net/gt96100eth: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 8/16 net/gt96100eth: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()
I would appreciate any comments from the janitor@sternweltens list. This is one (of many) cases where I made a decision about replacing
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);schedule_timeout(some_time);
with
msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(some_time));
msleep() is not exactly the same as the previous code, but I only did this replacement where I thought long delays were *desired*. If this is not the case here, then just disregard this patch.
Thanks,
Nish
PS. In this patch, the last delay is a bit confusing. It, in code, delayed for 1 msec, but the comment said 20 msecs, does anyone know which it should be?
Description: Replace gt96100_delay() with msleep() to guarantee the task delays for the desired time. Remove the definition of gt96100_delay().
---
linux-2.6.9-rc1-bk7-max/drivers/net/gt96100eth.c | 19 ++++--------------- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
drivers/net/gt96100eth.c renamed from drivers/net/gt96100eth.c~msleep-drivers_net_gt96100eth +4 -15
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@// prototypes static void *dmaalloc (size_t size,dma_addr_t *dma_handle);static void dmafree (size_t size,void *vaddr); -static void gt96100_delay (int msec);static int gt96100_add_hash_entry (struct net_device *dev,unsigned char * addr);static void read_mib_counters (struct gt96100_private *gp);
@@ -183,16 +182,6 @@ static void dmafree(size_t size, void *vfree_pages ((unsigned long )vaddr,get_order (size)); } -static void gt96100_delay (int ms) -{ -if (in_interrupt ()) -return ; -else { - current->state =TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE ; -schedule_timeout (ms*HZ /1000 ); - } -} -static int parse_mac_addr (struct net_device *dev,char * macstr) {
@@ -238,7 +227,7 @@ read_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg)// wait for last operation to complete while (GT96100_READ (GT96100_ETH_SMI_REG ) & smirBusy) {// snooze for 1 msec and check again -gt96100_delay (1 ); +msleep (1 );if (--timedout ==0 ) {printk (KERN_ERR "%s: busy timeout!!\n" , __FUNCTION__);
@@ -252,7 +241,7 @@ read_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg)// wait for read to complete while (!((smir =GT96100_READ (GT96100_ETH_SMI_REG )) & smirReadValid)) {// snooze for 1 msec and check again -gt96100_delay (1 ); +msleep (1 );if (--timedout ==0 ) {printk (KERN_ERR "%s: timeout!!\n" , __FUNCTION__);
@@ -304,7 +293,7 @@ write_MII(int phy_addr, u32 reg, u16 dat// wait for last operation to complete while (GT96100_READ (GT96100_ETH_SMI_REG ) & smirBusy) {// snooze for 1 msec and check again -gt96100_delay (1 ); +msleep (1 );if (--timedout ==0 ) {printk (KERN_ERR "%s: busy timeout!!\n" , __FUNCTION__);
@@ -528,7 +517,7 @@ abort(struct net_device *dev, u32 abort_// wait for abort to complete while (GT96100ETH_READ (gp,GT96100_ETH_SDMA_COMM ) & abort_bits) {// snooze for 20 msec and check again -gt96100_delay (1 ); +msleep (20 );// was gt96100_delay(1) -> should it be 20 or 1? if (--timedout ==0 ) {err ("%s: timeout!!\n" , __FUNCTION__);
_