted 24 lines
Signed-off-by Chris Lu <[email protected]>Co-developed-by Sean Wang <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Sean Wang <[email protected]>---
v2: fix typo
v3: fix bot checking error--- drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +1
-1@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_register_coredump);int btmtk_process_coredump (struct hci_dev *hdev,struct sk_buff *skb) {struct btmediatek_data *data =hci_get_priv (hdev); -int err; +int err, offset;if (!IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP ))return 0 ;
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) · line 395
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +1
-0@@ -392,15 +392,15 @@ int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)if (err <0 )break ; data->cd_info.cnt++; + offset = skb->len -sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END );
For sizeof() shouldn’t you use size_t? But that is unsigned of course. Maybe ssize_t then?
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) · line 398
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +1
-7/* Mediatek coredump data would be more than MTK_COREDUMP_NUM */ -if (data->cd_info.cnt >MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && - skb->len >sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) && - !memcmp ((char *)&skb->data[skb->len -sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END )], -MTK_COREDUMP_END ,sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) -1 )) { -bt_dev_info (hdev,"Mediatek coredump end" ); -hci_devcd_complete (hdev); - } +if (data->cd_info.cnt >MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && offset >0 )
Why not keep it like before, and just add the condition skb->len < sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)? The compiler is probably going to optimize so the value is not calculated twice.
Kind regards,
Paul
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +5
-0+if (!memcmp ((char *)&skb->data[offset],MTK_COREDUMP_END , +sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) -1 )) { +bt_dev_info (hdev,"Mediatek coredump end" ); +hci_devcd_complete (hdev); + }break ; }
Quoted 5 lines · Paul Menzel
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content.
Dear Chris,
Dear Paul,
Thanks for your review and feedback to Mediatek's Bluetooth driver code.
Quoted 34 lines
Am 12.07.23 um 07:18 schrieb Chris Lu:
Quoted 3 lines
There may be a potential null pointer risk if offset value is less than 0 when doing memcmp in
btmtk_process_coredump(). Checking offset is valid before doing memcmp.Use imperative mood: Check offset …
Quoted 15 lines
Signed-off-by Chris Lu <[email protected]>Co-developed-by Sean Wang <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Sean Wang <[email protected]>---
v2: fix typo
v3: fix bot checking error--- drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +0
-0drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_register_coredump); · line 370
Quoted 1 line
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +0
-0@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_register_coredump); int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff*skb)
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +1
-1{struct btmediatek_data *data =hci_get_priv (hdev); -int err; +int err, offset;if (!IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP ))return 0 ;@@ -392,15 +392,15 @@ int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev*hdev, struct
sk_buff*skb)
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) · line 395
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +1
-0if (err <0 )break ; data->cd_info.cnt++; +offset = skb->len -sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END );For
sizeof()shouldn’t you usesize_t? But that is unsigned of course. Maybessize_tthen?
yes, it's better to use ssize_t or size_t, I'll change declaratins of offset from int to ssize_t.
Quoted 18 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +0
-3/* Mediatek coredump data would be more than MTK_COREDUMP_NUM */ -if (data->cd_info.cnt >MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && - skb->len >sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) && - !memcmp((char *)&skb->data[skb->len -
sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)],drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) · line 398
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +1
-4- MTK_COREDUMP_END, sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) - 1)) { -bt_dev_info (hdev,"Mediatek coredump end" ); -hci_devcd_complete (hdev); -} +if (data->cd_info.cnt >MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && offset >0 )Why not keep it like before, and just add the condition
skb->len < sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)? The compiler is probably going to optimize so
the value is not calculated twice.
Quoted 5 lines
Kind regards,
Paul
The reason why I send this patch is when I backport devcoredump feature to specific project with older kernel version, the compiler might not so optimized that it would cause kernel panic when run into memcmp. As a result, make sure skb->len > sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) before doing memcmp part can avoid null pointer issue.
Besides, only in condition 'data->cd_info.cnt > MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && offset > 0' need to do memcmp to check the end of coredump. Driver do noting with condition skb->len < sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END) that additional condiction is not really necessary.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +5
-0+if (!memcmp ((char *)&skb->data[offset],MTK_COREDUMP_END , +sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) -1 )) { +bt_dev_info (hdev,"Mediatek coredump end" ); +hci_devcd_complete (hdev); +}break ; }
Dear Chris,
Am 12.07.23 um 10:53 schrieb Chris Lu (陸稚泓):
Quoted 4 lines · Paul Menzel
Quoted 3 lines
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content.
(It’d be nice if you removed such (automatically added) phrases from your reply.)
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks for your review and feedback to Mediatek's Bluetooth driver code.
Thank you for your reply.
Quoted 58 lines
Quoted 32 lines
Am 12.07.23 um 07:18 schrieb Chris Lu:
Quoted 3 lines
There may be a potential null pointer risk if offset value is less than 0 when doing memcmp in
btmtk_process_coredump(). Checking offset is valid before doing memcmp.Use imperative mood: Check offset …
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev
Quoted 24 lines
Signed-off-by Chris Lu <[email protected]>Co-developed-by Sean Wang <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Sean Wang <[email protected]>---
v2: fix typo
v3: fix bot checking error--- drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +1
-1@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(btmtk_register_coredump);int btmtk_process_coredump (struct hci_dev *hdev,struct sk_buff *skb) {struct btmediatek_data *data =hci_get_priv (hdev); -int err; +int err, offset;if (!IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP ))return 0 ;@@ -392,15 +392,15 @@ int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev*hdev, struct
sk_buff*skb)Quoted 7 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) · line 395
Quoted 4 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +1
-0if (err <0 )break ; data->cd_info.cnt++; +offset = skb->len -sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END );For
sizeof()shouldn’t you usesize_t? But that is unsigned of course. Maybessize_tthen?yes, it's better to use
ssize_torsize_t, I'll change declaratins of offset from int tossize_t.Quoted 14 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c int btmtk_process_coredump(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) · line 398
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +1
-7/* Mediatek coredump data would be more than MTK_COREDUMP_NUM */ -if (data->cd_info.cnt >MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && - skb->len >sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) && - !memcmp ((char *)&skb->data[skb->len -sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END )], -MTK_COREDUMP_END ,sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) -1 )) { -bt_dev_info (hdev,"Mediatek coredump end" ); -hci_devcd_complete (hdev); -} +if (data->cd_info.cnt >MTK_COREDUMP_NUM && offset >0 )Why not keep it like before, and just add the condition
skb->len < sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)? The compiler is probably going to optimize so the value is not calculated twice.
Quoted 9 lines
The reason why I send this patch is when I backport devcoredump feature to specific project with older kernel version, the compiler might not so optimized that it would cause kernel panic when run into memcmp. As a result, make sure
skb->len > sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)before doing memcmp part can avoid null pointer issue.
Besides, only in condition 'data->cd_info.cnt>MTK_COREDUMP_NUM&& offset > 0' need to do memcmp to check the end of coredump. Driver do noting with conditionskb->len < sizeof(MTK_COREDUMP_END)that additional condiction is not really necessary.
Just to avoid misunderstandings, my point, to add the comparison and get rid of the variable offset.
Kind regards,
Paul
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c +5
-0+if (!memcmp ((char *)&skb->data[offset],MTK_COREDUMP_END , +sizeof (MTK_COREDUMP_END ) -1 )) { +bt_dev_info (hdev,"Mediatek coredump end" ); +hci_devcd_complete (hdev); +}break ; }