package/dtc: renumber patches correctly
PATCH 1/2 package/dtc: renumber patches correctly
When c7ffd8a75d55e24d793106eabbb80964ab91081f ("package/dtc: fix include guards for older kernel/u-boot") introduced a new patch to the dtc package, it used the 0001 number, which was already used by another patch. Let's fix that.
---
...0002-Fix-include-guards-for-older-kernel-u-boot-sources.patch} | 0
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rename package/dtc/{0001-Fix-include-guards-for-older-kernel-u-boot-sources.patch => 0002-Fix-include-guards-for-older-kernel-u-boot-sources.patch} (100%)package/dtc/0002-Fix-include-guards-for-older-kernel-u-boot-sources.patch renamed from package/dtc/0001-Fix-include-guards-for-older-kernel-u-boot-sources.patch +0 -0
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
PATCH 2/2 package/dtc: backport upstream fix solving Assertion Error with some .dts files
The build of U-Boot on Microchip (formerly Atmel) platforms currently fails to build with an Assertion Error in dtc. This happens since we bumped dtc from 1.4.4 to 1.4.7, as a regression was introduced in dtc 1.4.6, and fixed post-1.4.7. This commit backports the upstream commit to resolve this Assertion Error.
The build error was:
dtc: livetree.c:438: propval_cell: Assertion `prop->val.len == sizeof(cell_t)' failed.
dtc: livetree.c:438: propval_cell: Assertion `prop->val.len == sizeof(cell_t)' failed. Aborted (core dumped)
Fixes:
https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/124434438
(and numerous other similar build failures)
--- ...s-fix-simple-bus-compatible-matching.patch | 120 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+) create mode 100644 package/dtc/0003-checks-fix-simple-bus-compatible-matching.patch
package/dtc/0003-checks-fix-simple-bus-compatible-matching.patch new file +120 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +From 5277449e5fd13a2f3778ed3380ba157cb9d4ea55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Rob Herring <[email protected]> +Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:30:03 -0700 +Subject: [PATCH] checks: fix simple-bus compatible matching + +Since commit 7975f6422260 ("Fix widespread incorrect use of strneq(), +replace with new strprefixeq()") simple-bus checks have been silently +skipped. The problem was 'end - str' is one more than the string length +and the strnlen in strprefixeq fails. This can't be fixed simply by +subtracting one as it is possible to have multiple '\0' at the end of +the property. Fix this by making the 'compatible' property string list +check a dependency, and then we can assume the property is null +terminated and we can just use streq() for comparisons. + +Add some tests so the problem doesn't happen again. + +Fixes: 7975f6422260 ("Fix widespread incorrect use of strneq(), replace with new strprefixeq()") +Reported-by: Kumar Gala <[email protected]> +Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]> +Signed-off-by: David Gibson <[email protected]> +[Backport from upstream commit e84742aa7b934cd6603e3a64f8c0966f683c5711] +Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> +--- + checks.c | 5 +++-- + tests/run_tests.sh | 4 ++++ + tests/unit-addr-simple-bus-compatible.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ + tests/unit-addr-simple-bus-reg-mismatch.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ + 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + create mode 100644 tests/unit-addr-simple-bus-compatible.dts + create mode 100644 tests/unit-addr-simple-bus-reg-mismatch.dts + +diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c +index a2cc103..acf91c3 100644 +--- a/checks.c ++++ b/checks.c +@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static bool node_is_compatible(struct node *node, const char *compat) + + for (str = prop->val.val, end = str + prop->val.len; str < end; + str += strnlen(str, end - str) + 1) { +- if (strprefixeq(str, end - str, compat)) ++ if (streq(str, compat)) + return true; + } + return false; +@@ -921,7 +921,8 @@ static void check_simple_bus_bridge(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, struct + if (node_is_compatible(node, "simple-bus")) + node->bus = &simple_bus; + } +-WARNING(simple_bus_bridge, check_simple_bus_bridge, NULL, &addr_size_cells); ++WARNING(simple_bus_bridge, check_simple_bus_bridge, NULL, ++ &addr_size_cells, &compatible_is_string_list); + + static void check_simple_bus_reg(struct check *c, struct dt_info *dti, struct node *node) + { +diff --git a/tests/run_tests.sh b/tests/run_tests.sh +index 7348c9c..c4354d2 100755 +--- a/tests/run_tests.sh ++++ b/tests/run_tests.sh +@@ -652,6 +652,10 @@ dtc_tests () { + check_tests pci-bridge-bad1.dts pci_bridge + check_tests pci-bridge-bad2.dts pci_bridge + ++ check_tests unit-addr-simple-bus-reg-mismatch.dts simple_bus_reg ++ check_tests unit-addr-simple-bus-compatible.dts simple_bus_reg ++ ++ + # Check warning options + run_sh_test dtc-checkfails.sh address_cells_is_cell interrupt_cells_is_cell -n size_cells_is_cell -- -Wno_size_cells_is_cell -I dts -O dtb bad-ncells.dts + run_sh_test dtc-fails.sh -n test-warn-output.test.dtb -I dts -O dtb bad-ncells.dts +diff --git a/tests/unit-addr-simple-bus-compatible.dts b/tests/unit-addr-simple-bus-compatible.dts +new file mode 100644 +index 0000000..c8f9341 +--- /dev/null ++++ b/tests/unit-addr-simple-bus-compatible.dts +@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ ++/dts-v1/; ++ ++/ { ++ #address-cells = <1>; ++ #size-cells = <1>; ++ ++ bus at 10000000 { ++ #address-cells = <1>; ++ #size-cells = <1>; ++ compatible = "foo-bus", "simple-bus"; ++ ranges = <0x0 0x10000000 0x10000>; ++ ++ node at 100 { ++ reg = <0x1000 1>; ++ }; ++ }; ++ ++}; +diff --git a/tests/unit-addr-simple-bus-reg-mismatch.dts b/tests/unit-addr-simple-bus-reg-mismatch.dts +new file mode 100644 +index 0000000..2823377 +--- /dev/null ++++ b/tests/unit-addr-simple-bus-reg-mismatch.dts +@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ ++/dts-v1/; ++ ++/ { ++ #address-cells = <1>; ++ #size-cells = <1>; ++ ++ bus at 10000000 { ++ #address-cells = <1>; ++ #size-cells = <1>; ++ compatible = "simple-bus"; ++ ranges = <0x0 0x10000000 0x10000>; ++ ++ node at 100 { ++ reg = <0x1000 1>; ++ }; ++ }; ++ ++}; +-- +2.19.1 +
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
PATCH 2/2 package/dtc: backport upstream fix solving Assertion Error with some .dts files
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> writes:
The build of U-Boot on Microchip (formerly Atmel) platforms currently fails to build with an Assertion Error in dtc. This happens since we bumped dtc from 1.4.4 to 1.4.7, as a regression was introduced in dtc 1.4.6, and fixed post-1.4.7. This commit backports the upstream commit to resolve this Assertion Error.
The build error was:
dtc: livetree.c:438:
propval_cell: Assertion `prop->val.len ==sizeof(cell_t)' failed.
dtc: livetree.c:438:propval_cell: Assertion `prop->val.len ==sizeof(cell_t)' failed. Aborted (core dumped)
Quoted 6 lines
Fixes:
https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/124434438
(and numerous other similar build failures)Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>
Committed, thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 2/2 package/dtc: backport upstream fix solving Assertion Error with some .dts files
In reply to Thomas PetazzoniQuoted 14 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> writes:
The build of U-Boot on Microchip (formerly Atmel) platforms currently fails to build with an Assertion Error in dtc. This happens since we bumped dtc from 1.4.4 to 1.4.7, as a regression was introduced in dtc 1.4.6, and fixed post-1.4.7. This commit backports the upstream commit to resolve this Assertion Error.
The build error was:
dtc: livetree.c:438:
propval_cell: Assertion `prop->val.len ==sizeof(cell_t)' failed.
dtc: livetree.c:438:propval_cell: Assertion `prop->val.len ==sizeof(cell_t)' failed. Aborted (core dumped)
Quoted 6 lines
Fixes:
https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot/-/jobs/124434438
(and numerous other similar build failures)Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>
Committed to 2018.08.x, thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 1/2 package/dtc: renumber patches correctly
In reply to Thomas PetazzoniQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> writes:
When
c7ffd8a75d55e24d793106eabbb80964ab91081f("package/dtc: fix include guards for olderkernel/u-boot") introduced a new patch to the dtc package, it used the 0001 number, which was already used by another patch. Let's fix that.Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>
Committed, thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
PATCH 1/2 package/dtc: renumber patches correctly
In reply to Thomas PetazzoniQuoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> writes:
When
c7ffd8a75d55e24d793106eabbb80964ab91081f("package/dtc: fix include guards for olderkernel/u-boot") introduced a new patch to the dtc package, it used the 0001 number, which was already used by another patch. Let's fix that.Signed-off-by Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>
Committed to 2018.08.x, thanks.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard