package/imagemagick: change download url to github
PATCH 1/2 package/imagemagick: change download url to github
Upstream quickly removes old versions from
http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases
For our LTS versions we should switch to a stable upstream repo which provides all released versions.
--- package/imagemagick/imagemagick.hash | 4 ++-- package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
package/imagemagick/imagemagick.hash +2 -2
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -# From http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases/digest.rdf -sha256 0058fcde533986334458a5c99600b1b9633182dd9562cbad4ba618c5ccf2a28f ImageMagick-7.0.5-10.tar.xz +# Locally computed +sha256 bd965d36a65cbcd420ec79a509a5ce0ecdfef036770cdc87fcd5374b9ed15ea7 7.0.5-10.tar.gz
package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk +2 -2
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ ################################################################################ IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION = 7.0.5-10 -IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = ImageMagick-$(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.xz -IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases +IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = $(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.gz +IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/archive IMAGEMAGICK_LICENSE = Apache-2.0 IMAGEMAGICK_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
PATCH 2/2 package/imagemagick: bump version to 7.0.6-0
--- package/imagemagick/imagemagick.hash | 2 +- package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
package/imagemagick/imagemagick.hash +1 -1
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ # Locally computed -sha256 bd965d36a65cbcd420ec79a509a5ce0ecdfef036770cdc87fcd5374b9ed15ea7 7.0.5-10.tar.gz +sha256 3a6b21352ed0eb984bdbd0943471df8605b978b527125921e97e5b404f2bee3a 7.0.6-0.tar.gz
package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk +1 -1
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # ################################################################################ -IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION = 7.0.5-10 +IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION = 7.0.6-0 IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = $(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.gz IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/archive IMAGEMAGICK_LICENSE = Apache-2.0
Signature · 1 line
2.11.0
PATCH 1/2 package/imagemagick: change download url to github
In reply to Bernd KuhlsHello,
Quoted 11 lines · Bernd Kuhls
Upstream quickly removes old versions from
http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releasesFor our LTS versions we should switch to a stable upstream repo which provides all released versions.
Signed-off-by Bernd Kuhls <[email protected]>--- package/imagemagick/imagemagick.hash | 4 ++-- package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Series applied. Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH 1/2 package/imagemagick: change download url to github
In reply to Bernd KuhlsQuoted 28 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Bernd" == Bernd Kuhls <[email protected]> writes:
Upstream quickly removes old versions from
http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releasesFor our LTS versions we should switch to a stable upstream repo which provides all released versions.
Signed-off-by Bernd Kuhls <[email protected]>--- package/imagemagick/imagemagick.hash | 4 ++-- package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)package/imagemagick/imagemagick.hash +2
-2@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -# From http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases/digest.rdf -sha256 0058fcde533986334458a5c99600b1b9633182dd9562cbad4ba618c5ccf2a28f ImageMagick-7.0.5-10.tar.xz +# Locally computed +sha256 bd965d36a65cbcd420ec79a509a5ce0ecdfef036770cdc87fcd5374b9ed15ea7 7.0.5-10.tar.gzpackage/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk +0
-0
package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk line 9
Quoted 7 lines
package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk +2
-2@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ ################################################################################ IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION = 7.0.5-10 -IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = ImageMagick-$(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.xz -IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases +IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = $(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.gz +IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/archive
That SOURCE name is a bit annoying. Is it a big issue that upstream (re)moves the downloads after some time when we transparently fall back to getting it from sources.buildroot.org?
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 1/2 package/imagemagick: change download url to github
Hello,
Quoted 9 lines · Peter Korsgaard
package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk line 9
Quoted 5 lines
IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION= 7.0.5-10package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk +2
-2-IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = ImageMagick-$(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.xz -IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases +IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = $(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.gz +IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/archiveThat SOURCE name is a bit annoying. Is it a big issue that upstream (re)moves the downloads after some time when we transparently fall back to getting it from sources.buildroot.org?
I indeed hadn't seen the stupid name for the tarball. On my side, I find it a bit annoying that we have to rely on sources.b.o to make things work, so having upstream location that are working on the long run is much better when possible. But I agree that the tarball name is really silly here, and the risk of conflict with other packages is real.
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH 1/2 package/imagemagick: change download url to github
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> writes:
Hello,
Quoted 9 lines · Peter Korsgaard
package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk line 9
Quoted 5 lines
IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION= 7.0.5-10package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk +2
-2-IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = ImageMagick-$(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.xz -IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases +IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = $(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.gz +IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/archiveThat SOURCE name is a bit annoying. Is it a big issue that upstream (re)moves the downloads after some time when we transparently fall back to getting it from sources.buildroot.org?
Quoted 5 lines
I indeed hadn't seen the stupid name for the tarball. On my side, I find it a bit annoying that we have to rely on sources.b.o to make things work, so having upstream location that are working on the long run is much better when possible. But I agree that the tarball name is really silly here, and the risk of conflict with other packages is real.
That is exactly my concern. So what do we do? Leave it like this so s.b.o isn't needed or revert to get back a sane tarball name?
There's pro/cons to both, but I think I would prefer to revert.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 1/2 package/imagemagick: change download url to github
Hello,
Quoted 16 lines · Peter Korsgaard
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines
package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk line 9
Quoted 5 lines
IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION= 7.0.5-10package/imagemagick/imagemagick.mk +2
-2-IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = ImageMagick-$(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.xz -IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases +IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = $(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.gz +IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/archiveThat SOURCE name is a bit annoying. Is it a big issue that upstream (re)moves the downloads after some time when we transparently fall back to getting it from sources.buildroot.org?
Quoted 5 lines
I indeed hadn't seen the stupid name for the tarball. On my side, I find it a bit annoying that we have to rely on sources.b.o to make things work, so having upstream location that are working on the long run is much better when possible. But I agree that the tarball name is really silly here, and the risk of conflict with other packages is real.
Quoted 4 lines
That is exactly my concern. So what do we do? Leave it like this so s.b.o isn't needed or revert to get back a sane tarball name?
There's pro/cons to both, but I think I would prefer to revert.
Perhaps we could revert *and* talk to the upstream developers and ask them to keep the tarballs at the same place, instead of (re)moving them ?
Thanks,
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH 1/2 package/imagemagick: change download url to github
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> writes:
Hi,
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I indeed hadn't seen the stupid name for the tarball. On my side, I find it a bit annoying that we have to rely on sources.b.o to make things work, so having upstream location that are working on the long run is much better when possible. But I agree that the tarball name is really silly here, and the risk of conflict with other packages is real.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
That is exactly my concern. So what do we do? Leave it like this so s.b.o isn't needed or revert to get back a sane tarball name?
There's pro/cons to both, but I think I would prefer to revert.
Perhaps we could revert *and* talk to the upstream developers and ask them to keep the tarballs at the same place, instead of (re)moving them ?
That is certainly worth a try. It is imagemagick though, so you never know. They seem to really remove all <version>-<minor> except the latest <minor> in each series.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard