Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

PATCH New Viresh Kumar 4 participants 7 messages Dec 15, 2014 – Dec 17, 2014

Subsystems (2)
Arm (32-bit) Arm/RISC-V/Renesas architecture
lore
Share & tools
lore

Viresh Kumar

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.

Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.

Cc <[email protected]> # 3.18
Reported-by Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
 arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +1 -1
index 9d7a32f93fcf..f86cb86afc66 100644
@@ -445,4 +445,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
 CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
 CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
 CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig +1 -1
index d7346ad51043..bfe79d5b8213 100644
@@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
 CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
 CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y
 CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
 CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9210=y
Signature · 1 line
2.2.0
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

Quoted 9 lines · Viresh Kumar

CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.

Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.

Cc <[email protected]> # 3.18
Reported-by Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

OK, so who should be applying this?

Quoted 27 lines
---
 arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
 arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +1 -1
index 9d7a32f93fcf..f86cb86afc66 100644
@@ -445,4 +445,4 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
 CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
 CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y
 CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
arch/arm/configs/shmobile_defconfig +1 -1
index d7346ad51043..bfe79d5b8213 100644
@@ -176,5 +176,5 @@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y
 CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y
 CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=y
 CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y
-CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
+CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT=y
 CONFIG_REGULATOR_DA9210=y
Signature · 2 lines
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
author
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

Quoted 5 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 4 lines · Viresh Kumar

CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.

Cc <[email protected]> # 3.18
Reported-by Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

OK, so who should be applying this?

I think you can take it..
@Arnd: Any objections ?

#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

In reply to Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 5 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 4 lines · Viresh Kumar

CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.

Cc <[email protected]> # 3.18
Reported-by Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

OK, so who should be applying this?

Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.

Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the v3.19-rc cycle.

Thanks,

Kevin

#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

Quoted 16 lines · Kevin Hilman
Quoted 5 lines · Rafael J. Wysocki
Quoted 4 lines · Viresh Kumar

CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines

Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.

Cc <[email protected]> # 3.18
Reported-by Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

OK, so who should be applying this?

Quoted 6 lines

Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.

Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the v3.19-rc cycle.

Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we wait to go through Tony?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/

#6 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: defconfigs: use CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT

Quoted 8 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 3 lines · Nishanth Menon

Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we wait to go through Tony?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/

I think I have seen that as part of Arnd pull request sent today to Linus.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/16/439

Right, this was initially planned for v3.19-rc, but since we were sending another round of pull requests, arm-soc/fixes was included.

Kevin