core: add host-gzip for cvs/git/svn backends
v2 cover core: add host-gzip for cvs/git/svn backends
Hello All!
As reported a few times already, gzip on some systems is aliased to pigz, a parallel implementation of gzip that takes advantage of multi-{processor,core,thread} systems to compress in parallel.
However, the compressed streams generated by pigz, even though they are valid gzip streams, differ for the streams generated by gzip. In fact, this is caused by pigz adding more checksums than is done by gzip, and because the streams are arbitrarily cut in blocks, the coder starts in different conditions for each blocks.
So, add a host variant to gzip, and use that as a download dependency for packages that need to create compressed tarballs (cvs, git, and svn).
While at it, do two seemingly unrelated cleanups: both where noticed while investigating how to do the last patch (i.e. the questions were:
How do we handle tar so I just copy that? -> noticed the tar comments. Then, should I export GZIP? If so, where? -> noticed SSH.)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
The following changes since commit 915c136c5c9abeb683b59fad4a0e05a25c1a1cc2
package/openocd: add missing host-pkgconf dependency (2018-11-16 23:28:50 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.buildroot.org/~ymorin/git/buildroot.git
for you to fetch changes up to ba548d03f79279b7f02605006a709ffc630e8639
support/dependencies: add a check for a suitable gzip (2018-11-17 18:12:51 +0100)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Yann E. MORIN (4):
core/download: drop the SSH command support/dependencies: treat BSD-tar like the other cases package/gzip: add host variant support/dependencies: add a check for a suitable gzip
Config.in | 4 ---- package/gzip/gzip.mk | 2 ++ package/pkg-download.mk | 1 - package/pkg-generic.mk | 4 +++- support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.mk | 3 +++ support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.sh | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ support/dependencies/check-host-tar.sh | 9 +++++---- 7 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) create mode 100644 support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.mk create mode 100755 support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.sh
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH v2 1/4 core/download: drop the SSH command
The ssh command was added back in 2011 with commit c61788f09 (GENTARGETS:
add support for scp://) and was used to check that the remote file existed, back when we supported 'make source-check'.
However, in 2017, with commit bf28a165d (pkg-{download, generic}: remove source-check), we actually removed support for source-check.
The SSH command however was not removed then, and stuck, even though nothing ever uses it It is not even exported in the environment, and scp does not use it either (it has -S to specify an ssh-compatible program).
Get rid of it.
--- Config.in | 4 ---- package/pkg-download.mk | 1 - 2 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
Config.in +0 -4
@@ -136,10 +136,6 @@ config BR2_SCP string "Secure copy (scp) command" default "scp" -config BR2_SSH - string "Secure shell (ssh) command" - default "ssh" - config BR2_HG string "Mercurial (hg) command" default "hg"
package/pkg-download.mk +0 -1
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ export BZR := $(call qstrip,$(BR2_BZR)) export GIT := $(call qstrip,$(BR2_GIT)) export HG := $(call qstrip,$(BR2_HG)) export SCP := $(call qstrip,$(BR2_SCP)) -SSH := $(call qstrip,$(BR2_SSH)) export LOCALFILES := $(call qstrip,$(BR2_LOCALFILES)) DL_WRAPPER = support/download/dl-wrapper
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
Thomas Petazzoni
AppliedPATCH v2 1/4 core/download: drop the SSH command
Hello,
Quoted 11 lines · Yann E. MORIN
The ssh command was added back in 2011 with commit
c61788f09(GENTARGETS:
add support for scp://) and was used to check that the remote file existed, back when we supported 'make source-check'.However, in 2017, with commit
bf28a165d(pkg-{download, generic}: remove source-check), we actually removed support for source-check.The SSH command however was not removed then, and stuck, even though nothing ever uses it It is not even exported in the environment, and scp does not use it either (it has -S to specify an ssh-compatible program).
Quoted 8 lines
Get rid of it.
Signed-off-by "Yann E. MORIN" <[email protected]>Cc Thomas De Schampheleire <[email protected]>--- Config.in | 4 ---- package/pkg-download.mk | 1 - 2 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
Applied to next, thanks.
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
PATCH v2 2/4 support/dependencies: treat BSD-tar like the other cases
In reply to Yann E. MORINCurrently, when we detect that tar is BSD-tar, we fake an unsupported version (major, minor) and rely on the version check to reject BSD-tar.
There is no reason to use such shenanigans, when we can simply reject it from the onset.
Simplify the logic:
- use positive logic in the condition
- directly exit in error
Also, comment that case like the other cases are commented.
--- support/dependencies/check-host-tar.sh | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
support/dependencies/check-host-tar.sh +5 -4
@@ -20,10 +20,11 @@ major=`echo "$version" | cut -d. -f1` minor=`echo "$version" | cut -d. -f2` bugfix=`echo "$version" | cut -d. -f3` version_bsd=`$tar --version | grep 'bsdtar'` -if [ ! -z "${version_bsd}" ] ; then - # mark as invalid version - not all command line options are available - major=0 - minor=0 + +# BSD tar does not have all the command-line options +if [ -n "${version_bsd}" ] ; then + # echo nothing: no suitable tar found + exit 1 fi # Minimal version = 1.27 (previous versions do not correctly unpack archives
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
PATCH v2 3/4 package/gzip: add host variant
In reply to Yann E. MORINIn case someone is building on a musl-based distro (Alpine), we do as for the target variant, and force the fflush_stdin detection.
We however do not do the /bin/sh trick, because we are building natively, so the shell check is working.
--- package/gzip/gzip.mk | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
package/gzip/gzip.mk +2 -0
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ GZIP_CONF_OPTS = --exec-prefix=/ GZIP_LICENSE = GPL-3.0+ GZIP_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING GZIP_CONF_ENV += gl_cv_func_fflush_stdin=yes +HOST_GZIP_CONF_ENV += gl_cv_func_fflush_stdin=yes # configure substitutes $(SHELL) for the shell shebang in scripts like # gzexe. Unfortunately, the same $(SHELL) variable will also be used by # make to run its commands. Fortunately, /bin/sh is always a POSIX shell
@@ -21,3 +22,4 @@ GZIP_CONF_ENV += gl_cv_func_fflush_stdin=yes GZIP_CONF_ENV += ac_cv_path_shell=/bin/sh $(eval $(autotools-package)) +$(eval $(host-autotools-package))
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
PATCH v2 4/4 support/dependencies: add a check for a suitable gzip
In reply to Yann E. MORINRecently, some hash mismatch have been reported, both by users as well as autobuilder failures, about tarballs generated from git repositories.
This turned out to be caused by users having the 'gzip' command somehow aliased to 'pigz' (which stand for: parallel implementation of gzip, which takes advantage of multi-processor system to parallelise the compression).
Unfortunately, the output of pigz-compressed archives differ from that of gzip (even though they *are* valid gzip-compressed streams).
Add a dependency check that ensures that gzip is not pigz. If that is the case, define a conditional dependency to host-gzip, that is used as a download dependency for packages that will generate compressed files, i.e. cvs, git, and svn.
Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/330/3308271fc641cadb59dbf1b5ee529a84f79e6d5c/
---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- don't fail, but define the conditional dependency (Thomas)
--- package/pkg-generic.mk | 4 +++- support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.mk | 3 +++ support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.sh | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.mk create mode 100755 support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.sh
package/pkg-generic.mk +3 -1
@@ -583,7 +583,9 @@ $(2)_DEPENDENCIES += host-skeleton endif ifneq ($$(filter cvs git svn,$$($(2)_SITE_METHOD)),) -$(2)_DOWNLOAD_DEPENDENCIES += $(BR2_TAR_HOST_DEPENDENCY) +$(2)_DOWNLOAD_DEPENDENCIES += \ + $(BR2_GZIP_HOST_DEPENDENCY) \ + $(BR2_TAR_HOST_DEPENDENCY) endif ifeq ($$(filter host-tar host-skeleton host-fakedate,$(1)),)
support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.mk new file +3 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +ifeq (,$(call suitable-host-package,gzip)) +BR2_GZIP_HOST_DEPENDENCY = host-gzip +endif
support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.sh new file +21 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +candidate="$1" # ignored + +gzip="$(which gzip)" +if [ ! -x "${gzip}" ]; then + # echo nothing: no suitable gzip found + exit 1 +fi + +# gzip displays its version string on stdout +# pigz displays its version string on stderr +version="$("${gzip}" --version 2>&1)" +case "${version}" in + (*pigz*) + # echo nothing: no suitable gzip found + exit 1 + ;; +esac + +printf "%s" "${gzip}"
Signature · 1 line
2.14.1
PATCH v2 4/4 support/dependencies: add a check for a suitable gzip
Yann,
support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.sh
Quoted 63 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Recently, some hash mismatch have been reported, both by users as well as autobuilder failures, about tarballs generated from git repositories.
This turned out to be caused by users having the 'gzip' command somehow aliased to 'pigz' (which stand for: parallel implementation of gzip, which takes advantage of multi-processor system to parallelise the compression).
Unfortunately, the output of pigz-compressed archives differ from that of gzip (even though they *are* valid gzip-compressed streams).
Add a dependency check that ensures that gzip is not pigz. If that is the case, define a conditional dependency to host-gzip, that is used as a download dependency for packages that will generate compressed files, i.e. cvs, git, and svn.
Fixes:
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/330/3308271fc641cadb59dbf1b5ee529a84f79e6d5c/Signed-off-by "Yann E. MORIN" <[email protected]>Cc Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]>Cc Peter Korsgaard <[email protected]>Cc Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]>Cc Marcin Niestr?j <[email protected]>Cc Erico Nunes <[email protected]>---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- don't fail, but define the conditional dependency (Thomas)--- package/pkg-generic.mk | 4 +++- support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.mk | 3 +++ support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.sh | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.mk create mode 100755 support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.shpackage/pkg-generic.mk +3
-1@@ -583,7 +583,9 @@ $(2)_DEPENDENCIES += host-skeleton endif ifneq ($$(filter cvs git svn,$$($(2)_SITE_METHOD)),) -$(2)_DOWNLOAD_DEPENDENCIES += $(BR2_TAR_HOST_DEPENDENCY) +$(2)_DOWNLOAD_DEPENDENCIES += \ + $(BR2_GZIP_HOST_DEPENDENCY) \ + $(BR2_TAR_HOST_DEPENDENCY) endif ifeq ($$(filter host-tar host-skeleton host-fakedate,$(1)),)support/dependencies/check-host-gzip.mk new file +3
-0@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +ifeq (,$(call suitable-host-package,gzip)) +BR2_GZIP_HOST_DEPENDENCY = host-gzip +endifsupport/dependencies/check-host-gzip.sh +0
-0
(Not wanting to hijack the intent of this patch :-) )
As part of a reproducible build, why should we conditionally build these dependencies and not instead always build them. Then builds start become reproducible with the same cached dl folder of material across a series of distro releases? Best example I have is a product that is under development for 2-3years and we may have a spread of build machine distros (ie Ubuntu 14 -> 18 LTS). We've recently started to run into this as products stabilize with the Buildroot concept of having these conditional host dependencies building. Where depending on the machine, we may miss a source archive in our collection of dl material at release time. Thoughts?
Quoted 33 lines
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..5f344c5f9bsupport/dependencies/check-host-gzip.sh new file +21
-1@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +candidate="$1" # ignored + +gzip="$(which gzip)" +if [ ! -x "${gzip}" ]; then + # echo nothing: no suitable gzip found + exit 1 +fi + +# gzip displays its version string on stdout +# pigz displays its version string on stderr +version="$("${gzip}" --version 2>&1)" +case "${version}" in + (*pigz*) + # echo nothing: no suitable gzip found + exit 1 + ;; +esac + +printf "%s" "${gzip}" --2.14.1
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot at busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Signature · 8 lines
Matthew L Weber / Pr Software Engineer Airborne Information Systems / RC Linux Secure Platforms MS 131-100, C Ave NE, Cedar Rapids, IA, 52498, USA www.rockwellcollins.com Note: Any Export License Required Information and License Restricted Third Party Intellectual Property (TPIP) content must be encrypted and sent to matthew.weber at corp.rockwellcollins.com.
PATCH v2 4/4 support/dependencies: add a check for a suitable gzip
Matthew, All,
On 2018-11-17 11:23 -0600, Matthew Weber spake thusly:
Quoted 1 line · Yann E. MORIN
[--SNIP--]
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Add a dependency check that ensures that gzip is not pigz. If that is the case, define a conditional dependency to host-gzip, that is used as a download dependency for packages that will generate compressed files, i.e. cvs, git, and svn.
[--SNIP--]
Quoted 11 lines
(Not wanting to hijack the intent of this patch :-) )
As part of a reproducible build, why should we conditionally build these dependencies and not instead always build them. Then builds start become reproducible with the same cached dl folder of material across a series of distro releases? Best example I have is a product that is under development for 2-3years and we may have a spread of build machine distros (ie Ubuntu 14 -> 18 LTS). We've recently started to run into this as products stabilize with the Buildroot concept of having these conditional host dependencies building. Where depending on the machine, we may miss a source archive in our collection of dl material at release time. Thoughts?
So, two things, that are contradictory one to the other:
1- we want reproducible builds,
2- we want fast builds
For 1, it would mean that we should build as much tools as possible. However, the more we build, the slower the build is.
For 2, we should rely as much as possible on distro-provided tools, However, the more we rely on the host, the less reproducible we get.
gzip has been rock stable over the years. IIRC, I took one of the first releases from way back 1993-or-so, and the latest one, 1.9; they were generating the exact same output, 25 years apart! That, is stability.
Given the goals of the gzip authors and maintainers, I don't expect they change anything to it anytime.
So, we really don't want to build it if the host provides it.
Now, we can't know what the future will be, and we can't predict what other tool is gonna change its behaviour, that we have to build our own. So, when you update to a newer host, you'll also have to adapt, even if that means adding a few new archives to your BR2_DL_DIR, yes.
If you want to be sure that, in the future, you'll be as reproducible as possible, then do a chroot. Even now, having a chroot ensures that all users/developpers of your project have a known and reproducible devel environment (no more "it builds for me" arguments!) You may even go further, and mandate a VM, and even go as far as having HW spares for the project lifetime (to run the VM on!).
As for Buildroot, I guess we're going to continue relying on the host tools when they meet our expectations.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH v2 4/4 support/dependencies: add a check for a suitable gzip
Yann,
Quoted 23 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Matthew, All,
On 2018-11-17 11:23 -0600, Matthew Weber spake thusly:
Quoted 1 line · Yann E. MORIN
[--SNIP--]
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Add a dependency check that ensures that gzip is not pigz. If that is the case, define a conditional dependency to host-gzip, that is used as a download dependency for packages that will generate compressed files, i.e. cvs, git, and svn.
[--SNIP--]
Quoted 11 lines
(Not wanting to hijack the intent of this patch :-) )
As part of a reproducible build, why should we conditionally build these dependencies and not instead always build them. Then builds start become reproducible with the same cached dl folder of material across a series of distro releases? Best example I have is a product that is under development for 2-3years and we may have a spread of build machine distros (ie Ubuntu 14 -> 18 LTS). We've recently started to run into this as products stabilize with the Buildroot concept of having these conditional host dependencies building. Where depending on the machine, we may miss a source archive in our collection of dl material at release time. Thoughts?
Quoted 8 lines
So, two things, that are contradictory one to the other:
1- we want reproducible builds,
2- we want fast buildsFor 1, it would mean that we should build as much tools as possible. However, the more we build, the slower the build is.
I'm definitely not advocating for building all the tools and libraries we use from the host distro packages. The case I'm running into is when additional host dependency checks/builds are added over time to Buildroot, it changes the consistency of the necessary set of cached dl archives depending on the machine you execute on. I do agree using a standard container or VM instance is the way to capture and define that "consistent environment". More times then not, I find that I can't control the OS users use for a dev env (many devops teams, timelines, "favorite OS", financial constraints, engineer opinions :-) ).
Use cases
1) We have a Sandbox environment which is engineered to create consistent offline rebuilds from a given set off offline inputs. This sandbox environment can't change as often as the distro used for day to day development. ie. need lots of projects to use the consistent environment to get our money out of the setup/doc effort. Normally we'd update the environment every ~4yrs. This mis-match of distro/env versions results in us doing some additional test builds in the sandbox and our day-to-day envs to identify the conditional host pkg builds.
2) Corporate network/proxy and offline builds. A user prepares to take a set of files offline and collects their material on distro 14.x.y.z (when online) and then had the same distro but 14.x (offline) that triggered a dependency build requiring another archive.
Quoted 12 lines
For 2, we should rely as much as possible on distro-provided tools, However, the more we rely on the host, the less reproducible we get.
gzip has been rock stable over the years. IIRC, I took one of the first releases from way back 1993-or-so, and the latest one, 1.9; they were generating the exact same output, 25 years apart! That, is stability.
Given the goals of the gzip authors and maintainers, I don't expect they change anything to it anytime.
So, we really don't want to build it if the host provides it.
Agree. What about adding the option that if only the reproducible option is enabled, then we build all host tools we have a version dependency on (ie. all those we'd normally just conditionally build)?
Quoted 5 lines
Now, we can't know what the future will be, and we can't predict what other tool is gonna change its behaviour, that we have to build our own. So, when you update to a newer host, you'll also have to adapt, even if that means adding a few new archives to your
BR2_DL_DIR, yes.
I'm actually worried/experiencing the opposite. It's when our distro versions are newer during development and we go back to a older OS for release or CI.
Quoted 7 lines
If you want to be sure that, in the future, you'll be as reproducible as possible, then do a chroot. Even now, having a chroot ensures that all users/developpers of your project have a known and reproducible devel environment (no more "it builds for me" arguments!) You may even go further, and mandate a VM, and even go as far as having HW spares for the project lifetime (to run the VM on!).
Yeah, the hard part is the $/time investment in those VM and dev environments means (at least for my company) they don't change as often and we've found you always end up with a different/new one on the next new project. As a Linux team supporting our own env and a series of dev configurations, we start to see some of the use cases appear. For instance I currently have a projects with dev envs close to my Buildroot build machine distro version and a project on the
fringe of support. Generally this spread of versions is Ok with our
projects only having a ~1-2yr development cycle before feature complete. It does mean we get caught occasionally by things like the conditional host dependencies. Internally we'll carry a patch to make this consistant but I figured I'd bring it up and see if collectively this would be a good upstream change.
Thanks for the feedback Yann!
PATCH v2 4/4 support/dependencies: add a check for a suitable gzip
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Matthew" == Matthew Weber <[email protected]> writes:
Hi,
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
So, we really don't want to build it if the host provides it.
Agree. What about adding the option that if only the reproducible option is enabled, then we build all host tools we have a version dependency on (ie. all those we'd normally just conditionally build)?
I think there are a number of use cases where BR2_REPRODUCIBLE would be interesting (E.G. we have discussed turning it on by default), but you do no want to pay the extra build time for building these host utilities.
So I'm open to an option to force building all host dependencies, but it should be keyed from a separate configuration option and not BR2_REPRODUCIBLE.
Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
Thomas Petazzoni
Appliedv2 cover core: add host-gzip for cvs/git/svn backends
In reply to Yann E. MORINHello,
Quoted 5 lines · Yann E. MORIN
Yann E. MORIN (4):
core/download: drop the SSH command support/dependencies: treat BSD-tar like the other cases package/gzip: add host variant support/dependencies: add a check for a suitable gzip
I've applied patches 2 to 4 to the next branch. Thanks!
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com