x86/smp: Cure stop_other_cpus() and kexec() troubles
Subsystems (4)
v3 cover x86/smp: Cure stop_other_cpus() and kexec() troubles
This is the third version of the stop_other_cpus() / kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() series. Version 2 can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
The two issues addressed are:
1) stop_other_cpus() continues after observing num_online_cpus() == 1.
This is problematic because the to be stopped CPUs clear their online bit first and then invoke eventually WBINVD, which can take a long time. There seems to be an interaction between the WBINVD and the reboot mechanics as this intermittendly results in hangs.
2) kexec() kernel can overwrite the memory locations which "offline" CPUs are monitoring. This write brings them out of MWAIT and they resume execution on overwritten text, page tables, data and stacks resulting in triple faults.
Cure them by:
#1 Synchronizing stop_other_cpus() with a CPU mask which is updated in
stop_this_cpu() _after_ WBINVD completes.
#2 Bringing offline CPUs out of MWAIT and move them into HLT before
starting the kexec() kernel. Optionaly send them an INIT IPI so they go back into wait for startup state.
Changes vs. V2:
- Use a CPU mask instead of an atomic counter and send the NMI only to CPUs which did not report that they reached HLT. That's still not race free vs. a late handling of the reboot vector, but that's not fixable.
Interestingly enough testing the NMI mechanics unearthed that after soft disabling the local APIC the CPU is _not_ handling the NMI despite the SDM claiming:
"The operation and response of a local APIC while in this software-disabled
state is as follows:
* The local APIC will respond normally to INIT, NMI, SMI, and SIPI messages."
I validated that even without handling the NMI, the CPU is kicked out of HLT reliably.
It's unclear whether that's X2APIC specific and I neither verified that behaviour on AMD. Nor is it clear what "respond normally" actually means.
The AMD APM is not helpful either:
"SMI, NMI, INIT, Startup, and Remote Read interrupts may be accepted"
Oh well.
The series is also available from git:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git x86/kexec
Thanks,
tglx
--- include/asm/cpu.h | 2 include/asm/smp.h | 4 + kernel/process.c | 25 +++++++-- kernel/smp.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- kernel/smpboot.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 5 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
PATCH v3 1/7 x86/smp: Make stop_other_cpus() more robust
Tony reported intermittent lockups on poweroff. His analysis identified the wbinvd() in stop_this_cpu() as the culprit. This was added to ensure that on SME enabled machines a kexec() does not leave any stale data in the caches when switching from encrypted to non-encrypted mode or vice versa.
That wbindv() is conditional on the SME feature bit which is read directly from CPUID. But that readout does not check whether the CPUID leaf is available or not. If it's not available the CPU will return the value of the highest supported leaf instead. Depending on the content the "SME" bit might be set or not.
That's incorrect but harmless. Making the CPUID readout conditional makes the observed hangs go away, but it does not fix the underlying problem:
CPU0 CPU1
stop_other_cpus()
send_IPIs(REBOOT); stop_this_cpu()
while (num_online_cpus() > 1); set_online(false);
proceed... -> hang
wbinvd()
WBINVD is an expensive operation and if multiple CPUs issue it at the same time the resulting delays are even larger.
But CPU0 already observed num_online_cpus() going down to 1 and proceeds which causes the system to hang.
This issue exists independent of WBINVD, but the delays caused by WBINVD make it more prominent.
Make this more robust by adding a cpumask which is initialized to the online CPU mask before sending the IPIs and CPUs clear their bit in stop_this_cpu() after the WBINVD completed. Check for that cpumask to become empty in stop_other_cpus() instead of watching num_online_cpus().
The cpumask cannot plug all holes either, but it's better than a raw counter and allows to restrict the NMI fallback IPI to be sent only to the CPUs which have not reported within the timeout window.
---
V3: Use a cpumask to make the NMI case slightly safer - Ashok
--- arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 23 +++++++++++++- arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h +2 -0
@@ -98,4 +98,6 @@ extern u64 x86_read_arch_cap_msr(void);int intel_find_matching_signature (void *mc,unsigned int csig,int cpf);int intel_microcode_sanity_check (void *mc,bool print_err,int hdr_type); +extern struct cpumask cpus_stop_mask; +#endif /* _ASM_X86_CPU_H */
arch/x86/kernel/process.c +21 -2
@@ -759,13 +759,23 @@ bool xen_set_default_idle(void) }#endif +struct cpumask cpus_stop_mask; +void __noreturn stop_this_cpu (void *dummy) { +unsigned int cpu =smp_processor_id (); +local_irq_disable (); +/* -* Remove this CPU: +* Remove this CPU from the online mask and disable it +* unconditionally. This might be redundant in case that the reboot +* vector was handled late and stop_other_cpus() sent an NMI. +* +* According to SDM and APM NMIs can be accepted even after soft +* disabling the local APIC. */ -set_cpu_online (smp_processor_id (), false); +set_cpu_online (cpu, false);disable_local_APIC ();mcheck_cpu_clear (this_cpu_ptr (&cpu_info));
@@ -783,6 +793,15 @@ void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dumm*/ if (cpuid_eax (0x8000001f ) &BIT (0 ))native_wbinvd (); + +/* +* This brings a cache line back and dirties it, but +* native_stop_other_cpus() will overwrite cpus_stop_mask after it +* observed that all CPUs reported stop. This write will invalidate +* the related cache line on this CPU. +*/ +cpumask_clear_cpu (cpu, &cpus_stop_mask); +for (;;) {/* * Use native_halt() so that memory contents don't change
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +50 -21
124 lines not on this page · raw message
Re: [patch v3 1/7] x86/smp: Make stop_other_cpus() more robust
Hi Thomas,
Quoted 44 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Tony reported intermittent lockups on poweroff. His analysis identified the
wbinvd()instop_this_cpu()as the culprit. This was added to ensure that on SME enabled machines akexec()does not leave any stale data in the caches when switching from encrypted to non-encrypted mode or vice versa.That
wbindv()is conditional on the SME feature bit which is read directly from CPUID. But that readout does not check whether the CPUID leaf is available or not. If it's not available the CPU will return the value of the highest supported leaf instead. Depending on the content the "SME" bit might be set or not.That's incorrect but harmless. Making the CPUID readout conditional makes the observed hangs go away, but it does not fix the underlying problem:
CPU0 CPU1
stop_other_cpus()
send_IPIs(REBOOT);stop_this_cpu()while (num_online_cpus() > 1); set_online(false); proceed... -> hang wbinvd()WBINVD is an expensive operation and if multiple CPUs issue it at the same time the resulting delays are even larger.
But CPU0 already observed
num_online_cpus()going down to 1 and proceeds which causes the system to hang.This issue exists independent of WBINVD, but the delays caused by WBINVD make it more prominent.
Make this more robust by adding a cpumask which is initialized to the online CPU mask before sending the IPIs and CPUs clear their bit in
stop_this_cpu()after the WBINVD completed. Check for that cpumask to become empty instop_other_cpus()instead of watchingnum_online_cpus().The cpumask cannot plug all holes either, but it's better than a raw counter and allows to restrict the NMI fallback IPI to be sent only to the CPUs which have not reported within the timeout window.
Fixes 08f253ec3767 ("x86/cpu: Clear SME feature flag when not in use")Reported-by Tony Battersby <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
---
V3: Use a cpumask to make the NMI case slightly safer - Ashok--- arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 23 +++++++++++++- arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
I tested them and seems to work fine on my system.
Maybe Tony can check in his setup would be great.
One thought on sending NMI below.
[snip]
Quoted 16 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +3
-1/* if the REBOOT_VECTOR didn't work, try with the NMI */ -if (num_online_cpus () >1 ) { +if (!cpumask_empty (&cpus_stop_mask)) {/* * If NMI IPI is enabled, try to register the stop handler * and send the IPI. In any case try to wait for the other * CPUs to stop. */ if (!smp_no_nmi_ipi && !register_stop_handler ()) { +u32 dm; +/* Sync above data before sending IRQ */ wmb ();pr_emerg ("Shutting down cpus with NMI\n" );
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c static void native_stop_other_cpus(int w · line 225
Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +8
-1-apic_send_IPI_allbutself (NMI_VECTOR ); + dm = apic->dest_mode_logical ?APIC_DEST_LOGICAL :APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL ; + dm |=APIC_DM_NMI ; + +for_each_cpu (cpu, &cpus_stop_mask) { +u32 apicid = apic->cpu_present_to_apicid (cpu); + +apic_icr_write (dm, apicid); +apic_wait_icr_idle ();
can we simplify this by just apic->send_IPI(cpu, NMI_VECTOR); ??
Re: [patch v3 1/7] x86/smp: Make stop_other_cpus() more robust
Quoted 11 lines · Ashok Raj
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c static void native_stop_other_cpus(int w · line 225
Quoted 8 lines · Thomas Gleixner
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +8
-0+ dm = apic->dest_mode_logical ?APIC_DEST_LOGICAL :APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL ; + dm |=APIC_DM_NMI ; + +for_each_cpu (cpu, &cpus_stop_mask) { +u32 apicid = apic->cpu_present_to_apicid (cpu); + +apic_icr_write (dm, apicid); +apic_wait_icr_idle ();can we simplify this by just
apic->send_IPI(cpu, NMI_VECTOR); ??
That would not set APIC_DM_NMI in delivery mode and the IPI would be sent with APIC_DM_FIXED.
Unfortunately we don't have apic->send_NMI() ...
Thanks,
tglx
Re: [patch v3 1/7] x86/smp: Make stop_other_cpus() more robust
Quoted 13 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 11 lines · Ashok Raj
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c static void native_stop_other_cpus(int w · line 225
Quoted 8 lines · Thomas Gleixner
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +8
-0+ dm = apic->dest_mode_logical ?APIC_DEST_LOGICAL :APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL ; + dm |=APIC_DM_NMI ; + +for_each_cpu (cpu, &cpus_stop_mask) { +u32 apicid = apic->cpu_present_to_apicid (cpu); + +apic_icr_write (dm, apicid); +apic_wait_icr_idle ();can we simplify this by just
apic->send_IPI(cpu, NMI_VECTOR); ??
Quoted 2 lines
That would not set
APIC_DM_NMIin delivery mode and the IPI would be sent withAPIC_DM_FIXED.
That's correct.
Maybe if we use apic->send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpu), NMI_VECTOR)
apic->send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpu),NMI_VECTOR)
__x2apic_send_IPI_mask()
__x2apic_send_IPI_dest() unsigned long cfg = __prepare_ICR(0, vector, dest); native_x2apic_icr_write(cfg, apicid);
__prepare_ICR() seems to have the magic for APIC_DM_NMI?
I suppose this works for non-x2apic parts as well
Cheers,
Ashok
Re: [patch v3 1/7] x86/smp: Make stop_other_cpus() more robust
Quoted 10 lines · Ashok Raj
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 1 line
can we simplify this by just
apic->send_IPI(cpu, NMI_VECTOR); ??That would not set
APIC_DM_NMIin delivery mode and the IPI would be sent withAPIC_DM_FIXED.That's correct.
Maybe if we use
apic->send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpu), NMI_VECTOR)
Quoted 7 lines
apic->send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpu),NMI_VECTOR)
__x2apic_send_IPI_mask()__x2apic_send_IPI_dest() unsigned long cfg = __prepare_ICR(0, vector, dest); native_x2apic_icr_write(cfg, apicid);
__prepare_ICR()seems to have the magic forAPIC_DM_NMI?
Bah. I clearly neither can read nor can remember any of the internals of that code:
apic->send_IPI()
x2apic_send_IPI()
__x2apic_send_IPI_dest()
It also works for all other APIC incarnations.
Thanks,
tglx
---
From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Subject: x86/smp: Make stop_other_cpus() more robust
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 18:37:00 +0200
Tony reported intermittent lockups on poweroff. His analysis identified the wbinvd() in stop_this_cpu() as the culprit. This was added to ensure that on SME enabled machines a kexec() does not leave any stale data in the caches when switching from encrypted to non-encrypted mode or vice versa.
That wbindv() is conditional on the SME feature bit which is read directly from CPUID. But that readout does not check whether the CPUID leaf is available or not. If it's not available the CPU will return the value of the highest supported leaf instead. Depending on the content the "SME" bit might be set or not.
That's incorrect but harmless. Making the CPUID readout conditional makes the observed hangs go away, but it does not fix the underlying problem:
CPU0 CPU1
stop_other_cpus()
send_IPIs(REBOOT); stop_this_cpu()
while (num_online_cpus() > 1); set_online(false);
proceed... -> hang
wbinvd()
WBINVD is an expensive operation and if multiple CPUs issue it at the same time the resulting delays are even larger.
But CPU0 already observed num_online_cpus() going down to 1 and proceeds which causes the system to hang.
This issue exists independent of WBINVD, but the delays caused by WBINVD make it more prominent.
Make this more robust by adding a cpumask which is initialized to the online CPU mask before sending the IPIs and CPUs clear their bit in stop_this_cpu() after the WBINVD completed. Check for that cpumask to become empty in stop_other_cpus() instead of watching num_online_cpus().
The cpumask cannot plug all holes either, but it's better than a raw counter and allows to restrict the NMI fallback IPI to be sent only the CPUs which have not reported within the timeout window.
---
V3: Use a cpumask to make the NMI case slightly safer - Ashok
V4: Simplify the NMI IPI code - Ashok
--- arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 23 +++++++++++++++- arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h +2 -0
@@ -98,4 +98,6 @@ extern u64 x86_read_arch_cap_msr(void);int intel_find_matching_signature (void *mc,unsigned int csig,int cpf);int intel_microcode_sanity_check (void *mc,bool print_err,int hdr_type); +extern struct cpumask cpus_stop_mask; +#endif /* _ASM_X86_CPU_H */
arch/x86/kernel/process.c +21 -2
@@ -759,13 +759,23 @@ bool xen_set_default_idle(void) }#endif +struct cpumask cpus_stop_mask; +void __noreturn stop_this_cpu (void *dummy) { +unsigned int cpu =smp_processor_id (); +local_irq_disable (); +/* -* Remove this CPU: +* Remove this CPU from the online mask and disable it +* unconditionally. This might be redundant in case that the reboot +* vector was handled late and stop_other_cpus() sent an NMI. +* +* According to SDM and APM NMIs can be accepted even after soft +* disabling the local APIC. */ -set_cpu_online (smp_processor_id (), false); +set_cpu_online (cpu, false);disable_local_APIC ();mcheck_cpu_clear (this_cpu_ptr (&cpu_info));
@@ -783,6 +793,15 @@ void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dumm*/ if (cpuid_eax (0x8000001f ) &BIT (0 ))native_wbinvd (); + +/* +* This brings a cache line back and dirties it, but +* native_stop_other_cpus() will overwrite cpus_stop_mask after it +* observed that all CPUs reported stop. This write will invalidate +* the related cache line on this CPU. +*/ +cpumask_clear_cpu (cpu, &cpus_stop_mask); +for (;;) {/* * Use native_halt() so that memory contents don't change
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +41 -21
110 lines not on this page · raw message
Re: [patch v3 1/7] x86/smp: Make stop_other_cpus() more robust
Quoted 19 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 10 lines · Ashok Raj
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 1 line
can we simplify this by just
apic->send_IPI(cpu, NMI_VECTOR); ??That would not set
APIC_DM_NMIin delivery mode and the IPI would be sent withAPIC_DM_FIXED.That's correct.
Maybe if we use
apic->send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpu), NMI_VECTOR)Quoted 7 lines
apic->send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpu),NMI_VECTOR)
__x2apic_send_IPI_mask()__x2apic_send_IPI_dest() unsigned long cfg = __prepare_ICR(0, vector, dest); native_x2apic_icr_write(cfg, apicid);
__prepare_ICR()seems to have the magic forAPIC_DM_NMI?
Quoted 8 lines
Bah. I clearly neither can read nor can remember any of the internals of that code:
apic->send_IPI()
x2apic_send_IPI()__x2apic_send_IPI_dest()It also works for all other APIC incarnations.
Works!
Ashok Raj
Reviewed-byRe: [patch v3 1/7] x86/smp: Make stop_other_cpus() more robust
Quoted 23 lines · Ashok Raj
Quoted 22 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 10 lines · Ashok Raj
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 1 line
can we simplify this by just
apic->send_IPI(cpu, NMI_VECTOR); ??That would not set
APIC_DM_NMIin delivery mode and the IPI would be sent withAPIC_DM_FIXED.That's correct.
Maybe if we use
apic->send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpu), NMI_VECTOR)Quoted 7 lines
apic->send_IPI_mask(cpumask_of(cpu),NMI_VECTOR)
__x2apic_send_IPI_mask()__x2apic_send_IPI_dest() unsigned long cfg = __prepare_ICR(0, vector, dest); native_x2apic_icr_write(cfg, apicid);
__prepare_ICR()seems to have the magic forAPIC_DM_NMI?Bah. I clearly neither can read nor can remember any of the internals of that code:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
apic->send_IPI()
x2apic_send_IPI()__x2apic_send_IPI_dest()It also works for all other APIC incarnations.
Works!
Forgot to add
Re: [patch v3 1/7] x86/smp: Make stop_other_cpus() more robust
In reply to Thomas GleixnerQuoted 10 lines · Thomas Gleixner
From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Subject: x86/smp: Makestop_other_cpus()more robust
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 18:37:00 +0200Tony reported intermittent lockups on poweroff. His analysis identified the
wbinvd()instop_this_cpu()as the culprit. This was added to ensure that on SME enabled machines akexec()does not leave any stale data in the caches when switching from encrypted to non-encrypted mode or vice versa.That
wbindv()is conditional on the SME feature bit which is read directly
wbinvd()
Otherwise:
Signature · 4 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquetteTony Battersby
Tested-byRe: [patch v3 1/7] x86/smp: Make stop_other_cpus() more robust
In reply to Ashok RajQuoted 54 lines · Ashok Raj
Hi Thomas,
Quoted 44 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Tony reported intermittent lockups on poweroff. His analysis identified the
wbinvd()instop_this_cpu()as the culprit. This was added to ensure that on SME enabled machines akexec()does not leave any stale data in the caches when switching from encrypted to non-encrypted mode or vice versa.That
wbindv()is conditional on the SME feature bit which is read directly from CPUID. But that readout does not check whether the CPUID leaf is available or not. If it's not available the CPU will return the value of the highest supported leaf instead. Depending on the content the "SME" bit might be set or not.That's incorrect but harmless. Making the CPUID readout conditional makes the observed hangs go away, but it does not fix the underlying problem:
CPU0 CPU1
stop_other_cpus()
send_IPIs(REBOOT);stop_this_cpu()while (num_online_cpus() > 1); set_online(false); proceed... -> hang wbinvd()WBINVD is an expensive operation and if multiple CPUs issue it at the same time the resulting delays are even larger.
But CPU0 already observed
num_online_cpus()going down to 1 and proceeds which causes the system to hang.This issue exists independent of WBINVD, but the delays caused by WBINVD make it more prominent.
Make this more robust by adding a cpumask which is initialized to the online CPU mask before sending the IPIs and CPUs clear their bit in
stop_this_cpu()after the WBINVD completed. Check for that cpumask to become empty instop_other_cpus()instead of watchingnum_online_cpus().The cpumask cannot plug all holes either, but it's better than a raw counter and allows to restrict the NMI fallback IPI to be sent only to the CPUs which have not reported within the timeout window.
Fixes 08f253ec3767 ("x86/cpu: Clear SME feature flag when not in use")Reported-by Tony Battersby <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Quoted 7 lines
---
V3: Use a cpumask to make the NMI case slightly safer - Ashok--- arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 23 +++++++++++++- arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Quoted 4 lines
I tested them and seems to work fine on my system.
Maybe Tony can check in his setup would be great.
plain 6.4-rc6: 50% failure rate
poweroff success: 2
poweroff fail: 2
6.4-rc6 with tglx v3 patch #1 only: 0% failure rate
poweroff success: 10
poweroff fail: 0
6.4-rc6 with all 7 tglx v3 patches: 0% failure rate
poweroff success: 10
poweroff fail: 0
Fixes my problem.
PATCH v3 2/7 x86/smp: Dont access non-existing CPUID leaf
In reply to Thomas GleixnerFrom: Tony Battersby <[email protected]>
stop_this_cpu() tests CPUID leaf 0x8000001f::EAX unconditionally. CPUs return the content of the highest supported leaf when a non-existing leaf is read. So the result of the test is lottery except on AMD CPUs which support that leaf.
While harmless it's incorrect and causes the conditional wbinvd() to be issued where not required.
Check whether the leaf is supported before reading it.
[ tglx: Adjusted changelog ]
--- arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/process.c +3 -2
@@ -763,6 +763,7 @@ struct cpumask cpus_stop_mask;void __noreturn stop_this_cpu (void *dummy) { +struct cpuinfo_x86 *c =this_cpu_ptr (&cpu_info);unsigned int cpu =smp_processor_id ();local_irq_disable ();
@@ -777,7 +778,7 @@ void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dumm*/ set_cpu_online (cpu, false);disable_local_APIC (); -mcheck_cpu_clear (this_cpu_ptr (&cpu_info)); +mcheck_cpu_clear (c);/* * Use wbinvd on processors that support SME. This provides support
@@ -791,7 +792,7 @@ void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dumm* Test the CPUID bit directly because the machine might've cleared * X86_FEATURE_SME due to cmdline options. */ -if (cpuid_eax (0x8000001f ) &BIT (0 )) +if (c->extended_cpuid_level >=0x8000001f && (cpuid_eax (0x8000001f ) &BIT (0 )))native_wbinvd ();/*
Re: [patch v3 2/7] x86/smp: Dont access non-existing CPUID leaf
Quoted 7 lines · Thomas Gleixner
From: Tony Battersby <[email protected]>
stop_this_cpu()tests CPUID leaf 0x8000001f::EAX unconditionally. CPUs return the content of the highest supported leaf when a non-existing leaf is read. So the result of the test is lottery except on AMD CPUs which support that leaf.
Quoted 8 lines
While harmless it's incorrect and causes the conditional
wbinvd()to be issued where not required.Check whether the leaf is supported before reading it.
[ tglx: Adjusted changelog ]
Fixes 08f253ec3767 ("x86/cpu: Clear SME feature flag when not in use")
Thanks for this fix.
This particular patch should probably also CC to stable.
Quoted 36 lines
Signed-off-by Tony Battersby <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>--- arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)arch/x86/kernel/process.c +3
-2@@ -763,6 +763,7 @@ struct cpumask cpus_stop_mask;void __noreturn stop_this_cpu (void *dummy) { +struct cpuinfo_x86 *c =this_cpu_ptr (&cpu_info);unsigned int cpu =smp_processor_id ();local_irq_disable ();@@ -777,7 +778,7 @@ void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dumm*/ set_cpu_online (cpu, false);disable_local_APIC (); -mcheck_cpu_clear (this_cpu_ptr (&cpu_info)); +mcheck_cpu_clear (c);/* * Use wbinvd on processors that support SME. This provides support @@ -791,7 +792,7 @@ void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dumm* Test the CPUID bit directly because the machine might've cleared * X86_FEATURE_SME due to cmdline options. */ -if (cpuid_eax (0x8000001f ) &BIT (0 )) +if (c->extended_cpuid_level >=0x8000001f && (cpuid_eax (0x8000001f ) &BIT (0 )))native_wbinvd ();/*
Re: [patch v3 2/7] x86/smp: Dont access non-existing CPUID leaf
Quoted 11 lines · Mario
Quoted 10 lines · Thomas Gleixner
From: Tony Battersby <[email protected]>
stop_this_cpu()tests CPUID leaf 0x8000001f::EAX unconditionally. CPUs return the content of the highest supported leaf when a non-existing leaf is read. So the result of the test is lottery except on AMD CPUs which support that leaf.While harmless it's incorrect and causes the conditional
wbinvd()to be issued where not required.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Check whether the leaf is supported before reading it.
[ tglx: Adjusted changelog ]
Fixes 08f253ec3767 ("x86/cpu: Clear SME feature flag when not in use")Thanks for this fix.
This particular patch should probably also CC to stable.
It's pretty much all stable material.
Re: [patch v3 2/7] x86/smp: Dont access non-existing CPUID leaf
In reply to Thomas GleixnerQuoted 1 line · Thomas Gleixner
Subject: Re: [patch v3 2/7] x86/smp: Dont access non-existing CPUID leaf
"Do not access a non-existing... "
Quoted 5 lines
From: Tony Battersby <[email protected]>
stop_this_cpu()tests CPUID leaf 0x8000001f::EAX unconditionally. CPUs return the content of the highest supported leaf when a non-existing leaf is read.
This should be:
"On Intel, querying an invalid extended CPUID leaf returns the values of the maximum basic CPUID leaf. On AMD, invalid CPUID leafs return zeros."
Other than that:
Signature · 4 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquettePATCH v3 3/7 x86/smp: Remove pointless wmb()s from native_stop_other_cpus()
In reply to Thomas GleixnerThe wmb()s before sending the IPIs are not synchronizing anything.
If at all then the apic IPI functions have to provide or act as appropriate barriers.
Remove these cargo cult barriers which have no explanation of what they are synchronizing.
---
V3: Remove second instance and reword changelog - PeterZ
--- arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +0 -6
@@ -184,9 +184,6 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wcpumask_clear_cpu (cpu, &cpus_stop_mask);if (!cpumask_empty (&cpus_stop_mask)) { -/* sync above data before sending IRQ */ -wmb (); -apic_send_IPI_allbutself (REBOOT_VECTOR );/*
@@ -210,9 +207,6 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wif (!smp_no_nmi_ipi && !register_stop_handler ()) {u32 dm; -/* Sync above data before sending IRQ */ -wmb (); -pr_emerg ("Shutting down cpus with NMI\n" ); dm = apic->dest_mode_logical ?APIC_DEST_LOGICAL :APIC_DEST_PHYSICAL ;
Re: [patch v3 3/7] x86/smp: Remove pointless wmb()s from native_stop_other_cpus()
Quoted 8 lines · Thomas Gleixner
The wmb()s before sending the IPIs are not synchronizing anything.
If at all then the apic IPI functions have to provide or act as appropriate barriers.
Remove these cargo cult barriers which have no explanation of what they are synchronizing.
Quoted 6 lines
Signed-off-by Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>---
V3: Remove second instance and reword changelog - PeterZ--- arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
Signature · 4 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette[tip: x86/core] x86/smp: Remove pointless wmb()s from native_stop_other_cpus()
In reply to Thomas GleixnerThe following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
The following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 2affa6d6db28855e6340b060b809c23477aa546e Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/2affa6d6db28855e6340b060b809c23477aa546e Author: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:33:54 +02:00 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> CommitterDate: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:51:46 +02:00
x86/smp: Remove pointless wmb()s from native_stop_other_cpus()
The wmb()s before sending the IPIs are not synchronizing anything.
If at all then the apic IPI functions have to provide or act as appropriate barriers.
Remove these cargo cult barriers which have no explanation of what they are synchronizing.
--- arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +0 -6
@@ -184,9 +184,6 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wait)cpumask_clear_cpu (cpu, &cpus_stop_mask);if (!cpumask_empty (&cpus_stop_mask)) { -/* sync above data before sending IRQ */ -wmb (); -apic_send_IPI_allbutself (REBOOT_VECTOR );/*
@@ -208,9 +205,6 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wait)* CPUs to stop. */ if (!smp_no_nmi_ipi && !register_stop_handler ()) { -/* Sync above data before sending IRQ */ -wmb (); -pr_emerg ("Shutting down cpus with NMI\n" );for_each_cpu (cpu, &cpus_stop_mask)
PATCH v3 4/7 x86/smp: Use dedicated cache-line for mwait_play_dead()
In reply to Thomas GleixnerMonitoring idletask::thread_info::flags in mwait_play_dead() has been an obvious choice as all what is needed is a cache line which is not written by other CPUs.
But there is a use case where a "dead" CPU needs to be brought out of that mwait(): kexec().
The CPU needs to be brought out of mwait before kexec() as kexec() can overwrite text, pagetables, stacks and the monitored cacheline of the original kernel. The latter causes mwait to resume execution which obviously causes havoc on the kexec kernel which results usually in triple faults.
Use a dedicated per CPU storage to prepare for that.
--- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 24 ++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +14 -10
@@ -101,6 +101,17 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_die_map); DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct cpuinfo_x86, cpu_info);EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL (cpu_info); +struct mwait_cpu_dead { +unsigned int control; +unsigned int status; +}; + +/* +* Cache line aligned data for mwait_play_dead(). Separate on purpose so +* that it's unlikely to be touched by other CPUs. +*/ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct mwait_cpu_dead, mwait_cpu_dead); +/* Logical package management. We might want to allocate that dynamically */ unsigned int __max_logical_packages__read_mostly ;EXPORT_SYMBOL (__max_logical_packages);
@@ -1758,10 +1769,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cond_wakeup_cpu0);*/ static inline void mwait_play_dead (void ) { +struct mwait_cpu_dead *md =this_cpu_ptr (&mwait_cpu_dead);unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;unsigned int highest_cstate =0 ;unsigned int highest_subcstate =0 ; -void *mwait_ptr;int i; if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD ||
@@ -1796,13 +1807,6 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void) (highest_subcstate -1 ); } -/* -* This should be a memory location in a cache line which is -* unlikely to be touched by other processors. The actual -* content is immaterial as it is not actually modified in any way. -*/ - mwait_ptr = ¤t_thread_info ()->flags; -wbinvd ();while (1 ) {
@@ -1814,9 +1818,9 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)* case where we return around the loop. */ mb (); -clflush (mwait_ptr); +clflush (md);mb (); -__monitor (mwait_ptr,0 ,0 ); +__monitor (md,0 ,0 );mb ();__mwait (eax,0 );
Re: [patch v3 4/7] x86/smp: Use dedicated cache-line for mwait_play_dead()
Quoted 6 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Monitoring
idletask::thread_info::flagsinmwait_play_dead()has been an obvious choice as all what is needed is a cache line which is not written by other CPUs.But there is a use case where a "dead" CPU needs to be brought out of that
mwait():kexec().
s/mwait()/wait state/
I guess.
Quoted 1 line
The CPU needs to be brought out of mwait before
kexec()askexec()can
Ditto.
Quoted 2 lines
overwrite text, pagetables, stacks and the monitored cacheline of the original kernel.
Yikes.
Quoted 3 lines
The latter causes mwait to resume execution which
obviously causes havoc on the kexec kernel which results usually in triple faults.
This sounds like a stable fix, no?
Signature · 4 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette[tip: x86/core] x86/smp: Use dedicated cache-line for mwait_play_dead()
In reply to Thomas GleixnerThe following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
The following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: f9c9987bf52f4e42e940ae217333ebb5a4c3b506 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/f9c9987bf52f4e42e940ae217333ebb5a4c3b506 Author: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:33:55 +02:00 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> CommitterDate: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:51:47 +02:00
x86/smp: Use dedicated cache-line for mwait_play_dead()
Monitoring idletask::thread_info::flags in mwait_play_dead() has been an obvious choice as all what is needed is a cache line which is not written by other CPUs.
But there is a use case where a "dead" CPU needs to be brought out of
MWAIT: kexec().
This is required as kexec() can overwrite text, pagetables, stacks and the monitored cacheline of the original kernel. The latter causes MWAIT to resume execution which obviously causes havoc on the kexec kernel which results usually in triple faults.
Use a dedicated per CPU storage to prepare for that.
--- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 24 ++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +14 -10
@@ -101,6 +101,17 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_die_map); DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct cpuinfo_x86, cpu_info);EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL (cpu_info); +struct mwait_cpu_dead { +unsigned int control; +unsigned int status; +}; + +/* +* Cache line aligned data for mwait_play_dead(). Separate on purpose so +* that it's unlikely to be touched by other CPUs. +*/ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct mwait_cpu_dead, mwait_cpu_dead); +/* Logical package management. We might want to allocate that dynamically */ unsigned int __max_logical_packages__read_mostly ;EXPORT_SYMBOL (__max_logical_packages);
@@ -1758,10 +1769,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cond_wakeup_cpu0);*/ static inline void mwait_play_dead (void ) { +struct mwait_cpu_dead *md =this_cpu_ptr (&mwait_cpu_dead);unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;unsigned int highest_cstate =0 ;unsigned int highest_subcstate =0 ; -void *mwait_ptr;int i; if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD ||
@@ -1796,13 +1807,6 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void) (highest_subcstate -1 ); } -/* -* This should be a memory location in a cache line which is -* unlikely to be touched by other processors. The actual -* content is immaterial as it is not actually modified in any way. -*/ - mwait_ptr = ¤t_thread_info ()->flags; -wbinvd ();while (1 ) {
@@ -1814,9 +1818,9 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)* case where we return around the loop. */ mb (); -clflush (mwait_ptr); +clflush (md);mb (); -__monitor (mwait_ptr,0 ,0 ); +__monitor (md,0 ,0 );mb ();__mwait (eax,0 );
PATCH v3 5/7 x86/smp: Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() breakage
In reply to Thomas GleixnerTLDR: It's a mess.
When kexec() is executed on a system with "offline" CPUs, which are parked in mwait_play_dead() it can end up in a triple fault during the bootup of the kexec kernel or cause hard to diagnose data corruption.
The reason is that kexec() eventually overwrites the previous kernels text, page tables, data and stack, If it writes to the cache line which is monitored by an previously offlined CPU, MWAIT resumes execution and ends up executing the wrong text, dereferencing overwritten page tables or corrupting the kexec kernels data.
Cure this by bringing the offline CPUs out of MWAIT into HLT.
Write to the monitored cache line of each offline CPU, which makes MWAIT resume execution. The written control word tells the offline CPUs to issue HLT, which does not have the MWAIT problem.
That does not help, if a stray NMI, MCE or SMI hits the offline CPUs as those make it come out of HLT.
A follow up change will put them into INIT, which protects at least against NMI and SMI.
--- arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 5 +++ arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h +2 -0
@@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ void wbinvd_on_cpu(int cpu);int wbinvd_on_all_cpus (void );void cond_wakeup_cpu0 (void ); +void smp_kick_mwait_play_dead (void ); +void native_smp_send_reschedule (int cpu);void native_send_call_func_ipi (const struct cpumask *mask);void native_send_call_func_single_ipi (int cpu);
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +5 -0
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@#include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/cpu.h> #include <linux/gfp.h> +#include <linux/kexec.h> #include <asm/mtrr.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -157,6 +158,10 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wif (atomic_cmpxchg (&stopping_cpu,-1 , cpu) !=-1 )return ; +/* For kexec, ensure that offline CPUs are out of MWAIT and in HLT */ +if (kexec_in_progress) +smp_kick_mwait_play_dead (); +/* * 1) Send an IPI on the reboot vector to all other CPUs. *
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +59 -0
93 lines not on this page · raw message
Borislav Petkov
maintainerRe: [patch v3 5/7] x86/smp: Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() breakage
Quoted 1 line · Thomas Gleixner
TLDR: It's a mess.
LOL. You don't need the rest of the commit message - this says it all. :-P
Quoted 1 line
When
kexec()is executed on a system with "offline" CPUs, which are parked
I'd say simply "with offlined CPUs"
Quoted 4 lines
in
mwait_play_dead()it can end up in a triple fault during the bootup of the kexec kernel or cause hard to diagnose data corruption.The reason is that
kexec()eventually overwrites the previous kernels text,
kernel's
Quoted 1 line
page tables, data and stack, If it writes to the cache line which is
... and stack. If it ...
Quoted 1 line
monitored by an previously offlined CPU, MWAIT resumes execution and ends
... by a previously...
Quoted 2 lines
up executing the wrong text, dereferencing overwritten page tables or corrupting the kexec kernels data.
Lovely.
Quoted 1 line
Cure this by bringing the offline CPUs out of MWAIT into HLT.
... offlined CPUs... :
Quoted 1 line
Write to the monitored cache line of each offline CPU, which makes MWAIT
ditto.
Quoted 1 line
resume execution. The written control word tells the offline CPUs to issue
ditto and so on.
Quoted 7 lines
HLT, which does not have the MWAIT problem.
That does not help, if a stray NMI, MCE or SMI hits the offline CPUs as those make it come out of HLT.
A follow up change will put them into INIT, which protects at least against NMI and SMI.
...
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
Quoted 12 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +4
-0@@ -1807,6 +1815,10 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void) (highest_subcstate -1 ); } +/* Set up state for the kexec() hack below */ + md->status =CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT ; + md->control =CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT ; +wbinvd ();while (1 ) {@@ -1824,10 +1836,57 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
JFYI: that last hunk has some conflicts applying to latest tip/master. Might need merge resolving...
Quoted 22 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +18
-0mb ();__mwait (eax,0 ); +if (READ_ONCE (md->control) ==CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT ) { +/* +* Kexec is about to happen. Don't go back into mwait() as +* the kexec kernel might overwrite text and data including +* page tables and stack. So mwait() would resume when the +* monitor cache line is written to and then the CPU goes +* south due to overwritten text, page tables and stack. +* +* Note: This does _NOT_ protect against a stray MCE, NMI, +* SMI. They will resume execution at the instruction +* following the HLT instruction and run into the problem +* which this is trying to prevent. +*/ +WRITE_ONCE (md->status,CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT ); +while (1 ) +native_halt (); + } +cond_wakeup_cpu0 ();
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c static inline void mwait_play_dead(void) · line 1867
Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +7
-0} } +/* +* Kick all "offline" CPUs out of mwait on kexec(). See comment in +* mwait_play_dead(). +*/ +void smp_kick_mwait_play_dead (void ) +{ +u32 newstate =CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT ;
Do you even need this newstate thing?
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c static inline void mwait_play_dead(void) · line 1878
Quoted 11 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +11
-0+struct mwait_cpu_dead *md; +unsigned int cpu, i; + +for_each_cpu_andnot (cpu, cpu_present_mask, cpu_online_mask) { + md =per_cpu_ptr (&mwait_cpu_dead, cpu); + +/* Does it sit in mwait_play_dead() ? */ +if (READ_ONCE (md->status) !=CPUDEAD_MWAIT_WAIT ) +continue ; + +/* Wait maximal 5ms */
/* Wait 5ms maximum */
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c static inline void mwait_play_dead(void) · line 1886
Quoted 8 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +8
-0+for (i =0 ;READ_ONCE (md->status) != newstate && i <1000 ; i++) { +/* Bring it out of mwait */ +WRITE_ONCE (md->control, newstate); +udelay (5 ); + } + +if (READ_ONCE (md->status) != newstate) +pr_err ("CPU%u is stuck in mwait_play_dead()\n" , cpu);
Shouldn't this be a pr_err_once thing so that it doesn't flood the console unnecessarily?
Signature · 4 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquetteRe: [patch v3 5/7] x86/smp: Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() breakage
Quoted 7 lines · Borislav Petkov
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)
Quoted 3 lines · Thomas Gleixner
TLDR: It's a mess.
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +0
-0while (1 ) {@@ -1824,10 +1836,57 @@ static inline void mwait_play_dead(void)JFYI: that last hunk has some conflicts applying to latest tip/master. Might need merge resolving...
Yes, I know.
Quoted 9 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c static inline void mwait_play_dead(void) · line 1867
Quoted 7 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +7
-0+/* +* Kick all "offline" CPUs out of mwait on kexec(). See comment in +* mwait_play_dead(). +*/ +void smp_kick_mwait_play_dead (void ) +{ +u32 newstate =CPUDEAD_MWAIT_KEXEC_HLT ;Do you even need this newstate thing?
Yes, for two reasons:
1) To explicitely tell the other CPU to go into HLT. MWAIT can resume execution due to SMIs or NMIs, so we don't want to go them into HLT unconditionally. TLD; .... :)
2) Two have the state feedback from the other CPU.
Quoted 6 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c static inline void mwait_play_dead(void) · line 1886
Quoted 3 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +3
-0+ +if (READ_ONCE (md->status) != newstate) +pr_err ("CPU%u is stuck in mwait_play_dead()\n" , cpu);Shouldn't this be a
pr_err_oncething so that it doesn't flood the console unnecessarily?
Yes, no, do not know :)
[tip: x86/core] x86/smp: Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() breakage
In reply to Thomas GleixnerThe following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
The following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: d7893093a7417527c0d73c9832244e65c9d0114f Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/d7893093a7417527c0d73c9832244e65c9d0114f Author: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:33:57 +02:00 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> CommitterDate: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:51:47 +02:00
x86/smp: Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() breakage
TLDR: It's a mess.
When kexec() is executed on a system with offline CPUs, which are parked in mwait_play_dead() it can end up in a triple fault during the bootup of the kexec kernel or cause hard to diagnose data corruption.
The reason is that kexec() eventually overwrites the previous kernel's text, page tables, data and stack. If it writes to the cache line which is monitored by a previously offlined CPU, MWAIT resumes execution and ends up executing the wrong text, dereferencing overwritten page tables or corrupting the kexec kernels data.
Cure this by bringing the offlined CPUs out of MWAIT into HLT.
Write to the monitored cache line of each offline CPU, which makes MWAIT resume execution. The written control word tells the offlined CPUs to issue HLT, which does not have the MWAIT problem.
That does not help, if a stray NMI, MCE or SMI hits the offlined CPUs as those make it come out of HLT.
A follow up change will put them into INIT, which protects at least against NMI and SMI.
--- arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 5 +++- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h +2 -0
@@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ void wbinvd_on_cpu(int cpu);int wbinvd_on_all_cpus (void );void cond_wakeup_cpu0 (void ); +void smp_kick_mwait_play_dead (void ); +void native_smp_send_reschedule (int cpu);void native_send_call_func_ipi (const struct cpumask *mask);void native_send_call_func_single_ipi (int cpu);
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +5 -0
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@#include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/cpu.h> #include <linux/gfp.h> +#include <linux/kexec.h> #include <asm/mtrr.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -157,6 +158,10 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wait)if (atomic_cmpxchg (&stopping_cpu,-1 , cpu) !=-1 )return ; +/* For kexec, ensure that offline CPUs are out of MWAIT and in HLT */ +if (kexec_in_progress) +smp_kick_mwait_play_dead (); +/* * 1) Send an IPI on the reboot vector to all other CPUs. *
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +59 -0
93 lines not on this page · raw message
PATCH v3 6/7 x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper function
In reply to Thomas GleixnerPutting CPUs into INIT is a safer place during kexec() to park CPUs.
Split the INIT assert/deassert sequence out so it can be reused.
---
V2: Fix rebase screwup
--- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +20 -29
@@ -853,47 +853,38 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi(int apicid,return (send_status | accept_status); } -static int -wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init (int phys_apicid,unsigned long start_eip) +static void send_init_sequence (int phys_apicid) { -unsigned long send_status =0 , accept_status =0 ; -int maxlvt, num_starts, j; - - maxlvt =lapic_get_maxlvt (); +int maxlvt =lapic_get_maxlvt (); -/* -* Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors. -*/ +/* Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors. */ if (APIC_INTEGRATED (boot_cpu_apic_version)) { -if (maxlvt >3 )/* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */ +/* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */ +if (maxlvt >3 )apic_write (APIC_ESR ,0 );apic_read (APIC_ESR ); } -pr_debug ("Asserting INIT\n" ); - -/* -* Turn INIT on target chip -*/ -/* -* Send IPI -*/ -apic_icr_write (APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG |APIC_INT_ASSERT |APIC_DM_INIT , - phys_apicid); - -pr_debug ("Waiting for send to finish...\n" ); - send_status =safe_apic_wait_icr_idle (); +/* Assert INIT on the target CPU */ +apic_icr_write (APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG |APIC_INT_ASSERT |APIC_DM_INIT , phys_apicid); +safe_apic_wait_icr_idle ();udelay (init_udelay); -pr_debug ("Deasserting INIT\n" ); - -/* Target chip */ -/* Send IPI */ +/* Deassert INIT on the target CPU */ apic_icr_write (APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG |APIC_DM_INIT , phys_apicid); +safe_apic_wait_icr_idle (); +} + +/* +* Wake up AP by INIT, INIT, STARTUP sequence. +*/ +static int wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init (int phys_apicid,unsigned long start_eip) +{ +unsigned long send_status =0 , accept_status =0 ; +int num_starts, j, maxlvt =lapic_get_maxlvt (); -pr_debug ("Waiting for send to finish...\n" ); - send_status =safe_apic_wait_icr_idle (); +send_init_sequence (phys_apicid);mb ();
Borislav Petkov
maintainerRe: [patch v3 6/7] x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper function
Quoted 17 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Putting CPUs into INIT is a safer place during
kexec()to park CPUs.Split the INIT assert/deassert sequence out so it can be reused.
Signed-off-by Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Ashok Raj <[email protected]>---
V2: Fix rebase screwup--- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +0
-0@@ -853,47 +853,38 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi(int apicid,return (send_status | accept_status); }
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi(int apicid, · line 858
Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +2
-6-static int -wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init (int phys_apicid,unsigned long start_eip) +static void send_init_sequence (int phys_apicid) { -unsigned long send_status =0 , accept_status =0 ; -int maxlvt, num_starts, j; - - maxlvt =lapic_get_maxlvt (); +int maxlvt =lapic_get_maxlvt ();
Whoops:
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c: In function ‘send_init_sequence’:arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:860:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
860 | int maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
| ^~~Signature · 4 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquetteRe: [patch v3 6/7] x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper function
Quoted 14 lines · Borislav Petkov
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi(int apicid, · line 858
Quoted 10 lines · Thomas Gleixner
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +2
-6-static int -wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init (int phys_apicid,unsigned long start_eip) +static void send_init_sequence (int phys_apicid) { -unsigned long send_status =0 , accept_status =0 ; -int maxlvt, num_starts, j; - - maxlvt =lapic_get_maxlvt (); +int maxlvt =lapic_get_maxlvt ();Whoops:
Quoted 4 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c: In function ‘send_init_sequence’:arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:860:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]860 | int maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt(); | ^~~
How so? It's the first thing in the function, no?
And in the other hunk it's _before_ code too.
Conflict resolution artifact?
Thanks,
tglx
[tip: x86/core] x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper function
In reply to Thomas GleixnerThe following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
The following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 6087dd5e86ff03a8cd4cffdf463a7f457e65cbff Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/6087dd5e86ff03a8cd4cffdf463a7f457e65cbff Author: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:33:58 +02:00 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> CommitterDate: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:51:47 +02:00
x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper function
Putting CPUs into INIT is a safer place during kexec() to park CPUs.
Split the INIT assert/deassert sequence out so it can be reused.
--- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 49 +++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +20 -29
@@ -853,47 +853,38 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi(int apicid, unsigned long start_eip)return (send_status | accept_status); } -static int -wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init (int phys_apicid,unsigned long start_eip) +static void send_init_sequence (int phys_apicid) { -unsigned long send_status =0 , accept_status =0 ; -int maxlvt, num_starts, j; +int maxlvt =lapic_get_maxlvt (); - maxlvt =lapic_get_maxlvt (); - -/* -* Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors. -*/ +/* Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors. */ if (APIC_INTEGRATED (boot_cpu_apic_version)) { -if (maxlvt >3 )/* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */ +/* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */ +if (maxlvt >3 )apic_write (APIC_ESR ,0 );apic_read (APIC_ESR ); } -pr_debug ("Asserting INIT\n" ); - -/* -* Turn INIT on target chip -*/ -/* -* Send IPI -*/ -apic_icr_write (APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG |APIC_INT_ASSERT |APIC_DM_INIT , - phys_apicid); - -pr_debug ("Waiting for send to finish...\n" ); - send_status =safe_apic_wait_icr_idle (); +/* Assert INIT on the target CPU */ +apic_icr_write (APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG |APIC_INT_ASSERT |APIC_DM_INIT , phys_apicid); +safe_apic_wait_icr_idle ();udelay (init_udelay); -pr_debug ("Deasserting INIT\n" ); - -/* Target chip */ -/* Send IPI */ +/* Deassert INIT on the target CPU */ apic_icr_write (APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG |APIC_DM_INIT , phys_apicid); +safe_apic_wait_icr_idle (); +} -pr_debug ("Waiting for send to finish...\n" ); - send_status =safe_apic_wait_icr_idle (); +/* +* Wake up AP by INIT, INIT, STARTUP sequence. +*/ +static int wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init (int phys_apicid,unsigned long start_eip) +{ +unsigned long send_status =0 , accept_status =0 ; +int num_starts, j, maxlvt =lapic_get_maxlvt (); + +send_init_sequence (phys_apicid);mb ();
PATCH v3 7/7 x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible
In reply to Thomas GleixnerParking CPUs in a HLT loop is not completely safe vs. kexec() as HLT can resume execution due to NMI, SMI and MCE, which has the same issue as the MWAIT loop.
Kicking the secondary CPUs into INIT makes this safe against NMI and SMI.
A broadcast MCE will take the machine down, but a broadcast MCE which makes HLT resume and execute overwritten text, pagetables or data will end up in a disaster too.
So chose the lesser of two evils and kick the secondary CPUs into INIT unless the system has installed special wakeup mechanisms which are not using INIT.
---
V3: Renamed the function to smp_park_other_cpus_in_init() so it can
be reused for crash eventually.
--- arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h +2 -0
@@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ void native_send_call_func_ipi(const strvoid native_send_call_func_single_ipi (int cpu);void x86_idle_thread_init (unsigned int cpu,struct task_struct *idle); +bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init (void ); +void smp_store_boot_cpu_info (void );void smp_store_cpu_info (int id);
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +32 -7
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static int smp_stop_nmi_callback(unsigne }/* -* this function calls the 'stop' function on all other CPUs in the system. +* Disable virtualization, APIC etc. and park the CPU in a HLT loop */ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC (sysvec_reboot) {
@@ -172,13 +172,17 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int w* 2) Wait for all other CPUs to report that they reached the * HLT loop in stop_this_cpu() * -* 3) If #2 timed out send an NMI to the CPUs which did not -* yet report +* 3) If the system uses INIT/STARTUP for CPU bringup, then +* send all present CPUs an INIT vector, which brings them +* completely out of the way. * -* 4) Wait for all other CPUs to report that they reached the +* 4) If #3 is not possible and #2 timed out send an NMI to the +* CPUs which did not yet report +* +* 5) Wait for all other CPUs to report that they reached the * HLT loop in stop_this_cpu() * -* #3 can obviously race against a CPU reaching the HLT loop late. +* #4 can obviously race against a CPU reaching the HLT loop late. * That CPU will have reported already and the "have all CPUs * reached HLT" condition will be true despite the fact that the * other CPU is still handling the NMI. Again, there is no
@@ -194,7 +198,7 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int w/* * Don't wait longer than a second for IPI completion. The * wait request is not checked here because that would -* prevent an NMI shutdown attempt in case that not all +* prevent an NMI/INIT shutdown in case that not all * CPUs reach shutdown state. */ timeout =USEC_PER_SEC ;
@@ -202,7 +206,27 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wudelay (1 ); } -/* if the REBOOT_VECTOR didn't work, try with the NMI */ +/* +* Park all other CPUs in INIT including "offline" CPUs, if +* possible. That's a safe place where they can't resume execution +* of HLT and then execute the HLT loop from overwritten text or +* page tables. +* +* The only downside is a broadcast MCE, but up to the point where +* the kexec() kernel brought all APs online again an MCE will just +* make HLT resume and handle the MCE. The machine crashs and burns +* due to overwritten text, page tables and data. So there is a +* choice between fire and frying pan. The result is pretty much +* the same. Chose frying pan until x86 provides a sane mechanism +* to park a CPU. +*/ +if (smp_park_other_cpus_in_init ()) + goto done; + +/* +* If park with INIT was not possible and the REBOOT_VECTOR didn't +* take all secondary CPUs offline, try with the NMI. +*/ if (!cpumask_empty (&cpus_stop_mask)) {/* * If NMI IPI is enabled, try to register the stop handler
@@ -234,6 +258,7 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wudelay (1 ); } +done:local_irq_save (flags);disable_local_APIC ();mcheck_cpu_clear (this_cpu_ptr (&cpu_info));
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +19 -0
@@ -1465,6 +1465,25 @@ void arch_thaw_secondary_cpus_end(void)cache_aps_init (); } +bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init (void ) +{ +unsigned int cpu, this_cpu =smp_processor_id (); +unsigned int apicid; + +if (apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64 || apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu) +return false; + +for_each_present_cpu (cpu) { +if (cpu == this_cpu) +continue ; + apicid = apic->cpu_present_to_apicid (cpu); +if (apicid ==BAD_APICID ) +continue ; +send_init_sequence (apicid); + } +return true; +} +/* * Early setup to make printk work. */
Re: [patch v3 7/7] x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible
Quoted 4 lines · Thomas Gleixner
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +0
-0@@ -202,7 +206,27 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wudelay (1 ); }
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c static void native_stop_other_cpus(int w · line 217
Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +9
-1-/* if the REBOOT_VECTOR didn't work, try with the NMI */ +/* +* Park all other CPUs in INIT including "offline" CPUs, if +* possible. That's a safe place where they can't resume execution +* of HLT and then execute the HLT loop from overwritten text or +* page tables. +* +* The only downside is a broadcast MCE, but up to the point where +* the kexec() kernel brought all APs online again an MCE will just +* make HLT resume and handle the MCE. The machine crashs and burns
"crashes"
With that
Signature · 4 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette[tip: x86/core] x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible
In reply to Thomas GleixnerThe following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
The following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 45e34c8af58f23db4474e2bfe79183efec09a18b Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/45e34c8af58f23db4474e2bfe79183efec09a18b Author: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:34:00 +02:00 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> CommitterDate: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 14:51:47 +02:00
x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible
Parking CPUs in a HLT loop is not completely safe vs. kexec() as HLT can resume execution due to NMI, SMI and MCE, which has the same issue as the MWAIT loop.
Kicking the secondary CPUs into INIT makes this safe against NMI and SMI.
A broadcast MCE will take the machine down, but a broadcast MCE which makes HLT resume and execute overwritten text, pagetables or data will end up in a disaster too.
So chose the lesser of two evils and kick the secondary CPUs into INIT unless the system has installed special wakeup mechanisms which are not using INIT.
--- arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 2 ++- arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h +2 -0
@@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ void native_send_call_func_ipi(const struct cpumask *mask);void native_send_call_func_single_ipi (int cpu);void x86_idle_thread_init (unsigned int cpu,struct task_struct *idle); +bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init (void ); +void smp_store_boot_cpu_info (void );void smp_store_cpu_info (int id);
arch/x86/kernel/smp.c +32 -7
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static int smp_stop_nmi_callback(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs) }/* -* this function calls the 'stop' function on all other CPUs in the system. +* Disable virtualization, APIC etc. and park the CPU in a HLT loop */ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC (sysvec_reboot) {
@@ -172,13 +172,17 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wait)* 2) Wait for all other CPUs to report that they reached the * HLT loop in stop_this_cpu() * -* 3) If #2 timed out send an NMI to the CPUs which did not -* yet report +* 3) If the system uses INIT/STARTUP for CPU bringup, then +* send all present CPUs an INIT vector, which brings them +* completely out of the way. * -* 4) Wait for all other CPUs to report that they reached the +* 4) If #3 is not possible and #2 timed out send an NMI to the +* CPUs which did not yet report +* +* 5) Wait for all other CPUs to report that they reached the * HLT loop in stop_this_cpu() * -* #3 can obviously race against a CPU reaching the HLT loop late. +* #4 can obviously race against a CPU reaching the HLT loop late. * That CPU will have reported already and the "have all CPUs * reached HLT" condition will be true despite the fact that the * other CPU is still handling the NMI. Again, there is no
@@ -194,7 +198,7 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wait)/* * Don't wait longer than a second for IPI completion. The * wait request is not checked here because that would -* prevent an NMI shutdown attempt in case that not all +* prevent an NMI/INIT shutdown in case that not all * CPUs reach shutdown state. */ timeout =USEC_PER_SEC ;
@@ -202,7 +206,27 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wait)udelay (1 ); } -/* if the REBOOT_VECTOR didn't work, try with the NMI */ +/* +* Park all other CPUs in INIT including "offline" CPUs, if +* possible. That's a safe place where they can't resume execution +* of HLT and then execute the HLT loop from overwritten text or +* page tables. +* +* The only downside is a broadcast MCE, but up to the point where +* the kexec() kernel brought all APs online again an MCE will just +* make HLT resume and handle the MCE. The machine crashes and burns +* due to overwritten text, page tables and data. So there is a +* choice between fire and frying pan. The result is pretty much +* the same. Chose frying pan until x86 provides a sane mechanism +* to park a CPU. +*/ +if (smp_park_other_cpus_in_init ()) + goto done; + +/* +* If park with INIT was not possible and the REBOOT_VECTOR didn't +* take all secondary CPUs offline, try with the NMI. +*/ if (!cpumask_empty (&cpus_stop_mask)) {/* * If NMI IPI is enabled, try to register the stop handler
@@ -225,6 +249,7 @@ static void native_stop_other_cpus(int wait)udelay (1 ); } +done:local_irq_save (flags);disable_local_APIC ();mcheck_cpu_clear (this_cpu_ptr (&cpu_info));
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +19 -0
@@ -1465,6 +1465,25 @@ void arch_thaw_secondary_cpus_end(void)cache_aps_init (); } +bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init (void ) +{ +unsigned int cpu, this_cpu =smp_processor_id (); +unsigned int apicid; + +if (apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64 || apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu) +return false; + +for_each_present_cpu (cpu) { +if (cpu == this_cpu) +continue ; + apicid = apic->cpu_present_to_apicid (cpu); +if (apicid ==BAD_APICID ) +continue ; +send_init_sequence (apicid); + } +return true; +} +/* * Early setup to make printk work. */
[BUG REPORT] Triggering a panic in an x86 virtual machine does not wait
In reply to Thomas GleixnerWhen I manually trigger panic in a qume x86 VM with
echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger,
I find that the VM will probably reboot directly, but the PANIC_TIMEOUT is 0. This prevents us from exporting the vmcore via panic, and even if we succeed in panic exporting the vmcore, the processes in the vmcore are mostly stop_this_cpu(). By dichotomizing we found the patch that introduced the behavior change
45e34c8af58f ("x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible"),
can anyone help to see what is happening?
Thanks!
Signature · 3 lines
With Best Regards, Baokun Li .
Re: [BUG REPORT] Triggering a panic in an x86 virtual machine does not wait
Quoted 4 lines · Baokun Li
When I manually trigger panic in a qume x86 VM with
echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger,
Quoted 8 lines
I find that the VM will probably reboot directly, but the
PANIC_TIMEOUTis 0.
This prevents us from exporting the vmcore via panic, and even if we succeed in panic exporting the vmcore, the processes in the vmcore are mostlystop_this_cpu(). By dichotomizing we found the patch that introduced the behavior change
45e34c8af58f("x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible"),
Bah, I missed that this is used by crash too. So if this happens to be invoked on an AP, i.e. not on CPU 0, then the INIT will reset the machine. Fix below.
Thanks,
tglx
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +8 -0
@@ -1348,6 +1348,14 @@ bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init(void)if (apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64 || apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu)return false; +/* +* If this is a crash stop which does not execute on the boot CPU, +* then this cannot use the INIT mechanism because INIT to the boot +* CPU will reset the machine. +*/ +if (this_cpu) +return false; +for_each_present_cpu (cpu) {if (cpu == this_cpu)continue ;
Re: [BUG REPORT] Triggering a panic in an x86 virtual machine does not wait
Quoted 31 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 4 lines · Baokun Li
When I manually trigger panic in a qume x86 VM with
echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger,Quoted 8 lines
I find that the VM will probably reboot directly, but the
PANIC_TIMEOUTis 0.
This prevents us from exporting the vmcore via panic, and even if we succeed in panic exporting the vmcore, the processes in the vmcore are mostlystop_this_cpu(). By dichotomizing we found the patch that introduced the behavior change
45e34c8af58f("x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible"),Bah, I missed that this is used by crash too. So if this happens to be invoked on an AP, i.e. not on CPU 0, then the INIT will reset the machine. Fix below.
Thanks,
tglx
---arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +1
-0@@ -1348,6 +1348,14 @@ bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init(void)if (apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64 || apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu)return false; +/*
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init(void) · line 1361
Quoted 10 lines
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +7
-0+* If this is a crash stop which does not execute on the boot CPU, +* then this cannot use the INIT mechanism because INIT to the boot +* CPU will reset the machine. +*/ +if (this_cpu) +return false; +for_each_present_cpu (cpu) {if (cpu == this_cpu)continue ;
This patch does fix the problem of rebooting at panic, but the exported stack stays at stop_this_cpu() like below, instead of showing what the corresponding process is doing as before.
PID: 681 TASK: ffff9ac2429d3080 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "fsstress" #0 [ffffb00200184fd0] stop_this_cpu at ffffffff89a4ffd8 #1 [ffffb00200184fe8] __sysvec_reboot at ffffffff89a94213 #2 [ffffb00200184ff0] sysvec_reboot at ffffffff8aee7491 --- <IRQ stack> ---
RIP: 0000000000000010 RSP: 0000000000000018 RFLAGS: ffffb00200f8bd08 RAX: ffff9ac256fda9d8 RBX: 0000000009973a85 RCX: ffff9ac256fda078 RDX: ffff9ac24416e300 RSI: ffff9ac256fda9e0 RDI: ffffffffffffffff RBP: ffff9ac2443a5f88 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: ffff9ac2422eeea0 R10: ffff9ac256fda9d8 R11: 0000000000549921 R12: ffff9ac2422eeea0 R13: ffff9ac251cd23c8 R14: ffff9ac24269a800 R15: ffff9ac251cd2150 ORIG_RAX: ffffffff8a1719e4 CS: 0206 SS: ffffffff8a1719c8
bt: WARNING: possibly bogus exception frame
Do you know how this happened? I would be grateful if you could fix it.
Thanks!
Signature · 3 lines
With Best Regards, Baokun Li .
Re: [BUG REPORT] Triggering a panic in an x86 virtual machine does not wait
Quoted 25 lines · Baokun Li
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init(void) · line 1357
Quoted 7 lines · Thomas Gleixner
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +7
-0+/* +* If this is a crash stop which does not execute on the boot CPU, +* then this cannot use the INIT mechanism because INIT to the boot +* CPU will reset the machine. +*/ +if (this_cpu) +return false;This patch does fix the problem of rebooting at panic, but the exported stack stays at
stop_this_cpu()like below, instead of showing what the corresponding process is doing as before.PID: 681 TASK: ffff9ac2429d3080 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "fsstress"
#0 [ffffb00200184fd0]stop_this_cpuatffffffff89a4ffd8#1 [ffffb00200184fe8]__sysvec_rebootatffffffff89a94213#2 [ffffb00200184ff0]sysvec_rebootatffffffff8aee7491
--- <IRQ stack> ---RIP: 0000000000000010 RSP: 0000000000000018 RFLAGS: ffffb00200f8bd08 RAX: ffff9ac256fda9d8 RBX: 0000000009973a85 RCX: ffff9ac256fda078 RDX: ffff9ac24416e300 RSI: ffff9ac256fda9e0 RDI: ffffffffffffffff RBP: ffff9ac2443a5f88 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: ffff9ac2422eeea0 R10: ffff9ac256fda9d8 R11: 0000000000549921 R12: ffff9ac2422eeea0 R13: ffff9ac251cd23c8 R14: ffff9ac24269a800 R15: ffff9ac251cd2150 ORIG_RAX: ffffffff8a1719e4 CS: 0206 SS: ffffffff8a1719c8
Quoted 3 lines
bt: WARNING: possibly bogus exception frame
Do you know how this happened? I would be grateful if you could fix it.
No, I don't. But there is clearly a hint:
Quoted 1 line
bt: WARNING: possibly bogus exception frame
So the exception frame seems to be corrupted. I have no idea why.
The question is, whether this goes away when you revert that commit or not. I can't oracle that out from your report.
Can you please revert 45e34c8af58f on top of Linus tree and verify that it makes the issue go away?
Thanks,
tglx
Re: [BUG REPORT] Triggering a panic in an x86 virtual machine does not wait
Quoted 9 lines · Thomas Gleixner
Quoted 8 lines · Baokun Li
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init(void) · line 1357
Quoted 7 lines · Thomas Gleixner
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +7
-0+/* +* If this is a crash stop which does not execute on the boot CPU, +* then this cannot use the INIT mechanism because INIT to the boot +* CPU will reset the machine. +*/ +if (this_cpu) +return false;
This does solve the problem of x86 VMs not waiting when they panic, so
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 16 lines
This patch does fix the problem of rebooting at panic, but the exported stack stays at
stop_this_cpu()like below, instead of showing what the corresponding process is doing as before.PID: 681 TASK: ffff9ac2429d3080 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "fsstress"
#0 [ffffb00200184fd0]stop_this_cpuatffffffff89a4ffd8#1 [ffffb00200184fe8]__sysvec_rebootatffffffff89a94213#2 [ffffb00200184ff0]sysvec_rebootatffffffff8aee7491
--- <IRQ stack> ---RIP: 0000000000000010 RSP: 0000000000000018 RFLAGS: ffffb00200f8bd08 RAX: ffff9ac256fda9d8 RBX: 0000000009973a85 RCX: ffff9ac256fda078 RDX: ffff9ac24416e300 RSI: ffff9ac256fda9e0 RDI: ffffffffffffffff RBP: ffff9ac2443a5f88 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: ffff9ac2422eeea0 R10: ffff9ac256fda9d8 R11: 0000000000549921 R12: ffff9ac2422eeea0 R13: ffff9ac251cd23c8 R14: ffff9ac24269a800 R15: ffff9ac251cd2150 ORIG_RAX: ffffffff8a1719e4 CS: 0206 SS: ffffffff8a1719c8Quoted 3 lines
bt: WARNING: possibly bogus exception frame
Do you know how this happened? I would be grateful if you could fix it.
No, I don't. But there is clearly a hint:
Quoted 1 line
bt: WARNING: possibly bogus exception frame
So the exception frame seems to be corrupted. I have no idea why.
The question is, whether this goes away when you revert that commit or not. I can't oracle that out from your report.
Quoted 6 lines
Can you please revert
45e34c8af58fon top of Linus tree and verify that it makes the issue go away?Thanks,
tglx
Yes, the stop_this_cpu() issue persisted after I reverted 45e34c8af58f and it has nothing to do with your patch, I will try to bisect to find out which patch introduced the issue.
Thank you very much for helping locate and rectify the problem that the x86 VM panic does not wait!
Cheers!
Signature · 3 lines
With Best Regards, Baokun Li .
[tip: x86/core] x86/smp: Don't send INIT to boot CPU
In reply to Thomas GleixnerThe following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
The following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: b1472a60a584694875a05cf8bcba8bdf0dc1cd3a Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/b1472a60a584694875a05cf8bcba8bdf0dc1cd3a Author: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 05 Jul 2023 10:59:23 +02:00 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> CommitterDate: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 15:42:31 +02:00
x86/smp: Don't send INIT to boot CPU
Parking CPUs in INIT works well, except for the crash case when the CPU which invokes smp_park_other_cpus_in_init() is not the boot CPU. Sending INIT to the boot CPU resets the whole machine.
Prevent this by validating that this runs on the boot CPU. If not fall back and let CPUs hang in HLT.
--- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +8 -0
@@ -1473,6 +1473,14 @@ bool smp_park_other_cpus_in_init(void)if (apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64 || apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu)return false; +/* +* If this is a crash stop which does not execute on the boot CPU, +* then this cannot use the INIT mechanism because INIT to the boot +* CPU will reset the machine. +*/ +if (this_cpu) +return false; +for_each_present_cpu (cpu) {if (cpu == this_cpu)continue ;