git checkout optimisation - part 3
v2 cover git checkout optimisation - part 3
Changes sine v1
(v1 was posted with subject "The ext4 filesystem and racy git")
-- patch 2/3 --
Added missing timestamp => timestamp.(u)sec update for unpack-trees.c
-- patch 3/3 --
New patch which removes some 14300 lstat(2) calls, and the total is now at 41677 calls, or 1.382 calls/unique string to lstat() for the reference 'git checkout'-test to Linux tag v2.6.27.
Total reduction so far for all the lstat/git checkout optimisation patches has been 120954 - 41677 = 79277 calls. Some 14400 fstat(2) calls is added, but those should be faster than simmilar lstat() calls.
(patch-series based on master)
Kjetil Barvik (3):
fix compile error when USE_NSEC is defined
make USE_NSEC work as expected
verify_uptodate(): add ce_uptodate(ce) test
builtin-fetch-pack.c | 4 +- cache.h | 6 ++-- read-cache.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- unpack-trees.c | 10 +++++-- 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
PATCH v2 1/3 fix compile error when USE_NSEC is defined
'struct cache' does not have a 'usec' member, but a 'unsigned int nsec' member. Simmilar 'struct stat' does not have a 'st_mtim.usec' member, and we should instead use 'st_mtim.tv_nsec'.
--- builtin-fetch-pack.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
builtin-fetch-pack.c +2 -2
@@ -802,14 +802,14 @@ struct ref *fetch_pack(struct fetch_pack_args *my_args, mtime.sec = st.st_mtime;#ifdef USE_NSEC - mtime.usec = st.st_mtim.usec; + mtime.nsec = st.st_mtim.tv_nsec;#endif if (stat (shallow, &st)) {if (mtime.sec)die ("shallow file was removed during fetch" ); }else if (st.st_mtime != mtime.sec #ifdef USE_NSEC - || st.st_mtim.usec != mtime.usec + || st.st_mtim.tv_nsec != mtime.nsec #endif )die ("shallow file was changed during fetch" );
Signature · 1 line
1.6.1.349.g99fa5
PATCH v2 2/3 make USE_NSEC work as expected
In reply to Kjetil BarvikSince the filesystem ext4 is now defined as stable in Linux v2.6.28, and ext4 supports nanonsecond resolution timestamps natively, it is time to make USE_NSEC work as expected.
This will make racy git situations less likely to happen. For 'git checkout' this means it will be less likely that we have to open, read the contents of the file into RAM, and check if file is really modified or not. The result sould be a litle less used CPU time, less pagefaults and a litle faster program, at least for 'git checkout'.
Since the number of possible racy git situations would increase when disks gets faster, this patch would be more and more helpfull as times go by. For a fast Solid State Disk, this patch should be helpfull.
Note that, when file operations starts to take less than 1 nanosecond, one would again start to get more racy git situations.
For more info on racy git, see Documentation/technical/racy-git.txt For more info on ext4, see http://kernelnewbies.org/Ext4
--- cache.h | 6 ++-- read-cache.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- unpack-trees.c | 8 ++++- 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
cache.h +3 -3
@@ -140,8 +140,8 @@ struct ondisk_cache_entry_extended { };struct cache_entry { -unsigned int ce_ctime; -unsigned int ce_mtime; +struct cache_time ce_ctime; +struct cache_time ce_mtime;unsigned int ce_dev;unsigned int ce_ino;unsigned int ce_mode;
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ struct index_state {struct cache_entry **cache;unsigned int cache_nr, cache_alloc, cache_changed;struct cache_tree *cache_tree; -time_t timestamp; +struct cache_time timestamp;void *alloc; unsigned name_hash_initialized : 1, initialized : 1;
read-cache.c +56 -14
129 lines not on this page · raw message
unpack-trees.c +6 -2
@@ -380,8 +380,12 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_optionsmemset (&o->result,0 ,sizeof (o->result)); o->result.initialized =1 ; -if (o->src_index) - o->result.timestamp = o->src_index->timestamp; +if (o->src_index) { + o->result.timestamp.sec = o->src_index->timestamp.sec; +#ifdef USE_NSEC + o->result.timestamp.nsec = o->src_index->timestamp.nsec; +#endif + } o->merge_size = len;if (!dfc)
Signature · 1 line
1.6.1.349.g99fa5
Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 2/3] make USE_NSEC work as expected
Quoted 9 lines · Kjetil Barvik
read-cache.c +0
-1@@ -67,8 +67,15 @@ void rename_index_entry_at(struct index_state *istate, int nr, const char *new_n*/ void fill_stat_cache_info (struct cache_entry *ce,struct stat *st) { - ce->ce_ctime = st->st_ctime;
read-cache.c void rename_index_entry_at(struct index_state *istate, int nr, const char *new_n · line 78
Quoted 10 lines
read-cache.c +9
-1- ce->ce_mtime = st->st_mtime; + ce->ce_ctime.sec = (unsigned int )st->st_ctime; + ce->ce_mtime.sec = (unsigned int )st->st_mtime; +#ifdef USE_NSEC + ce->ce_ctime.nsec = (unsigned int )st->st_ctim.tv_nsec; + ce->ce_mtime.nsec = (unsigned int )st->st_mtim.tv_nsec; +#else + ce->ce_ctime.nsec =0 ; + ce->ce_mtime.nsec =0 ; +#endif
How does this affect a use case where the same index file used with two instances of git (one compiled with and another without USE_NSEC)?
read-cache.c static int ce_match_stat_basic(struct cache_entry *ce, struct stat *st) · line 251
Quoted 9 lines
read-cache.c +3
-2@@ -232,8 +246,16 @@ static int ce_match_stat_basic(struct cache_entry *ce, struct stat *st)static int is_racy_timestamp (const struct index_state *istate,struct cache_entry *ce) {return (!S_ISGITLINK (ce->ce_mode) && - istate->timestamp && - ((unsigned int )istate->timestamp) <= ce->ce_mtime); + istate->timestamp.sec && +#ifdef USE_NSEC + /* nanosecond timestamped files can also be racy! */
Amusing ;-)
Quoted 6 lines
unpack-trees.c +0
-0@@ -380,8 +380,12 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options
unpack-trees.c int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options · line 388
Quoted 10 lines
unpack-trees.c +6
-2memset (&o->result,0 ,sizeof (o->result)); o->result.initialized =1 ; -if (o->src_index) - o->result.timestamp = o->src_index->timestamp; +if (o->src_index) { + o->result.timestamp.sec = o->src_index->timestamp.sec; +#ifdef USE_NSEC + o->result.timestamp.nsec = o->src_index->timestamp.nsec; +#endif + }
Do we need this hunk?
Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 2/3] make USE_NSEC work as expected
Quoted 16 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 14 lines · Kjetil Barvik
read-cache.c +4
-2@@ -67,8 +67,15 @@ void rename_index_entry_at(struct index_state *istate, int nr, const char *new_n*/ void fill_stat_cache_info (struct cache_entry *ce,struct stat *st) { - ce->ce_ctime = st->st_ctime; - ce->ce_mtime = st->st_mtime; + ce->ce_ctime.sec = (unsigned int )st->st_ctime; + ce->ce_mtime.sec = (unsigned int )st->st_mtime; +#ifdef USE_NSEC + ce->ce_ctime.nsec = (unsigned int )st->st_ctim.tv_nsec;
Quoted 8 lines
read-cache.c void rename_index_entry_at(struct index_state *istate, int nr, const char *new_n · line 78
Quoted 5 lines
read-cache.c +5
-0+ ce->ce_mtime.nsec = (unsigned int )st->st_mtim.tv_nsec; +#else + ce->ce_ctime.nsec =0 ; + ce->ce_mtime.nsec =0 ; +#endif How does this affect a use case where the same index file used with two instances of git (one compiled with and another without
USE_NSEC)?
OK, I admit that I was thinking safe here, so the one using the git compiled with USE_NSEC will see a slow down.
If we for the use case can assume that both is using an git program compiled from the same source, and the index file is placed on a filesystem which supports nanoseconds timestamp, I guess that the use case for the one using USE_NSEC could be better.
I will make a new patch to this one (since it is already placed in next), and then you can see if you like the updated one.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
unpack-trees.c +0
-0@@ -380,8 +380,12 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options
Quoted 12 lines
unpack-trees.c int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options · line 388
Quoted 10 lines
unpack-trees.c +6
-2memset (&o->result,0 ,sizeof (o->result)); o->result.initialized =1 ; -if (o->src_index) - o->result.timestamp = o->src_index->timestamp; +if (o->src_index) { + o->result.timestamp.sec = o->src_index->timestamp.sec; +#ifdef USE_NSEC + o->result.timestamp.nsec = o->src_index->timestamp.nsec; +#endif + }Do we need this hunk?
Since timestamp is now a 'struct cache_time' member, I converted the usage of this if-test to be in line with the USE_NSEC usage.
-- kjetil
Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 2/3] make USE_NSEC work as expected
Quoted 15 lines · Kjetil Barvik
Quoted 4 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 4 lines
read-cache.c +4
-0+ ce->ce_ctime.sec = (unsigned int )st->st_ctime; + ce->ce_mtime.sec = (unsigned int )st->st_mtime; +#ifdef USE_NSEC + ce->ce_ctime.nsec = (unsigned int )st->st_ctim.tv_nsec;Quoted 8 lines
read-cache.c void rename_index_entry_at(struct index_state *istate, int nr, const char *new_n · line 78
Quoted 5 lines
read-cache.c +5
-0+ ce->ce_mtime.nsec = (unsigned int )st->st_mtim.tv_nsec; +#else + ce->ce_ctime.nsec =0 ; + ce->ce_mtime.nsec =0 ; +#endif How does this affect a use case where the same index file used with two instances of git (one compiled with and another without
USE_NSEC)?
Quoted 1 line
OK, I admit that I was thinking safe here,...
It was not a veiled objection in the guise of a rhetoric question. I just wanted to know what happens, when you have "/usr/bin/git" compiled without NSEC and "/usr/local/bin/git" compiled with NSEC, and tried to use the two interchangeably. A NSEC enabled one will leave nsec in the index entry, and the normal one reads from the index file (truncating the nsec from both file timestamp and on-disk index entries), and it is unclear what it does to the racy-git algorithm. If there is no adverse effect, that is great. Otherwise, even though the on-disk format might be compatible, we need to somehow tell people not to use two gits on the same index file.
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
unpack-trees.c +0
-0@@ -380,8 +380,12 @@ int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_optionsQuoted 12 lines
unpack-trees.c int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options · line 388
Quoted 10 lines
unpack-trees.c +6
-2memset (&o->result,0 ,sizeof (o->result)); o->result.initialized =1 ; -if (o->src_index) - o->result.timestamp = o->src_index->timestamp; +if (o->src_index) { + o->result.timestamp.sec = o->src_index->timestamp.sec; +#ifdef USE_NSEC + o->result.timestamp.nsec = o->src_index->timestamp.nsec; +#endif + }Do we need this hunk?
Quoted 2 lines
Since timestamp is now a 'struct
cache_time' member, I converted the usage of this if-test to be in line with theUSE_NSECusage.
My question was if it is wrong to leave this as "a->timestamp = b->timestamp" which now becomes structure assignment. You would need to move extra 4 (or 8) bytes if you are not using NSEC, but this is not per index entry but one assignment for the whole index file, so...
PATCH v2 3/3 verify_uptodate(): add ce_uptodate(ce) test
In reply to Kjetil BarvikIf we inside verify_uptodate() can already tell from the ce entry that it is already uptodate by testing it with ce_uptodate(ce), there is no need to call lstat(2) and ie_match_stat() afterwards.
And, reading from the commit log message from:
commit eadb5831342bb2e756fa05c03642c4aa1929d4f5
Author: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
Date: Fri Jan 18 23:45:24 2008 -0800
Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry.
this also seems to be correct usage of the ce_uptodate() macro introduced by that patch.
This will avoid lots of lstat(2) calls in some cases, for example by running the 'git checkout' command.
--- unpack-trees.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
unpack-trees.c +1 -1
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int verify_uptodate(struct cache_entry *ce, {struct stat st; -if (o->index_only || o->reset) +if (o->index_only || o->reset ||ce_uptodate (ce))return 0 ;if (!lstat (ce->name, &st)) {
Signature · 1 line
1.6.1.349.g99fa5
Quoted 13 lines · Kjetil Barvik
Changes sine v1
(v1 was posted with subject "The ext4 filesystem and racy git")-- patch 2/3 --
Added missing timestamp => timestamp.(u)sec update forunpack-trees.c-- patch 3/3 --
New patch which removes some 14300 lstat(2) calls, and the total is now at 41677 calls, or 1.382 calls/unique string tolstat()for the reference 'git checkout'-test to Linux tag v2.6.27.
Quoted 6 lines
Total reduction so far for all the lstat/git checkout optimisation patches has been 120954 - 41677 = 79277 calls. Some 14400 fstat(2) calls is added, but those should be faster than simmilar
lstat()calls.(patch-series based on master)
Hmm, have you noticed that the rest of the stuff are queued on 'next'? Not that it matters in this case...
Quoted 1 line · Junio C Hamano
Hmm, have you noticed that the rest of the stuff are queued on 'next'?
Yes, I have! I was also glad to receive my first acked-by git-tag!! :-)
Heya,
Quoted 4 lines · Kjetil Barvik
Quoted 1 line · Junio C Hamano
Hmm, have you noticed that the rest of the stuff are queued on 'next'?
Yes, I have! I was also glad to receive my first acked-by git-tag!!
In that case, it wouldof been appopriate to base your further patches on next rather than master ;).
Signature · 3 lines
Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier