fat: Fix oops on corrupted vfat fs
Subsystems (2)
OGAWA Hirofumi
maintainerPATCH 1/1 fat: Fix oops on corrupted vfat fs
a) don't bother with ->d_time for positives - we only check it for negatives anyway.
b) make sure to set it at unlink and rmdir time - at *that* point soon-to-be negative dentry matches then-current directory contents
c) don't go into renaming of old alias in vfat_lookup() unless it has the same parent (which it will, unless we are seeing corrupted image)
---
fs/fat/namei_vfat.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
fs/fat/namei_vfat.c renamed from fs/fat/namei_vfat.c~fat-corrupt-fs-fix +11 -9
@@ -736,7 +736,12 @@ static struct dentry *vfat_lookup(struct } alias =d_find_alias (inode); -if (alias && !vfat_d_anon_disconn (alias)) { +/* +* Checking "alias->d_parent == dentry->d_parent" to make sure +* FS is not corrupted (especially double linked dir). +*/ +if (alias && alias->d_parent == dentry->d_parent && + !vfat_d_anon_disconn (alias)) {/* * This inode has non anonymous-DCACHE_DISCONNECTED * dentry. This means, the user did ->lookup() by an
@@ -755,12 +760,9 @@ static struct dentry *vfat_lookup(struct out:mutex_unlock (&MSDOS_SB (sb)->s_lock); - dentry->d_time = dentry->d_parent->d_inode->i_version; - dentry =d_splice_alias (inode, dentry); -if (dentry) - dentry->d_time = dentry->d_parent->d_inode->i_version; -return dentry; - +if (!inode) + dentry->d_time = dir->i_version; +return d_splice_alias (inode, dentry); error:mutex_unlock (&MSDOS_SB (sb)->s_lock);return ERR_PTR (err);
@@ -793,7 +795,6 @@ static int vfat_create(struct inode *dir inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = ts;/* timestamp is already written, so mark_inode_dirty() is unneeded. */ - dentry->d_time = dentry->d_parent->d_inode->i_version;d_instantiate (dentry, inode); out:mutex_unlock (&MSDOS_SB (sb)->s_lock);
@@ -824,6 +825,7 @@ static int vfat_rmdir(struct inode *dir,clear_nlink (inode); inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime =CURRENT_TIME_SEC ;fat_detach (inode); + dentry->d_time = dir->i_version; out:mutex_unlock (&MSDOS_SB (sb)->s_lock);
@@ -849,6 +851,7 @@ static int vfat_unlink(struct inode *dirclear_nlink (inode); inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime =CURRENT_TIME_SEC ;fat_detach (inode); + dentry->d_time = dir->i_version; out:mutex_unlock (&MSDOS_SB (sb)->s_lock);
@@ -889,7 +892,6 @@ static int vfat_mkdir(struct inode *dir, inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = ts;/* timestamp is already written, so mark_inode_dirty() is unneeded. */ - dentry->d_time = dentry->d_parent->d_inode->i_version;d_instantiate (dentry, inode);mutex_unlock (&MSDOS_SB (sb)->s_lock);
_
Quoted 11 lines · On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:31:28 +0900 OGAWA Hirofumi…
a) don't bother with ->d_time for positives - we only check it for negatives anyway.
b) make sure to set it at unlink and rmdir time - at *that* point soon-to-be negative dentry matches then-current directory contents
c) don't go into renaming of old alias invfat_lookup()unless it has the same parent (which it will, unless we are seeing corrupted image)Signed-off-by Al Viro <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]> # 3.17.x[Make change minimum, don't call d_move() for dir]Signed-off-by OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
It's unclear who did the "[Make change minimum.." alteration.
I do it this way:
[[email protected]: make change minimum, don't call d_move() for dir]
Also, who was the primary author of this patch? It *looks* like it was Al, unsure. If it was indeed Al then this can be communicated by putting his From: line at the very top of the changelog body.
OGAWA Hirofumi
maintainerQuoted 14 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 11 lines · On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:31:28 +0900 OGAWA Hirofumi…
a) don't bother with ->d_time for positives - we only check it for negatives anyway.
b) make sure to set it at unlink and rmdir time - at *that* point soon-to-be negative dentry matches then-current directory contents
c) don't go into renaming of old alias invfat_lookup()unless it has the same parent (which it will, unless we are seeing corrupted image)Signed-off-by Al Viro <[email protected]>Cc <[email protected]> # 3.17.x[Make change minimum, don't call d_move() for dir]Signed-off-by OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
Quoted 4 lines
It's unclear who did the "[Make change minimum.." alteration.
I do it this way:
[[email protected]: make change minimum, don't calld_move()for dir]
I see. OK, I will also use your format next time.
Quoted 3 lines
Also, who was the primary author of this patch? It *looks* like it was Al, unsure. If it was indeed Al then this can be communicated by putting his From: line at the very top of the changelog body.
Ah, sorry. The patch is written by Al, and I was forgetting to add "From:".
Signature · 1 line
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>