ARM: OMAP3: PM: don't explicitly enable the IO-chain interrupt
PATCH 1/1 ARM: OMAP3: PM: don't explicitly enable the IO-chain interrupt
commit 99b59df0 ARM: OMAP3: PM: fix shared PRCM interrupt leave disabled at boot
set the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag to the PCRM IO-chain irq to avoid this interrupt until the PM core code is ready to handle the interrupts.
It seems that this is not needed anymore after the OMAP PRCM I/O chain code re-implementation introduced on merge commit:
9a17d88 Merge tag 'omap-devel-c-for-3.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/
The IRQ_NOAUTOEN flags is not set for the PRCM I/O irq anymore on the new implementation. This has the effect that a request_irq() for the PRCM I/O chain irq will auto-enable the requested IRQ and a later call to enable_irq() will lead to the following warning:
[ 3.849334] WARNING: at kernel/irq/manage.c:436 enable_irq+0x3c/0x78() [ 3.856231] Unbalanced enable for IRQ 297 [ 3.860473] Modules linked in: [ 3.863739] [<c001a114>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c003c7e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64) [ 3.873687] [<c003c7e8>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64) from [<c003c894>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) [ 3.883819] [<c003c894>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) from [<c00993e0>] (enable_irq+0x3c/0x78) [ 3.893035] [<c00993e0>] (enable_irq+0x3c/0x78) from [<c067b1e8>] (omap3_pm_init+0x328/0x5f4) [ 3.902099] [<c067b1e8>] (omap3_pm_init+0x328/0x5f4) from [<c067161c>] (init_machine_late+0x1c/0x28) [ 3.911773] [<c067161c>] (init_machine_late+0x1c/0x28) from [<c0008648>] (do_one_initcall+0x34/0x178) [ 3.921539] [<c0008648>] (do_one_initcall+0x34/0x178) from [<c066e8f4>] (kernel_init+0xfc/0x1c0) [ 3.930847] [<c066e8f4>] (kernel_init+0xfc/0x1c0) from [<c00140b0>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8) [ 3.940246] ---[ end trace 55a0ad32ca2ca682 ]---
---
This patch was generated on top ofgit://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git
branch: master
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c +0 -1
@@ -693,7 +693,6 @@ int __init omap3_pm_init(void) ret =request_irq (omap_prcm_event_to_irq ("io" ), _prcm_int_handle_io,IRQF_SHARED |IRQF_NO_SUSPEND ,"pm_io" , omap3_pm_init); -enable_irq (omap_prcm_event_to_irq ("io" ));if (ret) {pr_err ("pm: Failed to request pm_io irq\n" );
Signature · 1 line
1.7.7.6
PATCH 1/1 ARM: OMAP3: PM: don't explicitly enable the IO-chain interrupt
+Paul
Quoted 8 lines · Javier Martinez Canillas
commit
99b59df0ARM: OMAP3: PM: fix shared PRCM interrupt leave disabled at bootset the
IRQ_NOAUTOENflag to the PCRM IO-chain irq to avoid this interrupt until the PM core code is ready to handle the interrupts.It seems that this is not needed anymore after the OMAP PRCM I/O chain code re-implementation introduced on merge commit:
Quoted 6 lines
9a17d88 Merge tag 'omap-devel-c-for-3.6' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/The
IRQ_NOAUTOENflags is not set for the PRCM I/O irq anymore on the new implementation. This has the effect that arequest_irq()for the PRCM I/O chain irq will auto-enable the requested IRQ and a later call toenable_irq()will lead to the following warning:
I noticed that warning too, but I don't think $SUBJECT patch is the right fix.
We still need the IRQ_NOAUTOEN so that cases where PM is not enabled, the IO chain interrupts are not enabled.
Looking closer, it looks like the merge of omap-devel-c-for-3.6 removed the IRQ_NOAUTOEN in the merge resolution, which wasn't right.
I'll cook up a fix for this.
Kevin
PATCH 1/1 ARM: OMAP3: PM: don't explicitly enable the IO-chain interrupt
Quoted 25 lines · Kevin Hilman
+Paul
Quoted 8 lines · Javier Martinez Canillas
commit
99b59df0ARM: OMAP3: PM: fix shared PRCM interrupt leave disabled at bootset the
IRQ_NOAUTOENflag to the PCRM IO-chain irq to avoid this interrupt until the PM core code is ready to handle the interrupts.It seems that this is not needed anymore after the OMAP PRCM I/O chain code re-implementation introduced on merge commit:
Quoted 6 lines
9a17d88 Merge tag 'omap-devel-c-for-3.6' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/The
IRQ_NOAUTOENflags is not set for the PRCM I/O irq anymore on the new implementation. This has the effect that arequest_irq()for the PRCM I/O chain irq will auto-enable the requested IRQ and a later call toenable_irq()will lead to the following warning:I noticed that warning too, but I don't think $SUBJECT patch is the right fix.
We still need the
IRQ_NOAUTOENso that cases where PM is not enabled, the IO chain interrupts are not enabled.
Quoted 8 lines
Looking closer, it looks like the merge of omap-devel-c-for-3.6 removed the
IRQ_NOAUTOENin the merge resolution, which wasn't right.I'll cook up a fix for this.
Kevin
Hi Kevin,
Yes, I can confirme you that the IRQ_NOAUTOEN was gone. I didn't know if the right solution was to set that flag again or to just remove the duplicated enable_irq(). I should had tag my patch with RFC instead of PATCH I guess :-)
Thanks a lot and best regards,
Javier
PATCH 1/1 ARM: OMAP3: PM: don't explicitly enable the IO-chain interrupt
Quoted 35 lines · Javier Martinez Canillas
Quoted 25 lines · Kevin Hilman
+Paul
Quoted 8 lines · Javier Martinez Canillas
commit
99b59df0ARM: OMAP3: PM: fix shared PRCM interrupt leave disabled at bootset the
IRQ_NOAUTOENflag to the PCRM IO-chain irq to avoid this interrupt until the PM core code is ready to handle the interrupts.It seems that this is not needed anymore after the OMAP PRCM I/O chain code re-implementation introduced on merge commit:
Quoted 6 lines
9a17d88 Merge tag 'omap-devel-c-for-3.6' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/The
IRQ_NOAUTOENflags is not set for the PRCM I/O irq anymore on the new implementation. This has the effect that arequest_irq()for the PRCM I/O chain irq will auto-enable the requested IRQ and a later call toenable_irq()will lead to the following warning:I noticed that warning too, but I don't think $SUBJECT patch is the right fix.
We still need the
IRQ_NOAUTOENso that cases where PM is not enabled, the IO chain interrupts are not enabled.Quoted 8 lines
Looking closer, it looks like the merge of omap-devel-c-for-3.6 removed the
IRQ_NOAUTOENin the merge resolution, which wasn't right.I'll cook up a fix for this.
Kevin
Quoted 6 lines
Hi Kevin,
Yes, I can confirme you that the
IRQ_NOAUTOENwas gone. I didn't know if the right solution was to set that flag again or to just remove the duplicatedenable_irq(). I should had tag my patch with RFC instead of PATCH I guess :-)
No worries. I just sent a patch adding back the IRQ_NOAUTOEN.
Thanks for reporting the bug. I had noticed the boot time errors to but had not yet got to looking into them. Your patch made me dig deeper.
Thanks,
Kevin