N8x0 to mainline patches
Hello,
I started working on adding N8x0 support to mainline, currently serial console works and I can mount initfs and rootfs on N800. The patches are available here:
http://www.valot.fi/kalle/n8x0/patches/n8x0-add/
To get all this coordinated, I created a wiki page for this:
If there's something wrong or missing, please update it or send me an email so that I can update it.
Signature · 1 line
Kalle Valo
Hi,
Quoted 7 lines · ext Kalle Valo
Hello,
I started working on adding N8x0 support to mainline, currently serial console works and I can mount initfs and rootfs on N800. The patches are available here:
I'd say at least patch #2 should be sent for to l-o right now since it gets rid of another OMAP_TAG.
All the other patches (besides #1) look fine and I guess you could send all of them here for people to take a look at.
But patch #2 clearly doesn't belong to that series and should be integrated
Signature · 1 line
balbi
Quoted 5 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 2 lines · ext Kalle Valo
Hello,
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I started working on adding N8x0 support to mainline, currently serial console works and I can mount initfs and rootfs on N800. The patches are available here:
I'd say at least patch #2 should be sent for to l-o right now since it gets rid of another
OMAP_TAG.
I didn't implement omap1 part yet. As soon as I have done that, I'll send it.
Quoted 1 line
All the other patches (besides #1)
Yeah, patch #1 is some weird linker magic which I need to look at more. The patch is in the set just to get things started and I'll remove it from the final patchset.
Quoted 2 lines
look fine and I guess you could send all of them here for people to take a look at.
Ok, I'll do that soon but I'll try to implement a bit more to the board file first.
Quoted 2 lines
But patch #2 clearly doesn't belong to that series and should be integrated
I agree. But isn't Tony on vacation the whole July and there is nobody to push it to linux-omap?
Thanks for looking at the patches!
Signature · 1 line
Kalle Valo
Hi,
Quoted 5 lines · ext Kalle Valo
Quoted 2 lines
I'd say at least patch #2 should be sent for to l-o right now since it gets rid of another
OMAP_TAG.I didn't implement omap1 part yet. As soon as I have done that, I'll send it.
ok, good :-)
Quoted 4 lines
I agree. But isn't Tony on vacation the whole July and there is nobody to push it to linux-omap?
Thanks for looking at the patches!
Yes, he is indeed. Good to see we are really getting rid of omap tags :-)
Signature · 1 line
balbi
Quoted 11 lines · Felipe Balbi
Hi,
Quoted 5 lines · ext Kalle Valo
Quoted 2 lines
I'd say at least patch #2 should be sent for to l-o right now since it gets rid of another
OMAP_TAG.I didn't implement omap1 part yet. As soon as I have done that, I'll send it.
ok, good :-)
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I agree. But isn't Tony on vacation the whole July and there is nobody to push it to linux-omap?
Thanks for looking at the patches!
Yes, he is indeed. Good to see we are really getting rid of omap tags :-)
Hey, nice job cleaning up the n8x0 board support! Let's get those into l-o master and queued up for the next merge window. (Except for the hacks that is).
Tony
Quoted 3 lines · Tony Lindgren
Hey, nice job cleaning up the n8x0 board support! Let's get those into l-o master and queued up for the next merge window. (Except for the hacks that is).
What did you think of the file layout? I decided to go with one file approach (against your advice, sorry) because I didn't see any benefit from having separate files.
My plan is this:
1. first finish OMAP_TAG_UART removal patch and send it for review
2. finins and send tusb6010 patch
+ omap2-add-usb-tusb6010-c
2. fold these n8x0 board file patches into one and send it for review:
+ n8x0-add-board-file
+ n8x0-onenand-support
+ n8x0-add-spi-support
+ n8x0-add-usb-support
Because the merge window is getting close, I'll do this ASAP.
There's a lot of to do still, but it's to get basic support to mainline already now, makes it easier for us to implement the missing pieces.
Signature · 1 line
Kalle Valo
Quoted 6 lines · Kalle Valo
My plan is this:
1. first finish
OMAP_TAG_UARTremoval patch and send it for review2. finins and send tusb6010 patch
Quoted 8 lines
+ omap2-add-usb-tusb6010-c
2. fold these n8x0 board file patches into one and send it for review:
+ n8x0-add-board-file
+ n8x0-onenand-support
+ n8x0-add-spi-support
+ n8x0-add-usb-support
This was item 3, of course. And I forget n8x0_defconfig, I'll send that as a separate patch.
Tony, does this look ok to you?
Kalle
Quoted 4 lines · Kalle Valo
Quoted 3 lines · Kalle Valo
My plan is this:
1. first finish
OMAP_TAG_UARTremoval patch and send it for review
This would be great.
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
2. finins and send tusb6010 patch
+ omap2-add-usb-tusb6010-c
The tusb6010 could be added later on as a fix too if you want to cut down dependencies.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
2. fold these n8x0 board file patches into one and send it for review:
+ n8x0-add-board-file
+ n8x0-onenand-support
+ n8x0-add-spi-support
+ n8x0-add-usb-support
Yeh one patch for the board file.
Quoted 2 lines
This was item 3, of course. And I forget
n8x0_defconfig, I'll send that as a separate patch.
Yeah it's easier to read the series that way.
Quoted 1 line
Tony, does this look ok to you?
Looks good to me!
Tony
Quoted 6 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
2. finins and send tusb6010 patch
+ omap2-add-usb-tusb6010-c
The tusb6010 could be added later on as a fix too if you want to cut down dependencies.
Good point, I'll send that separately.
Current n8x0 patches are here:
http://www.valot.fi/kalle/n8x0/patches/n8x0-add/2009-08-06-19:21/
They are just pending final testing and I'll send them after I have done that, hopefully tonight.
Tony, on which tree should I base the patches? They are now against linus's tree.
Signature · 1 line
Kalle Valo
Quoted 13 lines · Kalle Valo
Quoted 6 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
2. finins and send tusb6010 patch
+ omap2-add-usb-tusb6010-c
The tusb6010 could be added later on as a fix too if you want to cut down dependencies.
Good point, I'll send that separately.
Current n8x0 patches are here:
Quoted 7 lines
http://www.valot.fi/kalle/n8x0/patches/n8x0-add/2009-08-06-19:21/
They are just pending final testing and I'll send them after I have done that, hopefully tonight.
Tony, on which tree should I base the patches? They are now against linus's tree.
Great, yeah it's best to base all the patches against Linus' tree where possible.
I'll start piling up the omap-upstream queue for the merge window and will add your serial patch there. So we still have few more days to deal with the board file patch.
Tony
Quoted 9 lines · Kalle Valo
Quoted 3 lines · Tony Lindgren
Hey, nice job cleaning up the n8x0 board support! Let's get those into l-o master and queued up for the next merge window. (Except for the hacks that is).
What did you think of the file layout? I decided to go with one file approach (against your advice, sorry) because I didn't see any benefit from having separate files.
Your one file approach looks good to me.
Tony
Kalle Valo wrote at 2009-07-13 00:51 -0500:
Quoted 5 lines
I started working on adding N8x0 support to mainline, currently serial console works and I can mount initfs and rootfs on N800. The patches are available here:
Thanks for your work.
Quoted 3 lines
To get all this coordinated, I created a wiki page for this:
I have added a links section and will probably be doing more there.