2.5.2-pre7 still missing bits of kdev_t
Quoted 2 lines
(I suggested having
init_special_inodetaking akdev_targument as its third arg, but viro yelled at me :))
Yes. If you think that a kdev_t is a pointer to a struct with device information, then having a kdev_t there is wrong, because a special device node can have arbitrary major,minor not necessarily belonging to any device, so rdev should just have the numbers.
Andries