new benchmark btrfs 0.19 vs. ext4
Oh ya :). Ummmm, whoops.
I'll update and email revised charts over to Morten. If you want a mor= e immediate answer, you can look at his original numbers at the beginni= ng of this thread. Just check for it in a couple of days at the same U= RL's. I don't want to clog up this list with discussion about outdated=
benchmarks, of which this will soon be.
Quoted 4 lines · Josh Berry
From: Josh Berry <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: new benchmark btrfs 0.19 vs. ext4
To: "Morten P.D. Stevens" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Brian Neu" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]=
g" <[email protected]>
Quoted 14 lines
Date: Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 9:46 PM
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 17:06, Morten
P.D.
Stevens<[email protected]>Quoted 9 lines · wrote:
Hi Brian,
thanks for the chart.
Here are the results visually for all:
Quoted 10 lines
=20
What are the units?=A0 Are those measuring throughput or latency?
=20
I read these graphs as saying btrfs is either blazingly fast,
blazingly slow, or some combination thereof. ;) =20
-- Josh
=20
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html