Skip to contentSkip to conversation

STB0899 users, please verify results was Re: TechniSat SkyStar HD: Problems scaning and zaping

linux-dvb Simeon Simeonov 3 participants 3 messages Feb 28, 2008 – Feb 29, 2008 Media (V4L/DVB)

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

I don't know if is the same but with the latest mantis tree I get 100% success. Reverting to changeset mantis-100d4b009238 (which I think corresponds to multiproto 7200) I do NOT any locks on the same transponder.

----- Original Message ----
From: Manu Abraham <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:44:37 PM
Subject: [linux-dvb] STB0899 users, please verify results was Re: TechniSat SkyStar HD: Problems scaning and zaping

Quoted 21 lines · Vangelis Nonas

Hello,

Here is the output of hg log|head -n 5 for two different directories (multiproto and multiproto_7200)

for multiproto:

changeset:   7205:9bdb997e38b5
tag:         tip
user:        Manu Abraham <[email protected]>
date:        Sun Feb 24 02:10:56 2008 +0400
summary:     We can now reduce the debug levels, just need to look at 

errors only.

for multiproto_7200:

changeset:   7200:45eec532cefa
tag:         tip
parent:      7095:a577a5dbc93d
parent:      7199:0448e5a6d8a6
user:        Manu Abraham <[email protected]>
Quoted 5 lines

So I guess I was referring to 7200 and not to 7201.
I am very positive about the results because I have tested it many times. It is just that it is 7200 instead of 7201.
So as a concluesion, 7200 behaves better than 7205. My corrected little table follows below just for clarification.

Ok, fine this is very much possible. Can other STB0899 users (all of them) verify this result, such that i can revert back the changes ?

Quoted 11 lines

Changeset Verbose channels
--------------------------------

7200         1        2152
7200         2        2105
7200         5        2081
7205         1        1760
7205         2        1608
7205         5        1578
Quoted 1 line

I apologise for the confusion, I may have caused.

No worries, don't apologise, this is all a part of the testing phase.

Thanks,
Manu

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

      ____________________________________________________________________________________

Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

#1 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · Simeon Simeonov

I don't know if is the same but with the latest mantis tree I get 100% success. Reverting to changeset mantis-100d4b009238 (which I think corresponds to multiproto 7200) I do NOT any locks on the same transponder.

For the mantis tree, please test this changeset: 7275 72e81184fb9f as head
Please test how that looks in comparison to tip changeset 7282 a9ecd19a37c9

Regards,
Manu

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

#2 lore raw

I have for vp-1041:
72e81184fb9f work with SR=<22000, hi SR work with frequency offset ~+6 MHz for SR 44948 a9ecd19a37c9 work with SR 44948 ok
but both have trouble, from time to time long wait for lock, from time to time faster lock... I can't find dependence... I use vdr-1.5.14+h264 patch, test dvb-s only.

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb